Forums46
Topics546,797
Posts9,839,671
Members87,758
|
Most Online25,604 Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: txtrophy85]
#5537717
01/12/15 06:49 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,994
Judd
#1 Creedmoor Fan
|
#1 Creedmoor Fan
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,994 |
I knew this was one of two things....quarter bore homers or folks that knew the rifle they owned was better than everyone elses. Thanks for not disappointing. Then it turned into a richard measuring contest... congrats to the winner. We were told a while back the 22 hornet is the best so I'll stick with that, no way I'm changing to a quarter bore.
Don't let your ears hear what your eyes didn't see, and don't let your mouth say what your heart doesn't feel
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: txtrophy85]
#5537724
01/12/15 06:50 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 373
Scooterb
Bird Dog
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 373 |
Let's get back to the topic at hand here...I took the 257 Wby data with a 115VLD at a b.c. of .466 and compared it to the mighty 6.5 Creedmoor with it's 140 Amax and .585 b.c. I picked these two as comparisons because: A.)There are factory loaded rounds available with these bullets. B.) They are widely talked about on this forum for much different reasons. I plugged this data into 3 different ballistic calculators, (Strelok, JBM Ballistics, and handloads.com) I came up with some surprising information. Using the factory loaded manufacturers specs on both boxes of ammo, HSM loaded 257 Wby 115VLD at 3320fps and Hornady's 140 Amax match load with the A-max at 2710, I compared these figures and they are as follows: Handloads.com/calc Less than 1" of windage difference at 1k yards...Energy the same out to 900yds... JBM Ballistics Calc The table on the right of the table is a 270WSM HSM round at 3060 with a 150 VLD at .531 which also gets a bad reputation for "low b.c." on this forum. .1, yes, POINT ONE MOA windage difference at 1k yards between the .585 Amax and the .466 VLD 2.5% difference in energy with a nod to the Creedmoor at 1k yards with 21.7% greater bullet weight What say you? I say we are arguing for absolutely no reason when the numbers are nearly identical...
Last edited by Scooterb; 01/12/15 06:53 PM. Reason: Edited for clarity's sake
"I have too many guns," said no one, ever.
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: Judd]
#5537726
01/12/15 06:51 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053
bo3
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053 |
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: Scooterb]
#5537737
01/12/15 06:58 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053
bo3
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053 |
Let's get back to the topic at hand here...I took the 257 Wby data with a 115VLD at a b.c. of .466 and compared it to the mighty 6.5 Creedmoor with it's 140 Amax and .585 b.c. I picked these two as comparisons because: A.)There are factory loaded rounds available with these bullets. B.) They are widely talked about on this forum for much different reasons. I plugged this data into 3 different ballistic calculators, (Strelok, JBM Ballistics, and handloads.com) I came up with some surprising information. Using the factory loaded manufacturers specs on both boxes of ammo, HSM loaded 257 Wby 115VLD at 3320fps and Hornady's 140 Amax match load with the A-max at 2710, I compared these figures and they are as follows: Handloads.com/calc Less than 1" of windage difference at 1k yards...Energy the same out to 900yds... JBM Ballistics Calc The table on the right of the table is a 270WSM HSM round at 3060 with a 150 VLD at .531 which also gets a bad reputation for "low b.c." on this forum. .1, yes, POINT ONE MOA windage difference at 1k yards between the .585 Amax and the .466 VLD 2.5% difference in energy with a nod to the Creedmoor at 1k yards with 21.7% greater bullet weight What say you? I say we are arguing for absolutely no reason when the numbers are nearly identical... But there is about 80 inches of difference in the drop. This thread is about the flattest shooting. However I would use the creedmore for 1000 yards for the barrel life over the 257.
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: bo3]
#5537738
01/12/15 06:58 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 42,479
J.G.
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 42,479 |
So I failed to tell the whole story and that leads you to giving out more advice without all the facts.
Swapping what loads?
I ran the 55's from start to finish on that barrel. The reason it was finished is because the throat was eroded to the point that when I only had .224" of bullet sitting in the neck (the minimum) my bullets were jumping .100" to lands. I ran 500 more loads that season. I had to get a new barrel, and that was my opportunity to improve the external ballistics of the cartridge. And by the way, there is no published data I could find for a 22-250 pushing a 75 gr bullet. How in the world did I make it shoot? I asked for help from the THF and got one guy that had been down the same road. I took his data and used it. I did not argue with him, only thanked him. So was I supposed to read your mind to get the whole story? Kinda funny you burned out the barrel with a bullet it wouldn't stabilize. This forum is here to help each other. By your last sentence, I shouldn't question you and thank you for being on the same forum as me? Good thing you're not condescending to the new guy that's in over his head and doesn't worship BC. The real question here is, is it flatter to 500 then a 257 wby ( 3600fps BC of .4). How the hell does the 1:14 not stabilize a 55 gr? I put over 1500 rounds through the barrel with each bullet being stabilized just fine. You can question all you want. But do not hand out free advice on how I should laod for my rifles whithout knowing all the facts.
800 Yard Steel Range Precision Rifle Instruction Memberships and Classes Available
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: txtrophy85]
#5537743
01/12/15 07:01 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 329
bside
Bird Dog
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 329 |
Scooter, do you think it's really a good comparison to put a .308 class load up against 2 magnum loads and act like it's apples to apples?
why not .264 WM?
"hey guys, I stacked the deck by burning a lot more powder and the lower bc bullets almost held onto enough speed out to 1k"
Maybe that's not 100% fair, but you get my point, right?
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: bo3]
#5537751
01/12/15 07:07 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 42,479
J.G.
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 42,479 |
http://www.precisionrifleseries.com/news...pment-list.htmlWell I guess all these guys are all wrong and should be shooting a quarter bore. What do they know? I've only shot at (well I lost count) of these matches and not a .257 or .277 in the lot. Maybe I should switch over and gain a tad of an advantage.
800 Yard Steel Range Precision Rifle Instruction Memberships and Classes Available
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: txtrophy85]
#5537758
01/12/15 07:11 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 44,461
rifleman
Sparkly Pants
|
Sparkly Pants
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 44,461 |
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: J.G.]
#5537777
01/12/15 07:22 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053
bo3
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053 |
http://www.precisionrifleseries.com/news...pment-list.htmlWell I guess all these guys are all wrong and should be shooting a quarter bore. What do they know? I've only shot at (well I lost count) of these matches and not a .257 or .277 in the lot. Maybe I should switch over and gain a tad of an advantage. Going by that, you better get rid of your 7 mag. Only 3 shooters using a 7mm must be a dieing bore. No .223 either. Better let me take care about of that 22-250 for you.
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: bo3]
#5537781
01/12/15 07:26 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 42,479
J.G.
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 42,479 |
That aint benchrest. 7 Mag would recoil too hard and you wouldn't witness impact, or splash when shooting positional. You have to spot for yourself.
.224" anything gets pushed by the wind too much. 6, 6.5, and 7-08 are the balance of both worlds.
Next?
800 Yard Steel Range Precision Rifle Instruction Memberships and Classes Available
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: rifleman]
#5537783
01/12/15 07:27 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 329
bside
Bird Dog
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 329 |
.257stw load leaving at 4000 fps... 800 yds speed 2229 fps energy 1103 fpe time 0.808 sec drop -104.61 in 10mph drift 36.81 in 7mm 180Hybrid in a 7RM @ 3080 V: 2025 E: 1674 Drop: -111.78 Drift: 31.58 Time: 0.95 could probably do ~3200 on a STW/7-300 if we went wildcat with that bullet (102.49 drop, 29.69 drift) BC still wins.
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: rifleman]
#5537786
01/12/15 07:28 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 42,479
J.G.
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 42,479 |
If the chart isnt in Mils or MOA it was not produced by a distance shooter.
800 Yard Steel Range Precision Rifle Instruction Memberships and Classes Available
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: bside]
#5537805
01/12/15 07:35 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 44,461
rifleman
Sparkly Pants
|
Sparkly Pants
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 44,461 |
.257stw load leaving at 4000 fps... 800 yds speed 2229 fps energy 1103 fpe time 0.808 sec drop -104.61 in 10mph drift 36.81 in 7mm 180Hybrid in a 7RM @ 3080 V: 2025 E: 1674 Drop: -111.78 Drift: 31.58 Time: 0.95 could probably do ~3200 on a STW/7-300 if we went wildcat with that bullet (102.49 drop, 29.69 drift) BC still wins. Against a terrible LR bullet in the tsx.
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: J.G.]
#5537806
01/12/15 07:36 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053
bo3
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053 |
That aint benchrest. 7 Mag would recoil too hard and you wouldn't witness impact, or splash when shooting positional. You have to spot for yourself.
.224" anything gets pushed by the wind too much. 6, 6.5, and 7-08 are the balance of both worlds.
Next? So the link can be used to bash 257 and 277 but nothing else? I can see my hits with a 257 without a brake. So that means its better then you're 7 mag for competition? I'm confused but I think as low ng as it supports your side the link is good. If used against you its bad.
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: rifleman]
#5537814
01/12/15 07:39 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 329
bside
Bird Dog
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 329 |
Against a terrible LR bullet in the tsx.
You provided the data dude. don't get mad at me for comparing it against a bullet ~900 fps slower
Last edited by bside; 01/12/15 07:39 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: txtrophy85]
#5537823
01/12/15 07:41 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053
bo3
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053 |
The 257 is not the best round for every thing but its hard to beat where its good. To beat its short rang trajectory you have to use a stw, rum, ruger (nosler), or 378 weatherby case. Isn't this what the op was asking?
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: bo3]
#5537836
01/12/15 07:45 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,091
txtrophy85
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,091 |
The 257 is not the best round for every thing but its hard to beat where its good. To beat its short rang trajectory you have to use a stw, rum, ruger (nosler), or 378 weatherby case. Isn't this what the op was asking? Yes....it was exactly what I was asking
For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: bside]
#5537837
01/12/15 07:45 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 44,461
rifleman
Sparkly Pants
|
Sparkly Pants
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 44,461 |
Against a terrible LR bullet in the tsx.
You provided the data dude. don't get mad at me for comparing it against a bullet ~900 fps slower Just yanked it off their website, run it against equal bullets or a 115 VLD that should run 3800. With 300yd zero, you should be able to hold on hair 0-500.
Last edited by rifleman; 01/12/15 07:46 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: bo3]
#5537838
01/12/15 07:46 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 42,479
J.G.
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 42,479 |
Shoot anything you please. I could give a rat's arse.
You started trolling me about BC comparison. Then questioning why I put this bullet in that twist, then telling me how I SHOULD HAVE loaded for that barrel. And how I was doing so many things wrong. So now that you have apparently got a clue that you were wrong about twist rates married to bullet weights, you would like to deflect, hoping I wouldn't notice. So what about that argument?
If you'll scroll way back I simply stated there is no such thing as "flat shooting". Some drop less than others, fine. I don't care how much they drop. I care how much the wind pushes them. Yes a 1 mph cross wind will push more bullets than others. And the only way to see such low wind is to cause a parralax error, read mirage, then correct parralax to make the shot. Unless the weather is about 70 F, and above, then it is visible from 100 all the way out with parralax corrected. Now go ahead and tell me all that is wrong too, since I have not earned the data I am sharing.
800 Yard Steel Range Precision Rifle Instruction Memberships and Classes Available
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: bside]
#5537850
01/12/15 07:49 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,433
jeffbird
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,433 |
I remember a hunt in the early '70's with an older gentleman shooting an old 30-40 Krag with iron sights, who dropped deer DRT out to 250 - 300 yards. Another person on the hunt was using a 300 Weatherby and could not come close to producing the same results.
What was the difference? Not the loads, but practice.
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: jeffbird]
#5537867
01/12/15 07:56 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 42,479
J.G.
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 42,479 |
I remember a hunt in the early '70's with an older gentleman shooting an old 30-40 Krag with iron sights, who dropped deer DRT out to 250 - 300 yards. Another person on the hunt was using a 300 Weatherby and could not come close to producing the same results.
What was the difference? Not the loads, but practice.
Bingo!
800 Yard Steel Range Precision Rifle Instruction Memberships and Classes Available
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: txtrophy85]
#5537883
01/12/15 08:01 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053
bo3
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053 |
The 257 is not the best round for every thing but its hard to beat where its good. To beat its short rang trajectory you have to use a stw, rum, ruger (nosler), or 378 weatherby case. Isn't this what the op was asking? Yes....it was exactly what I was asking A 6.5 rum would be fun. I've thought of building one. Easy to form cases from a 7 rum but I don't know who has a reamer.
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: rifleman]
#5537901
01/12/15 08:06 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 329
bside
Bird Dog
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 329 |
Against a terrible LR bullet in the tsx.
You provided the data dude. don't get mad at me for comparing it against a bullet ~900 fps slower Just yanked it off their website, run it against equal bullets or a 115 VLD that should run 3800. With 300yd zero, you should be able to hold on hair 0-500. http://www.bergerbullets.com/ballistics/run them yourself
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: txtrophy85]
#5537906
01/12/15 08:06 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,994
Judd
#1 Creedmoor Fan
|
#1 Creedmoor Fan
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,994 |
The 257 is not the best round for every thing but its hard to beat where its good. To beat its short rang trajectory you have to use a stw, rum, ruger (nosler), or 378 weatherby case. Isn't this what the op was asking? Yes....it was exactly what I was asking Then when someone mentioned one (22 Creed) you told him he was full of [censored] and starting talking about ft/lbs etc? Just like my wife....why ask the question if you already in your mind know the answer? The original question was: Does a flatter shooting sub 30 cal exist? (referring to the .257roy in your title) Answer is yes...they are out there. The two that come instantly to mind are a 220 swift and 22 Creed...I'd have to run numbers but a stout 6mm pushing a 75-90g bullet should be close too. You might even be able to get a light 7mm bullet to shoot in a 7mm and get it to 257roy trajectory. Probably could even work up something in the 6.5saum to get close. So they do exist...and inside 300y they will all kill TX deer stone dead, dead is still the goal...right? Y'all are arguing over something that doesn't matter, point is txtrophy (and few others) love their .257roys...that is awesome and I'm happy for you. Everyone else have guns they love too...doesn't mean what (insert your name here) is better than everyone elses.
Don't let your ears hear what your eyes didn't see, and don't let your mouth say what your heart doesn't feel
|
|
|
Re: Let's talk .257 wby
[Re: Judd]
#5537928
01/12/15 08:14 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 62,064
BOBO the Clown
kind of a big deal
|
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 62,064 |
The 257 is not the best round for every thing but its hard to beat where its good. To beat its short rang trajectory you have to use a stw, rum, ruger (nosler), or 378 weatherby case. Isn't this what the op was asking? Yes....it was exactly what I was asking Then when someone mentioned one (22 Creed) you told him he was full of [censored] and starting talking about ft/lbs etc? Just like my wife....why ask the question if you already in your mind know the answer? The original question was: Does a flatter shooting sub 30 cal exist? (referring to the .257roy in your title) Answer is yes...they are out there. The two that come instantly to mind are a 220 swift and 22 Creed...I'd have to run numbers but a stout 6mm pushing a 75-90g bullet should be close too. You might even be able to get a light 7mm bullet to shoot in a 7mm and get it to 257roy trajectory. Probably could even work up something in the 6.5saum to get close. So they do exist...and inside 300y they will all kill TX deer stone dead, dead is still the goal...right? Y'all are arguing over something that doesn't matter, point is txtrophy (and few others) love their .257roys...that is awesome and I'm happy for you. Everyone else have guns they love too...doesn't mean what (insert your name here) is better than everyone elses. 22creed isn't flatter- but does use a lot less powder and kicks a lot less.
Bottom line, never trust a man whose uncle was eaten by cannibals.-Sen Joni Ernst
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|