texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
duckguy247, Stephen Robertson, avsb, RBeau, Jason Winn
72633 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,840
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 66,209
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
Stub 45,385
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics545,436
Posts9,822,128
Members87,633
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
0 and 2, GW's trail cam vs landowner in TN #9046631 05/13/24 03:49 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 533
S
spankyttx Online Content OP
Tracker
OP Online Content
Tracker
S
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 533
the landowner is up 2 now. just an update on the GW's placing trail cams on private property using the open fields doctrine in TN. a few wanted to hear any updates. this attorney briefly talks about asset forfeiture towards the end.



LI-SI-WI-NWI
Re: 0 and 2, GW's trail cam vs landowner in TN [Re: spankyttx] #9046638 05/13/24 03:59 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 20,993
TurkeyHunter Online Content
determined
Online Content
determined
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 20,993
https://www.drovers.com/news/indust...and-unconstitutional-appeals-court-rules

https://reason.com/2024/05/10/tenne...nts-who-planted-cameras-on-private-land/

"The three-judge panel concluded unanimously that while the state law at issue is constitutional, the wildlife agents' application of it was not."


Wonder if the state will appeal?

Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3