Forums46
Topics545,455
Posts9,822,301
Members87,633
|
Most Online25,604 Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
.243 vs. .22-250
#2103421
02/09/11 03:19 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,651
longhorn_cop
OP
Veteran Tracker
|
OP
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,651 |
I am looking at getting a varmint/hog gun. I know the merits of the .22-250, but like the .243 as it has a little more pop with the heavier bullets. I have seen the lighter .243 rounds are smoking near 4000 fps. How is the recoil difference? Muzzle blast? Is shooting prairie dogs all day a chore with the .243? Sorry for the questions, just want to be sure what I'm going to buy.
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: longhorn_cop]
#2103465
02/09/11 03:29 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
vanguard
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469 |
both burn barrels. if you want to shoot a lot, get a 223 if you want to hunt bigger game get the 243 if you just want a smokin screamer and 1500 round life get the 22-250
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: vanguard]
#2103565
02/09/11 04:03 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 9,776
mustafa
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 9,776 |
. . . and make sure that the barrel is cold hammer forged.
Team Barbacoa Pro Staff. Dallas Safari Club Life Member
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: mustafa]
#2103627
02/09/11 04:19 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,903
JJH
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,903 |
for mostly PD's I think you'd be better off with a 22-250 (or 223). For larger varmints (yotes?), hogs, deer, I'd lean toward the 243. Recoil with varmint-weight bullets is pretty close.
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: vanguard]
#2103674
02/09/11 04:31 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 14,523
changedmyname
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 14,523 |
both burn barrels. if you want to shoot a lot, get a 223 if you want to hunt bigger game get the 243 if you just want a smokin screamer and 1500 round life get the 22-250 So a 22-250 only lasts 1500 shots? I have never heard that. Not disagreeing, just never heard it.
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: changedmyname]
#2103686
02/09/11 04:34 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,343
BMD
Silver Spoon
|
Silver Spoon
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,343 |
both burn barrels. if you want to shoot a lot, get a 223 if you want to hunt bigger game get the 243 if you just want a smokin screamer and 1500 round life get the 22-250 So a 22-250 only lasts 1500 shots? I have never heard that. Not disagreeing, just never heard it. maybe in screamer like a swift and running hot loads but 22/250 life is nit that short.
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: JJH]
#2103688
02/09/11 04:34 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,281
Korean Redneck
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,281 |
I have both and I love having both. Can't comment on the recoil because my 243 is a hunter's type rifle and my 22-250 is a bull barrel 26" rifle.
If I had to have only one, I think I would go with the 22-250. Once again, mine are 2 different rifles. Still, my 22-250 is much more accurate. I do mostly use it for varmints, but the ranch manager at my company's ranch uses a 22-250 for doess, javalena, and hog. I'll add that he is an insanely good shooter so he's the kind of guy that can kill a small hog with a 22lr. Besides, they make some great heavier 22-250 rounds for larger game.
I hate to contradict people I don't know, but I never understood the whole "burning your barrel" concept. My 243 is a very old 788 I got used. Me and brother alone have put about 700 through it and it still has the same performance. I don't abuse barrels and maintain them very well.
I'm a dude who likes long barrels!
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: Korean Redneck]
#2103699
02/09/11 04:37 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 9,776
mustafa
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 9,776 |
in a heavy 250 you can stay in the scope and see where if you hit what you were shooting at.
Team Barbacoa Pro Staff. Dallas Safari Club Life Member
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: mustafa]
#2103773
02/09/11 04:56 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,778
ccoker
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,778 |
I have used both, a bunch I own an old Sako 243 and my dad one in 22-250 His was built in 66 and has killed a TON of deer, hogs, coyotes, etc..
I gurantee that it has WAY over 1500 hundred rounds through it and it still shoots one ragged hole at 100 yards.
They are both great calibers, the 243 will shoot heavier 100g bullets if that's your thing where as the 22-250 usually stops around 63 (Dad uses a 63g Sierra SP)
The 243 will also shoot lighter bullets for varmints
Both will do what you want
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: mustafa]
#2103793
02/09/11 05:00 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,224
Rebel.
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,224 |
I sure like the .243, but then again I'm a glutton for carnage.
There is hardly any recoil from my rifle, but it also weighs in right at 16lbs.
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: vanguard]
#2103814
02/09/11 05:07 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 35,382
Brother in-law
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 35,382 |
both burn barrels. if you want to shoot a lot, get a 223 if you want to hunt bigger game get the 243 if you just want a smokin screamer and 1500 round life get the 22-250 Wrong
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: Brother in-law]
#2103852
02/09/11 05:17 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 772
Big Pa
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 772 |
I prefer the 22.250 over the .243... Just my 2 cents....
6th generation Texan
All these threats to our way of life> I am starting a new religion. The Temple of the .223
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: changedmyname]
#2104237
02/09/11 07:02 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
vanguard
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469 |
So a 22-250 only lasts 1500 shots? I have never heard that. Not disagreeing, just never heard it.
its no secret, faster cartridges always wear faster than slower cartridges. Lot of other things contribute, heat is the enemy. P-dog shooters who shoot a bunch without letting it cool down can burn a 22-250 in as little as 800 rounds, but the consenses is a 22-250 is usually between 1000 rounds and 2500. Plus what is acceptable accuracy, it might shoot 1/2" groups and open up to 1 1/2 " groups at the 2000 mark, if thats ok with you youll prolly see 3000 round count in it. But theres no denying a 22-250 is a barrel burner, a .223 can see 10,000 rounds or roughly 4 times the life of a 22-250. .243 will last half as long as a .308 even though they both share the same case. Over bore is a relation of case capacity and bore diameter. Over bore cartridges always wear faster. heres a chart.
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: vanguard]
#2104305
02/09/11 07:23 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 14,523
changedmyname
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 14,523 |
I guess it is a secret since you are the only one who thinks it. Like I said, I have never heard that a 22-250 is done in 1500 rounds.
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: changedmyname]
#2104319
02/09/11 07:27 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
vanguard
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469 |
its not my opinon, its what I have read
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: vanguard]
#2104380
02/09/11 07:50 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 40,167
redchevy
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 40,167 |
Personaly I think you need to determine if you are going to use it more as a varmit or deer/hog hunting rifle. Is it going to be deer hunting once a year and varmits every weekend or deer hunting every day of the season and varmits once a month?
In my opinion the 22-250 and 243 are about the same in the noise department. I have never been much of a 22-250 fan, it just doesnt do anything that i need or want it to do that a 223 doesnt do alot cheaper. If i was going to be mostly deer/hog hunting definatley the 243, and if I was going to be mostly varmit hunting a 223. JMO I know ill pizz of the 22-250 club, just my thoughts tho.
matt
It's hell eatin em live
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: redchevy]
#2105049
02/09/11 10:30 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,651
longhorn_cop
OP
Veteran Tracker
|
OP
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,651 |
Thanks guys. Lots of great information, on both sides.
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: longhorn_cop]
#2105545
02/10/11 12:33 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 347
wigeon
Bird Dog
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 347 |
Get both. If you are prairie dog hunting it might be wise to rotate guns. I like my .243win a lot. If you want to save the pelts on the yotes and bobcats dont get .243. They leave huge exit wounds in the varmit rounds I have used
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: Big Pa]
#2106569
02/10/11 07:16 AM
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,180
yukons95
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,180 |
X2 on that one! My 22-250 with 62gr. tsx's seem to do more damage traveling faster than my buddies 243 with the same type of bullet on deer and hogs.
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: yukons95]
#2106585
02/10/11 08:13 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,289
Sirrah243
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,289 |
I think it is more realistic that the 243 shooting the shorter lighter varmit bullets will shoot out in 1,500 rounds rather than than the 22-250.
I thought that I had shot a 22-250 out in 1,500 rounds and started talking to one of the most knowledgable P-dog shooters at my gun club. He said he shoots 22-250 so hot that he wraps wet towels around the barrel to cool it down and he said he has never shot a 22-250 out in less that 5,000 rounds even with abuse like I mentioned. He said the problem is usually copper fouling.
Copper was my problem. Mine was key holing at 100 yds. Sweets and JB and mine was shot fine again.
243 you have a wider variety of bullet weights 55-105 gr. 22-250 52-68 gr. This is off the top of my head but it should be within a couple of grains.
Good luck!
�A hunt based only on the trophies taken falls far short of what the ultimate goal should be.� -Fred Bear
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: Sirrah243]
#2106614
02/10/11 12:04 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 194
htharp
Woodsman
|
Woodsman
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 194 |
I wrestled with a desire to buy a 22-250 for a while. I am a fan of the 243, very versatile gun with a wide range of bullet options (58 to 100 grain are my choices). I compared the 22-250 to it and could not come up with a reason to use it over the 243. Not much difference in the powder used and a smaller range of projectiles. It is also not legal in many places for deer if I wanted to use it for that. I ended up with a 223 heavy barrel varmint rifle and a 243 in a lighter weight. The 243 will serve as backup on prairie dog shoots and is great as a carry around rifle for larger varmints and deer size animals if I choose. The 223 is comfortable to shoot a large number of rounds through, and it is less expensive to shoot. Good combo for me.
There's so much I don't know that I don't even know what I don't know.
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: htharp]
#2106846
02/10/11 02:56 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
vanguard
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469 |
copied from lilja web site.
As a very rough rule of thumb I would say that with cartridges of .222 Remington size you could expect an accurate barrel life of 3-4000 rounds. And varmint type accuracy should be quite a bit longer than this.
For medium size cartridges, such as the .308 Winchester, 7x57 and even the 25-06, 2-3000 rounds of accurate life is reasonable.
Hot .224 caliber type cartridges will not do as well and 1000-2500 rounds is to be expected.
Bigger magnum hunting type rounds will shoot from 1500-3000 accurate rounds. But the bigger 30-378 Weatherby types won't do as well, being closer to the 1500 round figure.
These numbers are based on the use of stainless steel barrels. For chrome-moly barrels I would reduce these by roughly 20%.
The .17 and .50 calibers are rules unto themselves and I'm pressed to predict a figure.
The best life can be expected from the 22 long rifle barrels with 5000-10,000 accurate rounds to be expected. We have in our shop one our drop-in Anschutz barrels that has 200,000 rounds through it and the shooter, a competitive small-bore shooter reported that it had just quit shooting.
Remember that predicting barrel life is a complicated, highly variable subject. You are the best judge of this with your particular barrel. Signs of accurate barrel life on the wane are increased copper fouling, lengthened throat depth, and decreased accuracy.
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: vanguard]
#2107736
02/10/11 09:10 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,651
longhorn_cop
OP
Veteran Tracker
|
OP
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,651 |
Thanks for all the help guys.
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: longhorn_cop]
#2108046
02/10/11 11:19 PM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,080
HWY_MAN
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,080 |
I've owned and hunted with every caliber mentioned above and I still end up shooting the 243 when it comes to coyote size varmints.
Yes! A Weatherby does kill them deader.
|
|
|
Re: .243 vs. .22-250
[Re: HWY_MAN]
#2108302
02/11/11 12:49 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
dee
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219 |
.243 barrel life is similar to the .22-250 if used in a heavy target string or heated Pdog shooting sitting. Both are throat demolishers if not taken care of.
"A vote is like a rifle; it's usefulness depends on the character of the user" Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|