texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Buff65, TrophyHtr316, Pete's, DeVoBrown, JBRYANT 82
72089 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,802
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,539
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 44,028
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,481
Posts9,737,546
Members87,089
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Stoeger M3000 vs M3500 #7659297 11/12/19 05:47 AM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 12
S
shschofield Offline OP
Light Foot
OP Offline
Light Foot
S
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 12
I’ve been in the market for a semi auto shotgun for a while. Something that won’t break the bank but won’t give me issues either. I’ve read really good things about the Stoeger M3500 and pretty much had my mind made up, but when at Academy earlier today; I saw they had the M3000 on sale for $475. As far as I can tell, the only difference is the 3500 can shoot up to 3.5in shells while the 3000 can only shoot up to 3in. My question is. Does anyone have any experience with one of or both of these, and any advice on which to go with? I like the ability to shoot 3.5in shells, but the price difference makes it a difficult choice. Gun would be an all around wing shooting and clay gun. TIA

Re: Stoeger M3000 vs M3500 [Re: shschofield] #7659363 11/12/19 12:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,394
B
booradley Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
B
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,394
Don’t own either one, owned a M2000 a long time ago and it worked. Son-in-law has a M3500 that’s seen light and he’s not had any issues with it.

If one of the uses was Sporting Clays there’s absolutely no way I’d have a 3500. The chances are too great of it not cycling light target loads. I wouldn’t own a 3000 either for clays but I’d have one before I’d have a 3500. Many people, including myself, have no use for a 3.5” 12 gauge semi-automatic shotgun even for geese. I also can’t think of a worse 3.5” semi-auto to own than a M3500. The recoil is big time detached retina heavy. A gas operated 3.5” shooting 3.5” shells will have a lot less felt recoil than the inertia operated M3500.

For the same amount of money you could get a Mossberg 930 or a Weatherby SA-08 which I believe are much better shotguns, especially for wing shooting and clays.


Don’t roll those bloodshot eyes at me.
Re: Stoeger M3000 vs M3500 [Re: shschofield] #7659579 11/12/19 04:00 PM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 12
S
shschofield Offline OP
Light Foot
OP Offline
Light Foot
S
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 12
Thanks for the response. I’ve owned a benelli nova 12 guage pump for a few years and have put a couple thousand rounds through it ranging from light2 3/4 target to 3.5in. I’m new to the semi auto world and was wondering if you had any insight to the comparison of recoil between that of the inertia driven and that of a pump? I’m a big guy and the recoil doesn’t bother me any but was curious if it’s more or less of a kick.

Re: Stoeger M3000 vs M3500 [Re: shschofield] #7659601 11/12/19 04:16 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 26,250
KRoyal Online Sleepy
Texoma Legend
Online Sleepy
Texoma Legend
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 26,250
I've owned both the 2500 pistol grip turkey model and 3000 26" barrel camo model, I don't use the 3 1/2 shells for ducks so never needed one. I also have the M3K 3000 model made for 3Gun competitions. I've duck, dove, and turkey hunted with mine and have shot a lot of shells through them ranging from light target loads to heavy duck loads. Only problem I ever had was from me not cleaning it after 2 seasons and it jammed once. Have not had a problem since. I shot a nova before I bought mine and can't tell a difference between the two recoil wise.

I would hands down buy the Stoeger over the Mossberg 930, there are tons of horror stories online about that gun.


[Linked Image]



Re: Stoeger M3000 vs M3500 [Re: shschofield] #7659642 11/12/19 04:45 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,183
T
Tactical Cowboy Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
T
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,183
3000. I can’t ever see me shooting 3.5”


The secret to a long life is to try not to shorten it.
Re: Stoeger M3000 vs M3500 [Re: shschofield] #7662420 11/15/19 02:44 AM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,394
B
booradley Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
B
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,394
“ I would hands down buy the Stoeger over the Mossberg 930, there are tons of horror stories online about that gun.”

I’ve read more horror stories about Stoeger semi’s than I have about 930’s. I owned a 930 and had good luck with it.


Don’t roll those bloodshot eyes at me.
Re: Stoeger M3000 vs M3500 [Re: shschofield] #7663345 11/16/19 02:03 AM
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,706
Master Plumb Online Content
Pro Tracker
Online Content
Pro Tracker
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,706
I have the 3000 awesome gun.

Re: Stoeger M3000 vs M3500 [Re: booradley] #7663406 11/16/19 03:27 AM
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 29,672
S
Sneaky Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
S
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 29,672
Originally Posted by booradley
“ I would hands down buy the Stoeger over the Mossberg 930, there are tons of horror stories online about that gun.”

I’ve read more horror stories about Stoeger semi’s than I have about 930’s. I owned a 930 and had good luck with it.


And....I wouldn’t spend my money on either.

Re: Stoeger M3000 vs M3500 [Re: shschofield] #7668780 11/21/19 03:53 PM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 12
S
shschofield Offline OP
Light Foot
OP Offline
Light Foot
S
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 12
Update...picked up the m3000 last weekend. Taking it duck hunting on Sunday, so we’ll see how it does!

Re: Stoeger M3000 vs M3500 [Re: shschofield] #7668790 11/21/19 04:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 26,250
KRoyal Online Sleepy
Texoma Legend
Online Sleepy
Texoma Legend
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 26,250
Good choice I really like mine and have no complaints


[Linked Image]



Re: Stoeger M3000 vs M3500 [Re: shschofield] #7701630 12/29/19 11:09 PM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 12
S
shschofield Offline OP
Light Foot
OP Offline
Light Foot
S
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 12
Figured Id offer an update. I have taken the gun on a duck hunt, as well as skeet shooting a couple times in the last month and it has performed really well. Aside from a couple shells (out of about 100) not fully ejecting, it has not had a single issue. And those shells may just be because they were light loads and the gun hadn't been fully broken in yet.

Re: Stoeger M3000 vs M3500 [Re: shschofield] #7701917 12/30/19 03:50 AM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,779
P_102 Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,779
One thing about inertia guns, the butt needs to be firmly against the shoulder or it could have cycling problems.... not saying yours wasn’t, just that it can happen.


Do not trifle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
Re: Stoeger M3000 vs M3500 [Re: P_102] #7702431 12/30/19 08:47 PM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 12
S
shschofield Offline OP
Light Foot
OP Offline
Light Foot
S
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 12
Thanks for the insight. It very well may not have been.

Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3