“Her campaign website says if Harris is elected, she would "ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, require universal background checks, and support red flag laws that keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people."

“Trump's campaign said in a statement that he would "terminate every single one of the Harris-Biden's attacks on law-abiding gun owners his first week in office and stand up for our constitutionally enshrined right to bear arms."

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-harris-guns-2024/

The choice shouldn't be any clearer for anyone who owns a firearm for protection or hunting.

That’s what I thought. Polar opposites.

The idiots are too dumb to look at what effect Clinton's bans had. And too dumb to know her bans would only attack law abiding citizens. Illinois and California are the only evidence one needs.

Exactly what I stated in way earlier post, and we still have members here that won't vote in this presidential election because they don't like either candidate.

There are people on THF that excused Tulsi anti second voting record because it was semi auto firearms aka AR’s

She has an interesting grey streak in her hair as well, which has about as much to do with the OP's post as your statement.

TCM3 nailed it. We're faced with a choice between two polar opposites.

The near future of the gun control fight will be determined shortly.

Political platform differences between the two could not be more different than night and day. If there were ever an election where I believed the “undecided” should be barred from voting it would be this one. If you are undecided than you are to stupid to make choices for the rest of us. There is pretty much no middle ground between the two so just sit down and let the people who know what they want in life decide who to vote for.

Well said JCB

Should be good now especially for the first two years.