you meant to say commies

They could stack so many more charges but...he's a good boy that others were jealous of! How about illegally possessing a firearm (pistol under 21) and reckless endangerment for throwing it in the street?

the privileged class......

POS family is on Nextdoor asking for money!

I can tell you one thing RIGHT NOW. If it was a WHITE KID that did the shooting his azz would be sitting in jail with NO BAIL and it would be all over the news everywhere.

Tired of this [censored].

Yup

They don't call it Tolerant County for nothing...by the way, where did he get the gun?

Whoever gave him that gun should go to prison too.

The eTrace will likely come back to the guy who had it stolen out of the console of his truck.

Family claiming he was a straight A student never been in trouble Previously in private school but wanted to go to public school for a different experience. I'm sure that's all true...

the caliber of SOME folks we have on our city council, she is also running for mayor. City "leaders" , school board "leaders"......and you wonder why

"Not in her character" That was a good one.

Think the cops would have brought him food from Burger King?

After further research...I was wrong. He isn't the kid delivering the whipping, he was the kid curled up in a ball getting whipped. Sounds like he was being bullied but still that's no excuse for using a gun.

Perhaps to stop from getting kicked in the head and receiving life ending injury is an excuse for using a gun?

Perhaps...if you were of age to own the gun and in a location where having it was legal. Details...they really are important, hence the reason I clarified my previous post.

I think for a permit holder (and having a weapon on his or her person) if one was getting their tail kicked and was starting to lose consciousness and the permit holder pulled his or her weapon do defend themselves, they would be within their right to defend themselves. If that permit holder did NOT have their weapon ON them and was getting their tail kicked, but was able to walk away after the incident and then go and retrieve a weapon, proceed back to the guy that kicked your tail and then shoot that person, would it actually be in self defense?

BINGO

So that the confession held up in court? So he didn’t walk over rights being violated? Then yes they would of fed before interrogation

Feds where advising from top down on the Dylann stuff, so try again

Nope, not at all. That doesn't pass the reasonableness test in any way.

Nailed it Skinner

The family set up a go fund me for the shooter because he's traumatized.

I never said that he pulled a gun to defend himself, nor did I say that he did so before losing conciseness, you did. I do not see how you got that from my post.
I was only commenting on how people pull out a phone and video such things before trying to stop them, regardless how far the beating was to go.

He is so traumatized he had welcome home party.

Taking matters into your own hands is an irrational sentiment I too often see expressed within this forum. As you can see, might not be the best way to go about it.