texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
dtorgie, bluebiller, Time2GoHuntin, RobbiTX86, Droptine3030
72075 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,799
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,534
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,982
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,235
Posts9,734,660
Members87,075
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: MrSand] #6058166 11/30/15 06:21 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,198
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,198
I'm aware of body sizes, and know the formula by heart. Trouble is, the height of the shoulder on a hog, coyote, deer is not a set number, therfore it causes a variance in the math. You will get close ranging with the reticle, but you will not be perfect 100% of the time.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: Cleric] #6058179 11/30/15 06:27 PM
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 16
M
MrSand Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
M
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 16
If you know how to range, then you also know how to do a proper range card, either by pen and paper or if it is a place that is frequented often, mentally. As part of that is known sizes of items for reference... heck for hunting the inside spread of a deer's antlers is fairly easy to gauge... anyways I can see it is pointless trying to discuss anything further. Clearly you are an expert on all things (in your mind anyways) have a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.

Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: Cleric] #6058184 11/30/15 06:31 PM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 15,731
6
603Country Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
6
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 15,731
Wow, what a grump!

I'd go for the 6.5.

And I still need a good RF. Another big hog got past me last evening. About 450 yards. I guess I need a 6mm CM, it being a true laser beam.

Last edited by 603Country; 11/30/15 06:40 PM.

Not my monkeys, not my circus...
Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: MrSand] #6058187 11/30/15 06:31 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,198
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,198
Go back to the point of the thread, 6mm vs. 6.5mm. And lets look at Cleric's chart 500 to 800 yards.

.....6mm.....6.5mm

500...2.2...2.7
600...3.0...3.7
700...3.9...4.7
800...4.8...5.8

So lets use your "flat shooting term" (which really doesn't exist, in terms of "long range"). And only look at the 6mm

Judge the distance 500 and it's actually 600, you're .8 Mil off. A mil at 600 yards is 21.6", multiply by .8 and you missed by 17.3" at the target. That's a miss on a 2 MOA piece of steel, a miss on a coyote, a miss on a hog, a miss on a deer.

So back to my original statement, bullet drop is irrelavent in long range. But to satisfy you WE MUST KNOW THE DISTANCE TO THE TARGET WITH ANY CARTRIDGE.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: Cleric] #6058189 11/30/15 06:32 PM
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 713
H
headhunter54 Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
H
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 713
Oh snap.

Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: Cleric] #6058205 11/30/15 06:40 PM
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 16
M
MrSand Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
M
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 16
Please don't put words in my mouth. It's a cheap and childish way to try to "win".

I said flatter.

If you miss judge the distance by 100 yards, it's probably time to practice using those skills that you know by heart. LOL

Back to what I was saying. A flatter shooting cartridge will be more forgiving of slight ranging errors. No it will not make up for your "skills" but for most here it will get them on target.

My original point: bullet drop is not irrelevant, it depends. Depends if it is known distance, and in that case the relevance is minimized, but in unknown/certain ranges a flatter shooting will allow for a larger margin of error.

Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: MacDaddy21] #6058244 11/30/15 07:00 PM
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 16
M
MrSand Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
M
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 16
Originally Posted By: MacDaddy21
Originally Posted By: MrSand
Both are nice, but I copied this guy's chambering and it spanks both of those easily.

Link to thread

I'm seeing velocity with 140gr VLD's in the 2950 fps range with very low ES.


6.5 SLR is a beast! I helped a friend get one built and it shoots extremely well. Brass choices are awesome too. One of his early group at 500 was under 1.5". Sweet round for sure. King of the 6.5's IMO.


I originally was going to go for GA Precision's 6.5 RSAUM, but the brass availability had me on the fence, then I stumbled on that guy's post. I'm glad I did. I still don't know what the top end is, as I have been so happy with the performance so far I haven't had the desire to wring it out.

Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: MrSand] #6058249 11/30/15 07:02 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,198
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,198
That's cool. Be upset and take what ever stance you like.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: MrSand] #6058284 11/30/15 07:15 PM
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,107
C
catslayer Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
C
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,107
Fireman... look at his post count... he is trolling


Dumbest thing I've heard on here... Fireman and "ignorant" in the same post bahhahahhahha


Sombody smells like fried borritos...
Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: J.G.] #6058353 11/30/15 07:46 PM
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 16
M
MrSand Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
M
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 16
The only one that seemed to be upset is you. Is it me, or can you not stand when anyone points out when a post of yours is not factually correct(a simple question since I'm new here)?

It's nothing personal, just trying to share accurate information, take it or leave it. If this is not what this forum is for, my apologies.

Any who, have a wonderful day.

Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: MrSand] #6058432 11/30/15 08:22 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,198
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,198
Originally Posted By: MrSand
just trying to share accurate information, take it or leave it. If this is not what this forum is for, my apologies.


You opinion that it is accurate, my opinion is that it is not. Agree to disagree.

Yes that is what this forum is for.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: Cleric] #6058493 11/30/15 08:52 PM
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 16
M
MrSand Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
M
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 16
Well, let me break it down a little so that you can understand that I am factually correct, no opinion needed.

In your earlier example you used 500 yards so I will do the same.

If while ranging there is a +/- 25 yard error that will translate into:

6mm:
So at 475 yards the bullet drops 35.2 inches
at 500 yards the bullet drops 40.3 inches
at 525 yards the bullet drops 45.9 inches

So if the shooter ranged 500 yards and the deer is actually 475 yards the shot will be 5.1 inches high
If the shooter ranged 500 yards and the deer is actually 525 yards the shot will be 5.6 inches low

The same scenario with the 6.5mm moving at 2800 fps:

So at 475 yards the bullet drops 43.4 inches
at 500 yards the bullet drops 49.6 inches
at 525 yards the bullet drops 56.3 inches

So if the shooter ranged 500 yards and the deer is actually 475 yards the shot will be 6.2 inches high
If the shooter ranged 500 yards and the deer is actually 525 yards the shot will be 6.7 inches low

So even with the two closely matched cartridges you can see that the 6mm will shoot roughly 2.2 inches (or 17%) less in total drop when compared to it's 6.5mm cousin. Providing more margin for error. It's really not complicated, nor worth getting all snotty over.

Assumptions for calc:
Berger hybrids
6mm 3100 fps
6.5mm 2800 fps
default atmospherics

calculator used: JBM http://www.jbmballistics.com/cgi-bin/jbmtraj-5.1.cgi

Cheers

Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: MrSand] #6058555 11/30/15 09:19 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,198
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,198
Are you deranged? I've never been upset, and am not snotty.

All of this is because you don't want to use a range finder, that's the basis of your argument. 2.2" less drop at the target, big whoop, dial one more tenth Mil on the turret. And Cleric said this will be a target rifle, so he will have the time to bump the target with a laser prior to shooting at it. When he shoots at my range, I'll tell him how far every target is, and how they're labeled. The only single time I've given at rat's a$$ of how much elevation correction I needed was shooting my 7 Rem Mag a mile. And the only reason I was concerned was if I was going to run out of travel. Sure enough, I did, topped out at 22.0 Mils, but needed 24.5. It bothered me for one second, because all I had to do was hold the extra 2.5 Mils to make up the difference. 1400 yards, and in, either the 6mm or the 6.5 mm will allow most scopes to dial exactly to where they need to be.

This is just silly.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: Cleric] #6058562 11/30/15 09:21 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,777
P_102 Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,777
MrSand, perhaps you would be better received if you refrained from comments like; "kind of ignorant", "cheap and childish" and "snotty".....just my opinion of course.

P_102


Do not trifle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: Cleric] #6058564 11/30/15 09:22 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,499
C
charlesb Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
C
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,499
I would never shoot at any game animal over 300 yards away. Rocks, steel plates, yes... Game animals, no.

- But that's just me.

Last edited by charlesb; 11/30/15 09:22 PM.

Kind regards, charlesb


Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: Cleric] #6058567 11/30/15 09:22 PM
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 16
M
MrSand Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
M
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 16
And hunting... you seem to have issues...

Originally Posted By: FiremanJG
Are you deranged? I've never been upset, and am not snotty.

And Cleric said this will be a target rifle, so he will have the time to bump the target with a laser prior to shooting at it. When he shoots at my range, I'll tell him how far every target is, and how they're labeled.

This is just silly.


Originally Posted By: Cleric
Originally Posted By: charlesb
I guess a lot of that depends upon the intended purpose.




Lot of truth here. This would be a paper/steel puncher. Maybe the occasional hunt


Besides, my comment was directed to your altruistic comment that drop doesn't matter and I simply corrected you. I corrected you by pointing out that it depends, gave an example, further broke the example down with hard numbers to support how drop can matter.

Cheers

Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: P_102] #6058569 11/30/15 09:23 PM
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 16
M
MrSand Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
M
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 16

Point taken.

Originally Posted By: P_102
MrSand, perhaps you would be better received if you refrained from comments like; "kind of ignorant", "cheap and childish" and "snotty".....just my opinion of course.

P_102

Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: MrSand] #6058643 11/30/15 09:57 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,198
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,198
I've have no issues.

You've still not convinced me, or probably anyone else around here, that elevation correction matters on a target rifle.

Again, a difference of opinion. Some people's matter, some don't...


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: J.G.] #6058645 11/30/15 09:58 PM
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 16
M
MrSand Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
M
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 16

Oh, and one last time, please do not put words in my mouth. I'll be honest, that does bother me.

Originally Posted By: FiremanJG
All of this is because you don't want to use a range finder, that's the basis of your argument.


I never said that.

However, being able to (accurately) range with a reticle for hunting or shooting steel is a very good skill to have (that is my opinion anyways).

Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: Cleric] #6058855 11/30/15 11:37 PM
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,954
H
huntwest Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
H
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,954
I think MrSand has some sand in his knickers!
Just say he is right and maybe he will go away.

Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: Cleric] #6058894 11/30/15 11:50 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,439
T
TFF Caribou Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
T
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,439
Like I said... popcorn

Saw it coming...


The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference. -George Washington
Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: Cleric] #6058922 12/01/15 12:02 AM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,277
J
Judd Online Confused
#1 Creedmoor Fan
Online Confused
#1 Creedmoor Fan
J
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,277
I'm a 6mm whore and would take the 6 Creedmoor over the 6.5 but as everyone has outlined...there isn't a whole lot of difference between them. The hybrid is a baddonkey when it comes to bucking the wind. But so is the 140 hybrid...it just don't/can't carry speed like the 6mm.

Two things beat the wind...speed & BC. I want both and the 6mm's give me that. The only place that a 6.5 is really better on watching splashes or hearing ding steel is over 800y and I'd argue most matches are won with shots less than 800y. Most guys shooting either long range benchrest clay stuff or tactical stuff have went to the 6...it's just more fun to shoot and that 105hybird is bad medicine. I've got 4 right now and thinking about a 5th wink


Originally Posted by Phil Robertson
Don't let your ears hear what your eyes didn't see, and don't let your mouth say what your heart doesn't feel
Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: MrSand] #6059099 12/01/15 01:14 AM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053
B
bo3 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
B
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053
Originally Posted By: MrSand
Well, let me break it down a little so that you can understand that I am factually correct, no opinion needed.

In your earlier example you used 500 yards so I will do the same.

If while ranging there is a +/- 25 yard error that will translate into:

6mm:
So at 475 yards the bullet drops 35.2 inches
at 500 yards the bullet drops 40.3 inches
at 525 yards the bullet drops 45.9 inches

So if the shooter ranged 500 yards and the deer is actually 475 yards the shot will be 5.1 inches high
If the shooter ranged 500 yards and the deer is actually 525 yards the shot will be 5.6 inches low

The same scenario with the 6.5mm moving at 2800 fps:

So at 475 yards the bullet drops 43.4 inches
at 500 yards the bullet drops 49.6 inches
at 525 yards the bullet drops 56.3 inches

So if the shooter ranged 500 yards and the deer is actually 475 yards the shot will be 6.2 inches high
If the shooter ranged 500 yards and the deer is actually 525 yards the shot will be 6.7 inches low

So even with the two closely matched cartridges you can see that the 6mm will shoot roughly 2.2 inches (or 17%) less in total drop when compared to it's 6.5mm cousin. Providing more margin for error. It's really not complicated, nor worth getting all snotty over.

Assumptions for calc:
Berger hybrids
6mm 3100 fps
6.5mm 2800 fps
default atmospherics

calculator used: JBM http://www.jbmballistics.com/cgi-bin/jbmtraj-5.1.cgi

Cheers


Not much of a difference. The problem is the two rounds in question are to close. There is a reason they are popular for competition. If you compared on to a 308 you would have a point but these two are too close in performance.

Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: Cleric] #6059222 12/01/15 01:47 AM
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 868
T
Txhillbilly Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
T
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 868
Never had any 6mm rifles,but I have three in 6.5mm and they work for me.
6.5 Creedmoor - 260 Remington - 6.5/06 A Square

Re: 6mm vs 6.5mm creedmoor [Re: Txhillbilly] #6059274 12/01/15 02:04 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,832
D
Drop Tine Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
D
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,832
Originally Posted By: Txhillbilly
Never had any 6mm rifles,but I have three in 6.5mm and they work for me.
6.5 Creedmoor - 260 Remington - 6.5/06 A Square


How do you like the 6.5-06? Been considering one of them for a custom build. What kind of performance are you seeing with 130's & 140's?


[Linked Image]
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3