Forums46
Topics552,139
Posts9,900,679
Members88,167
|
Most Online28,231 Feb 7th, 2025
|
|
|
Re: Interesting article on the .270 in American Rifleman
[Re: Nogalus Prairie]
#6283607
05/02/16 05:17 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,584
txtrophy85
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,584 |
I am a .270 guy too. O'Connor sucked me in back in the day as a kid reading Outdoor Life. In east TX in the '70s it was actually not all that easy to find .270 cartridges. The .30-06 was still king by a long shot. Pump action and semi auto Remington's in .30-06 was the east Texas gun of choice
For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
|
|
|
Re: Interesting article on the .270 in American Rifleman
[Re: J.G.]
#6283680
05/02/16 06:11 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,410
WileyCoyote
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,410 |
Way back when I was repping for a Dallas based SG distributor in the late '70's, a dealer in Longview, Tony Valentino @ Tony's H&T, who delighted in ribbing everyone, but specialized in getting reps goats whenever possible...asked me a question in front of a retail customer of his who couldn't make up his mind in the classic 270 x '06 question that I'd never heard before...."Where would you need to live to own a 30'06 or a 270 to be accepted in deer camp??" I answered that since an old time gunsmith in Gregg County apparently had proclaimed 30'06 was king and derided everyone miserably that owned a 270...you'd prolly need to live in Longview to own a 30'06...Tony laughed, thought about it, and then gave us a name of a long dead 'smith that fit my description. Then asked the 2nd part of the 270 ??...and I replied ..."Smith County, since I knew that Richard "Mac" McBride in downtown Tyler across from the fire Station sold the poohwah out of 270's whenever possible"...That settled the deal since the retail customer was from Van Zandt County that is closer to Tyler than it is to Longview...and he walked out with a brand new 742 in 270...one of only 5 or 10 that Tony had in stock...to the never less than 50 or 60 742 '06's at any one time after September 1st...and sell out what ever he had left at Christmas.
I wish I had a Dollar for every Remmy 742 or 760 30'06 & case of Green box rifle ammo I sold all over East Texas from Paris to Beaumont in those days, as my retirement would be forever secure. I sold mostly Bolt actions west of Tyler ...and Houston or DFW and 90% Winchester ammo west of I-35.
Folks used to ask me what to buy caliber wise incessantly in those days...my standard answer was...what does your preacher, granddady's, daddy, uncles and cousins all shoot ...and thats what you buy so you can get some sleep at nite in deer camp without any harrasment. Ron
It is TIME for Term Limits, cause Politicians are like childrens diapers and for the same reasons...Robin Williams "These are the times that try men's soul's"...Thomas Paine
"Those who fail to learn from History are doomed to repeat it" ....Santayana
|
|
|
Re: Interesting article on the .270 in American Rifleman
[Re: J.G.]
#6283695
05/02/16 06:27 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
Nogalus Prairie
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091 |
Y'all are so right. The old Remington pumps and autos (Gamemaster 740 and Woodsmaster 760 IIRC) in .30-06 were the most common rifles in every east TX camp. Of course, the Winchester 94 in .30-30 was pretty dang common too.
I learned long ago you can't reason someone out of something they don't reason themselves into.
|
|
|
Re: Interesting article on the .270 in American Rifleman
[Re: J.G.]
#6283729
05/02/16 06:50 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,426
DuckCoach1985
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,426 |
I have a 1970s winchester model 70 with the 20" barrel in .270 inherited from my grandpa. Not the prettiest rifle in the world but I love it! Stupid accurate with the 150 gr SP Core-Lokts, and tons of knock down power. Neck shot on this doe back in January right around 120 yards. DRT 
Last edited by DuckCoach1985; 05/02/16 06:54 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Interesting article on the .270 in American Rifleman
[Re: DuckCoach1985]
#6283774
05/02/16 07:19 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,263
J.G.
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,263 |
Call me a psychopath, but that's my favorite shot on does and coyotes, and I do it suppressed.
Peeeww, thump...thud.
No tracking, no meat damaged. (deer meat not coyote meat)
![[Linked Image]](http://www.precisionriflehunters.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/garvey.jpg) 800 Yard Steel Range Precision Rifle Instruction Memberships and Classes Available
|
|
|
Re: Interesting article on the .270 in American Rifleman
[Re: txtrophy85]
#6284020
05/02/16 10:03 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,903
JJH
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,903 |
[quote=ckat][quote=Texas Dan]
The .280 is a necked down 06'. The brass is the same
Not quite...the 280 headspace is longer so as not to be chamber-able in a 270. And the overall case length is the same as the 270...longer than the 30/06.
|
|
|
Re: Interesting article on the .270 in American Rifleman
[Re: J.G.]
#6284527
05/03/16 10:51 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,828
colt45-90
Texas colt45
|
Texas colt45
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,828 |
I've wondered for years how the bullet came to be, and was sitting between the 6.5 mm and very close to the 7mm. This may be an explanation.
"It is said that the development of the .270 began in 1923. Surely Winchester engineers didn't pull the bullet diameter out of thin air, so at that time their reason for settling on .277" must have been based on some sort of rationale. Unfortunately, it seems to have been lost to the sands of time."
"If you think about it, it's an odd choice: The difference between .277 and 7mm is just 0.007", truly not enough to argue about. The difference between .270 and the 6.5 mm is a bit more, 0.013", but still hardly enough to get worked up over."
"It does seem that the company's goal was to increase velocity and flatten trajectory by necking down the .30-06 Sprg. case- perhaps with an eye toward reducing recoil as well. An internet search turned up several interesting comments, including that the 6.5 mm and 7mm were "European" bullet diameter, both with numerous cartridges and case dimensions already on the market, but unlikely to sell well in a post-World War I America. And there was still one incredibly simple explanation that never, ever crossed my mind: Multiply our popular .308" diameter by .90 and the result is .277". So the .270" is 90 percent of, or 10 percent smaller than , the then-standard .30 caliber. Perhaps that is coincidence and the explanation remains lost- or perhaps that 10 percent represented the engineering design goal."
That seems very plausible to me. I have heard comments about the twist on the .270, what would be the ideal twist, 1-8 or 1-9?
hold on Newt, we got a runaway
|
|
|
Re: Interesting article on the .270 in American Rifleman
[Re: colt45-90]
#6284618
05/03/16 12:48 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,263
J.G.
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,263 |
Berger recently made a 170 gr high BC bullet for the .270. It will need a 1:8 twist to stabilize. That's half the battle, the other half is getting barrel makers to make that twist in .277
I only see a small section of shooters that will be interested in the bullet and the barrel to stabilize it. And that will be the ones that already have lots of .270 brass and dies. Anyone else wanting to build a long action hotrod will probably just go to a 7mm or 6.5mm,like has been done for decades.
![[Linked Image]](http://www.precisionriflehunters.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/garvey.jpg) 800 Yard Steel Range Precision Rifle Instruction Memberships and Classes Available
|
|
|
Re: Interesting article on the .270 in American Rifleman
[Re: J.G.]
#6284685
05/03/16 01:42 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 40,704
redchevy
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 40,704 |
Yep when I read about the 170 grain .277 bullets berger was making I was almost committed to yanking the barrel off my 270 for a build, but then thought about it for a sec and said heck if im going to build one its gonna be something other than a 270 limited to one bullet choice.
It's hell eatin em live
|
|
|
Re: Interesting article on the .270 in American Rifleman
[Re: redchevy]
#6284747
05/03/16 02:14 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,263
J.G.
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,263 |
^^Exactly.
Go down a caliber, and up a caliber, and you get yourself a wide variety of bullet choices. Especially when going to the 7mm. Keeping the same action it would be too easy to re-chamber it for 280 Ackley. And bras can be had without fire forming.
![[Linked Image]](http://www.precisionriflehunters.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/garvey.jpg) 800 Yard Steel Range Precision Rifle Instruction Memberships and Classes Available
|
|
|
Re: Interesting article on the .270 in American Rifleman
[Re: J.G.]
#6284777
05/03/16 02:29 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 40,704
redchevy
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 40,704 |
^^Exactly.
Go down a caliber, and up a caliber, and you get yourself a wide variety of bullet choices. Especially when going to the 7mm. Keeping the same action it would be too easy to re-chamber it for 280 Ackley. And bras can be had without fire forming. I know you can chamber/shoot 280 in a 280 AI, but can you accitentaly chamber a 280AI in a 280 Rem? My thoughts tell me no. I load for my dad's 280 and don't want a 280AI if it would lead to issues with that.
It's hell eatin em live
|
|
|
Re: Interesting article on the .270 in American Rifleman
[Re: redchevy]
#6284801
05/03/16 02:39 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,263
J.G.
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 43,263 |
280 A.I. won't fit in a 280 chamber. Straight walls, and a different shoulder angle.
![[Linked Image]](http://www.precisionriflehunters.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/garvey.jpg) 800 Yard Steel Range Precision Rifle Instruction Memberships and Classes Available
|
|
|
Re: Interesting article on the .270 in American Rifleman
[Re: BigPig]
#6297139
05/13/16 02:17 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,084
bigbob_ftw
Big Sprocket Bob
|
Big Sprocket Bob
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,084 |
Interesting stuff. I love my 270 X2 X3
|
|
|
Re: Interesting article on the .270 in American Rifleman
[Re: J.G.]
#6299839
05/16/16 06:09 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 20
PA17
Light Foot
|
Light Foot
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 20 |
Jack O'Connor was right then and still is today when he wrote: "If the hunter does his part, the .270 will not let him down."
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|