Forums46
Topics538,441
Posts9,737,078
Members87,089
|
Most Online25,604 Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE
#8474356
12/13/21 03:50 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,235
wp75169
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,235 |
I have a 336 35 Remington with the micro-groove barrel. I’m going to run some 200 grain Cast Performance Bullets that are WLNGC. They are a brinell hardness 18-21. How fast can I push these bullets with the micro-groove? Obligatory pictures
|
|
|
Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE
[Re: wp75169]
#8474869
12/14/21 12:31 AM
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,987
TAB
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,987 |
Man do some research on cast boolets.com I always heard micro grove and lead is bad juju
I know those bullets are hard and gas checked, I’d run it and see what ya get might clean it a few time to see just how bad it leads up if it even does.. I bet that gas check takes care of it tho..
|
|
|
Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE
[Re: wp75169]
#8475148
12/14/21 12:11 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,968
GasGuzzler
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,968 |
2000-2200 I bet if the lead is that hard. Also depends on the pressure curve (what powder and load).
Pass the gravy.
|
|
|
Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE
[Re: GasGuzzler]
#8475225
12/14/21 01:31 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,235
wp75169
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,235 |
2000-2200 I bet if the lead is that hard. Also depends on the pressure curve (what powder and load). No idea yet. I have 3031 and a couple of other useable powders.
|
|
|
Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE
[Re: wp75169]
#8475510
12/14/21 05:47 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 604
ASIC777
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 604 |
Following this because I have just started shooting cast bullets but I now have a question, do you still need to lube GC bullets, especially if they are over 1800 fps?
Lifetime NRA Member
|
|
|
Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE
[Re: ASIC777]
#8475625
12/14/21 07:48 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 319
HenryL
Bird Dog
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 319 |
Following this because I have just started shooting cast bullets but I now have a question, do you still need to lube GC bullets, especially if they are over 1800 fps? Toss all your lube and go the powder coating route...thankfully, I got into casting post-the lubing days and never had to deal with lube.
|
|
|
Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE
[Re: HenryL]
#8475700
12/14/21 09:12 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 604
ASIC777
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 604 |
Following this because I have just started shooting cast bullets but I now have a question, do you still need to lube GC bullets, especially if they are over 1800 fps? Toss all your lube and go the powder coating route...thankfully, I got into casting post-the lubing days and never had to deal with lube. But I seem to recall folks have problems with coatings at speeds around 2,000 FPS? I understand the allure for pistol bullets.
Lifetime NRA Member
|
|
|
Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE
[Re: wp75169]
#8475912
12/14/21 11:51 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 426
McKinneyHusker
Bird Dog
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 426 |
First and foremost will be the bullet diameter, it should at a minimum be .001 over bore most go .002 - .003 over bore size. Gas checked bullets can be fired at jacketed bullet speeds, although I would stay mid-range on the jacket bullet speeds.
|
|
|
Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE
[Re: ASIC777]
#8475922
12/15/21 12:04 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 319
HenryL
Bird Dog
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 319 |
Following this because I have just started shooting cast bullets but I now have a question, do you still need to lube GC bullets, especially if they are over 1800 fps? Toss all your lube and go the powder coating route...thankfully, I got into casting post-the lubing days and never had to deal with lube. But I seem to recall folks have problems with coatings at speeds around 2,000 FPS? I understand the allure for pistol bullets. I've never had a single issue with powder coating at any speed with pistol or rifle, so I have nothing that I can contribute on that topic... it could just be I'm to ignorant to notice there is an issue - but my cast bullets reach the desired velocity and accuracy levels that I am after with no noticeable issues for a person of my skills level (which is to say, not an expert!). Mind you I currently only cast for: Pistols9MM .40 S&W Rifles6.5 CM 30-30 300 Blackout 308 WIN .50 Muzzleloader Shotguns12 GA. - Slugs only
|
|
|
Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE
[Re: wp75169]
#8479784
12/18/21 11:12 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 353
Big Sam
Bird Dog
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 353 |
One of the great advantages of jacketed bullets is that so many things do not have to be just right to get decent results. Cast bullets in rifle cartridges are very sensitive to the smoothness of your bore, diameter of your bore, alloy of the bullet, lube on the bullet and the gas check. The hardness of the bullet is important but not in the sense that harder is better. You certainly want the bullet to be over bore diameter but that assumes you know your actual bore diameter. But you also want to drive the bullet hard enough for it to obturate in the more. That gives you a better seal, less leading and more accuracy.... all things being equal. Cast Performance bullets are pretty hard and take a lot of pressure to obturate in the barrel. If you were trying to run loads much slower you would probably need a softer bullet. This is harder to achieve in a micro groove barrel but hardly impossible. Generally you want to run with appropriate powders on the slower side.
Do your research and see what happens with velocity, accuray and bore leading as you develop loads. Remember that you have to clean all the bullet lube out of the bore to see how much leading has actually stuck in the more. A little bit of leading is not a big deal. When you are done you will have given yourself a good education in high speed lead bullets.
"Group think" is not thinking. It is the lack of independent thought. It is a cancer of the mind.
|
|
|
Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE
[Re: wp75169]
#8480121
12/19/21 11:44 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,968
GasGuzzler
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,968 |
Pass the gravy.
|
|
|
Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE
[Re: GasGuzzler]
#8480458
12/19/21 05:48 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 353
Big Sam
Bird Dog
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 353 |
Thanks for your input GG. I have many thousands of rounds experience with coated handgun bullets but zero in a high powered rifle. I think the coating is more forgiving in handgun application vs lube. Would you say the same is true at rifle velocities????
"Group think" is not thinking. It is the lack of independent thought. It is a cancer of the mind.
|
|
|
Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE
[Re: wp75169]
#8481333
12/20/21 01:25 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,968
GasGuzzler
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,968 |
I haven't tested much. Just started coating. Seems it's a win-win to me. Read this topic posted yesterday elsewhere about cast and coating .30-06 rounds. CLICK HERE
Pass the gravy.
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|