Forums46
Topics551,056
Posts9,888,532
Members88,094
|
Most Online28,231 Feb 7th, 2025
|
|
|
New ATF powder proposal
#8913674
09/08/23 02:23 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 908
machinist
OP
Tracker
|
OP
Tracker
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 908 |
Has anyone seen the new ATF powder proposal? It was signed by Merrill Garland and says that anyone with anyamout of explosive(gun powder) has to report it to the local authorities. They want how much you have, how and where it is stored. When you obtain as little as 1 lb. It has to be reported in 48 hours. I saw this on a U Tube video last night. It was signed on Aug. 11th.
some people like silver and gold I like brass and lead with a little powder in between
|
|
|
Re: New ATF powder proposal
[Re: machinist]
#8913781
09/08/23 05:35 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,264
Grizz
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,264 |
The only thing I can find is on the ATF website and it still says it's a proposed rule change. It would require reporting it to the local fire authority, such as the fire marshal, so fire fighters will have a heads up in the event of a fire. I'm very suspicious of anything like this that comes in a wrapper of "safety", and I'm being very kind by using the word suspicious. If they put any weight in the comments on their site, it will fail immediately. 
|
|
|
Re: New ATF powder proposal
[Re: machinist]
#8913804
09/08/23 06:14 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 15,605
ntxtrapper
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 15,605 |
555.141 Exemptions. (a) General. Except for the provisions of §§ 555.180 and 555.181, this part does not apply to: (1) Any aspect of the transportation of explosive materials via railroad, water, highway, or air which is regulated by the U.S. Department of Transportation and its agencies, and which pertains to safety. For example, regulations issued by the Department of Transportation addressing the security risk of aliens transporting explosives by commercial motor or railroad carrier from Canada preclude the enforcement of 18 U.S.C. 842(i)(5) against persons shipping, transporting, receiving, or possessing explosives incident to and in connection with the commercial transportation of explosives by truck or rail from Canada into the United States. Questions concerning this exception should be directed to ATF's Explosives Industry Program Branch in Washington, DC. (2) The use of explosive materials in medicines and medicinal agents in the forms prescribed by the official United States Pharmacopeia or the National Formulary. “The United States Pharmacopeia and The National Formulary,” USP and NF Compendia, are available from the United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc., 12601 Twinbrook Parkway, Rockville, Maryland 20852. (3) The transportation, shipment, receipt, or importation of explosive materials for delivery to any agency of the United States or to any State or its political subdivision. (4) Small arms ammunition and components of small arms ammunition. (5) The manufacture under the regulation of the military department of the United States of explosive materials for, or their distribution to or storage or possession by, the military or naval services or other agencies of the United States. (6) Arsenals, navy yards, depots, or other establishments owned by, or operated by or on behalf of, the United States. (7) The importation, distribution, and storage of fireworks classified as UN0336, UN0337, UN0431, or UN0432 explosives by the U.S. Department of Transportation at 49 CFR 172.101 and generally known as “consumer fireworks” or “articles pyrotechnic.” (8) Gasoline, fertilizers, propellant actuated devices, or propellant actuated industrial tools manufactured, imported, or distributed for their intended purposes. (9) Industrial and laboratory chemicals which are intended for use as reagents and which are packaged and shipped pursuant to U.S. Department of Transportation regulations, 49 CFR Parts 100 to 177, which do not require explosives hazard warning labels. (10) Model rocket motors that meet all of the following criteria— (i) Consist of ammonium perchlorate composite propellant, black powder, or other similar low explosives; (ii) Contain no more than 62.5 grams of total propellant weight; and (iii) Are designed as single-use motors or as reload kits capable of reloading no more than 62.5 grams of propellant into a reusable motor casing. (b) Black powder. Except for the provisions applicable to persons required to be licensed under subpart D, this part does not apply with respect to commercially manufactured black powder in quantities not to exceed 50 pounds, percussion caps, safety and pyrotechnic fuses, quills, quick and slow matches, and friction primers, if the black powder is intended to be used solely for sporting, recreational, or cultural purposes in antique firearms, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(16) or antique devices, as exempted from the term “destructive devices” in 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(4).
|
|
|
Re: New ATF powder proposal
[Re: machinist]
#8913832
09/08/23 07:10 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 908
machinist
OP
Tracker
|
OP
Tracker
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 908 |
ntx that is not what the new proposal is about. It is what Grizz said. The U Tube video showed the document signed by Merrill Garland on the 11th of August.
Last edited by machinist; 09/08/23 07:11 PM.
some people like silver and gold I like brass and lead with a little powder in between
|
|
|
Re: New ATF powder proposal
[Re: machinist]
#8913889
09/08/23 09:24 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,264
Grizz
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,264 |
After reading much more federal law than I wanted to, the rule has already been amended as shown. However ntxtrapper's post is correct about the exemption. On the ATF website, you can click on components of small arms ammunition and the definition comes up to the side. Powder is included in the exemption from the definition of explosive materials, so it doesn't apply to us for reloading powder. It does say black powder doesn't get that exemption, so I assume it would apply if you have that but I'm not sure. ![[Linked Image]](https://texashuntingforum.com/forum/pics/userpics/2023/09/full-7848-399562-screenshot_2023_09_08_162242.png)
|
|
|
Re: New ATF powder proposal
[Re: machinist]
#8913894
09/08/23 09:30 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 20,335
Judd
#1 Creedmoor Fan
|
#1 Creedmoor Fan
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 20,335 |
I suspected the YouTube stuff on this was about getting folks to click and see their videos...it's how they are paid.
Having said all of that, smokeless powder historically hasn't been viewed as explosive but instead hazardous.
Don't let your ears hear what your eyes didn't see, and don't let your mouth say what your heart doesn't feel As much as I hate to admit it, I do like my truck
|
|
|
Re: New ATF powder proposal
[Re: machinist]
#8913961
09/09/23 12:18 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,333
blkt2
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,333 |
I use high test hydrogen peroxide for my work and occasionally the ATF will pester me about why I buy so much of it.
|
|
|
Re: New ATF powder proposal
[Re: machinist]
#8913975
09/09/23 01:31 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,371
QMC SW/EXW
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,371 |
All of my powder got ruined in a freak spilled milk incident. I have nothing to report.
Retired Navy Chief NJROTC Instructor for Los Fresnos High School
|
|
|
Re: New ATF powder proposal
[Re: machinist]
#8914725
09/10/23 06:35 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,109
J.G.
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,109 |
I have had quite a few orders of gun powder shipped to me over the years. Every single box had a haz-mat placard on it. ![[Linked Image]](https://texashuntingforum.com/forum/pics/userpics/2023/09/full-10697-399657-1000001523.png) However, DOT does classify primers as an explosive. Also why you pay a "Haz-Mat" fee when shipping them. ![[Linked Image]](https://texashuntingforum.com/forum/pics/userpics/2023/09/full-10697-399658-1000001524.png) And yet every home owner in America has this hazardous material stored in various quantities. Some quite large. Plus, anyone with anything that operates on propane has this hazardous material in or about their home. ![[Linked Image]](https://texashuntingforum.com/forum/pics/userpics/2023/09/full-10697-399660-1000001526.jpg) If you also have a pool, and chlorinate it yourself, you have this hazardous material. ![[Linked Image]](https://texashuntingforum.com/forum/pics/userpics/2023/09/full-10697-399661-1000001527.png)
![[Linked Image]](http://www.precisionriflehunters.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/garvey.jpg) 800 Yard Steel Range Precision Rifle Instruction Memberships and Classes Available
|
|
|
Re: New ATF powder proposal
[Re: Grizz]
#8914756
09/10/23 07:04 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 15,605
ntxtrapper
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 15,605 |
After reading much more federal law than I wanted to, the rule has already been amended as shown. However ntxtrapper's post is correct about the exemption. On the ATF website, you can click on components of small arms ammunition and the definition comes up to the side. Powder is included in the exemption from the definition of explosive materials, so it doesn't apply to us for reloading powder. It does say black powder doesn't get that exemption, so I assume it would apply if you have that but I'm not sure. This helps much more than reading the codified statutes ![[Linked Image]](https://texashuntingforum.com/forum/pics/userpics/2023/09/full-19470-399662-img_6924.jpeg)
|
|
|
Re: New ATF powder proposal
[Re: machinist]
#8915622
09/11/23 10:54 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 104
TxCookin
Woodsman
|
Woodsman
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 104 |
The limited exemption for Black powder is here, it was also posted above....
Black powder is an explosive material for purposes of federal explosives laws and regulations.
However, the law exempts from regulation commercially manufactured black powder in quantities not exceeding 50 pounds (as well as percussion caps, safety and pyrotechnic fuses, quills, quick and slow matches, and friction primers) intended to be used solely for sporting, recreational, or cultural purposes in antique firearms as defined in 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(16) or in antique devices exempted from the term "destructive device" in 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(4).
By the way...this rule is still in the open comment period. As well as the new stupid rule change proposed about who.what constitutes a "Dealer" of firearms according to the ATF. This rule change however will heavily impact many of the individuals on this site , as well as most "private" sales at gun shows!
Last edited by TxCookin; 09/11/23 11:09 PM.
|
|
|
Re: New ATF powder proposal
[Re: machinist]
#8915867
09/12/23 11:44 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,109
J.G.
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,109 |
I received 10 pounds of smokeless powder on Saturday. For the first time ever, the box had an Explosive placard on it.
Which is not correct.
![[Linked Image]](http://www.precisionriflehunters.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/garvey.jpg) 800 Yard Steel Range Precision Rifle Instruction Memberships and Classes Available
|
|
|
Re: New ATF powder proposal
[Re: machinist]
#8916171
09/12/23 08:22 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 15,605
ntxtrapper
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 15,605 |
|
|
|
Re: New ATF powder proposal
[Re: machinist]
#8931818
10/08/23 09:27 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 14,600
Ramsey
Pepe' Le Pew
|
Pepe' Le Pew
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 14,600 |
Great read in this topic. The antis are persistent that is for sure.
FKH!!!!
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, txcornhusker
|