texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
BobOso, Tbirdszz, Fischpat, barracude, LEAD
72065 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,797
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,533
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,948
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,081
Posts9,732,785
Members87,065
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Before the e-collar [Re: bill oxner] #5587468 02/07/15 11:57 AM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
N
Nogalus Prairie Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
N
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
Originally Posted By: bill oxner
This forum is slow, I'll hijack ey own thread with another question. Herman Smith said,"but to keep him sweet, I killed plenty of quail for him."

Do you think it's necessary to kill birds over your pointing dogs for reward, or that finding and pointing birds is reward enough?


I am a total rookie, but the answer to this one seems clear. The dog is hunting. That means his instinct is to kill. Nothing they do is for show to them. So I believe killing is essential to complete the hunting act. I understand that is not always possible these days and that's a shame.


Originally Posted by Russ79
I learned long ago you can't reason someone out of something they don't reason themselves into.


Re: Before the e-collar [Re: Nogalus Prairie] #5587729 02/07/15 03:33 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 201
1
1971snipe Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
1
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 201
With my previous dog (e-pointer), I don't think I'd been able to handle him without the e-collar, especially when woodcock hunting ... I'd use the beeper function of the collar to keep him in close, "close" being a relative term for that dog.

The dog I now have, (another EP), has never had an e-collar on him, and has never needed one ... <knocking on wood>.

Same breed but different lines; two completely different dogs.

Re: Before the e-collar [Re: bobcat1] #5587789 02/07/15 04:22 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,868
C
Chet Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
C
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,868
Originally Posted By: bobcat1
Originally Posted By: bill oxner
I haven't been to a horseback trial in years, and no longer take the AF, but it's my understanding that they're running mostly broke derbies now days.

Most modern day trainers never lay a hand on their dogs. It's all done with the e-collar, along with improved breeding stock.
They have been running broke derbies for years. Now some of those derbies might have been a little more than 2 years old too. wink


You are absolutely right, the days of placing derbies on potential are gone, if a derby is going to win in open stakes he better be broke.

Re: Before the e-collar [Re: Chet] #5588257 02/07/15 11:49 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,289
B
bobcat1 Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
B
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,289
Originally Posted By: Chet
Originally Posted By: bobcat1
Originally Posted By: bill oxner
I haven't been to a horseback trial in years, and no longer take the AF, but it's my understanding that they're running mostly broke derbies now days.

Most modern day trainers never lay a hand on their dogs. It's all done with the e-collar, along with improved breeding stock.
They have been running broke derbies for years. Now some of those derbies might have been a little more than 2 years old too. wink


You are absolutely right, the days of placing derbies on potential are gone, if a derby is going to win in open stakes he better be broke.
Right! What used to be derbies are what puppy stakes look like.


Bobby Barnett

Page 2 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3