Forums46
Topics551,858
Posts9,897,478
Members88,155
|
Most Online28,231 Feb 7th, 2025
|
|
|
Re: AR .308 vs .223
[Re: DallasShootingSupplies]
#1951483
12/24/10 10:55 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,290
B-Ran
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,290 |
If you have a 308, there will never be a need to get a beowolf. I'm not even going to bother telling you why you're full of Get both... get them all! Start with 5.56 to get used to the wonderful world of ARs. Move up from there. Keep in mind... that's how it all starts. Soon you'll be buying AR pistols in 6.8 because you've got everything else and you want to kill a hog with something new! Your full of it. A 308 has more energy at 500 yards than a 300 grain beuwolf does at 100. A 308 will do anything a Beowolf can do. The 50 has its place, but if you have a 308 AR you are FAR better off. Versatility isn't even comparable. I have a 45/70 which is ballistically similar, its a cool gun, but essentially a brush gun. So you've changed your tune... now it has its place but before you said there was no need for it? Guess we'll just agree to somewhat disagree. The OP was talking about shooting hogs... doesn't a brush gun fit that category pretty well? Sure it doesn't fit the long range aspect, but there's still a niche. If I'm in the thick river bottoms and there's a 300+ lb boar heading toward me... I'd rather have a Beowulf than my .308  That doesn't mean someone couldn't go in with a .22, but there's a certain level of comfort knowing that you don't have to rely on making a perfect shot. I think that qualifies as a need, and a good fit for that need is the Beowulf cartridge. Plus... it's just cool as heck! Nobody can deny that. The energy you speak of... I use a Beowulf in 75+/- yd ranges... for further ranges I'll grab another rifle. It's no secret that you don't use a .50 at long range, but up close I'd rather have the support of a 400 grain bullet on my side rather than a 150 grain bullet. If you mention energy you have to mention momentum. What's going to carry that energy further once it hits... is that not important? It is very important, especially with those tanks with legs we call hogs. Sorry OP, rant off.
|
|
|
Re: AR .308 vs .223
[Re: B-Ran]
#1951672
12/25/10 12:46 AM
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,243
DallasShootingSupplies
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,243 |
I didn't say there wasn't a need for it. I said, if you have a 308 AR, you won't need a beowolf.
A 308 TSX will do way more damage than a Beo at any range. If you can't kill a hog with a 308, first time everytime your a terrible shot.
I've killed over a hundred hogs with my 5.56, when I use my 308 with a TSX or game king, its too easy.
|
|
|
Re: AR .308 vs .223
[Re: DallasShootingSupplies]
#1951717
12/25/10 01:11 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,290
B-Ran
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,290 |
A 308 TSX will do way more damage than a Beo at any range. If you can't kill a hog with a 308, first time everytime your a terrible shot. You're right about that. I mean, after all... pigs stand still all the time right? It's also ridiculous to hunt unless you're in a stand watching a feeder, so it's waaaaaay too easy not to shoot them, one shot one kill. Every time.  Please. Get in the bottoms and chase them or any other critter for that matter, and you'll eventually have to shoot more than once. Anyone that claims otherwise is really pulling your chain. Really, an AR in 3006 is where it's at. HA! 
|
|
|
Re: AR .308 vs .223
[Re: B-Ran]
#1951732
12/25/10 01:17 AM
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,243
DallasShootingSupplies
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,243 |
My point was a clean shot will take one down everytime. Of course multiple shots are needed at times (runners/sounders etc)
I hunt in the bottoms weekly. Matter of fact 90% of our hunting land is thick bottom land, only a couple clearings.
My original statement was if you have a 308 AR, you won't need a Beo. That statement is 100% correct, not sure how this got sidetracked.
A TSX round is really something to behold. If I get off my lazy butt I will upload pics from two weeks ago where we shot a doe and a bobcat with a .223 TSX. Both kills left a fist size exit wound, in 308 form the TSX is pure carnage.
Last edited by DallasShootingSupplies; 12/25/10 01:27 AM.
|
|
|
Re: AR .308 vs .223
[Re: DallasShootingSupplies]
#1951754
12/25/10 01:28 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,290
B-Ran
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,290 |
My point was a clean shot will take one down everytime. Of course multiple shots are needed at times (runners/sounders etc)
I hunt in the bottoms weekly. Matter of fact 90% of our hunting land is thick bottom land, only a couple clearings. I know what you mean I just like to stir the pot and enjoy the debate. You must be a lucky man then to have that much hunting available to you. Bet you're gonna have some Christmas ham tomorrow huh!  However... most of us set up our .308 ARs with high power scopes and bipods packing on all sorts of weight to reach out and touch something. I like to have my short, light, big bore with an aimpoint on top for up-close fun, so in that regard... maybe someone else can agree that there's a need for more than just the 308 AR.
Last edited by B-Ran; 12/25/10 01:42 AM.
|
|
|
Re: AR .308 vs .223
[Re: B-Ran]
#1951756
12/25/10 01:29 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 669
Canazes9
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 669 |
A 308 TSX will do way more damage than a Beo at any range. If you can't kill a hog with a 308, first time everytime your a terrible shot. You're right about that. I mean, after all... pigs stand still all the time right? It's also ridiculous to hunt unless you're in a stand watching a feeder, so it's waaaaaay too easy not to shoot them, one shot one kill. Every time.  Please. Get in the bottoms and chase them or any other critter for that matter, and you'll eventually have to shoot more than once. Anyone that claims otherwise is really pulling your chain. Really, an AR in 3006 is where it's at. HA! Benelli R1, 20" Carbine weighs 7 #'s. Accurate, light, can be field stripped completely like an AR-10, holds zero between cleanings/strippings, 10 round magazines available (although they are pricey!). David
|
|
|
Re: AR .308 vs .223
[Re: B-Ran]
#1951795
12/25/10 01:49 AM
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,243
DallasShootingSupplies
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,243 |
My point was a clean shot will take one down everytime. Of course multiple shots are needed at times (runners/sounders etc)
I hunt in the bottoms weekly. Matter of fact 90% of our hunting land is thick bottom land, only a couple clearings. I know what you mean I just like to stir the pot and enjoy the debate. You must be a lucky man then to have that much hunting available to you. Bet you're gonna have some Christmas ham tomorrow huh!  However... most of us set up our .308 ARs with high power scopes and bipods packing on all sorts of weight to reach out and touch something. I like to have my short, light, big bore with an aimpoint on top for up-close fun, so in that regard... maybe someone else can agree that there's a need for more than just the 308 AR. I enjoy the debate! LOL Yea, most people do have very heavy 308 AR's. 20-24 inch barrel etc and its a freaking mule to carry around. I tried to keep mine as light as possible, its a 16 inch version. Bottom land is a curse and a blessing. Stalking is essentially impossible right now through most of it, there is 6 inches of leaves on the ground. A freaking squirrel sounds like a train coming through. But bottom land has the most hogs so I like that. I have to essentially hunt with feeders during the winter, or hunt the water holes and creeks.
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|