Forums46
Topics551,861
Posts9,897,506
Members88,155
|
Most Online28,231 Feb 7th, 2025
|
|
|
Disappointed in Ruger
#8017548
10/21/20 01:25 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,560
txtrophy85
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,560 |
Looked at the Ruger website...can’t get a standard Model M77 anymore. They have a nice walnut/stainless rifle in a limited caliber selection. Can’t even get a .270 anymore.
Forget a blued job unless you want a compact or safari model.
Looks like another classic hunting rifle is falling by the wayside
For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: txtrophy85]
#8017557
10/21/20 01:33 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 22,280
7mag
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 22,280 |
I have a M77 in 270 I have had for many yrs. It is NOT the the sought after tang safety though. But it is still my favorite bolt action I have in the safe. I still use it quite often so not a safe queen.
"Laugh with many, but don't trust any"
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: txtrophy85]
#8017580
10/21/20 01:58 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 123
CSA81
Woodsman
|
Woodsman
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 123 |
The first rifle I bought with my own money was a M77 in 220 swift. Still my favorite rifle and a joy to shoot. I’ve since picked up a 7-08 compact and 7WSM. All three are the standard blued with walnut stock. My dad recently got a Ruger African in 6.5 Swede and it’s incredible. For me, nothing will ever look better than the Winchester model 70 and the Ruger m77. The #1 is in its own class, just don’t own one yet. I know the Ruger Americans sell like crazy and they are simply filling demand. Cheap plastic guns or heavy barreled,1000yd guns are popular. Hopefully they continue to make them for distributor exclusives or in small batches.
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: txtrophy85]
#8017602
10/21/20 02:23 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,505
scottfromdallas
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,505 |
No one buys 270 anymore. It doesn't have all the modern case geometry that kills things so well.
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: txtrophy85]
#8017609
10/21/20 02:28 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,979
patriot07
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,979 |
I'm sure it's based on sales. When was the last time anyone on this forum went to the store and bought a new M77?
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: patriot07]
#8017620
10/21/20 02:39 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,505
scottfromdallas
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,505 |
I'm sure it's based on sales. When was the last time anyone on this forum went to the store and bought a new M77? They have gotten too pricey. I love the 77. Last one I bought one was 2006 when I bought one in 338 Federal. I paid $580 for it. Now they want close to a $1000 and I can get a Winchester 70 for the same price. Ruger 77 made its reputation as a solid hunting rifle that was about 25% cheaper then Remington, Winchester and Browning. They were a little rougher and came with a bad trigger that could easily be fixed. It was a working man's gun. They aren't worth what they are asking. Same thing they did with the Mini 14. Price them over what they are worth.
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: CSA81]
#8017640
10/21/20 03:08 AM
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 28,287
skinnerback
THF Celebrity Chef
|
THF Celebrity Chef
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 28,287 |
For me, nothing will ever look better than the Winchester model 70 Running right there with the Rem BDL & CDL. IMO I love the model 70.
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: scottfromdallas]
#8017696
10/21/20 05:01 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,560
txtrophy85
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,560 |
No one buys 270 anymore. It doesn't have all the modern case geometry that kills things so well.
my neighbor bought one yesterday! But you are right, i bet they are rare in new rifles coming off the factory line.
For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: patriot07]
#8017697
10/21/20 05:03 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,560
txtrophy85
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,560 |
I'm sure it's based on sales. When was the last time anyone on this forum went to the store and bought a new M77? I dont know many people period that are buying hunting rifles like that period, be it a model 700 BDL, a Winchester Model 70 or a M77. Everyone i run with are buying high end long range type rifles, save for a newbie buying his first deer rifle. Which probably has much to do with its no longer being offered. Hunters new to the sport are enticed by the low cost synthetic rifles like the Ruger American, Savage Axis, etc. They shoot good and can be had for under $400
For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: txtrophy85]
#8017806
10/21/20 12:50 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,615
Texas Dan
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,615 |
Hunters new to the sport are enticed by the low cost synthetic rifles like the Ruger American, Savage Axis, etc. They shoot good and can be had for under $400 I agree. The average newcomer today may not carry a strong legacy in firearm history that make them desire a more legendary rifle like the Winchester Model 70 or Remington Model 700. I even noticed that Savage is now offering multiple versions of their legendary Model 110 that include adjustable, synthetic stocks. Savage still offers a "Classic" version of the Model 110 but it doesn't carry the same look, at least in my opinion, as the original Model 110's. When I think of a legendary deer rifle, I think only of a rifle with a finely grained wood stock. I currently own just one rifle with a synthetic stock, a Remington Model 597 that I picked up for cheap target practice using .22 ammo. I consider it the ugliest rifle that I own.
Last edited by Texas Dan; 10/21/20 01:04 PM.
"When the debate is lost, insults become the tool of the loser."
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: txtrophy85]
#8017979
10/21/20 03:11 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,482
TSU99
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,482 |
Been disappointed in Ruger since the American line came out.
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: txtrophy85]
#8018034
10/21/20 03:55 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,386
pertnear
"Demolition Man"
|
"Demolition Man"
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,386 |
I've never cared much for any Ruger long guns other than the #1. It's amazing that the Ruger #1 seems like it is made by a different manufacturer compared to their other rifles. I'm still PO'd they quit making the #3's as part of there "bargain line" of rifles.
"I haven't shot a 1,000 deer, but I've sat around a 1,000 Texas camp fires. I'm a happy man." - pertnear
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: TSU99]
#8018120
10/21/20 05:10 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,560
txtrophy85
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,560 |
Been disappointed in Ruger since the American line came out. thats when it all started going downhill. I know its an incredibly successful line for them but damn, it sure turned them a completely different direction. I always thought the M77 line was a fantastic rifle, not a "working man's rifle" like many tout it, but on par with the model 70 and 700, and a good step above the Savage 110. They just had chitty triggers
For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: txtrophy85]
#8018202
10/21/20 06:35 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 296
George S
Bird Dog
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 296 |
The choice of cartridge offering by manufacturers is cyclical. The .270 will be back. Again.
Oderint dum metuant - Lucius Accius
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: George S]
#8018278
10/21/20 07:39 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,615
Texas Dan
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,615 |
The choice of cartridge offering by manufacturers is cyclical. The .270 will be back. Again.
Truth is, the .270 Winchester has never left the nation's Top Ten list of most popular rifle cartridges based on the number of factory loads that were available in 2019. Because getting total sales numbers for each caliber is practically impossible, about all we have to go on is the total number of load options that manufacturers are making available to retailers. .223 Remington - 421 loads .308 Winchester - 365 loads .30-06 Springfield - 269 loads .300 Winchester Magnum - 190 loads 7mm Remington Magnum - 150 loads .270 Winchester - 143 loads .300 ACC Blackout (BLK) - 137 loads .243 Winchester - 133 loads 6.5 Creedmoor - 122 loads .300 Winchester Short Magnum - 84 loads [list] [*]1.
"When the debate is lost, insults become the tool of the loser."
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: George S]
#8018279
10/21/20 07:39 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,615
Texas Dan
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,615 |
The choice of cartridge offering by manufacturers is cyclical. The .270 will be back. Again.
Truth is, the .270 Winchester remains a member (#6) of the nation's Top Ten list of most popular rifle cartridges based on the number of factory load options that were available in 2019. Because getting total sales numbers for each caliber is practically impossible, about all we have to go on is the total number of load options that manufacturers are making available to retailers. 1. .223 Remington - 421 loads 2. .308 Winchester - 365 loads 3. .30-06 Springfield - 269 loads 4. .300 Winchester Magnum - 190 loads 5. 7mm Remington Magnum - 150 loads 6. .270 Winchester - 143 loads 7. .300 ACC Blackout (BLK) - 137 loads 8. .243 Winchester - 133 loads 9. 6.5 Creedmoor - 122 loads 10. .300 Winchester Short Magnum - 84 loads Source
Last edited by Texas Dan; 10/21/20 08:44 PM.
"When the debate is lost, insults become the tool of the loser."
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: CSA81]
#8018333
10/21/20 08:18 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,696
Reloder28
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,696 |
The first rifle I bought with my own money was a M77 in 220 Swift. I did too in 1978. That gun was custom barrel accurate. Found out later the barrels were outsourced from Shilen.I think I paid about $250 for the rifle new.
You don't know what you don't know.........
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: txtrophy85]
#8018488
10/21/20 10:17 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 2,058
Adchunts
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 2,058 |
There appears to be two different groups of people buying rifles these days...the bargain hunter, and the Buzzsaw. Doesn’t seem to be much interest in the middle ground, so if you are a large manufacturer, you have to decide which group to pursue. High end guns probably make some money, but what is a major gun maker going to do with all the machinery and manpower they have invested in over decades? You gotta build what makes money, and what people want to buy.
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: Adchunts]
#8018537
10/21/20 10:54 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,615
Texas Dan
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,615 |
There appears to be two different groups of people buying rifles these days...the bargain hunter, and the Buzzsaw. Doesn’t seem to be much interest in the middle ground, so if you are a large manufacturer, you have to decide which group to pursue. High end guns probably make some money, but what is a major gun maker going to do with all the machinery and manpower they have invested in over decades? You gotta build what makes money, and what people want to buy. IMO, it's also driven by what buyers are able to find on store shelves. While you can easily find Henry rifles just about anywhere you look, try finding a Winchester. There are a few of the independent retailers that will maintain an extensive stock of rifles in many different calibers and brands, but you may have to drive a few miles to visit them. The largest retailer in my area has to be Able's Ammo in Huntsville. Their shelf is probably 40 feet long and three tiers deep.
Last edited by Texas Dan; 10/21/20 10:54 PM.
"When the debate is lost, insults become the tool of the loser."
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: txtrophy85]
#8018683
10/22/20 12:49 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,108
Michael W.
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,108 |
I have had several Model. 77 Rugers. I only kept one, in .308. Bought it about 35 yrs. ago if I recall right. Had it rebarreled with a Hart stainless barrel. Then about 15 yrs ago I bought a 50% completed thumbhole stock. Took about 3 weeks working in the evenings to get it finished. It shoots several different load into less than MOA. The one rifle that I likely never get rid of.
Last edited by Michael W.; 10/22/20 01:05 AM.
A clear conscience is often the sign of a fuzzy memory.
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: Adchunts]
#8018799
10/22/20 02:02 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,505
scottfromdallas
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,505 |
There appears to be two different groups of people buying rifles these days...the bargain hunter, and the Buzzsaw. Doesn’t seem to be much interest in the middle ground, so if you are a large manufacturer, you have to decide which group to pursue. High end guns probably make some money, but what is a major gun maker going to do with all the machinery and manpower they have invested in over decades? You gotta build what makes money, and what people want to buy. Pretty good post. Mid priced rifle sales have declined along with the middle class.
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: scottfromdallas]
#8018886
10/22/20 03:12 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,979
patriot07
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,979 |
There appears to be two different groups of people buying rifles these days...the bargain hunter, and the Buzzsaw. Doesn’t seem to be much interest in the middle ground, so if you are a large manufacturer, you have to decide which group to pursue. High end guns probably make some money, but what is a major gun maker going to do with all the machinery and manpower they have invested in over decades? You gotta build what makes money, and what people want to buy. Pretty good post. Mid priced rifle sales have declined along with the middle class. I'm not sure I agree with that. Tikka CTR can't stay in stock. People use it for hunting, target shooting, etc. Ruger just happens to be inferior in every way, and roughly the same price-wise.
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: txtrophy85]
#8019153
10/22/20 01:22 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,214
J.G.
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,214 |
There are pretty rifles, with high gloss wood, and high gloss bluing. Those are works of art.
There are utility rifles, with blasted finish, and synthetic stocks. Those are utility rifles, like an Estwing hammer. People are gravitating more toward utility rifles. They need them to work, work in all weather, and not cause the user to get bent out of shape over a scratch. Go before show. Shoot straight, all the time, in every state of the union.
And to say the Ruger American is bad, does not add up to me. The RPR and Americans I've shot all did very well. They shot surprisingly tight.
![[Linked Image]](http://www.precisionriflehunters.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/garvey.jpg) 800 Yard Steel Range Precision Rifle Instruction Memberships and Classes Available
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: txtrophy85]
#8019196
10/22/20 01:46 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 40,679
redchevy
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 40,679 |
Pretty rifles are great to look at but i think to most people they are not practical. Did you buy it to look at or to use? Will a pretty rifle do the dirty work? Sure but it will bear the marks of it. I dont think most people are willing to do that to their pretty rifle. Thus the "utility" rifle Fireman mentions is taking off. I know i fall into that category.
It's hell eatin em live
|
|
|
Re: Disappointed in Ruger
[Re: redchevy]
#8019209
10/22/20 01:51 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,214
J.G.
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,214 |
Pretty rifles are great to look at but i think to most people they are not practical. Did you buy it to look at or to use? Will a pretty rifle do the dirty work? Sure but it will bear the marks of it. I dont think most people are willing to do that to their pretty rifle. Thus the "utility" rifle Fireman mentions is taking off. I know i fall into that category. The only rifles I own with wood stocks are my Marlin lever actions. They're blued, and I have to fight to keep them from rusting. Dinging the wood bugs me, but it's gonna happen. I hate those synthetic lever guns, though. But I love stainless and synthetic bolt actions. The bolt actions are wrenches, and I treat them like wrenches. I take care of them, but scratches and dings are part of the deal. Any time I've been a guest on a lease, a ranch, or lately hunting with my first guide, I get the same reply when they see whatever rifle or rifles I show up with. "Well, I can tell you shoot those things."
![[Linked Image]](http://www.precisionriflehunters.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/garvey.jpg) 800 Yard Steel Range Precision Rifle Instruction Memberships and Classes Available
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|