Forums46
Topics538,866
Posts9,742,340
Members87,122
|
Most Online25,604 Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: BigfootWallace]
#8968214
12/05/23 08:57 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,656
BOBO the Clown
kind of a big deal
|
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,656 |
AGAIN, where any of those ranches listed State Parks for DECADES?
If it wasn't a State Park for the last few decades its irrelevant.
so if I lease you ranch for cattle I own it? and any other property you own?
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: BOBO the Clown]
#8968219
12/05/23 09:00 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 913
BigfootWallace
OP
Tracker
|
OP
Tracker
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 913 |
AGAIN, where any of those ranches listed State Parks for DECADES?
If it wasn't a State Park for the last few decades its irrelevant.
so if I lease you ranch for cattle I own it? Are you the State of Texas? Have you been leasing it for DECADES while thousands of random people (mostly urban like yourself) enjoyed it? Apples to Oranges.
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: BigfootWallace]
#8968221
12/05/23 09:01 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,656
BOBO the Clown
kind of a big deal
|
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,656 |
the lease was 10% of total property, they had option to buy both previous lease and rest, they declined. It gets purchased on fair market and they try to ED ENTIRE property
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: BigfootWallace]
#8968222
12/05/23 09:01 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,343
Judd
#1 Creedmoor Fan
|
#1 Creedmoor Fan
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,343 |
Good...if the state wanted it they could've bought it just like the developer, ED should've never been a part of this situation...sad it was even considered.
Don't let your ears hear what your eyes didn't see, and don't let your mouth say what your heart doesn't feel
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: BigfootWallace]
#8968223
12/05/23 09:02 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 913
BigfootWallace
OP
Tracker
|
OP
Tracker
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 913 |
It's not just a random piece of property. It's been a State Parks for decades. How can one be so dense as to compare this to Joe Smiths place next door.
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: BigfootWallace]
#8968224
12/05/23 09:03 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,656
BOBO the Clown
kind of a big deal
|
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,656 |
AGAIN, where any of those ranches listed State Parks for DECADES?
If it wasn't a State Park for the last few decades its irrelevant.
so if I lease you ranch for cattle I own it? Are you the State of Texas? Have you been leasing it for DECADES while thousands of random people (mostly urban like yourself) enjoyed it? Apples to Oranges. nope a lease is a lease, so if you lease hunting to the state for walkin or draw program they own it now?
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: BigfootWallace]
#8968225
12/05/23 09:04 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 913
BigfootWallace
OP
Tracker
|
OP
Tracker
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 913 |
We need a poll. Who agrees with this and lives within 50' of someone else.
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: BOBO the Clown]
#8968226
12/05/23 09:04 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 913
BigfootWallace
OP
Tracker
|
OP
Tracker
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 913 |
AGAIN, where any of those ranches listed State Parks for DECADES?
If it wasn't a State Park for the last few decades its irrelevant.
so if I lease you ranch for cattle I own it? Are you the State of Texas? Have you been leasing it for DECADES while thousands of random people (mostly urban like yourself) enjoyed it? Apples to Oranges. nope a lease is a lease, so if you lease hunting to the state for walkin or draw program they own it now? Apples to Oranges.
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: BigfootWallace]
#8968232
12/05/23 09:17 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 18,573
ducknbass
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 18,573 |
Bigfootwallace is for private property rights as long as they are doing with it what he deems acceptable
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: BigfootWallace]
#8968235
12/05/23 09:21 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,103
batman
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,103 |
The TPW screwed this up! They had ample opportunity to save the park, has any explanation been communicated? Could it be they’re just stuck on dumb…….;)
Last edited by batman; 12/05/23 09:21 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: BigfootWallace]
#8968237
12/05/23 09:23 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 18,573
ducknbass
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 18,573 |
Anyone that has paid attention knows that Texas, Parks and wildlife have had every right to buy that property before the developer, but they decided not to then there was an uproar and a couple state senators took off with it. This should have never gotten this far the state of Texas should’ve made their decision and lived with it.
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: BigfootWallace]
#8968239
12/05/23 09:23 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,343
Judd
#1 Creedmoor Fan
|
#1 Creedmoor Fan
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,343 |
Hey y'all BFW and I finally agreed on something...
Don't let your ears hear what your eyes didn't see, and don't let your mouth say what your heart doesn't feel
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: BigfootWallace]
#8968241
12/05/23 09:25 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 12,799
Paluxy
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 12,799 |
It's not just a random piece of property. It's been leased as a State Parks for decades. How can one be so dense as to compare this to Joe Smiths place next door. FIFY
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: Judd]
#8968244
12/05/23 09:27 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 913
BigfootWallace
OP
Tracker
|
OP
Tracker
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 913 |
Hey y'all BFW and I finally agreed on something... Always more than happy to be on the opposite side of basically anything that a Dallas "person" says. Kind of backs up my point.
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: BigfootWallace]
#8968268
12/05/23 10:01 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,239
blkt2
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,239 |
Hey y'all BFW and I finally agreed on something... Always more than happy to be on the opposite side of basically anything that a Dallas "person" says. Kind of backs up my point. This Dallas person owns rural land in Hood County (It was rural when I bought it, not so much now), Rusk County, and Brewster County. Guess what? If I feel like developing any of it the government doesn't have a say.
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: batman]
#8968274
12/05/23 10:10 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 12,799
Paluxy
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 12,799 |
The TPW screwed this up! They had ample opportunity to save the park, has any explanation been communicated? Could it be they’re just stuck on dumb…….;) IMO it coincided with the announcement of the state surplus money. The state didn't show much interest until they had money burning a hole in their pocket.
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: blkt2]
#8968277
12/05/23 10:12 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 913
BigfootWallace
OP
Tracker
|
OP
Tracker
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 913 |
Hey y'all BFW and I finally agreed on something... Always more than happy to be on the opposite side of basically anything that a Dallas "person" says. Kind of backs up my point. This Dallas person owns rural land in Hood County (It was rural when I bought it, not so much now), Rusk County, and Brewster County. Guess what? If I feel like developing any of it the government doesn't have a say. We have all seen your "stories" I'm sure you own most of this part of the country and get all of women here too.....
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: BigfootWallace]
#8968279
12/05/23 10:15 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 26,559
JCB
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 26,559 |
I grew up camping and fishing at Lake Fairfield so I have a soft spot for it and would love to see it preserved for future generations. Bottom line is the state didnt give a flying flip about the park when it was offered up for sale until someone actually bought it. At that point they felt cheated so they decided to steal it back from the rightful owners. Only problem is the rightful owners had some pretty good lawyers on their side and were able to squash the theft of their property.
Hate to see it chopped up and sold off as home sites but justice prevailed here. At least I was able to make one last trip out there with Dad before the gates were closed for good.
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: BigfootWallace]
#8968301
12/05/23 10:41 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,958
Ol Thumper
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,958 |
Screw the state and all the Asshats that tried to steal it, they had every freaking opportunity to buy it with our own money and they didn’t so they can F’Off……
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: BigfootWallace]
#8968307
12/05/23 10:47 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,475
ntxtrapper
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,475 |
I’m happy with the results. I wouldn’t want the state to steal my land either.
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: BigfootWallace]
#8968308
12/05/23 10:49 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 16,902
68rustbucket
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 16,902 |
So how much is a lot there listed for?
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: ntxtrapper]
#8968311
12/05/23 10:50 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 913
BigfootWallace
OP
Tracker
|
OP
Tracker
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 913 |
I’m happy with the results. I wouldn’t want the state to steal my land either. Was your land a State Parks for the last 50 years? If not I wouldn't worry about it.
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: BigfootWallace]
#8968318
12/05/23 10:53 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,475
ntxtrapper
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,475 |
I’m happy with the results. I wouldn’t want the state to steal my land either. Was your land a State Parks for the last 50 years? If not I wouldn't worry about it. No I’m just not a Commie.
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: ntxtrapper]
#8968320
12/05/23 10:54 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 913
BigfootWallace
OP
Tracker
|
OP
Tracker
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 913 |
I’m happy with the results. I wouldn’t want the state to steal my land either. Was your land a State Parks for the last 50 years? If not I wouldn't worry about it. No I’m just not a Commie. Just an urban transplant. Might be worse than a commie in some circles lol
|
|
|
Re: Texas will no longer try to seize former Fairfield Lake State Park site through eminent domain
[Re: BigfootWallace]
#8968323
12/05/23 10:57 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,475
ntxtrapper
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,475 |
I’m happy with the results. I wouldn’t want the state to steal my land either. Was your land a State Parks for the last 50 years? If not I wouldn't worry about it. No I’m just not a Commie. Just an urban transplant. Might be worse than a commie in some circles lol I live on a ranch and grew up 20 miles from any town. Try again.
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|