texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
victorcaoh, gtmill6619, cpen13, Huntinkid, garey
72055 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,797
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,531
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,941
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,062
Posts9,732,577
Members87,055
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Ruger SFAR range report #8896516 08/06/23 08:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,356
S
scot Online Happy OP
THF Trophy Hunter
OP Online Happy
THF Trophy Hunter
S
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,356
Finally got to get out a shoot the SFAR I picked up 2 months ago. 16” model with a sightmark wraith scope. Ran it suppressed on gas setting 1.

Was about 95 degrees when I got to the farm. Cows destroyed my target stand so I had to rig some something to hold my target.

Had two rounds with me to try. Federal Fusion 150gr and Federal Gold Medal 168’s. Was also sighting in a 300blk so I was taking three shots, adjusting the scope and then switching rifles.

Groups ranged from 1.25” - 2” but my rear support was awfully suspect. Was extremely soft shooting and since I don’t have an adjustable gas block on the 300blk the SFAR was definitely quieter at the ear than the 8.5” 300.

Only shot one group with the federal gold medal match. Was a 2” group which is not my typical experience with that load. The only failure to load was with the gold medal match.

All brass was landing at about 2:30 6’ away or so. Brass was not very beat up compared to some reports I’ve read but I stayed on gas setting 1 all day.

I think it is a keeper and gives me more confidence for an all around day and night rifle. The weight is awesome and if it keeps running alright it should be good to go.

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[img]https://imgur.com/a/rIj3Lgs[/img]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

Re: Ruger SFAR range report [Re: scot] #8896566 08/06/23 10:32 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 11,658
G
GusWayne Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
G
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 11,658
The one I had was a turd

Re: Ruger SFAR range report [Re: GusWayne] #8896573 08/06/23 10:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,356
S
scot Online Happy OP
THF Trophy Hunter
OP Online Happy
THF Trophy Hunter
S
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,356
Originally Posted by GusWayne
The one I had was a turd


Did it get worse or start pretty bad?

Re: Ruger SFAR range report [Re: scot] #8896600 08/06/23 11:17 PM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 33,987
B
Buzzsaw Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
B
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 33,987
Thanks for the update. Got a buddy who wants a lighter weight AR to shoot deer and pigs within 200 yards. Been wanting to know how this gun performs.


SPACE FOR RENT


Re: Ruger SFAR range report [Re: scot] #8896609 08/06/23 11:33 PM
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 4,072
P
Pig_Popper Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Online Content
Extreme Tracker
P
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 4,072
There is a decent sized thread on AR15 dot com on this model

MANY users report the Ruger gas block is contacting the interior of the handguard and SOME suspect this leads to accuracy issues.

The folks over there are either replacing the gas block all together or shaving material from the inside of the handguard

Also use of higher settings than 1 usually kills brass


This space is For Sale - inquire within ...
Re: Ruger SFAR range report [Re: scot] #8896615 08/06/23 11:43 PM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 33,987
B
Buzzsaw Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
B
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 33,987
might get better groups with more magnification and a lighter trigger, just a thought.


SPACE FOR RENT


Re: Ruger SFAR range report [Re: Buzzsaw] #8896620 08/06/23 11:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,356
S
scot Online Happy OP
THF Trophy Hunter
OP Online Happy
THF Trophy Hunter
S
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,356
Originally Posted by Buzzsaw
might get better groups with more magnification and a lighter trigger, just a thought.


The sightmark has 12x on the top end. In daylight it is plenty clear. The trigger is also very decent. I was just using a pair of work gloves on an ammo box as a rear rest. With a sand bag I expect to be able to get a little more accuracy.

Also even though I was alternating between three shot groups on two rifles, since it was 100 degrees the rifles weren’t able to cool and groups got worse as I shot more.

Re: Ruger SFAR range report [Re: Pig_Popper] #8896623 08/06/23 11:51 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,356
S
scot Online Happy OP
THF Trophy Hunter
OP Online Happy
THF Trophy Hunter
S
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,356
Originally Posted by Pig_Popper
There is a decent sized thread on AR15 dot com on this model

MANY users report the Ruger gas block is contacting the interior of the handguard and SOME suspect this leads to accuracy issues.

The folks over there are either replacing the gas block all together or shaving material from the inside of the handguard

Also use of higher settings than 1 usually kills brass



Fortunately mine is set so the gas block is very well centered in the hand guard but the barrel is light enough to flex with the suppressor on so very possible to made contact when shooting. Still plenty accurate for what I’m trying to do.

At night on a tripod I’m not worried about 1/4” groups.

Re: Ruger SFAR range report [Re: scot] #8896627 08/06/23 11:55 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 11,658
G
GusWayne Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
G
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 11,658
Originally Posted by scot
Originally Posted by GusWayne
The one I had was a turd


Did it get worse or start pretty bad?


Hard to say, started around 2” and I wasn’t happy

Added suppressor, changed scope, rings and changed ammo

Some groups went from 2”, others 4”

It just seemed to not like ammo overall lol

I wanted it to work, it’s a great idea and fit right.

But it just wouldn’t, I couldn’t make it.

It’s a 2”-4” Gun in my mind

I think Ruger is into something but they don’t have it yet

Maybe I had a lemon, I doubt it but this idea is down the road tech

Re: Ruger SFAR range report [Re: scot] #8896686 08/07/23 01:24 AM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,839
The Dude Abides Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,839
2”-4” groupings are horrible. How much money do you have wrapped up in this gun?


Originally Posted by Superduty
I am still looking for the perfect apron, one with reinforced knee areas would be perfect.

Re: Ruger SFAR range report [Re: Pig_Popper] #8896851 08/07/23 01:53 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 925
B
BigDad Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
B
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 925
There has been a lot of discussion about the gas block and the 4 setting gas regulator (0-3). Ruger recommends running it unsuppressed on setting 2 but most SFARs including mine would not cycle consistently on setting 2 so I had to run wide open on setting 3. Ruger has since changed the regulator and I received a replacement via their warranty dept and it now cycles flawlessly on setting 2,

Brass damage (case head gouging) was pretty bad for the first 100-150 rounds I ran through the gun but diminished after I broke it in. Now fired brass is in good shape.

I have not been impressed with the SFAR's accuracy, 1.5-2.5 MOA at 100 yds with several different loads I've tried. Good enough for 100-200 yard hog hunting but I'd like better.

I recently tried Fed GM Match 168 SMK ammo and accuracy was just under 1 MOA. I decided to try to duplicate that load with a hunting bullet, I did some research online and the general consciences on the web is that Federal uses 42.0 - 43.5 gr IMR-4064 power in that round. I pulled the bullets from a couple of the Fed GMM ammo and the powder does appear to be IMR-4064 and weighed 43.5 gr. I loaded 10 rounds each using 165 Nosler BT, 165 SGK and 168 AMAX and 43.5 grains of IMR-4064, CCI #34 primer, Starline brass, 2.800" OAL. The Fed GMM factory velocity was 2468 fps, The velocity using my handloads was 165 Nosler BT- 2505 fps, 165 SGK - 2486 fps and 168 AMAX - 2513 fps, so its a littler hotter than the factory load but within reason. The 165 NBT was the most accurate producing 2 4 shot groups under 1 MOA. Unfortunately each group had one flier that opened them up to just over 2 MOA each.

I'll continue to tweak the 165 NBT IMR-4064 load to see if I can get rid of the fliers. I'll probably reduce the charge a bit and play with the OAL.

Originally Posted by Pig_Popper
There is a decent sized thread on AR15 dot com on this model

MANY users report the Ruger gas block is contacting the interior of the handguard and SOME suspect this leads to accuracy issues.

The folks over there are either replacing the gas block all together or shaving material from the inside of the handguard

Also use of higher settings than 1 usually kills brass



I noticed the clearance between the handguard and gas block is tight and I thought it might be touching but I can't tell for sure. Anyone know how to measure that?


Joe
Re: Ruger SFAR range report [Re: BigDad] #8896866 08/07/23 02:05 PM
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 4,072
P
Pig_Popper Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Online Content
Extreme Tracker
P
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 4,072
Originally Posted by BigDad
There has been a lot of discussion about the gas block and the 4 setting gas regulator (0-3). Ruger recommends running it unsuppressed on setting 2 but most SFARs including mine would not cycle consistently on setting 2 so I had to run wide open on setting 3. Ruger has since changed the regulator and I received a replacement via their warranty dept and it now cycles flawlessly on setting 2,

Brass damage (case head gouging) was pretty bad for the first 100-150 rounds I ran through the gun but diminished after I broke it in. Now fired brass is in good shape.

I have not been impressed with the SFAR's accuracy, 1.5-2.5 MOA at 100 yds with several different loads I've tried. Good enough for 100-200 yard hog hunting but I'd like better.

I recently tried Fed GM Match 168 SMK ammo and accuracy was just under 1 MOA. I decided to try to duplicate that load with a hunting bullet, I did some research online and the general consciences on the web is that Federal uses 42.0 - 43.5 gr IMR-4064 power in that round. I pulled the bullets from a couple of the Fed GMM ammo and the powder does appear to be IMR-4064 and weighed 43.5 gr. I loaded 10 rounds each using 165 Nosler BT, 165 SGK and 168 AMAX and 43.5 grains of IMR-4064, CCI #34 primer, Starline brass, 2.800" OAL. The Fed GMM factory velocity was 2468 fps, The velocity using my handloads was 165 Nosler BT- 2505 fps, 165 SGK - 2486 fps and 168 AMAX - 2513 fps, so its a littler hotter than the factory load but within reason. The 165 NBT was the most accurate producing 2 4 shot groups under 1 MOA. Unfortunately each group had one flier that opened them up to just over 2 MOA each.

I'll continue to tweak the 165 NBT IMR-4064 load to see if I can get rid of the fliers. I'll probably reduce the charge a bit and play with the OAL.

Originally Posted by Pig_Popper
There is a decent sized thread on AR15 dot com on this model

MANY users report the Ruger gas block is contacting the interior of the handguard and SOME suspect this leads to accuracy issues.

The folks over there are either replacing the gas block all together or shaving material from the inside of the handguard

Also use of higher settings than 1 usually kills brass



I noticed the clearance between the handguard and gas block is tight and I thought it might be touching but I can't tell for sure. Anyone know how to measure that?



Feeler gauges is typically the play , accessing the area is problematic


This space is For Sale - inquire within ...
Re: Ruger SFAR range report [Re: BigDad] #8896876 08/07/23 02:29 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 9,935
U
unclebubba Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
U
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 9,935
Originally Posted by BigDad


I recently tried Fed GM Match 168 SMK ammo and accuracy was just under 1 MOA. I decided to try to duplicate that load with a hunting bullet, I did some research online and the general consciences on the web is that Federal uses 42.0 - 43.5 gr IMR-4064 power in that round. I pulled the bullets from a couple of the Fed GMM ammo and the powder does appear to be IMR-4064 and weighed 43.5 gr. I loaded 10 rounds each using 165 Nosler BT, 165 SGK and 168 AMAX and 43.5 grains of IMR-4064, CCI #34 primer, Starline brass, 2.800" OAL. The Fed GMM factory velocity was 2468 fps, The velocity using my handloads was 165 Nosler BT- 2505 fps, 165 SGK - 2486 fps and 168 AMAX - 2513 fps, so its a littler hotter than the factory load but within reason. The 165 NBT was the most accurate producing 2 4 shot groups under 1 MOA. Unfortunately each group had one flier that opened them up to just over 2 MOA each.

I'll continue to tweak the 165 NBT IMR-4064 load to see if I can get rid of the fliers. I'll probably reduce the charge a bit and play with the OAL.





Why would you work up a load that way? It seems like a waste of time. Run a ladder test or load groups of progressively larger powder throws then pick out the best group.

Re: Ruger SFAR range report [Re: unclebubba] #8896890 08/07/23 02:55 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 925
B
BigDad Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
B
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 925
Originally Posted by unclebubba
Originally Posted by BigDad


I recently tried Fed GM Match 168 SMK ammo and accuracy was just under 1 MOA. I decided to try to duplicate that load with a hunting bullet, I did some research online and the general consciences on the web is that Federal uses 42.0 - 43.5 gr IMR-4064 power in that round. I pulled the bullets from a couple of the Fed GMM ammo and the powder does appear to be IMR-4064 and weighed 43.5 gr. I loaded 10 rounds each using 165 Nosler BT, 165 SGK and 168 AMAX and 43.5 grains of IMR-4064, CCI #34 primer, Starline brass, 2.800" OAL. The Fed GMM factory velocity was 2468 fps, The velocity using my handloads was 165 Nosler BT- 2505 fps, 165 SGK - 2486 fps and 168 AMAX - 2513 fps, so its a littler hotter than the factory load but within reason. The 165 NBT was the most accurate producing 2 4 shot groups under 1 MOA. Unfortunately each group had one flier that opened them up to just over 2 MOA each.

I'll continue to tweak the 165 NBT IMR-4064 load to see if I can get rid of the fliers. I'll probably reduce the charge a bit and play with the OAL.





Why would you work up a load that way? It seems like a waste of time. Run a ladder test or load groups of progressively larger powder throws then pick out the best group.


This is the first time a factory load has outperformed my handloading efforts. I generally do ladders and work up to a powder charge but since the powder charge work had already been done for me by Federal and their load has beaten tall the loads I have worked up, I thought I'd go with what they had and and I must say it worked pretty well. Now I just need to tweak it. I may do a powder ladder using IMR-4064 but first I'll try messing with the OAL.

The 165 NBT groups are Top Right and Bottom Left on the target below.

[Linked Image]


Joe
Re: Ruger SFAR range report [Re: Pig_Popper] #8896898 08/07/23 03:03 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 925
B
BigDad Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
B
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 925
Originally Posted by Pig_Popper
Originally Posted by BigDad
There has been a lot of discussion about the gas block and the 4 setting gas regulator (0-3). Ruger recommends running it unsuppressed on setting 2 but most SFARs including mine would not cycle consistently on setting 2 so I had to run wide open on setting 3. Ruger has since changed the regulator and I received a replacement via their warranty dept and it now cycles flawlessly on setting 2,

Brass damage (case head gouging) was pretty bad for the first 100-150 rounds I ran through the gun but diminished after I broke it in. Now fired brass is in good shape.

I have not been impressed with the SFAR's accuracy, 1.5-2.5 MOA at 100 yds with several different loads I've tried. Good enough for 100-200 yard hog hunting but I'd like better.

I recently tried Fed GM Match 168 SMK ammo and accuracy was just under 1 MOA. I decided to try to duplicate that load with a hunting bullet, I did some research online and the general consciences on the web is that Federal uses 42.0 - 43.5 gr IMR-4064 power in that round. I pulled the bullets from a couple of the Fed GMM ammo and the powder does appear to be IMR-4064 and weighed 43.5 gr. I loaded 10 rounds each using 165 Nosler BT, 165 SGK and 168 AMAX and 43.5 grains of IMR-4064, CCI #34 primer, Starline brass, 2.800" OAL. The Fed GMM factory velocity was 2468 fps, The velocity using my handloads was 165 Nosler BT- 2505 fps, 165 SGK - 2486 fps and 168 AMAX - 2513 fps, so its a littler hotter than the factory load but within reason. The 165 NBT was the most accurate producing 2 4 shot groups under 1 MOA. Unfortunately each group had one flier that opened them up to just over 2 MOA each.

I'll continue to tweak the 165 NBT IMR-4064 load to see if I can get rid of the fliers. I'll probably reduce the charge a bit and play with the OAL.

Originally Posted by Pig_Popper
There is a decent sized thread on AR15 dot com on this model

MANY users report the Ruger gas block is contacting the interior of the handguard and SOME suspect this leads to accuracy issues.

The folks over there are either replacing the gas block all together or shaving material from the inside of the handguard

Also use of higher settings than 1 usually kills brass



I noticed the clearance between the handguard and gas block is tight and I thought it might be touching but I can't tell for sure. Anyone know how to measure that?



Feeler gauges is typically the play , accessing the area is problematic


I'll give feeler gauges a try, thanks! Its tight so I may have to trim the feeler gauge to get it in there


Joe
Re: Ruger SFAR range report [Re: scot] #8896919 08/07/23 03:33 PM
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 500
6
65x55 Online Content
Tracker
Online Content
Tracker
6
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 500
I'd like someone to do a head to head comparison with the Browning BAR Stalker, which is 6.6 pounds with a 22" barrel.

Re: Ruger SFAR range report [Re: scot] #8903692 08/18/23 06:49 PM
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 4,072
P
Pig_Popper Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Online Content
Extreme Tracker
P
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 4,072
Mandatory viewing if you’re considering buying a SFAR or already own one



This space is For Sale - inquire within ...
Re: Ruger SFAR range report [Re: scot] #8963099 11/28/23 03:14 AM
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,193
A
AP2714 Online Content
Pro Tracker
Online Content
Pro Tracker
A
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,193
Man i like the idea of this rifle, but so many mixed reviews.

Re: Ruger SFAR range report [Re: AP2714] #8963101 11/28/23 03:17 AM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,356
S
scot Online Happy OP
THF Trophy Hunter
OP Online Happy
THF Trophy Hunter
S
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,356
Originally Posted by AP2714
Man i like the idea of this rifle, but so many mixed reviews.


I could be talked out of this one. It seems be be on the positive side of the bell curve accuracy wise.

Re: Ruger SFAR range report [Re: Pig_Popper] #8963423 11/28/23 08:10 PM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 15,645
Q
QuitShootinYoungBucks Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Q
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 15,645
Originally Posted by Pig_Popper
Mandatory viewing if you’re considering buying a SFAR or already own one



Man, that sure speaks poorly of Ruger quality, at least on this model.


[Linked Image]

https://web.archive.org/web/20170223065011/http:/www.rrdvegas.com/silencer-cleaning.html
Re: Ruger SFAR range report [Re: scot] #8963836 11/29/23 02:46 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 92
J
jdangler Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
J
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 92
I was able to get mine to shoot federal fusion 150s into 1.25" - 1.5" groups....using a suppressor and had the gas block on setting 2 (I changed out the buffer in mine to an H2). My next range outing will be to see how it cycles on gas setting 1 for a box or 2 and see what drop looks like at 200 yards -

Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3