texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
DEX FINGERLIGHT, Colonel, Jackrabbit21, longhorntracker, Scoot N Shoot
73096 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,840
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 68,097
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
Stub 46,292
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics551,082
Posts9,888,893
Members88,096
Most Online28,231
Feb 7th, 2025
Print Thread
South Korea Plane Crash 💥 #9160731 12/30/24 01:03 AM
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 20,531
Roll-Tide Online Content OP
THF Celebrity
OP Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 20,531
This loooks terrible. Pilot looks to have been doing a good job, but they hit some wall or something very hard, causing an explosion. Worst possible outcome.

https://x.com/bnonews/status/1873174704720425440?s=46&t=dxAyRrvehO6uhdIaGTZQXA

Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: Roll-Tide] #9160732 12/30/24 01:04 AM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 34,985
bigbob_ftw Online Content
Big Sprocket Bob
Online Content
Big Sprocket Bob
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 34,985
Short runway..


[Linked Image][Linked Image]
Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: Roll-Tide] #9160757 12/30/24 01:29 AM
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 18,714
J
Jimbo1 Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
J
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 18,714
No flaps or landing gear deployed. Major failure. The 2 flight attendants that survived should buy some lottery tickets.

Last edited by Jimbo1; 12/30/24 01:31 AM.

Awake - Not Woke!
Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: Roll-Tide] #9160759 12/30/24 01:34 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 18,453
S
S.A. hunter Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
S
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 18,453

Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: bigbob_ftw] #9160780 12/30/24 02:15 AM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 15,927
T
TexFlip Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 15,927
Originally Posted by bigbob_ftw
Short runway..

He overshot it.


Originally Posted by unclebubba
Just to make sure that it is done thoroughly, I go both ways.

Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: Roll-Tide] #9160784 12/30/24 02:25 AM
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 20,531
Roll-Tide Online Content OP
THF Celebrity
OP Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 20,531
I would look for water. A Sully landing has to be a better option. Probably why I’m not a pilot.

Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: Roll-Tide] #9160795 12/30/24 02:43 AM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 15,189
D
don k Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
D
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 15,189
Something very strange about this. Hope we find out someday.

Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: Roll-Tide] #9160808 12/30/24 03:13 AM
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,219
6
68A Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Online Content
Extreme Tracker
6
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,219
I read there was a bird strike prior to landing attempt. Lost an engine. Watched a video that showed there is manual backup controls for landing gear but they may have lost hydraulics (flaps not down, gear not down and no reverse thrusters). Only way that happened is if they inadvertently shut down the wrong engine after bird strike. After one pass of runway, they pulled a teardrop maneuver and immediately dove in on the belly landing. Said it looks like they didn’t try to work through emergency procedures (APU, fuel dump, landing gear). Said the pilot may have panicked or maybe just forgot about the manual controls since they’re on the floor behind and beside copilots seat. Sad deal whatever happened.

Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: 68A] #9160812 12/30/24 03:21 AM
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 18,714
J
Jimbo1 Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
J
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 18,714
Originally Posted by 68A
I read there was a bird strike prior to landing attempt. Lost an engine. Watched a video that showed there is manual backup controls for landing gear but they may have lost hydraulics (flaps not down, gear not down and no reverse thrusters). Only way that happened is if they inadvertently shut down the wrong engine after bird strike. After one pass of runway, they pulled a teardrop maneuver and immediately dove in on the belly landing. Said it looks like they didn’t try to work through emergency procedures (APU, fuel dump, landing gear). Said the pilot may have panicked or maybe just forgot about the manual controls since they’re on the floor behind and beside copilots seat. Sad deal whatever happened.

Aviation expert said that this morning and the black box should be revealing. Very experienced Pilot.


Awake - Not Woke!
Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: Roll-Tide] #9160816 12/30/24 03:27 AM
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 20,531
Roll-Tide Online Content OP
THF Celebrity
OP Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 20,531
Blancoliorios YouTube video was informative.

Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: bigbob_ftw] #9160818 12/30/24 03:31 AM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 12,843
Duck_Hunter Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 12,843
Originally Posted by bigbob_ftw
Short runway..


Apparently a bird was lodged in the wing. I don’t know enough about that stuff to understand why the landing gear would be affected. Definitely seemed like a short runway and I guess the wall was there to prevent planes from causing more damage to buildings or roads beyond the runway? Is that something that would make sense?

Also read that ATC made them circle around after the first landing attempt, then made them use a different runway. Seems odd.


Originally Posted by bill oxner
I just turned it on . I was looking bird dogs in the butt this morning.


[Linked Image]
Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: Roll-Tide] #9160884 12/30/24 02:28 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,523
S
splash556 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
S
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,523
Heard that was runway was 9200' long. More than long enough for a belly landing if everything goes right. No flaps, slats, or gear = higher landing speed though. Not sure how a bird strike would effect all hydraulics. Black box will be telling for sure.


[Linked Image]
Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: Roll-Tide] #9160891 12/30/24 02:34 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 15,189
D
don k Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
D
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 15,189
[Linked Image]
I have a friend who was a Co-Pilot on a 737-800. I ask him about backup systems for flaps and gear.

Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: don k] #9160906 12/30/24 03:01 PM
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,219
6
68A Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Online Content
Extreme Tracker
6
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,219
Originally Posted by don k
[Linked Image]
I have a friend who was a Co-Pilot on a 737-800. I ask him about backup systems for flaps and gear.


If I am understanding that correctly, there’s quadruple redundancy for the flaps and gear? A pump, B pump and an electric pump on both. Seems like it’d take a lot to lose all of those options, basically have to be falling out of the sky like a rock. I suppose they can’t really train on crash landings but I’d guess they’d train on landing procedures in the event of an engine failure, or at least I’d hope they’d do that every few months in a simulator so that it’s second nature.

Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: Roll-Tide] #9161135 12/31/24 12:51 AM
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 356
R
Rounder Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
R
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 356
Pilot error I assure you. A short amount of time it will come to light.

Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: Rounder] #9161151 12/31/24 01:13 AM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,241
topwater13 Online Content
Veteran Tracker
Online Content
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,241
Originally Posted by Rounder
Pilot error I assure you. A short amount of time it will come to light.

Per Blanco, it didn’t seem like they gave themselves enough time to complete most of the checklists.

Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: Roll-Tide] #9161161 12/31/24 01:30 AM
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 29
D
DCR Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
D
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 29
Guys I work on these for a living,worked on the first one ever built and the last one ever built,I know this aircraft and its systems inside and out,there is no way that a bird strike could cause the flaps and landing gear to fail to deploy,once airborne that plane will fly just fine on one engine,and actually has five redundant systems for the flaps,2 Eng driven A_B pumps,2 Elec A-B pumps plus an elec motor to drive the flaps and slats down in the event of total A-B system hyd failure,the landing gear is another pretty much fail proof system,and it is a slam dunk fact that in the nine minutes between the bird strike/toga and the gear up/flaps up landing they never attempted a Manuel extension of either the flaps or the gear.
I don’t normally jump to conclusions on causes of aircraft crash’s,but this is just so far out of the norm its hard not to,If the FDR and CVR show something different,I will be the first to come back here and say I was wrong,but right now this goes squarely on the flight crew as far as I can tell.

Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: Roll-Tide] #9161541 12/31/24 08:50 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,630
J
jetdad Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
J
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,630
Wouldn't surprise me if the systems were hacked.

Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: DCR] #9161566 12/31/24 10:00 PM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,241
topwater13 Online Content
Veteran Tracker
Online Content
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,241
Originally Posted by DCR
Guys I work on these for a living,worked on the first one ever built and the last one ever built,I know this aircraft and its systems inside and out,there is no way that a bird strike could cause the flaps and landing gear to fail to deploy,once airborne that plane will fly just fine on one engine,and actually has five redundant systems for the flaps,2 Eng driven A_B pumps,2 Elec A-B pumps plus an elec motor to drive the flaps and slats down in the event of total A-B system hyd failure,the landing gear is another pretty much fail proof system,and it is a slam dunk fact that in the nine minutes between the bird strike/toga and the gear up/flaps up landing they never attempted a Manuel extension of either the flaps or the gear.
I don’t normally jump to conclusions on causes of aircraft crash’s,but this is just so far out of the norm its hard not to,If the FDR and CVR show something different,I will be the first to come back here and say I was wrong,but right now this goes squarely on the flight crew as far as I can tell.

I don't disagree. Humans grow accustomed to routine, and when it doesn't go as planned we sometimes forget ourselves. That is why emergency checklists are important. They do some of the thinking for you.

Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: jetdad] #9161656 01/01/25 01:25 AM
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 29
D
DCR Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
D
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 29
Originally Posted by jetdad
Wouldn't surprise me if the systems were hacked.

Actually if you knew anything about the next Gen it would surprise the hell out of you,you have no idea of the lengths that Boeing goes too,to protect their hard and soft ware,even the foreign airlines still have to pay Boeing for their latest updates,and data loads,every black box on the aircraft is loaded via a Pmat with a hard connection,when we unplug the pmat from the base it has the latest updates for that tail number in it,if the load does not meet the Boeing ops the aircraft will reject it,long story is ,you can’t hack an aircraft’s software.

Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: DCR] #9161661 01/01/25 01:31 AM
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 29,136
W
Western Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
W
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 29,136
Originally Posted by DCR
Guys I work on these for a living,worked on the first one ever built and the last one ever built,I know this aircraft and its systems inside and out,there is no way that a bird strike could cause the flaps and landing gear to fail to deploy,once airborne that plane will fly just fine on one engine,and actually has five redundant systems for the flaps,2 Eng driven A_B pumps,2 Elec A-B pumps plus an elec motor to drive the flaps and slats down in the event of total A-B system hyd failure,the landing gear is another pretty much fail proof system,and it is a slam dunk fact that in the nine minutes between the bird strike/toga and the gear up/flaps up landing they never attempted a Manuel extension of either the flaps or the gear.
I don’t normally jump to conclusions on causes of aircraft crash’s,but this is just so far out of the norm its hard not to,If the FDR and CVR show something different,I will be the first to come back here and say I was wrong,but right now this goes squarely on the flight crew as far as I can tell.


Great info!

Saw A pilot with supposes a bazillion hrs on this model aircraft, said there was a simple lever in the cpit, that once pulled, allow the landing gear to fall just by gravity. His point was also likely crew iirc


If at first you dont succeed, then skydiving is not for you..

"Don't trust everything you read on the Internet"- Abraham Lincoln

Dennis

Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: DCR] #9162796 01/02/25 10:19 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,630
J
jetdad Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
J
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,630
Originally Posted by DCR
Originally Posted by jetdad
Wouldn't surprise me if the systems were hacked.

Actually if you knew anything about the next Gen it would surprise the hell out of you,you have no idea of the lengths that Boeing goes too,to protect their hard and soft ware,even the foreign airlines still have to pay Boeing for their latest updates,and data loads,every black box on the aircraft is loaded via a Pmat with a hard connection,when we unplug the pmat from the base it has the latest updates for that tail number in it,if the load does not meet the Boeing ops the aircraft will reject it,long story is ,you can’t hack an aircraft’s software.


So, I am a never say never type person. I think any system can eventually get hacked. This is especially true when so many components are mfg'd out of the country. I'm guessing Janet Yellen thought the same thing about the Treasury dept systems security.

Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: jetdad] #9163002 01/03/25 01:49 PM
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 29
D
DCR Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
D
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 29
Originally Posted by jetdad
Originally Posted by DCR
Originally Posted by jetdad
Wouldn't surprise me if the systems were hacked.

Actually if you knew anything about the next Gen it would surprise the hell out of you,you have no idea of the lengths that Boeing goes too,to protect their hard and soft ware,even the foreign airlines still have to pay Boeing for their latest updates,and data loads,every black box on the aircraft is loaded via a Pmat with a hard connection,when we unplug the pmat from the base it has the latest updates for that tail number in it,if the load does not meet the Boeing ops the aircraft will reject it,long story is ,you can’t hack an aircraft’s software.


So, I am a never say never type person. I think any system can eventually get hacked. This is especially true when so many components are mfg'd out of the country. I'm guessing Janet Yellen thought the same thing about the Treasury dept systems security.

So exactly which system would you hack to cause this chain of events to occur? The landing gear system? The flap system?,total BS these are two completely separate systems and neither are automated,they are controlled by the crew only through manual inputs from the cockpit.
Perhaps the engines? Not sure how you would hack a bird into the engine,but suppose you did,while the engine is a fly by wire,and has two EECs,they are also Boeing proprietary software protected,and alternate each cycle,and there is no way to program one to fail an engine.
As far as auto flight goes,it is obvious that the crew was hand flying the aircraft on the final approach as they were well off of the localizer and below the glide slope on the final approach.
Most likely scenario I have seen that makes any kind of sense is ,they shut the wrong engine down,that would explain the loss of A-system Eng.driven hydraulics and maybe the elec A system if they failed to transfer the elec power from the #2 engine,or the APU was not running,the landing gear operate on A-system and the Flaps off of B-system.
Either way to say a system is hacked and this caused the crash is totally unrealistic,I have plenty of training resources that I would be glad to go over with you to prove my point,(cannot share current Manuals due to the Boeing proprietary BS I go through ever time I sign in),I am not trying to be a know it all,But this is one of the aircraft I make my living working on,and I know it very well.
For the Record the Next Gen -700 -800 737 is probably one of the Best and safest aircraft ever built,and I would not hesitate to fly on one,and often do.

Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: Roll-Tide] #9163024 01/03/25 02:27 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,630
J
jetdad Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
J
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,630
I didn't say it was hacked. I said it wouldn't surprise me. Thanks for the info though, it's insightful.

Re: South Korea Plane Crash 💥 [Re: Roll-Tide] #9163031 01/03/25 02:46 PM
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 1,039
D
duffas Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
D
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 1,039
I agree with DCR, not a hack. Pilot error - too fast & short.

Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threadsâ„¢ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3