texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Buff65, TrophyHtr316, Pete's, DeVoBrown, JBRYANT 82
72089 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,802
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,539
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 44,030
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,485
Posts9,737,592
Members87,089
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
7.62x39 300aac or 6.8 #3101202 03/20/12 03:35 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,301
J
jackwabbit2 Offline OP
Veteran Tracker
OP Offline
Veteran Tracker
J
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,301
Help me decide will be a brush hog and deer weapon. What say you brain trust?



I have some magic beans if anyone is interested. No extra time hunting but they'll make you fart to the tune of Back In Black...

KC 1/10/10
Re: 7.62x39 300aac or 6.8 [Re: jackwabbit2] #3101233 03/20/12 03:45 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 44,585
RKHarm24 Offline
sergeant
Offline
sergeant
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 44,585
6.8....




Re: 7.62x39 300aac or 6.8 [Re: RKHarm24] #3101236 03/20/12 03:46 AM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 35,153
B
Brother in-law Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
B
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 35,153
Another vote for 6.8


Re: 7.62x39 300aac or 6.8 [Re: Brother in-law] #3101304 03/20/12 04:06 AM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 46,950
G
Gravytrain Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
G
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 46,950
I'm back and forth like a mad man on those three, today I'm with the first two answers, 6.8 SPC II (11:1 twist). So right now, today if I had money in hand for a new upper, it would be 6.8...tomorrow I'll probably change my mind again. Heck I really want all three, I'm really just deciding which goes in the safe first.

And if you want to know why I want 6.8 first, it's velocity and energy.


Last edited by Gravytrain; 03/20/12 04:08 AM.

Upon us all, upon us all, a little rain must fall
Re: 7.62x39 300aac or 6.8 [Re: Gravytrain] #3101380 03/20/12 04:23 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,301
J
jackwabbit2 Offline OP
Veteran Tracker
OP Offline
Veteran Tracker
J
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,301
7.62 is the way I am leaning due to the abundace of ammo



I have some magic beans if anyone is interested. No extra time hunting but they'll make you fart to the tune of Back In Black...

KC 1/10/10
Re: 7.62x39 300aac or 6.8 [Re: Gravytrain] #3101456 03/20/12 04:39 AM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,731
S
Sami Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
S
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,731
Originally Posted By: Gravytrain
And if you want to know why I want 6.8 first, it's velocity and energy.

I'll take a 6.5 over 6.8 anyday. For a brush gun, x39 is a decent choice. 300BLK only if one plans to run it suppressed.


Re: 7.62x39 300aac or 6.8 [Re: Sami] #3101476 03/20/12 04:46 AM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 46,950
G
Gravytrain Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
G
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 46,950
Originally Posted By: Sami
Originally Posted By: Gravytrain
And if you want to know why I want 6.8 first, it's velocity and energy.

I'll take a 6.5 over 6.8 anyday. For a brush gun, x39 is a decent choice. 300BLK only if one plans to run it suppressed.


I would choose 6.8 over 6.5 for upper price and availability of off the shelf ammo. I reload, but I enjoy reloading in small batches for my .308 bolt action rifle. I would have no problem reloading 6.8 (or 6.5) hunting ammo. Reloading enough 6.5 grendel (or 6.8) plinking ammo for a decent day at the range would be a chore. I have enough chores.



Upon us all, upon us all, a little rain must fall
Re: 7.62x39 300aac or 6.8 [Re: Gravytrain] #3101481 03/20/12 04:49 AM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,731
S
Sami Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
S
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,731
Originally Posted By: Gravytrain
Originally Posted By: Sami
Originally Posted By: Gravytrain
And if you want to know why I want 6.8 first, it's velocity and energy.

I'll take a 6.5 over 6.8 anyday. For a brush gun, x39 is a decent choice. 300BLK only if one plans to run it suppressed.


I would choose 6.8 over 6.5 for upper price and availability of off the shelf ammo. I reload, but I enjoy reloading in small batches for my .308 bolt action rifle. I would have no problem reloading 6.8 (or 6.5) hunting ammo. Reloading enough 6.5 grendel (or 6.8) plinking ammo for a decent day at the range would be a chore. I have enough chores.

Then plink with a .223 or x39... smile


Re: 7.62x39 300aac or 6.8 [Re: Sami] #3101627 03/20/12 12:16 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,757
C
ccoker Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
C
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,757
6.8 is a fantastic hunting round and 16" is about ideal in length, an 18" barrel only gets about 25 FPS more

not a good plinking round

I have had several and it is my go to rifle for hunting under 300 yards

6.5 is a great long range round, but you need a long barrel to get full powder burn, most are 24", some down to 20

just depends on what you want to do with it


Re: 7.62x39 300aac or 6.8 [Re: ccoker] #3102208 03/20/12 03:57 PM
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 377
S
silverphoenix Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
S
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 377
6.5 is a lot cheaper--you can get wolf brass case for $13 a box. Just order in bulk.

The ballistics of the 6.5 Grendel are far better than the 6.8--look and see for yourself.



Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum

Are you in College Station? Like 3-Gun? Click Below!
http://www.facebook.com/Aggie3Gunners
Re: 7.62x39 300aac or 6.8 [Re: silverphoenix] #3102225 03/20/12 04:02 PM
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,776
N
NTXBowfisher Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
N
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,776
depends on what you want to do w/ it, if you like short barrels and supressors go .300BLK. I also like the .300BLK because it doesn't take a special mag or bolt like the 7.62s or 6.8s, just swap in a barrel and your good to go... my .02$



signature coming soon
Re: 7.62x39 300aac or 6.8 [Re: NTXBowfisher] #3102537 03/20/12 05:49 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 838
stxhunter Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 838
Originally Posted By: NTXBowfisher
depends on what you want to do w/ it, if you like short barrels and supressors go .300BLK. I also like the .300BLK because it doesn't take a special mag or bolt like the 7.62s or 6.8s, just swap in a barrel and your good to go... my .02$


My thoughts exactly!! If you're wanting an AR platform that takes standard everything (minus the barrel) with more punch up to 200yrds and cheaper ammo go with the 300 blk.

If you want a flat shooting, more expensive round that requires special mags and bcg out to several hundred yards go with the 6.8.

Ammo for the 300blk can be had as low as $12 per box and as high as 30+, with most being in the $15-$20 range.

It really boils down to how you will be using it. Is it just a range plinker, long distance shooter, or match setup?





www.bigpiglights.com
Specializing in Hog Hunting and Night Vision Equipment
(956)793-0904
Re: 7.62x39 300aac or 6.8 [Re: silverphoenix] #3102804 03/20/12 07:35 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,757
C
ccoker Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
C
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,757
Originally Posted By: silverphoenix


The ballistics of the 6.5 Grendel are far better than the 6.8--look and see for yourself.


They are better due to high BC 6.5 bullets
But, in order to drive them fast enough to make a diiference you have to run longer barrels than the 6.8

I shot my buddies JP Grendel upper and it was fantastic at 1k
But _I_ wouldn't want to hunt with that 24" barreled AR as I like ARs for their handiness, your preferences may vary





Last edited by ccoker; 03/20/12 07:40 PM.
Re: 7.62x39 300aac or 6.8 [Re: stxhunter] #3102810 03/20/12 07:36 PM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,301
J
jackwabbit2 Offline OP
Veteran Tracker
OP Offline
Veteran Tracker
J
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,301
As stated in the first post it will be a brush hog and deer gun it may get streched out to 150yds from time to time



I have some magic beans if anyone is interested. No extra time hunting but they'll make you fart to the tune of Back In Black...

KC 1/10/10
Re: 7.62x39 300aac or 6.8 [Re: jackwabbit2] #3102856 03/20/12 07:53 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 18,970
C
ChadTRG42 Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
C
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 18,970
My vote is 300 BLK OUT.



[Linked Image]
Custom and Precision Ammunition!!
https://DallasReloads.com/
Type 01 and Type 06 FFL
Re: 7.62x39 300aac or 6.8 [Re: ChadTRG42] #3102901 03/20/12 08:14 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,519
T
tannerlst Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
T
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,519
I own a 6.8 and a 300blk . Personally I like my 6.8 most , but the 300 is still waiting on its can


Re: 7.62x39 300aac or 6.8 [Re: tannerlst] #3103380 03/20/12 10:24 PM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,243
D
DallasShootingSupplies Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
D
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,243
As others have said, I would go 6.5 or 6.8. Would go 300 if I was gonna run a can and short barrel, which is what it was designed for.


Subsonic yada yada means nothing to me. Its not gonna be going fast enough to frag, will be an ice pick. My silenced Glock 21 running 230 grains is similar to the the 300 running subs. Alot of salesman say the 300 subs are good on game, I am still waiting on alot of pics of dead hogs to surface using them. We have had a whisper for years, they are quiet though.

A short 6.8 running 85 or 95 grain TSX's will be tough to beat.


Last edited by DallasShootingSupplies; 03/20/12 10:26 PM.

www.class3machining.com
Barrel Threading
50k+ barrels done. Zero Baffle Strikes
www.facebook.com/barrelthreading
www.instagram.com/class_3_machining/
Recommended by Silencerco, Capitol Armory, Hansohn Brothers, Gemtech, Ally Outfitters, The Firearm Blog etc
Re: 7.62x39 300aac or 6.8 [Re: DallasShootingSupplies] #3103433 03/20/12 10:39 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 18,970
C
ChadTRG42 Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
C
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 18,970
Originally Posted By: DallasShootingSupplies
A short 6.8 running 85 or 95 grain TSX's will be tough to beat.

That is true!! You can push a 110 grain bullet in a 6.8 about 2650 to 2700 fps. But in a 300 blk out, you can only push a 110 grain bullet to 2370 fps. So there is an energy and fps increase over the blk out.



[Linked Image]
Custom and Precision Ammunition!!
https://DallasReloads.com/
Type 01 and Type 06 FFL
Re: 7.62x39 300aac or 6.8 [Re: ChadTRG42] #3103473 03/20/12 10:59 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,757
C
ccoker Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
C
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,757
I have never shot a 300 Blackout on game, but have taken a lot of hogs and deer with a 6.8 and been very impressed with the terminal performance and have never lost one or had to shoot twice...


Re: 7.62x39 300aac or 6.8 [Re: ccoker] #3103497 03/20/12 11:09 PM
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,776
N
NTXBowfisher Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
N
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,776
having owned both, I'd say shooting a 6.8 or supersonics in .300blk are pretty close. I've wrecked pigs with both. I like both of the calibers performance over the .223...



signature coming soon
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3