texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Zay, Gunguy1972, RealBigfoot, SSgt3000, Katherine
73183 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,840
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 68,208
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
Stub 46,459
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics552,255
Posts9,902,181
Members88,183
Most Online28,231
Feb 7th, 2025
Print Thread
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: ntxtrapper] #8977888 12/25/23 03:03 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,713
4
4Weight Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
4
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,713
Originally Posted by ntxtrapper
Originally Posted by grizzlyman
Wasn't the 6.5 Creedmore designed for little girls?


Nope. They were designed for folks with a lifted yellow jeep with rubber ducks on the dash.


This thread has now been hijacked but this ^^^^^ is hilarious!!!

Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: BlackSnake] #8977890 12/25/23 03:04 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 706
G
gunslinger922 Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
G
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 706
250 Savage in an old Ruger M77 compact would be perfect

Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: 10 Gauge] #8977892 12/25/23 03:09 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,277
J.G. Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,277
Originally Posted by Bryan C. Heimann
118 db with 300 blackout. Less than 22 LR. Man that sounds like the solution. It’s not cheep though.


I am not a wealthy man. But when it comes to suppressors, they are the one thing that price is not a factor.

Buy the smallest, lightest, best decibel reduction made. And it does not matter if it is $100 or $200 more than the next "decent" option. Because 20, 30, 40 years from now, who gives a chit that you spent $100 or $200 more on the BEST? Suppressors will last a person a lifetime.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: BlackSnake] #8977931 12/25/23 04:51 AM
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 660
C
Catperch Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
C
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 660
I shouldn’t even comment on this topic with all you experts bc I am definitely not a ballistics expert. But just from experience I know I started on a rem 700 .243 at 10 years old. I still to this day shoot that gun. I’ve only started shooting my .270 lately bc my son is shooting my .243. For the first 25 years of shooting it, I never even thought twice about what ammo I even shot. Just bought a cheap box and hunted. Killed countless deer with it with no problems and never thought about all the details that we discuss now. I’m a .243 fan. I even shot it with a 4 power Weaver scope until 10 years ago. Go with the .243

Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: txtrophy85] #8977935 12/25/23 05:16 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,715
G
grout-scout Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
G
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,715
Originally Posted by txtrophy85
Originally Posted by Bryan C. Heimann
Whatever i get next it is coming with a suppressor. Just based on the last several posts in this thread. Suppessor… suppressor… suppressor… suppressor…

It is a pretty big deal for me to spend $1k or more on a single accessory like that. Plus a tax stamp. It’s a big deal for a lot of folks. But i feel like i might be making a mistake, just by not having a suppressor.



Harvester evo. $699 and a great hunting suppressor.



You buy yours from Twisted Precision in CP?

Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: BlackSnake] #8977936 12/25/23 05:24 AM
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 22
D
DSpur72 Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
D
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 22
.223's and 22-250's are more than sufficient to harvest deer, ethically. To me - shot placement is more critical than caliber size. Typically, less recoil equates to a more accurate shot - especially with kids. If a new shooter (whether a kid or just a new shooter in general), is taught proper shot placement and proper shooting techniques - larger calibers are not needed. With all that said, I am talking about a typical Texas whitetail at a reasonable distance. I shoot a 22-250, 50 gr Hornady Varmint Express and take nothing but neck shots on deer and ear hole shots on pigs. I have had neither take a step after impact and have very little to no loss of meat. My opinion - those calibers are great teaching tools and extremely lethal.

Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: Jgraider] #8977937 12/25/23 05:28 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11,008
U
unclebubba Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
U
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11,008
Originally Posted by Jgraider
Originally Posted by Bryan C. Heimann
Whatever i get next it is coming with a suppressor. Just based on the last several posts in this thread. Suppessor… suppressor… suppressor… suppressor…

It is a pretty big deal for me to spend $1k or more on a single accessory like that. Plus a tax stamp. It’s a big deal for a lot of folks. But i feel like i might be making a mistake, just by not having a suppressor.


Smart move.

Yep. My first suppressor is a 9mm suppressor that I use on my 357 mag rifle and 300blk. My next purchase will be a full power short action rifle (308 or 7mm08) threaded and ready to go for a direct thread suppressor that will live on that rifle. Go with a short barrel. Even a 20" barrel seems a bit unwieldy once you add a suppressor. You won't regret having a suppressor.


http://www.boatloan.com/michael-hunt/

Originally Posted by Hirogen
I am a right wing redneck with tendencies that border on Anarchy.

Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: unclebubba] #8977951 12/25/23 12:17 PM
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 15,925
H
Hudbone Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
H
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 15,925
Originally Posted by unclebubba
Go with a short barrel. Even a 20" barrel seems a bit unwieldy once you add a suppressor. You won't regret having a suppressor.


Worth noting.

Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: BlackSnake] #8977967 12/25/23 01:25 PM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 11,628
D
DQ Kid Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
D
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 11,628
Big fan of 7MM-08 and .25-.06, would probably start a younger person there. .25-.06 with a 117 or even 100 gr. bullet is a laser with plenty of knockdown and more than manageable recoil. 7MM-08 creeps up closer to a
.270 in terms of recoil and .30 cal from there and upward. Candidly I don't know much about the newer popular calibers, 6.5 Creedmore, 350 Legend, etc. Have heard that the 350 Legend is best when kept under 200 yard shots due to lost velocity and droppage though.

Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: BlackSnake] #8977995 12/25/23 02:45 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 372
T
Texas JB Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
T
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 372
Send em on home with the trusty 270 win laugh


pour one for the poor one
it’s the Indian, not the arrow
Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: DSpur72] #8978015 12/25/23 03:30 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 63,288
BOBO the Clown Offline
kind of a big deal
Offline
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 63,288
Originally Posted by DSpur72
.223's and 22-250's are more than sufficient to harvest deer, ethically. To me - shot placement is more critical than caliber size. Typically, less recoil equates to a more accurate shot - especially with kids. If a new shooter (whether a kid or just a new shooter in general), is taught proper shot placement and proper shooting techniques - larger calibers are not needed. With all that said, I am talking about a typical Texas whitetail at a reasonable distance. I shoot a 22-250, 50 gr Hornady Varmint Express and take nothing but neck shots on deer and ear hole shots on pigs. I have had neither take a step after impact and have very little to no loss of meat. My opinion - those calibers are great teaching tools and extremely lethal.


I grew up killing lots of stiff with 22-250, but the twist rate always kept me away from bigger bullets,

I been culling with 223 1/8 and 77gr TMK’s all high shoulder and shoulder shots from 75 to 242yard. So far nothings went more the 2 feet


Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, b/c they know not victory nor defeat"- #26 TR
Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: QMC SW/EXW] #8978102 12/25/23 06:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 101
C
carmackj1 Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
C
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 101
Originally Posted by QMC SW/EXW
7mm-08. Not much recoil and it will untrack any deer that lives.

Hornady makes a reduced recoil round that isn't much different than recoil on the .223. I use this in my daughters and it shoots great.
[Linked Image]

Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: 10 Gauge] #8978113 12/25/23 06:44 PM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 28,287
skinnerback Offline
THF Celebrity Chef
Offline
THF Celebrity Chef
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 28,287
Originally Posted by Bryan C. Heimann
118 db with 300 blackout. Less than 22 LR. Man that sounds like the solution. It’s not cheep though.



You won't regret this decision.

Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: grout-scout] #8978114 12/25/23 06:52 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,595
T
txtrophy85 Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,595
Originally Posted by grout-scout
Originally Posted by txtrophy85
Originally Posted by Bryan C. Heimann
Whatever i get next it is coming with a suppressor. Just based on the last several posts in this thread. Suppessor… suppressor… suppressor… suppressor…

It is a pretty big deal for me to spend $1k or more on a single accessory like that. Plus a tax stamp. It’s a big deal for a lot of folks. But i feel like i might be making a mistake, just by not having a suppressor.



Harvester evo. $699 and a great hunting suppressor.



You buy yours from Twisted Precision in CP?


Wilkersons in Boerne


For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: Creekrunner] #8978247 12/26/23 12:37 AM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,282
B
BlackSnake Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
B
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,282
Nailed it. lol
But I’d rather get them their first rifle anyways



Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: BlackSnake] #8978248 12/26/23 12:46 AM
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 27,894
Creekrunner Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 27,894
Originally Posted by BlackSnake
Nailed it. lol
But I’d rather get them their first rifle anyways


I have an inkling you're referring to my comment. I'm an expert on the "other" grandparents. You go Grandpa. I'm behind you 100%.


...and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. Gen. 1:28
Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: garyrapp55] #8978257 12/26/23 12:54 AM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,282
B
BlackSnake Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
B
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,282
Very kind of you. I’ll keep you in mind



Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: Creekrunner] #8978275 12/26/23 01:22 AM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,282
B
BlackSnake Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
B
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,282
100%



Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: BlackSnake] #8978325 12/26/23 03:39 AM
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 371
D
DJ22 Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
D
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 371
.243 is a better round for those longer shots. It’s basically a necked down .308; giving similar accuracy. I started at age 10 with a Remington bolt action in that caliber. Still my favorite caliber for deer. A walnut stock takes up what little kick it has a little better than synthetic; however, synthetic better for girls if they need to walk or spot n stalk with it.
IMO: .243 is best. Be sure to have them measured; have stock cut down by professional. Its like learning to ride a bicycle that is too tall. Not comfortable.

Last edited by DJ22; 12/26/23 03:48 AM. Reason: Added
Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: BlackSnake] #8978423 12/26/23 04:24 PM
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 5,832
S
Smokey Bear Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
S
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 5,832
12 year old little girls. .223 with a fast twist (anywhere from 9-7) to shoot heavier bullets or .243. If you teach them to shoot they won’t have any trouble. If you don’t teach them to shoot they will experience erratic results regardless of caliber. Learning to shoot requires a lot of practice and should be fun. Light recoil during practice is the reason I chose the .223 or .243. For a young child and practice a .223 is going to be easiest to master during practice without them getting twitchy. (How I started my own son). I’m 63 and the .243 has been referred to as a woman’s and children’s rifle for as long as I remember. .243 is a solid choice to learn with. Heavy rifle makes absolutely no sense for a small framed child’s hunting rifle if you want them to learn to handle it in any setting other than a bench rest. A light weight, small caliber, compact bolt gun is the ticket for your granddaughters in my opinion.
These caliber for kids threads are great but the discussions are always all over the place.
Enjoy the time you get to spend with them!


Smokey Bear---Lone Star State.
Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: BlackSnake] #8978445 12/26/23 05:11 PM
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 1,134
DustyArmadillo Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 1,134
If she’s a big girl I wouldn’t avoid the bigger calibers (especially if suppressed)

A 223 with a 60 grain partition will absolutely hammer a deer.

You really want her to feel comfortable behind the gun and not develop any bad flinching habits (like me)

Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: BlackSnake] #8978449 12/26/23 05:30 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 170
J
Jesse Griffiths Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
J
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 170
Started my daughter at age 7 with .17HMR to get used to shooting, then she graduated to a .243 with reduced recoil loads to hunt deer (she did drop a big hog with a headshot with the .17). In the field, I'd quietly replace the .243 reduced recoil loads with a 100 grain shell and she never knew the difference, and regularly shoots deer with the same gun at age 13. I did get her barrel threaded for a suppressor, and that really helps her--at least psychologically--with recoil and sound. I think there's a lot to recovering deer, and if she's shooting something on the lighter side like a .223, there's a chance the deer might be lost with a less than perfect shot, which might adversely affect her desire to hunt in the future. A .243 could be the rifle she carries for the rest of her life.


author of The Turkey Book, The Hog Book and Afield
@thewildbooks.com @daidue.com
Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: BlackSnake] #8978513 12/26/23 08:59 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 513
C
ctonsmitty Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
C
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 513
kids grow quickly-----

I own both .243 (my first rifle at 11 years old) and 7mm-08 (a good choice as they grow older)

I would start with a 243 and shoot with a Caldwell rest (at the range) Once they actually hunt, they won't feel any recoil with their adrenaline flowing

GOOD LUCK!!!

Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: BlackSnake] #8978600 12/27/23 01:17 AM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,541
H
hawk Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
H
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,541
I found myself in the same situation last year with my 11 year old granddaughter. I went with the 243 and all went great! We practiced several times at the range with a life size deer target prior to season. Once season was here she felt confident. Two shots =2 bucks. I was a proud grandfather. [Linked Image]
[Linked Image]

Re: 223, 243, 270, 30.06 [Re: BlackSnake] #8978606 12/27/23 01:37 AM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 797
T
Treinta-Treinta Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
T
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 797
Awesome!

Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3