texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
victorcaoh, gtmill6619, cpen13, Huntinkid, garey
72055 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,796
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,526
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,923
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,021
Posts9,731,915
Members87,055
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Porting or Muzzle Brake? #7396804 01/06/19 05:11 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 348
A
aka_SUBMOAS Offline OP
Bird Dog
OP Offline
Bird Dog
A
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 348
Been hunting and filming lately and was wondering if anyone has ever installed a muzzle brake or had there in-line ported? Not worried about recoil but more of smoke redirection.
Thanks, Gary


Make The First Shot Count.....
Re: Porting or Muzzle Brake? [Re: aka_SUBMOAS] #7403143 01/13/19 12:39 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,038
V
Vern1 Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
V
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,038
They don't call them smoke poles for nothing!

You might try Pyrodex??
I'm a traditional front stuffer and always used FFg or FFFg black powder in my 45 and 50.
I've never tried Pyrodex so don't know if it smokes less or not.

I am tempted to switch mostly due to cleanup.
My wife doesn't care much about me jumping in shower with the barrel to clean it out after each session!

Last edited by Vern1; 01/13/19 12:40 PM.

Cheers,
Vern1
Texans since The Old 300 in 1824
NRA Lifetime Member
Re: Porting or Muzzle Brake? [Re: aka_SUBMOAS] #7403323 01/13/19 04:32 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 20,951
Sniper John Online Happy
gumshoe
Online Happy
gumshoe
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 20,951
Interesting thought. If you use loose powder, you would have to adapt something to get past the ports so not to lose powder when loading it. If you use sabots, I would wonder if there could be a problem with the ports damaging the sabot while loading or while it exits the barrel. For example a shotgun for duck hunting with a ported wad stripping choke that separates the wad from the pellets as it exits the barrrel. I think a ported barrel for a muzzleloader would have to have been engineered and tested for that type of rifle and load be it size of holes, angle of ports, etc. to work right. Or maybe a clamp on barrel brake to push the smoke to the sides. Then if it does not work, it can be removed and not leave you with a messed up barrel. Personally I think a ported barrel or brake both would make overall visibility worse. Another option since you can shoot smokeless in Texas is to pick up a smokeless muzzleloader.

Re: Porting or Muzzle Brake? [Re: aka_SUBMOAS] #7403894 01/14/19 08:51 AM
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 1,012
O
Old Stony Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
O
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 1,012
Smokeless muzzleloader ?? Excuse me but I just had a big chill running up my spine !!

Re: Porting or Muzzle Brake? [Re: aka_SUBMOAS] #7404069 01/14/19 02:51 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,549
R
redchevy Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,549
Pyrodexx RS smokes like a tires on fire.


It's hell eatin em live
Re: Porting or Muzzle Brake? [Re: Old Stony] #7404623 01/14/19 11:44 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,506
kmon11 Online Shocked
junior
Online Shocked
junior
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,506
Originally Posted by Old Stony
Smokeless muzzleloader ?? Excuse me but I just had a big chill running up my spine !!


Yup they make them. Savage made one for several years.


lf the saying "Liar, Liar your pants on fire" were true
Mainstream news might be fun to watch
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3