Forums46
Topics552,148
Posts9,900,920
Members88,171
|
Most Online28,231 Feb 7th, 2025
|
|
|
Re: Question about breed standards
[Re: Duck_Dogs]
#1246891
02/16/10 04:37 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 408
Gengo
OP
Bird Dog
|
OP
Bird Dog
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 408 |
Agreed you will never kill bird out more than 100 yards but we always have a couple birds every year that make it 100+ yards before they go down and are crippled out that far. It’s like over training for something. You may only get a retrieve of over 100 yards a couple times a year and I want a dog that can do that when the time comes. A dog that only trains on making retrieves 100+ yards can easily get a bird that drops 30 yards out, however a dog that only trains on 30 yard birds rarely can get a bird a couple hundred yards out. The reason for this is their confidence and training. But this is all based upon training methods and not pedigree. When I started to train for hunt test and field trials I would have my gun dog run the same setups. I would usually have to run them as singles for her and she wouldn’t run as straight of a line but no one cares about that when hunting.
See in my area we also have a big problem with gators going after dogs. This year will be Willie's first year to hunt so on any long retrieves I will probably walk him out to probably 30 yards or so from the bird and let him get it. That way if those eyes surface I will be well within range to put a hurting on him for looking at my pup. I just wouldn't be able to handle it if something were to happen to him. I like your method though for training for the long ones because they do happen a few times a year.
|
|
|
Re: Question about breed standards
[Re: jbois]
#1246968
02/16/10 05:10 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,038
IronSpikeLabs
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,038 |
I just read about EIC and watched a video of a dog with it, man that is sad. Whats the test cost and why wouldnt this be tested for by breeders? There is NO reason why a responsible and ethical breeder would not test their breeding stock for EIC AND the other health issues within the breed. Some on this board say that their breeding stock is not heavily field bred and they have never had a problem....so why test?? That is not the way they should think... I have a conformation bred dog that is an EIC carrier. If I didn't know that and assumed because he was not field bred, he shouldn't be tested and decided to breed him to a bitch of unknown status, then I could possibly be producing affected puppies out of ignorance.... That would not be responsible of me? Would it?? Field trial lines have been crossed with regularity with show lines and that accounts for the presence of EIC in both. We keep going back to the issue of testing and resonsibility, but I have yet to have someone justify the breeding of KNOWN EIC carriers. What is the point in the testing and the claim that it is being done 'in the interest of the breed' if the breeder is going to go ahead and pour more EIC carriers into the gene pool? Yet, that is exactly what they are doing.
|
|
|
Re: Question about breed standards
[Re: IronSpikeLabs]
#1247074
02/16/10 05:57 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 163
Duck_Dogs
Woodsman
|
Woodsman
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 163 |
If people are all informed about EIC and CNM and test their dogs then we can make sure that no more EIC or CNM affected dogs are produced. I have people ask me all the time what is EIC and CNM and why do your pups come with a hip and eye guarantee. I inform them about it all and educate them. So when breeders are listing in their ads that a dog is an EIC carrier this is being responsible because they are putting it out in the open. So if someone who doesn’t know what EIC is they will probably ask what does it mean that your dog is a carrier and then they can become educated about the issue. As I stated previously EIC testing is new compared to hip and eye testing. I think hip and eye certification should be standard for a responsible breeder. However what’s different about hips and eyes and EIC and CNM is you can’t guarantee you won’t produce a dog with hip and eye issues even with clearances. You can go to OFA’s website and look at the statistics, but you can breed two OFA Excellent dogs and still produce a pup with hip problems. But you cant breed an EIC carrier and an EIC clear dog and produce an EIC affected pup.
|
|
|
Re: Question about breed standards
[Re: Duck_Dogs]
#1247126
02/16/10 06:28 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,087
HupDog Daddy
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,087 |
I was reading up on the lineage of the Labrador and found that the original dog was a cross between the St.Johns and the Tweed Spaniel. The dog in it's early form was only a 50~60 lb dog. I think unfortunately that the Labrador has become a victim of it's own popularity. I have had 1 Lab in the past -- Nothing special just a dog. His hips were so bad that by the time he was 5 yrs old he was unable to walk and had to be destroyed. Very sad
" Money isn't everything, but it sure keeps the kids in touch"
|
|
|
Re: Question about breed standards
[Re: Duck_Dogs]
#1247347
02/16/10 08:04 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,658
nogeese
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,658 |
But you cant breed an EIC carrier and an EIC clear dog and produce an EIC affected pup. [/quote]
ok I am not a Geneticist but isnt it just a matter of time until this mutates and is able to perpetuate when only one dog has the gene?
|
|
|
Re: Question about breed standards
[Re: IronSpikeLabs]
#1247394
02/16/10 08:23 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 117
jbois
Woodsman
|
Woodsman
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 117 |
I just read about EIC and watched a video of a dog with it, man that is sad. Whats the test cost and why wouldnt this be tested for by breeders? There is NO reason why a responsible and ethical breeder would not test their breeding stock for EIC AND the other health issues within the breed. Some on this board say that their breeding stock is not heavily field bred and they have never had a problem....so why test?? That is not the way they should think... I have a conformation bred dog that is an EIC carrier. If I didn't know that and assumed because he was not field bred, he shouldn't be tested and decided to breed him to a bitch of unknown status, then I could possibly be producing affected puppies out of ignorance.... That would not be responsible of me? Would it?? Field trial lines have been crossed with regularity with show lines and that accounts for the presence of EIC in both. We keep going back to the issue of testing and resonsibility, but I have yet to have someone justify the breeding of KNOWN EIC carriers. What is the point in the testing and the claim that it is being done 'in the interest of the breed' if the breeder is going to go ahead and pour more EIC carriers into the gene pool? Yet, that is exactly what they are doing. And you have yet to answer the question about your own breeding stock!! Are your dog's tested for EIC?? Don't get on a high horse about other breeder's and what they are breeding. If they know the status of their dog, if it is a carrier and they breed to a clear dog, at least you know what you are getting as a puppy buyer. Because you have yet to answer my original question to you about your breeding stock, you could be breeding clears, carriers, or affecteds.....you have no idea.....
|
|
|
Re: Question about breed standards
[Re: Duck_Dogs]
#1247398
02/16/10 08:24 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 117
jbois
Woodsman
|
Woodsman
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 117 |
If people are all informed about EIC and CNM and test their dogs then we can make sure that no more EIC or CNM affected dogs are produced. I have people ask me all the time what is EIC and CNM and why do your pups come with a hip and eye guarantee. I inform them about it all and educate them. So when breeders are listing in their ads that a dog is an EIC carrier this is being responsible because they are putting it out in the open. So if someone who doesn’t know what EIC is they will probably ask what does it mean that your dog is a carrier and then they can become educated about the issue. As I stated previously EIC testing is new compared to hip and eye testing. I think hip and eye certification should be standard for a responsible breeder. However what’s different about hips and eyes and EIC and CNM is you can’t guarantee you won’t produce a dog with hip and eye issues even with clearances. You can go to OFA’s website and look at the statistics, but you can breed two OFA Excellent dogs and still produce a pup with hip problems. But you cant breed an EIC carrier and an EIC clear dog and produce an EIC affected pup.
Good post.....
|
|
|
Re: Question about breed standards
[Re: jbois]
#1247876
02/16/10 11:48 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 183
dmax
Woodsman
|
Woodsman
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 183 |
As far as the comments about FT dogs skills being counter productive to hunting, that's nuts. So are the comments about FT dogs being to hyper and hard to train. Sure there are some lines that produce dogs that require experienced trainers and handlers to control but it is not true for every FT breeding. I hunt with a FT/HT dog and he sits as long as needed and quiet.
When I got my dog I told the trainer, "I just want a good huntin dog"
She runs HT and her husband's truck is all FT dogs. This was their response...
You train them (HT/FT dogs) the same way.
The foundation for a good gun dog and HT/FT dog are the same.
Last edited by dmax; 02/17/10 12:16 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Question about breed standards
[Re: dmax]
#1249002
02/17/10 01:40 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,413
Mud Shark
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,413 |
That's right. Having an HT/FT dog, THAT IS CALM IN THE BLIND, is like having a 4x4 truck. It's better to have and not need it than to need it and not have it.
Over prepare. Just like any other athlete. Be prepared for more than is expected.
Mud Shark
|
|
|
Re: Question about breed standards
[Re: Gengo]
#1256977
02/20/10 08:52 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 237
EricW
Woodsman
|
Woodsman
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 237 |
You know I am an avid duck hunter and the only time I ever have to get a duck that is more than 100 yards is when the wind pushes it across the pond or something. In 98% of those situations a dog would have been able to get to the duck after only about 50 yards. I do understand for geese as they tend to sail and are harder to bring down. For ducks however, you will NEVER kill a duck at 100 yards which is pretty much the simulation you get at hunt tests from what I have seen on YouTube. Plus like what was stated previously, as a hunter I need a dog that is able to sit still and quietly in less than ideal conditions for up a couple hours (yes we do get up and stretch and walk around when nothing is flying so the dog would get stretch time too) and remain still when all of a sudden a group of 100 teal come cupping in out of no where. I have hunted a lot. I hunted last day of the season this year, my dog went on 2 200+ yard retrieves for blue wing teal. They sailed and swam. I have seen a reason for it all.
|
|
|
Re: Question about breed standards
[Re: EricW]
#1256991
02/20/10 09:02 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 237
EricW
Woodsman
|
Woodsman
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 237 |
Computer was down, so I am just now trying to catch up with all this. My dog does just as well hunting as he does in the tests. He is very successful in both and is very experienced in both. You can't ask for a better dog. Taking him to a test is like taking him to the park to throw the tennis ball, he loves it. It is fun for him. It is practice for the hunting field too. Just like we practice in sports. We don't practice by just playing, we practice with scrimages, training, drills, etc.
I with dmax and TG37. Plus, I have seen the "country" lab. Or the "hunting" lab. In fact, one of my best friends has a lab from "good hunting stock", "years of proven hunters by hunters" and we are lucky if the dog so much as looks at retrieving anything. I have trained and seen plenty of these country labs come into the kennels. I rather take my chances with the pedigrees personally. No doubt there are country dogs out there I would love to get my hands on, finding them is hard. Here and there I see dogs that I want to get ahold of, but just like my dog, they don't campain them, so no one knows of them. However, just like anything, there are pedigrees I won't touch that other people want. So to each their own, what it really boils down to is no one is right or wrong, everyone has their own opionion. Everyone desires what fits their opinion, what they like, and what fits their personality. Some like dogs with pep, some like dogs that are easy going. I like the smaller dogs (50-60lbs) and others like the big 80 to 100lb dogs. There are pluses and minuses to each.
Eric W.
Last edited by EricW; 02/20/10 09:04 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Question about breed standards
[Re: EricW]
#1257049
02/20/10 09:41 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 408
Gengo
OP
Bird Dog
|
OP
Bird Dog
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 408 |
Computer was down, so I am just now trying to catch up with all this. My dog does just as well hunting as he does in the tests. He is very successful in both and is very experienced in both. You can't ask for a better dog. Taking him to a test is like taking him to the park to throw the tennis ball, he loves it. It is fun for him. It is practice for the hunting field too. Just like we practice in sports. We don't practice by just playing, we practice with scrimages, training, drills, etc.
I with dmax and TG37. Plus, I have seen the "country" lab. Or the "hunting" lab. In fact, one of my best friends has a lab from "good hunting stock", "years of proven hunters by hunters" and we are lucky if the dog so much as looks at retrieving anything. I have trained and seen plenty of these country labs come into the kennels. I rather take my chances with the pedigrees personally. No doubt there are country dogs out there I would love to get my hands on, finding them is hard. Here and there I see dogs that I want to get ahold of, but just like my dog, they don't campain them, so no one knows of them. However, just like anything, there are pedigrees I won't touch that other people want. So to each their own, what it really boils down to is no one is right or wrong, everyone has their own opionion. Everyone desires what fits their opinion, what they like, and what fits their personality. Some like dogs with pep, some like dogs that are easy going. I like the smaller dogs (50-60lbs) and others like the big 80 to 100lb dogs. There are pluses and minuses to each.
Eric W. Well said.
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, sig226fan (Rguns.com), TreeBass, txcornhusker
|