texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Virgil Martin, Lease manager, AJH, jandj, dtaylor3111
73155 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,840
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 68,178
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
Stub 46,410
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics551,856
Posts9,897,446
Members88,155
Most Online28,231
Feb 7th, 2025
Print Thread
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: NMGW] #6705099 03/14/17 04:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 681
E
Eyesofahunter Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
E
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 681

This thread is a little schizophrenic.

For sure OP asks about turrets for LR shooting with a tale of hunting. He then tell me after taking view of this is hunting question to one of LR shooting to finally end up at 600 yards for sheep.

I bridge the gap between JG and NP I have done a lot of both styles of hunting and shooting. I try to advance the topic with my experience and methods not telling others they are wrong. Maybe no one is interested in what I have to say or wants to be critical but what I post is based on having done it not just a view point.

Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: Nogalus Prairie] #6705106 03/14/17 04:38 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,214
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,214
NP, that approach does happen for me, but not all the time. I am also right at home carrying a lever action .30-30 in creek bottoms, which I have my own. Same argument, different day on the binoculars. You've not looked through what I carry, with my eyes, so you don't know how good of a job it does for me. If a coyote is in open ground, and if he moves, I will see him at 1000 yards, it has happened. I don't carry binoculars AND a range finder. There is no need to guess distance, that's how shots are missed and animals are wounded.

I know how to hunt, in close, I promise. Shape, shine, silhouette, and shadow. Move toward animals with the wind in your face, use low areas to mask approach, use trees and other fixed objects to mask your approach.

I don't disagree with the rest of your post. Just yesterday I was leaving the range. Pulled up to the gate, truck idling, grabbed the 7-08 and went up to the platform. I did not dial a thing. The wind was howling all day long, and was crossing the shot from 7 o'clock at about 15 miles an hour. Held elevation (not dial) held wind, and hit an 8" plate at 400 yards. Put everything back in then truck and headed home.

Did my usual text to my wife telling her I was on my way home. 30 seconds later I texted her again "cancel that, I see hogs". That was the 5 I saw 800 yards out. They had found some corn I put out five days ago. I took off walking almost half a mile trying to get close. By the tine I got there they had cleaned up the corn and ducked off into the near by woods. I followed for a while, but it got thick and was getting dark. The clock was what turned me around. That's hunting, you don't always get to harvest, and I get that.

Here's some pics, I just took, of what I have around my place on the way in and out.

East side of the road. I've got permission, but I will not bother a deer. We don't have enough in my area.


.
.
.
West side of the road.


I defy any person to close the distance, quickly, on a brilliant coyote on that terrain.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: booradley] #6705107 03/14/17 04:38 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,214
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,214
Originally Posted By: booradley
I believe you hunt and hunt a lot Jason. Even though we've never met, which I'd like to remedy, I believe in your knowledge, respect and admire it. If I ever shoot animals at the distances you do, I'll do it the way you do it and will ask you to teach me.


It would be my pleasure, sir.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: J.G.] #6705132 03/14/17 05:09 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
N
Nogalus Prairie Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
N
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
Originally Posted By: FiremanJG
NP, that approach does happen for me, but not all the time. I am also right at home carrying a lever action .30-30 in creek bottoms, which I have my own. Same argument, different day on the binoculars. You've not looked through what I carry, with my eyes, so you don't know how good of a job it does for me. If a coyote is in open ground, and if he moves, I will see him at 1000 yards, it has happened. I don't carry binoculars AND a range finder. There is no need to guess distance, that's how shots are missed and animals are wounded.

I know how to hunt, in close, I promise. Shape, shine, silhouette, and shadow. Move toward animals with the wind in your face, use low areas to mask approach, use trees and other fixed objects to mask your approach.

I don't disagree with the rest of your post. Just yesterday I was leaving the range. Pulled up to the gate, truck idling, grabbed the 7-08 and went up to the platform. I did not dial a thing. The wind was howling all day long, and was crossing the shot from 7 o'clock at about 15 miles an hour. Held elevation (not dial) held wind, and hit an 8" plate at 400 yards. Put everything back in then truck and headed home.

Did my usual text to my wife telling her I was on my way home. 30 seconds later I texted her again "cancel that, I see hogs". That was the 5 I saw 800 yards out. They had found some corn I put out five days ago. I took off walking almost half a mile trying to get close. By the tine I got there they had cleaned up the corn and ducked off into the near by woods. I followed for a while, but it got thick and was getting dark. The clock was what turned me around. That's hunting, you don't always get to harvest, and I get that.

Here's some pics, I just took, of what I have around my place on the way in and out.

East side of the road. I've got permission, but I will not bother a deer. We don't have enough in my area.


.
.
.
West side of the road.


I defy any person to close the distance, quickly, on a brilliant coyote on that terrain.


I have never argued with your shooting ability and the work you put in to acquire it. All I ever say to anyone is "Use whatever abilities you have honestly and wisely when hunting game animals." I don't think that's controversial.

All this discussion has been is about what factors can/should go into that. Which is a good discusssion to have. More shooting ability/skill can certainly have the potential to increase one's opportunities. Your skill in that area certainly gives you an edge over most people - provided it's put to good use.

So can increasing one's game locating ability/skills (good optics and knowing how to use them, not looking for a "whole animal", etc.). So can knowing animal behavior/habits. So can increasing one's stalking/hunting skills. So can increasing one's level of fitness. So can increasing one's level of comfort on the mountain (clothing, sleeping gear, good lightweight gear, etc.)

As for the first thing mentioned, I do think you would find a good pair of binoculars in addition to a rangefinder (or binocular/rangefinder combo) very beneficial to any type of hunting you do. One can simply not gain the same steadiness and field of view with a monocular as one has with binoculars. I don't think that's a very controversial opinion either.


Originally Posted by Russ79
I learned long ago you can't reason someone out of something they don't reason themselves into.


Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: NMGW] #6705152 03/14/17 05:23 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
N
Nogalus Prairie Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
N
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
I don't profess to be a great mountain hunter. I do work at improving in all areas. And I try to be honest about my limitations in all of those areas. Not being proficient at LR shooting is one - so I go in with a "get within my range" mindset. It's a matter of both knowing your strengths and limitations. Using your strengths and doing what you can to minimize/work around your limitations - all with the goal to give yourself the best chances for success.





Originally Posted by Russ79
I learned long ago you can't reason someone out of something they don't reason themselves into.


Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: Nogalus Prairie] #6705162 03/14/17 05:31 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,214
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,214
No argument.

Again, I see the benefits to good binoculars. But since I have learned what great glass can do for a person, and I demand a range finder, the binoculars I want are the 10X Swarovski EL Range. Look at the price tag of those. sick

So in the mean time, I have to use the best hand held glass I have, which is the Swarovski 8X Laser Guide. It is true to Swarovski quality on lenses, but I have one, instead of two. It has done a great job for me in the mountains of Colorado, the canyons of Terrel county, the panhandle plains, and on the Blackland prairie where I call home, and get to hunt 52 weeks a year.

But all this is getting off the topic of dialing turrets, or holding with a reticle, for distance and wind.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: NMGW] #6705186 03/14/17 05:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,736
N
NMGW Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
N
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,736
Well I had NO idea this would gain this much traction, but that is OK.

My initial question was not about sheep hunting or even hunting in general, but about accurate bullet placement at long range "you decide what long range means to you" and the equipment required to accomplish that.

But I do openly admit that I shoot to hunt and not vice-versa. 95% of my hunting is on public land in New Mexico, which means I have to draw. I am crowding 60 now so I know I am not going to get that many more chances. I do not have the funds for a $25K Alaskan sheep hunt "although I would love to". Up til now I have had a self imposed range limit of 400 yards and have connected on most of those shots, in fact my last 8 hunts resulted in one shot kills. I have had the opportunity to hunt Texas a few times and have taken 5 animals with 5 shots, so I can shoot.

But I have taken 2 shots on Trophy Barbary rams at 550 and 600 under dead calm wind conditions and missed. I would just like become skilled enough to make that shot if I ever get the chance again. Barbary sheep on public land is a tough hunt in New Mexico with over 600 tags issued "talk about schizophrenic" they get that way.

What Fireman said about shooting steel at 800 yards so you can make that 400 yard shot is spot on, And if I can stretch to 600 all the better, if I ever get that chance again. And if I need better equipment, gun, scope, or more knowledge then I would like to try to get that if I am able.

BTW Barbary sheep is the only thing I have been able to draw a tag for in the last few years so that I why the comments about sheep hunting. But it could be Elk, Muleys, or Coyotes. I just want to be able to take an ethical shot with confidence at as long a range as my equipment will allow.


New Mexico: Not Really New, Not Really Mexico
Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: NMGW] #6705192 03/14/17 06:07 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,214
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,214
I welcome you to schedule a day with me, but you might have the record for the longest drive a customer has made. Right now Corpus Cristi has the record. I know it would be a drive.

I've got three Mil/ Mil scopes, all in their own rings. If you had a pic rail on your rifle I could easily mount each scope for you to try, and zeroing them is a snap. It wouldn't bother me at all to lose each scope's zero for my rifles and to zero them to your rifle/ ammo.

Obviously I have bills to pay running my own range, but I really enjoy teaching this stuff, and getting people to understand it, and do it themselves. I would do it for free if I could afford to.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: NMGW] #6705203 03/14/17 06:27 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
N
Nogalus Prairie Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
N
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
Originally Posted By: NMGW
Well I had NO idea this would gain this much traction, but that is OK.

My initial question was not about sheep hunting or even hunting in general, but about accurate bullet placement at long range "you decide what long range means to you" and the equipment required to accomplish that.

But I do openly admit that I shoot to hunt and not vice-versa. 95% of my hunting is on public land in New Mexico, which means I have to draw. I am crowding 60 now so I know I am not going to get that many more chances. I do not have the funds for a $25K Alaskan sheep hunt "although I would love to". Up til now I have had a self imposed range limit of 400 yards and have connected on most of those shots, in fact my last 8 hunts resulted in one shot kills. I have had the opportunity to hunt Texas a few times and have taken 5 animals with 5 shots, so I can shoot.

But I have taken 2 shots on Trophy Barbary rams at 550 and 600 under dead calm wind conditions and missed. I would just like become skilled enough to make that shot if I ever get the chance again. Barbary sheep on public land is a tough hunt in New Mexico with over 600 tags issued "talk about schizophrenic" they get that way.

What Fireman said about shooting steel at 800 yards so you can make that 400 yard shot is spot on, And if I can stretch to 600 all the better, if I ever get that chance again. And if I need better equipment, gun, scope, or more knowledge then I would like to try to get that if I am able.

BTW Barbary sheep is the only thing I have been able to draw a tag for in the last few years so that I why the comments about sheep hunting. But it could be Elk, Muleys, or Coyotes. I just want to be able to take an ethical shot with confidence at as long a range as my equipment will allow.


Lol traction is good. smile

Good luck and have fun improving your shooting and chasing stuff wherever that takes you.


Originally Posted by Russ79
I learned long ago you can't reason someone out of something they don't reason themselves into.


Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: J.G.] #6705243 03/14/17 07:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,736
N
NMGW Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
N
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,736
Originally Posted By: FiremanJG
I welcome you to schedule a day with me, but you might have the record for the longest drive a customer has made. Right now Corpus Cristi has the record. I know it would be a drive.

I've got three Mil/ Mil scopes, all in their own rings. If you had a pic rail on your rifle I could easily mount each scope for you to try, and zeroing them is a snap. It wouldn't bother me at all to lose each scope's zero for my rifles and to zero them to your rifle/ ammo.

Obviously I have bills to pay running my own range, but I really enjoy teaching this stuff, and getting people to understand it, and do it themselves. I would do it for free if I could afford to.


I was already thinking about that, 1300 miles round trip. 2 more weeks left in Barbary sheep season "have not connected yet". Don't be surprised if I contact you after that.


New Mexico: Not Really New, Not Really Mexico
Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: Nogalus Prairie] #6705245 03/14/17 07:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,736
N
NMGW Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
N
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,736
Originally Posted By: Nogalus Prairie
Lol traction is good. smile

Good luck and have fun improving your shooting and chasing stuff wherever that takes you.


Thanks, if I finally get that Barbary ram I will post pictures.


New Mexico: Not Really New, Not Really Mexico
Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: NMGW] #6705254 03/14/17 07:43 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
N
Nogalus Prairie Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
N
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
Originally Posted By: NMGW
Originally Posted By: Nogalus Prairie
Lol traction is good. smile

Good luck and have fun improving your shooting and chasing stuff wherever that takes you.


Thanks, if I finally get that Barbary ram I will post pictures.


up


Originally Posted by Russ79
I learned long ago you can't reason someone out of something they don't reason themselves into.


Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: NMGW] #6705278 03/14/17 08:19 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,214
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,214
Originally Posted By: NMGW
Originally Posted By: FiremanJG
I welcome you to schedule a day with me, but you might have the record for the longest drive a customer has made. Right now Corpus Cristi has the record. I know it would be a drive.

I've got three Mil/ Mil scopes, all in their own rings. If you had a pic rail on your rifle I could easily mount each scope for you to try, and zeroing them is a snap. It wouldn't bother me at all to lose each scope's zero for my rifles and to zero them to your rifle/ ammo.

Obviously I have bills to pay running my own range, but I really enjoy teaching this stuff, and getting people to understand it, and do it themselves. I would do it for free if I could afford to.


I was already thinking about that, 1300 miles round trip. 2 more weeks left in Barbary sheep season "have not connected yet". Don't be surprised if I contact you after that.


I've been building living quarters the last two weeks at the range. One of its' uses will be for guests to have a place to stay, that are driving in a long way. Until it is finished, you'll have to do what others have done before you, look into a hotel room in Greenville, which is not far down the road.

I'll look forward to hearing from you.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: SapperTitan] #6707052 03/16/17 06:57 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,075
A
aerangis Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
A
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,075
Originally Posted By: SapperTitan
Buy a Scope with mil turrets and a mil/mil reticle and know your dope and then you won't have to dial the scope just use the reticle.


Don't get no simpler than that...

Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: aerangis] #6707054 03/16/17 07:01 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
N
Nogalus Prairie Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
N
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
Originally Posted By: aerangis
Originally Posted By: SapperTitan
Buy a Scope with mil turrets and a mil/mil reticle and know your dope and then you won't have to dial the scope just use the reticle.


Don't get no simpler than that...


Do you have to have a certain FP scope for that? Or at least use the same magnification as the mil/mil reticle was sighted for?


Originally Posted by Russ79
I learned long ago you can't reason someone out of something they don't reason themselves into.


Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: Nogalus Prairie] #6707088 03/16/17 07:42 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
D
dee Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
D
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
Originally Posted By: Nogalus Prairie
Originally Posted By: aerangis
Originally Posted By: SapperTitan
Buy a Scope with mil turrets and a mil/mil reticle and know your dope and then you won't have to dial the scope just use the reticle.


Don't get no simpler than that...


Do you have to have a certain FP scope for that? Or at least use the same magnification as the mil/mil reticle was sighted for?


It can be done on sfp but the subtensions or bdc is only correct at one magnification typically full magnification.


"A vote is like a rifle; it's usefulness depends on the character of the user" Theodore Roosevelt
Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: Nogalus Prairie] #6707109 03/16/17 08:02 PM
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 30,820
S
Sneaky Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
S
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 30,820
Originally Posted By: Nogalus Prairie
Originally Posted By: aerangis
Originally Posted By: SapperTitan
Buy a Scope with mil turrets and a mil/mil reticle and know your dope and then you won't have to dial the scope just use the reticle.


Don't get no simpler than that...


Do you have to have a certain FP scope for that? Or at least use the same magnification as the mil/mil reticle was sighted for?


No. It can be done with either. First focal plane scopes are accurate at any magnification. Second are accurate at one, but you can always half it at half of the magnification it's accurate at, supposedly. I don't know that I'd trust that to be terribly accurate, but I suppose it's not something done at extended ranges much.

Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: Sneaky] #6707150 03/16/17 08:48 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,214
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,214
Originally Posted By: Sneaky
Originally Posted By: Nogalus Prairie
Originally Posted By: aerangis
Originally Posted By: SapperTitan
Buy a Scope with mil turrets and a mil/mil reticle and know your dope and then you won't have to dial the scope just use the reticle.


Don't get no simpler than that...


Do you have to have a certain FP scope for that? Or at least use the same magnification as the mil/mil reticle was sighted for?


No. It can be done with either. First focal plane scopes are accurate at any magnification. Second are accurate at one, but you can always half it at half of the magnification it's accurate at, supposedly. I don't know that I'd trust that to be terribly accurate, but I suppose it's not something done at extended ranges much.


Sometimes magnification needs to be turned down for extended range shooting, when the mirage is too heavy.

With the right scope it can be trusted if you true your reticle. Let's say you have a 20X, second focal plane scope, and you view a fixed object down range, and measure it to be 1.0 Mil tall, with the magnification set at 20X, where the reticle is calibrated to. When you turn the magnification down to 10X that same object should now measure 2.0 Mils tall. Turn down the magnification to 10X, and have a look to see if that is in fact, correct. If it is not, adjust magnification until that object is in fact 2.0 Mils, then you will know where your true half power is, or more importantly where your reticle is showing double true values.

Or buy an FFP scope and a Mil is always a Mil. grin


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: NMGW] #6707153 03/16/17 08:53 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
N
Nogalus Prairie Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
N
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
When I do it this dummy will probably go FFP.


Originally Posted by Russ79
I learned long ago you can't reason someone out of something they don't reason themselves into.


Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: Nogalus Prairie] #6707187 03/16/17 09:16 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,214
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,214
Originally Posted By: Nogalus Prairie
When I do it this dummy will probably go FFP.


It removes a factor. Which is what a certain type of shooting is all about.

There's complaint of FFP was with the magnification turned up the reticle is too thick. In reality the reticle thickness relationship is always the same to the target image. The other complaint is with magnification turned down all the way, the reticle is too thin to find, especially in low light, where low magnification is used.

Manufacturers have produced solutions to both complaints. The center most part of the reticle is thinner than the rest of it, providing a fine aim point for precise shooting. That takes care of the high magnification complaint.

They corrected illumination problems we used to have, in that they were so bright they washed out the target image, in low light, or complete darkness, using a spot light. Now they will turn down to very faint illumination up to very bright. And many have provided an off setting in between each setting.

1-off-2-off-3-off ect.

That took care of the low magnification/ low light complaint.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: NMGW] #6707192 03/16/17 09:23 PM
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 30,820
S
Sneaky Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
S
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 30,820
Simple enough. I'll just stick with FFP, though. I like it simple.

Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: NMGW] #6707369 03/17/17 12:44 AM
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 9
P
PIGLIPS56 Offline
Green Horn
Offline
Green Horn
P
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 9
SFP scopes are accurate at any magnification. The only time the magnifying comes into play is to measure yardage with the mildot. Know your yardage and get the dope for that bullet and rifle and turn the turret and fire when done turn it back to 0 and you are zeroed in at a 100 or what ever you want.If you get a scope that is built lets say for a 300 or 556 or what ever it does not matter the bullet drop is already built into the scope.

Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: PIGLIPS56] #6707383 03/17/17 12:59 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,214
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,214
Not correct.

Elevation corrections are in Mils.
Windage correction are in Mils.

When a shooter wants to make those corrections with pure holds, he needs the reticle to subtend true. An SFP scope, the reticle only subtend true at one magnification.

Cranking on the turrets does not matter weather the scope is SPF or FFP. But show me someone that dials wind, and I will show you someone that constantly re-dials wind. And then they've spent so much time, the wind has changed yet again, and they start the process all over.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: PIGLIPS56] #6707402 03/17/17 01:12 AM
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 23,847
Bee'z Online Happy
The Beedazzler
Online Happy
The Beedazzler
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 23,847
Originally Posted By: PIGLIPS56
FFP scopes are accurate at any magnification.


FIFY cheers


[Linked Image]
Re: An argument for turrets ???? [Re: J.G.] #6707478 03/17/17 02:30 AM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,736
N
NMGW Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
N
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,736
Originally Posted By: FiremanJG
NOT TRUE..........When a shooter wants to make those corrections with pure holds, he needs the reticle to subtend true. An SFP scope, the reticle only subtend true at one magnification.


^^^^^THIS up

Last edited by NMGW; 03/17/17 02:31 AM.

New Mexico: Not Really New, Not Really Mexico
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3