Forums46
Topics552,140
Posts9,900,752
Members88,167
|
Most Online28,231 Feb 7th, 2025
|
|
|
Re: WWII Weapon?
[Re: The Dude Abides]
#9196863
03/09/25 01:51 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 23,856
Bee'z
The Beedazzler
|
The Beedazzler
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 23,856 |
M3 Grease Gun is pretty cool. I'm surprised no one has mentioned it. Agree, the cost to make one was incredible compared to others.
|
|
|
Re: WWII Weapon?
[Re: Tbar]
#9196927
03/09/25 04:51 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,905
Espy
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,905 |
A loaded M1 Garand weighed 11#'s. A loaded BAR weighed 19#'s A loaded Thompson weighed 14#'s. A M2 mortar weighed 42#'s.
Lugging those plus your pack, shovel, grandes, extra ammo, etc across North Africa and Europe must have sucked bad!
Put me down for the M1 carbine at 6#'s if I'm going to have to walk long distance. Ive shot a M1 Garland several times. They are some heavy suckers.
|
|
|
Re: WWII Weapon?
[Re: TurkeyHunter]
#9197070
03/09/25 02:59 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 10,501
Old Rabbit
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 10,501 |
Probably the M1 Carbine due to the weight. That said, I would really liked to have inherited my father-in-laws Presentation Grade Thompson.
|
|
|
Re: WWII Weapon?
[Re: Bee'z]
#9197140
03/09/25 05:47 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,938
The Dude Abides
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,938 |
M3 Grease Gun is pretty cool. I'm surprised no one has mentioned it. Agree, the cost to make one was incredible compared to others. Guberment was looking for a low cost alternate to the Thompson which was very expensive to make. The only "safety" on the M3 was the dust cover...interesting.
I am still looking for the perfect apron, one with reinforced knee areas would be perfect. Some people live an entire lifetime & wonder if they ever made a difference in the world, a veteran doesn't have that problem. Reagan
|
|
|
Re: WWII Weapon?
[Re: TurkeyHunter]
#9197522
03/10/25 03:31 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 805
Jhop
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 805 |
I carried an M60 with a 1911 as my sidearm in the Army. After 7 years of lugging it around, I'd say M1 Carbine or M3 grease gun. Followed up by M1 Garand, Thompson, BAR, and in last place a M1903A4. I own or shot them all. While I love the M1903A4, there's something to be said for volume of fire. Folks who haven't the joy of neck and shoulder pain of carrying a heavy weapon and ammo for long distances overestimate their abilities to do so.
|
|
|
Re: WWII Weapon?
[Re: TurkeyHunter]
#9197528
03/10/25 03:51 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 21,578
TurkeyHunter
OP
determined
|
OP
determined
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 21,578 |
Machine gun and mortar teams I'll bet had to lug stuff around
|
|
|
Re: WWII Weapon?
[Re: TurkeyHunter]
#9197838
03/11/25 03:25 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 669
Uncle Zeek
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 669 |
Knowing what I know now, an M2 carbine.
"Decency is not news; it's buried in the obituaries, but it's a force stronger than crime" ~ Robert A. Heinlein Artim Law Firm, PLLC Estate, probate & taxes AND 07/02 FFL 2250 Morriss Road, Suite 205 Flower Mound TX 75028 972-746-0758 work zac@artimlegal.com
|
|
|
Re: WWII Weapon?
[Re: The Dude Abides]
#9197881
03/11/25 06:05 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,332
Hunt Dog
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,332 |
M3 Grease Gun is pretty cool. I'm surprised no one has mentioned it. Agree, the cost to make one was incredible compared to others. Guberment was looking for a low cost alternate to the Thompson which was very expensive to make. The only "safety" on the M3 was the dust cover...interesting. My Dad was a Marine Recon Sgt in Korea ('52 - '53). Dad carried a Thompson with the rear stock removed. One guys in his squad carried a Grease gun until the night they were behind enemy lines and the guy slipped down a hill and it started going off because of the 'safety'. Dad banned the grease gun from his squad after that.
|
|
|
Re: WWII Weapon?
[Re: TurkeyHunter]
#9198920
03/14/25 06:23 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,026
psycho0819
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,026 |
My preference would depend greatly on where I would have been deployed. In general, if in the pacific theater, either a Thompson or M1 Carbine. If in the European theater, a Garand. That's generally speaking, of course. Many scenarios which could have changed that.
Last edited by psycho0819; 03/14/25 06:24 PM.
Tolerance is the virtue of a man without conviction.
The end of the world began the day it was created, and life is a sexually transmitted terminal disease.
|
|
|
Re: WWII Weapon?
[Re: TurkeyHunter]
#9200784
03/19/25 11:59 PM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,402
nsmike
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,402 |
I would go with the Johnson LMG at 13 lbs with the firepower of a BAR. They a were very limited issue item.
for every stereotype there's a prototype don't be the prototype
|
|
|
Re: WWII Weapon?
[Re: TurkeyHunter]
#9200832
03/20/25 01:08 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 128
Yakblue
Woodsman
|
Woodsman
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 128 |
Don’t think it’s been mentioned….
I’d pick the STG 44.
Germans made it too late in the war and on too small of a scale. Only a few ever made it to the front lines, war was already lost..had they had it in early stages when they were steamrolling with landsers carrying the K98, who knows.
Was the first true “assault rifle” In fact, the STG 44 stands for sturmgewehr 44, “storm rifle” or “assault rifle”
Pumps 600 rounds a minute rate of fire, with a larger caliber round than would be expected.
Kalashnikov styled his AK-47 design off the stg 44. They are remarkably similar in appearance.
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|