texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
OregonWild, RAUKUS01, Dutch_Dogs_77, ShootScootLoot, JerryC12
72136 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,810
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,571
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 44,161
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics539,023
Posts9,744,256
Members87,136
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 4 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: Spacemonkey] #4040732 02/10/13 08:38 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,268
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,268
I'm not saying the 06 can't hang. I'm saying I never see one. The main reson is probably due to the added recoil of the 06. We shoot positional, and extra recoil can mean the difference in regaining your sight picture quickly for another hit or running out of time since the position you built was broken by the recoil.

And yes dee, the .308 is even fading away. Most of the top guys last year shot some type of 6.5mm. More speed AND more BC what's not to love?


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: HWY_MAN] #4042235 02/11/13 04:26 AM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 584
0
00possum Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
0
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 584
Originally Posted By: HWY_MAN
Originally Posted By: 00possum
Yep, 30-06, 2700ft. 308 2500


What load combinations are you looking at, both of those are light if your using 150's or 165's.


Superformance

Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: Kevin_M] #4042258 02/11/13 04:31 AM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 32,092
T
txtrophy85 Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 32,092
Originally Posted By: Kevin_M
hammer This is still being debated? Here's how it goes... You find an article defending what you prefer and I find one defending what I prefer, add a few comments and then repeat.

Never mind,this is entertaining. Keep it going! cheers



lets talk about which is better, salt or pepper?


For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: txtrophy85] #4042389 02/11/13 05:42 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 44,461
R
rifleman Offline
Sparkly Pants
Offline
Sparkly Pants
R
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 44,461
So .308 is not as good as the 30-06...most competition shooters would rather have a 6.5, the ones who throw budget to the wind will be slinging more lead than that...some may even opt for a 338-06 to push some big ol' slow pills. As far as recoil....they're .30cal and aren't even belted magnums, don't worry about it.

Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: rifleman] #4042402 02/11/13 05:58 AM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 584
0
00possum Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
0
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 584
I wouldn't quite say that.

Last edited by 00possum; 02/11/13 05:58 AM.
Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: Dave Davidson] #4042969 02/11/13 03:05 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,269
G
GriffGruff78 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
G
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,269
Originally Posted By: Dave Davidson
This has probably been cussed and discussed quite often. I have seen reputable shooters here recommend a .308. I know that a 30-06 has a larger variety of factory made ammo.

So why would anybody recommend a .308 over a 30-06? What will a .308 do that a 30-06 won't?


Ford-Chevy.

I like the flexibility of the .30-06. If you intend to split pubes at 800 meters, maybe there is some math somewhere that says the .308 is a better cartridge for you, but if you intend to kill a variety of animals on the North American continent with factory ammunition (or want the flexibility to kill all of 'em), I don't see that the ".30-06 short" conveys much tangible advantage apart from an almost negligible reduction in recoil (and if you feel recoil when you're hunting you're either toting a .338-.378 Weatherby or you need to get your adrenals checked).

If you're just looking to kill stuff South of Canada, what's the difference?

If you're just looking to kill stuff South of Amarillo, neither of the two really does anything that a .243 Winchester won't do just as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_GjFMzVT7c

Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: GriffGruff78] #4042992 02/11/13 03:13 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,268
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,268
Originally Posted By: GriffGruff78
Originally Posted By: Dave Davidson
This has probably been cussed and discussed quite often. I have seen reputable shooters here recommend a .308. I know that a 30-06 has a larger variety of factory made ammo.

So why would anybody recommend a .308 over a 30-06? What will a .308 do that a 30-06 won't?


Ford-Chevy.

I like the flexibility of the .30-06. If you intend to split pubes at 800 meters, maybe there is some math somewhere that says the .308 is a better cartridge for you, but if you intend to kill a variety of animals on the North American continent with factory ammunition (or want the flexibility to kill all of 'em), I don't see that the ".30-06 short" conveys much tangible advantage apart from an almost negligible reduction in recoil (and if you feel recoil when you're hunting you're either toting a .338-.378 Weatherby or you need to get your adrenals checked).

If you're just looking to kill stuff South of Canada, what's the difference?

If you're just looking to kill stuff South of Amarillo, neither of the two really does anything that a .243 Winchester won't do just as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_GjFMzVT7c


Agreed.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: dee] #4044151 02/11/13 08:54 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,200
D
dawaba Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
D
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,200
Originally Posted By: dee
Originally Posted By: dawaba
The old Springfield should be a worthy companion to my .375 H&H Whitworth.


Pics of said Whitworth?


Pics via PM.


"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple.....and wrong." H. L. Mencken
Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: J.G.] #4045804 02/12/13 05:09 AM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 584
0
00possum Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
0
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 584
Originally Posted By: FiremanJG
Originally Posted By: GriffGruff78
Originally Posted By: Dave Davidson
This has probably been cussed and discussed quite often. I have seen reputable shooters here recommend a .308. I know that a 30-06 has a larger variety of factory made ammo.

So why would anybody recommend a .308 over a 30-06? What will a .308 do that a 30-06 won't?


Ford-Chevy.

I like the flexibility of the .30-06. If you intend to split pubes at 800 meters, maybe there is some math somewhere that says the .308 is a better cartridge for you, but if you intend to kill a variety of animals on the North American continent with factory ammunition (or want the flexibility to kill all of 'em), I don't see that the ".30-06 short" conveys much tangible advantage apart from an almost negligible reduction in recoil (and if you feel recoil when you're hunting you're either toting a .338-.378 Weatherby or you need to get your adrenals checked).

If you're just looking to kill stuff South of Canada, what's the difference?

If you're just looking to kill stuff South of Amarillo, neither of the two really does anything that a .243 Winchester won't do just as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_GjFMzVT7c


Agreed.


X2

But I still prefer the 308s knockdown power, and I'll say it again "I've never shot a 30-06" so I can really compare knockdown power besides the ballistics.

Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: GriffGruff78] #4046316 02/12/13 02:27 PM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 136
P
progress4m Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
P
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 136
Originally Posted By: GriffGruff78
Originally Posted By: Dave Davidson
This has probably been cussed and discussed quite often. I have seen reputable shooters here recommend a .308. I know that a 30-06 has a larger variety of factory made ammo.

So why would anybody recommend a .308 over a 30-06? What will a .308 do that a 30-06 won't?


Ford-Chevy.

I like the flexibility of the .30-06. If you intend to split pubes at 800 meters, maybe there is some math somewhere that says the .308 is a better cartridge for you, but if you intend to kill a variety of animals on the North American continent with factory ammunition (or want the flexibility to kill all of 'em), I don't see that the ".30-06 short" conveys much tangible advantage apart from an almost negligible reduction in recoil (and if you feel recoil when you're hunting you're either toting a .338-.378 Weatherby or you need to get your adrenals checked).

If you're just looking to kill stuff South of Canada, what's the difference?

If you're just looking to kill stuff South of Amarillo, neither of the two really does anything that a .243 Winchester won't do just as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_GjFMzVT7c


100% agreed!

Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: progress4m] #4046367 02/12/13 02:39 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,200
D
dawaba Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
D
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,200
Never dwell on which is better.

A true rifle looney will own a .30-06 AND a .308 AND a .243 (and probably multiple rifles for each). Such variety provides hours of tinkering, reloading, chronographing, and shooting pleasure.

Hunting is just the icing on the cake.


"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple.....and wrong." H. L. Mencken
Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: 00possum] #4046376 02/12/13 02:40 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 788
H
hermano W Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
H
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 788
If you really want to compare between the two, make sure you are reading the ballistics of bullets of the same weight. That way you won't be comparing the knockdown power of a 180 grain .308 against the knockdown power of a 150 grain 30-06...

Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: dawaba] #4046379 02/12/13 02:41 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,269
G
GriffGruff78 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
G
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,269
Originally Posted By: dawaba
Never dwell on which is better.

A true rifle looney will own a .30-06 AND a .308 AND a .243 (and probably multiple rifles for each). Such variety provides hours of tinkering, reloading, chronographing, and shooting pleasure.

Hunting is just the icing on the cake.


Hereinabove, one finds truth.

Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: GriffGruff78] #4046404 02/12/13 02:47 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13,530
H
Hunt n Fish Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
H
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13,530
Originally Posted By: dawaba
Never dwell on which is better.

A true rifle looney will own a .30-06 AND a .308 AND a .243 (and probably multiple rifles for each). Such variety provides hours of tinkering, reloading, chronographing, and shooting pleasure.

Hunting is just the icing on the cake.


Ahhh Yes! As I always say - "Man can't have too many guns"


HnF

"Prayer is when you talk to the Lord, Meditation is when you listen to what he says"
Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: 00possum] #4046957 02/12/13 04:57 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053
B
bo3 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
B
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053
Originally Posted By: 00possum
Originally Posted By: FiremanJG
Originally Posted By: GriffGruff78
Originally Posted By: Dave Davidson
This has probably been cussed and discussed quite often. I have seen reputable shooters here recommend a .308. I know that a 30-06 has a larger variety of factory made ammo.

So why would anybody recommend a .308 over a 30-06? What will a .308 do that a 30-06 won't?


Ford-Chevy.

I like the flexibility of the .30-06. If you intend to split pubes at 800 meters, maybe there is some math somewhere that says the .308 is a better cartridge for you, but if you intend to kill a variety of animals on the North American continent with factory ammunition (or want the flexibility to kill all of 'em), I don't see that the ".30-06 short" conveys much tangible advantage apart from an almost negligible reduction in recoil (and if you feel recoil when you're hunting you're either toting a .338-.378 Weatherby or you need to get your adrenals checked).

If you're just looking to kill stuff South of Canada, what's the difference?

If you're just looking to kill stuff South of Amarillo, neither of the two really does anything that a .243 Winchester won't do just as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_GjFMzVT7c


Agreed.


X2

But I still prefer the 308s knockdown power, and I'll say it again "I've never shot a 30-06" so I can really compare knockdown power besides the ballistics.


You do realize that a 30-06 has more "knockdown" then a 308 right? There is no replacement for displacement (case capacity).

Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: bo3] #4047171 02/12/13 06:12 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,160
G
gbeard Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
G
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,160
Not even a .50 BMG will "KNOCK DOWN" a deer. It will simply pass strait through and unless the brain is hit or spine is severed, it will run.

Any talk about "knockdown power" is nonsense.

Velocity, expansion, and penetration is all that is relevant when killing animals.

Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: 00possum] #4047211 02/12/13 06:24 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,029
T
TexasEd Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
T
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,029
Originally Posted By: 00possum

X2

But I still prefer the 308s knockdown power, and I'll say it again "I've never shot a 30-06" so I can really compare knockdown power besides the ballistics.


????

.30-06 uses the same bullets and has higher velocity.


Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: GriffGruff78] #4047267 02/12/13 06:47 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 14,199
T
tth_40 Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 14,199
Originally Posted By: GriffGruff78
Originally Posted By: dawaba
Never dwell on which is better.

A true rifle looney will own a .30-06 AND a .308 AND a .243 (and probably multiple rifles for each). Such variety provides hours of tinkering, reloading, chronographing, and shooting pleasure.

Hunting is just the icing on the cake.




Hereinabove, one finds truth.


'Xactly right. Guilty! rifle


Originally Posted By: theserxtremedays
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers
Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: tth_40] #4049081 02/13/13 03:52 AM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 584
0
00possum Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
0
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 584
Yes, but I was referring to the 243. What are you trying to say a 308 wont knock down deer? I've never, ever seen a deer run from a shoulder shot with the 308. Never. Period. If that isn't "knock down" power then what is? It literally knocks the deer down off his feet onto his belly or side, usually side. The deer does not fly off its feet, it's simply knocked down. Don't over complicate things. What kind of bullets do you use gbeard?

Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: 00possum] #4049457 02/13/13 01:08 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,269
G
GriffGruff78 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
G
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,269
Just playing devil's advocate, but I broke a big bodied 8 point down with a 100 grain .243 when I was eleven. Never took a step.

Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: 00possum] #4049518 02/13/13 01:50 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,200
D
dawaba Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
D
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,200
Originally Posted By: 00possum
Yes, but I was referring to the 243. What are you trying to say a 308 wont knock down deer? I've never, ever seen a deer run from a shoulder shot with the 308. Never. Period. If that isn't "knock down" power then what is? It literally knocks the deer down off his feet onto his belly or side, usually side. The deer does not fly off its feet, it's simply knocked down. Don't over complicate things. What kind of bullets do you use gbeard?


John Taylor, the old African hunter and writer, invented an arbitrary cartridge ranking that he called "knock-out" power. The fact that it had no basis in science and physics bothered him little.

Maybe it's time that someone here on the THF should rank cartridges according to "knock-down" ability. A working knowledge of momentum, kinetic energy, and terminal ballistics need not be a prerequisite. However, the ability to shout loudly might come in handy.....


"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple.....and wrong." H. L. Mencken
Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: GriffGruff78] #4049610 02/13/13 02:14 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,243
S
Spacemonkey Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
S
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,243
Originally Posted By: GriffGruff78
Just playing devil's advocate, but I broke a big bodied 8 point down with a 100 grain .243 when I was eleven. Never took a step.


Agree with your logic. My first deer was a large doe at 420 yards with an 87 grain Sierra spitzer in a ruger 250 savage when I was just a teen. She didn't run anywhere. I hit her in the neck.

Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: ChadTRG42] #4049633 02/13/13 02:20 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
N
Nogalus Prairie Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
N
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
Originally Posted By: ChadTRG42
It's a simple answer. The '06 can push the exact same .308 bullet about 150 to 200 fps faster than a 308 Win. More speed equals more energy, less drop and less wind drift. More speed also means more recoil. Simple.


This whole thing could have stopped right there. smile


Originally Posted by Russ79
I learned long ago you can't reason someone out of something they don't reason themselves into.


Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: dawaba] #4051673 02/14/13 02:03 AM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 584
0
00possum Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
0
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 584
Originally Posted By: dawaba
Originally Posted By: 00possum
Yes, but I was referring to the 243. What are you trying to say a 308 wont knock down deer? I've never, ever seen a deer run from a shoulder shot with the 308. Never. Period. If that isn't "knock down" power then what is? It literally knocks the deer down off his feet onto his belly or side, usually side. The deer does not fly off its feet, it's simply knocked down. Don't over complicate things. What kind of bullets do you use gbeard?


John Taylor, the old African hunter and writer, invented an arbitrary cartridge ranking that he called "knock-out" power. The fact that it had no basis in science and physics bothered him little.

Maybe it's time that someone here on the THF should rank cartridges according to "knock-down" ability. A working knowledge of momentum, kinetic energy, and terminal ballistics need not be a prerequisite. However, the ability to shout loudly might come in handy.....


I'm up for it

Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: 00possum] #4051766 02/14/13 02:29 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,547
J
Johnny Lobos Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
J
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,547
The main reason the 06 is sitting behind the 308 in competition shooting is because the event was started by men and has evolved into girls and sissies.

The 30-06 is still King in the hunting rhelm.

Page 4 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3