texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Buff65, TrophyHtr316, Pete's, DeVoBrown, JBRYANT 82
72089 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,802
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,539
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 44,018
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,441
Posts9,737,078
Members87,089
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE #8474356 12/13/21 03:50 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,235
W
wp75169 Online Content OP
THF Celebrity
OP Online Content
THF Celebrity
W
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,235
I have a 336 35 Remington with the micro-groove barrel. I’m going to run some 200 grain Cast Performance Bullets that are WLNGC. They are a brinell hardness 18-21. How fast can I push these bullets with the micro-groove?

Obligatory pictures

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE [Re: wp75169] #8474869 12/14/21 12:31 AM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,987
T
TAB Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
T
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,987
Man do some research on cast boolets.com I always heard micro grove and lead is bad juju

I know those bullets are hard and gas checked, I’d run it and see what ya get might clean it a few time to see just how bad it leads up if it even does.. I bet that gas check takes care of it tho..

Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE [Re: wp75169] #8475148 12/14/21 12:11 PM
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,968
GasGuzzler Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,968
2000-2200 I bet if the lead is that hard. Also depends on the pressure curve (what powder and load).


Pass the gravy.


Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE [Re: GasGuzzler] #8475225 12/14/21 01:31 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,235
W
wp75169 Online Content OP
THF Celebrity
OP Online Content
THF Celebrity
W
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,235
Originally Posted by GasGuzzler
2000-2200 I bet if the lead is that hard. Also depends on the pressure curve (what powder and load).



No idea yet. I have 3031 and a couple of other useable powders.

Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE [Re: wp75169] #8475510 12/14/21 05:47 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 604
A
ASIC777 Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
A
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 604
Following this because I have just started shooting cast bullets but I now have a question, do you still need to lube GC bullets, especially if they are over 1800 fps?


Lifetime NRA Member
Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE [Re: ASIC777] #8475625 12/14/21 07:48 PM
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 319
H
HenryL Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
H
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 319
Originally Posted by ASIC777
Following this because I have just started shooting cast bullets but I now have a question, do you still need to lube GC bullets, especially if they are over 1800 fps?

Toss all your lube and go the powder coating route...thankfully, I got into casting post-the lubing days and never had to deal with lube.

Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE [Re: HenryL] #8475700 12/14/21 09:12 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 604
A
ASIC777 Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
A
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 604

Originally Posted by HenryL
Originally Posted by ASIC777
Following this because I have just started shooting cast bullets but I now have a question, do you still need to lube GC bullets, especially if they are over 1800 fps?

Toss all your lube and go the powder coating route...thankfully, I got into casting post-the lubing days and never had to deal with lube.


But I seem to recall folks have problems with coatings at speeds around 2,000 FPS? I understand the allure for pistol bullets.


Lifetime NRA Member
Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE [Re: wp75169] #8475912 12/14/21 11:51 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 426
M
McKinneyHusker Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
M
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 426
First and foremost will be the bullet diameter, it should at a minimum be .001 over bore most go .002 - .003 over bore size. Gas checked bullets can be fired at jacketed bullet speeds, although I would stay mid-range on the jacket bullet speeds.

Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE [Re: ASIC777] #8475922 12/15/21 12:04 AM
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 319
H
HenryL Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
H
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 319
Originally Posted by ASIC777

Originally Posted by HenryL
Originally Posted by ASIC777
Following this because I have just started shooting cast bullets but I now have a question, do you still need to lube GC bullets, especially if they are over 1800 fps?

Toss all your lube and go the powder coating route...thankfully, I got into casting post-the lubing days and never had to deal with lube.


But I seem to recall folks have problems with coatings at speeds around 2,000 FPS? I understand the allure for pistol bullets.

I've never had a single issue with powder coating at any speed with pistol or rifle, so I have nothing that I can contribute on that topic... it could just be I'm to ignorant to notice there is an issue - but my cast bullets reach the desired velocity and accuracy levels that I am after with no noticeable issues for a person of my skills level (which is to say, not an expert!). Mind you I currently only cast for:


Pistols
9MM
.40 S&W

Rifles
6.5 CM
30-30
300 Blackout
308 WIN
.50 Muzzleloader

Shotguns
12 GA. - Slugs only



Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE [Re: wp75169] #8479784 12/18/21 11:12 PM
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 353
B
Big Sam Online Content
Bird Dog
Online Content
Bird Dog
B
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 353
One of the great advantages of jacketed bullets is that so many things do not have to be just right to get decent results. Cast bullets in rifle cartridges are very sensitive to the smoothness of your bore, diameter of your bore, alloy of the bullet, lube on the bullet and the gas check. The hardness of the bullet is important but not in the sense that harder is better. You certainly want the bullet to be over bore diameter but that assumes you know your actual bore diameter. But you also want to drive the bullet hard enough for it to obturate in the more. That gives you a better seal, less leading and more accuracy.... all things being equal. Cast Performance bullets are pretty hard and take a lot of pressure to obturate in the barrel. If you were trying to run loads much slower you would probably need a softer bullet. This is harder to achieve in a micro groove barrel but hardly impossible. Generally you want to run with appropriate powders on the slower side.

Do your research and see what happens with velocity, accuray and bore leading as you develop loads. Remember that you have to clean all the bullet lube out of the bore to see how much leading has actually stuck in the more. A little bit of leading is not a big deal. When you are done you will have given yourself a good education in high speed lead bullets.


"Group think" is not thinking. It is the lack of independent thought. It is a cancer of the mind.
Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE [Re: wp75169] #8480121 12/19/21 11:44 AM
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,968
GasGuzzler Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,968
My 336RC waffle top is thankfully too old to have micro-grooving. I use a Ranch Dog Lee bullet designed for my Marlin. It's PC'd and GC'd and is loaded over IMR3031 as well (I have reduced loads using A2400 and Unique as well). Only difference is it's a .30-30WIN not 35Rem. Don't need to lube them, that's what the PC is for. Big Sam has good advice there.

[Linked Image][Linked Image]

And BEFORE I started powder coating (previous owner of the mold made the notes on the box).

[Linked Image][Linked Image]
[Linked Image][Linked Image]


Pass the gravy.


Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE [Re: GasGuzzler] #8480458 12/19/21 05:48 PM
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 353
B
Big Sam Online Content
Bird Dog
Online Content
Bird Dog
B
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 353
Originally Posted by GasGuzzler
My 336RC waffle top is thankfully too old to have micro-grooving. I use a Ranch Dog Lee bullet designed for my Marlin. It's PC'd and GC'd and is loaded over IMR3031 as well (I have reduced loads using A2400 and Unique as well). Only difference is it's a .30-30WIN not 35Rem. Don't need to lube them, that's what the PC is for. Big Sam has good advice there.

[Linked Image][Linked Image]

And BEFORE I started powder coating (previous owner of the mold made the notes on the box).

[Linked Image][Linked Image]
[Linked Image][Linked Image]




Thanks for your input GG. I have many thousands of rounds experience with coated handgun bullets but zero in a high powered rifle. I think the coating is more forgiving in handgun application vs lube. Would you say the same is true at rifle velocities????


"Group think" is not thinking. It is the lack of independent thought. It is a cancer of the mind.
Re: WLNGC Vs MICRO-GROOVE [Re: wp75169] #8481333 12/20/21 01:25 PM
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,968
GasGuzzler Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,968
I haven't tested much. Just started coating. Seems it's a win-win to me. Read this topic posted yesterday elsewhere about cast and coating .30-06 rounds.

CLICK HERE


Pass the gravy.


Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3