texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Hinter51, 2******o, Phantom10, CharlieEchoAlpha, paxglobal
73146 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,840
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 68,167
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
Stub 46,396
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics551,718
Posts9,895,763
Members88,146
Most Online28,231
Feb 7th, 2025
Print Thread
Page 9 of 10 1 2 7 8 9 10
Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: jim whitecotton EdD] #2441027 07/20/11 02:05 AM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,350
B
BMD Offline
Silver Spoon
Offline
Silver Spoon
B
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,350
Yep, I have converted a few after being converted myself by seeing the results myself up


Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: vanguard] #2441052 07/20/11 02:17 AM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 148
J
jim whitecotton EdD Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
J
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 148
Originally Posted By: vanguard
do they even make the x anymore



I got a nice supply of the original Barnes X's for my 300 and 270. When it takes one per animal, I got enough to last the rest of my days.


Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: jim whitecotton EdD] #2441056 07/20/11 02:19 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
V
vanguard Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
V
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
why did they replace the original




Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: vanguard] #2441066 07/20/11 02:23 AM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 148
J
jim whitecotton EdD Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
J
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 148
Originally Posted By: vanguard
why did they replace the original


They made the best, even better.


Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: jim whitecotton EdD] #2441089 07/20/11 02:32 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
V
vanguard Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
V
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
oh i thought because they werent reliably expanding


Last edited by vanguard; 07/20/11 02:33 AM.


Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: vanguard] #2441091 07/20/11 02:33 AM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 148
J
jim whitecotton EdD Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
J
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 148
Originally Posted By: vanguard
oh i thought because they were reliably expanding


thanks for proving our point......... rofl


Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: vanguard] #2441093 07/20/11 02:34 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
V
vanguard Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
V
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
theyre definately not a long range bullet




Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: vanguard] #2441116 07/20/11 02:41 AM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,350
B
BMD Offline
Silver Spoon
Offline
Silver Spoon
B
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,350
juggle

Really have you ever shot just one confused2


Let me answer for you... Hell no!


So you are talking from reading your googled info again, until you try them you are running your head about something you have zero experience with, would be like me telling an AR guy how to build his AR roflmao


Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: BMD] #2441127 07/20/11 02:47 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
V
vanguard Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
V
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
dont even want to try them pos's.

I like expanding boolits




Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: piney woods hunter] #2441222 07/20/11 03:11 AM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 521
R
RHAAS90 Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
R
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 521
The ROSSI youth guns are very light and have short barrels which cause for more felt recoil. I have a Rossi .243 I use and it feels like my 12 gauge when I fire it. (ITs my truck gun) I would reccomend a .243 in your situation. .243 is very mild and there are alot of options in ammo to suit your son or your game that you are hunting. Also it will be something that he can rely on as far as forgiveness. The .223 (while effective) doesnt have the knockdown that the .243 has. Some rounds of .243 still have over 1000 lbs. of energy reaching 300 yards. All Im saying is the .243 winchester performs for hunters a heck of a lot better and the recoil difference is minumum. Losing a deer is 10000000 times demoralizing than a slight more kick when the gun goes off. A weatherby vangaurd ( even in carbine) or a remington 700 ADL are both very good and accurate rifles that your son can grow up using and are very affordable. Especially on this site you could probably pick up a perfectly good used rifle from the members here.

Take it or leave it. I just think it is a safe investment to suit both your immediate needs for your son AND as he gets older.


Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: vanguard] #2441229 07/20/11 03:12 AM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,350
B
BMD Offline
Silver Spoon
Offline
Silver Spoon
B
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,350
Then like I said you don't know a damn thing about em rofl

No reason for us to even discuss it any further cause you just admitted to talking out of your arse!


Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: BMD] #2441417 07/20/11 04:42 AM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 785
L
longone Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
L
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 785
Not a big fan of running copper solids down the barrel of high $ rifles, cleaning them is a real pain. Barnes makes good stuff so does Nosler, Berger, ect. for me a toughest bullet is Swift A-frame, however they don't make anything below 6.5. But lets remember we're talking about Texas Whitetails not northern Alberta. Some of you need might read PO Ackleys' book. and learn about shock ect. .223 is what all three of my boys and countless of our clients started out killing deer and 100's of hogs with. Over the past 15 years of hunting with clients I have only seen two deer lost. One .243 shooting Nosler BT, and one 7mmRm Shooting Barnes X. Trailed these animals most of night, and the next day, I guess it keeps comming back to shot placement... hmmmmmm



Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented immigrant"
is like calling a drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist".
Type VII/Class II SOT..
www.tacticalhogcontrol.com
www.cottonwoodarmory.com
Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: longone] #2441450 07/20/11 05:10 AM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,350
B
BMD Offline
Silver Spoon
Offline
Silver Spoon
B
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,350
I am running TSX down lilja barrels with zero troubles!


Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: BMD] #2441613 07/20/11 12:29 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 793
T
TX4Ever Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
T
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 793
Ive never had one problem with the TSX and ive actually killed animals with them so im with BMD...they leave massive blood trails and ive never lost an animal when i shoot them!




Medically Retired Staff Sergeant/USAF/'06-'12/Deployment- FOB Mahmudiyah, Iraq Oct'08-Jan'10
Dallas PD Sep'13-Present
Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: TX4Ever] #2441630 07/20/11 12:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
V
vanguard Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
V
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
well in 40 years ive never had a problem with any boolit ive used, none were a tsx. So whats the fix.
I guess barrels dont foul enough, accuracy doesnt suck enough, and ammo doesnt cost enough.
Great alternative, not !




Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: vanguard] #2441712 07/20/11 01:30 PM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,350
B
BMD Offline
Silver Spoon
Offline
Silver Spoon
B
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,350
Dude your continued Ignorance and willingness to talk about a product you have admittedly never used just shows that you are truly a

troll


Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: BMD] #2441720 07/20/11 01:33 PM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,350
B
BMD Offline
Silver Spoon
Offline
Silver Spoon
B
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,350
Just like you talking bout copper fouling how would u know????,,


It is a non issue and I do know as have shot TSX and TTSX
So please continue to show your ignorance and google knowledge rofl


Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: BMD] #2441949 07/20/11 03:00 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 40,669
R
redchevy Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 40,669
To me the tsx and other premium lines of bullets like a-frames partitions and bonded bullets offer a guaranteed performance if you will.

Yes maybe your standard cup and core bullet will do the trick say 90% of the time, but they do have issues. I hav shot deer at 60 yards behind the shoulder with a 150 grain hornady interlock that blew up did not exit didnt leave a blood trail, and I didnt hit a shoulder. I cant explain it, but if the deer would have gone further than the 30 yards it did I probably would never have found it. I have never seen a partition or tsx fail like this.

I agree though they are not long range bullets, droped velocity equates to poor expansion with them, but I wont pretend I shoot a country mile like many do, I have only kild a handful of animals past 100 yards, 1 past 200 yards and it was a hog killed with a borrowed 222 and a balitic tip.



It's hell eatin em live
Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: redchevy] #2442018 07/20/11 03:24 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,903
J
JJH Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
J
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,903
All products made by humans, can and will fail. Fortunately, the failure rate on modern bullets, premium or conventional, is very very low. It is low enough that I doubt any individual hunter will ever use a given bullet enough to have a statistically valid sample. And what normally happens, is, if we have a failure with a given bullet, we stop using it, so that getting a statistically valid sample never happens.

IMO, the TSx/TTSX type bullets have their place. They allow a hunter to use a cartridge with would normally be considered light for a given purpose. Examples would be a 22-250 for deer or a 270 for elk. Or if you have a cartridge which has a high MV, the TTSX allows you to use it with confidence without destroying a lot of meat or risking bullet blowup and poor penetration.

But for the typical deer hunter in Texas shooting cartridges with a MV of say, 3000fps or less ( 270, 280, 7x57, '06, 308, 7-08, etc), I see no real advantage in super bullets.

As long as one uses a bullet within its design parameters, there are lots of ways to success. Deer ain't hard to kill. YMMV


Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: JJH] #2442142 07/20/11 04:15 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 40,669
R
redchevy Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 40,669
Well just to throw a rench in your theory I have been shooting the 150 interlokcs for a while now, I loaded 100 of them and decided I wouldnt stop using them until they were gone.. I have a little over 50 left, and they have dont things I didnt like multiple times. They have never failed to kill my deer/hogs but most of the time on a body shot they wont exit, behind not in the shoulder and the next time they will look like a bomb went off on the exit side. The only thing I have good to say abou thtem is they shoot good in my rifle.

matt



It's hell eatin em live
Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: redchevy] #2442188 07/20/11 04:35 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,903
J
JJH Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
J
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,903
Matt: Just curious. Are these 150's 30 cal or 270? What are you shooting them out of? thanks


Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: JJH] #2442876 07/20/11 09:18 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 40,669
R
redchevy Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 40,669
They are 270 150 grain hornady interlocks, shooting them out of a remington 700 sendero.

And to qualify I have had them not exit several times when shot behind the shoulder, they have never exited when you hit a shoulder. These shots are all around 90 to 100 yards.

Just for fun I loaded some 220 grain 30 cal interlock round nose for my 300 wby, and the performance is worse with them. I have shot several hogs with that load that never exit, they blow up nearly on contact. I was told int eh 300 wby that this is because the 220's were designed with the 30-06 in mind and were intended for use with muzzle velocities of 2300 feet per second, not the faster speeds the magnum threw them at.

matt



It's hell eatin em live
Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: redchevy] #2443046 07/20/11 10:18 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,903
J
JJH Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
J
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,903
thanks, Matt. That is quite interesting, but curious. Guess all I can say is that it's very different from my experience with 150gr Hornady's in a 270. I have always gotten great performance from them on deer. And I have a friend in Europe who is a professional hunter, and that combo is all he uses. In his experience, they perform equal to partitions. He also used them in Africa on numerous elk-sized animals. Who knows?


Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: JJH] #2443589 07/21/11 01:53 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 40,669
R
redchevy Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 40,669
Who knows, maybe it was just a bad lot or something. I loaded the 153 or 154 grain ones in my dads 280 and was pretty happy with them, thats why I switched to them, they sure are cheaper than partitions, but they just didnt behave the same in the 270.



It's hell eatin em live
Re: .223 vs. .243? Help.... [Re: piney woods hunter] #2443765 07/21/11 02:59 AM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 212
D
dk1051 Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 212
7mag and protien! just kidding. Good luck on your hunt.


Page 9 of 10 1 2 7 8 9 10
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3