texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
victorcaoh, gtmill6619, cpen13, Huntinkid, garey
72055 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,797
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,527
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,930
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,035
Posts9,732,223
Members87,055
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: No brow tines = cull? [Re: DQ Kid] #7498562 04/28/19 01:31 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,221
Grizz Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,221
Originally Posted by DQ Kid
Originally Posted by Grizz
Statistically, if they have no brow tines at 3.5 I would cull them. However, there are always exceptions to the rule. This guy had no brown tines at 2.5 and tiny bumps at 3.5. I killed him at 4.5 and he scored 164. He still didn't have much for brown tines but he was a heck of a buck (my personal best). I guess my point is to look at more than the brown tines before making your decision.

[Linked Image]

Great buck Grizz, what county, how large a place if I may ask?



350 acres in Stephens Co.


[Linked Image] [Linked Image]
Re: No brow tines = cull? [Re: sbushee] #7501612 05/01/19 07:30 PM
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,579
S
Son of a Blitch Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Online Content
Extreme Tracker
S
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,579
We have a lot of bucks without brow tines in Dimmit County. I have probably taken 15 of them in the last 15 years. Cull them at 2.5 sometimes. At 3.5 if they don't have any brows at all, like this one below, they are green lighted.

[Linked Image]


PS - nice buck, Grizz!!!!

Last edited by Son of a Blitch; 05/01/19 07:31 PM.

George Blitch
george@mapmyranch.com
www.SonofaBlitch.com
www.MapMyRanch.com
www.YouTube.com/@sonofablitch
"Keep your aim as true as your word" - GB
Re: No brow tines = cull? [Re: Grizz] #7501632 05/01/19 07:57 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,685
T
txbobcat Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
T
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,685
Originally Posted by Grizz
Statistically, if they have no brow tines at 3.5 I would cull them. However, there are always exceptions to the rule. This guy had no brown tines at 2.5 and tiny bumps at 3.5. I killed him at 4.5 and he scored 164. He still didn't have much for brown tines but he was a heck of a buck (my personal best). I guess my point is to look at more than the brown tines before making your decision.

[Linked Image]


Was he tagged?

Re: No brow tines = cull? [Re: txbobcat] #7501909 05/02/19 12:21 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,221
Grizz Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,221
Originally Posted by txbobcat
Originally Posted by Grizz
Statistically, if they have no brow tines at 3.5 I would cull them. However, there are always exceptions to the rule. This guy had no brown tines at 2.5 and tiny bumps at 3.5. I killed him at 4.5 and he scored 164. He still didn't have much for brown tines but he was a heck of a buck (my personal best). I guess my point is to look at more than the brown tines before making your decision.

[Linked Image]


Was he tagged?


License tag? Yes.


[Linked Image] [Linked Image]
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3