Forums46
Topics552,117
Posts9,900,457
Members88,167
|
Most Online28,231 Feb 7th, 2025
|
|
|
thermal mono/bino
#8433858
10/30/21 01:44 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,988
patriot07
OP
Extreme Tracker
|
OP
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,988 |
I know nothing about IR, thermal, etc. scopes. Is there a low-cost thermal monocular or binocular that would be worth getting just to keep an eye on animals at my place. Will not be used for hunting in any way, shape, or form.
|
|
|
Re: thermal mono/bino
[Re: patriot07]
#8433867
10/30/21 01:57 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 15,948
ntxtrapper
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 15,948 |
A FLIR Scout TK is about 500 bucks and would be my super low cost choice. Just get a new one so the internal rechargeable battery is fresh. Short range and not the greatest for definition but you will be able to find live critters in the dark. It goes up from there and you will get what you pay for.
|
|
|
Re: thermal mono/bino
[Re: patriot07]
#8433964
10/30/21 03:43 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 23,854
Bee'z
The Beedazzler
|
The Beedazzler
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 23,854 |
I would just use the scope. A good qd will go to zero I have tried it.
|
|
|
Re: thermal mono/bino
[Re: patriot07]
#8433971
10/30/21 03:56 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 891
HLo
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 891 |
Something less than $300...Bushnell Equinox Z to see 100-150 yards (Digital with IR Light) but tight FOV in my opinion and on a tripod much more stable picture. But usable over a red light. Red light with a regular scope is even cheaper and you can see a long ways with it. Spend $500 - $3K thermal monocular that can see much further (500 yards - 1,500 yards). The more money the clearer and longer distances you can see typically All about the use / budget.
Last edited by HLo; 10/30/21 03:58 AM.
HLo
|
|
|
Re: thermal mono/bino
[Re: HLo]
#8435458
11/01/21 01:33 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,988
patriot07
OP
Extreme Tracker
|
OP
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,988 |
Something less than $300...Bushnell Equinox Z to see 100-150 yards (Digital with IR Light) but tight FOV in my opinion and on a tripod much more stable picture. But usable over a red light. Red light with a regular scope is even cheaper and you can see a long ways with it. Spend $500 - $3K thermal monocular that can see much further (500 yards - 1,500 yards). The more money the clearer and longer distances you can see typically All about the use / budget. Low budget. Would like to easily see deer at 100-150 yards. Trees aren't clear enough to see further than that.
|
|
|
Re: thermal mono/bino
[Re: Bee'z]
#8435459
11/01/21 01:34 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,988
patriot07
OP
Extreme Tracker
|
OP
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,988 |
I would just use the scope. A good qd will go to zero I have tried it. What scope? I don't have a NV/IR scope
|
|
|
Re: thermal mono/bino
[Re: patriot07]
#8435478
11/01/21 01:59 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 23,854
Bee'z
The Beedazzler
|
The Beedazzler
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 23,854 |
I have a no longer made flir PTS233 with an ADM mount and the buddies I hunt with have pulsars with bobo mounts. We all scan with them and then mount up when we find something. YMMV
Skip nightvision and go IR. I had one and thermal even on the lower end is outstanding
|
|
|
Re: thermal mono/bino
[Re: patriot07]
#8435798
11/01/21 03:05 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,988
patriot07
OP
Extreme Tracker
|
OP
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,988 |
Can the thermal of IR see through light trees/brush out to 100-150 yards?
|
|
|
Re: thermal mono/bino
[Re: patriot07]
#8435829
11/01/21 03:44 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,025
gr8fuldoug
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,025 |
Interesting question…
So you’re going to be able to see stuff through some brush moving through the openings in the brush, but thermal cant see through a solid image like a tree.
|
|
|
Re: thermal mono/bino
[Re: patriot07]
#8435935
11/01/21 05:34 PM
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,546
TX_LT230FH
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,546 |
Can the thermal of IR see through light trees/brush out to 100-150 yards? Yes, you will have much better luck picking up animals in light brush/trees with a thermal than with NV. NV gets so much back-scatter from the brush that you're lucky if you can pick up the reflection from their eyes only. With the thermal you can see a small animal at 125-150 yards moving in the woods no problem.
|
|
|
Re: thermal mono/bino
[Re: patriot07]
#8435964
11/01/21 06:20 PM
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8,444
Double Naught Spy
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8,444 |
Can the thermal of IR see through light trees/brush out to 100-150 yards? Technically, no, it will not see through brush. It will see INTO brush via gaps in the foliage that NV won't pick out, but it will not see through anything solid (other than its own lens). It won't even see through window glass. However, THERE MUST BE DIRECT LINE OF SIGHT GAPS IN THE BRUSH FOR THERMAL TO SEE THE ANIMAL. Maybe you can see 125 yards into the forest that has little or no understory. Maybe you can see 5 yards into the forest that has a lot.
Last edited by Double Naught Spy; 11/01/21 06:21 PM.
|
|
|
Re: thermal mono/bino
[Re: Double Naught Spy]
#8435967
11/01/21 06:25 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,988
patriot07
OP
Extreme Tracker
|
OP
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,988 |
Can the thermal of IR see through light trees/brush out to 100-150 yards? Technically, no, it will not see through brush. It will see INTO brush via gaps in the foliage that NV won't pick out, but it will not see through anything solid (other than its own lens). It won't even see through window glass. However, THERE MUST BE DIRECT LINE OF SIGHT GAPS IN THE BRUSH FOR THERMAL TO SEE THE ANIMAL. Maybe you can see 125 yards into the forest that has little or no understory. Maybe you can see 5 yards into the forest that has a lot. Yeah the brush I want to see through will definitely have gaps and lines of sight. It's not super thick up front. And a lot of it in the back might be tree trunks and stuff like that - so hopefully it can just see around those.
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, txcornhusker
|