16" .22 Creedmoor, that is going to wear the thermal scope. I needed a scope for load development. It sure looks out of place.

7-35 ATACR doubled the weight of the rig! Bet it shot well.

Looks like a winner

Its a chode

Yes, looks terrible, makes Laney Wilson’s new ozempic butt look good

I can see what I'm doing.

I’m image so, it’s the Hubble space telescope

Yes, and clean up your toolbox.

At least it could help her look for her hiney.

I'm so glad I'm not the only one that has crap all over my bench and outlets with no covers!

You could take the sunshade off and loose 3-4" of scope.
If it works stay with it.

I think my AR that's at your place looks ridiculous. Your rifle told mine to hold its beer. Good thing looks don't matter.

It looks like the Hubble telescope mounted on a Daisy BB gun.

Ain't no BB gun. I worked on a 16" 22 Creedmoor today. 80.5 gr Berger.

This load shot 3212 fps. And it shot this tight, partially because I could see. God bless great rifle scopes and nice triggers! 200 Yards

Imagine the group it would’ve shot with a good scope

Says the guy that uses Vortex MOA scopes. You have zero credibility pertaining to scopes.

Is it me, or is the scope bigger than the rifle?

Compensating for something?

You map that out to 700?

Several loads I tried are giving me some shiny on the case heads. Ejector circles.

Today, I'm going to try some lighter loads. If I end up going back to that load, or any other load I end up on, it will be shot out to 800 yards.

Back to why I bought a thermal with a Mil reticle in it. From the living room, I can see 500 yards with no obstructions. I can see 800 yards, but with some trees in between.

I think it needs another sun shade.

That rifle makes your scope look fat

That's more appropriate. I had it backerds.

A classic case of attaching a firearm to an optic.

Bolt is on the wrong side

The bolt is in the center.

Geez...the bolt handle

Hah did you go out of your way to find a particularly ugly stock?

The first priority was getting a stock or a chassis quickly. This was to my door in four days. AG Composites will take 12 weeks. Manners and McMillan will take 6 months.

The KRG Bravo is less than $500.

Manners, McMilan, AG Composites is $800 plus $250 bottom metal.

It doesn't seem too ugly to me.

I have heard great things about the KRG Bravo at its price point.

"She's got a great personality!"

Butter face...

Actually, I think it's a great lookin' gun.

Those start at 250 lbs!

I was just being a smart azz. To me in general chassis setups are not aesthetically pleasing. This is my tackdriver. Old school style but works.



It's a switch barrel rifle using shouldered prefits. Have 260 and 308 barrels for it.

This rifle lives on a tripod, in my living room, 90% of the time. The chassis works, and is comfortable to shoot.

It is the only one I have. The rest are composite stocks. I've got several Manners, one McMillan, and one AG Composites. I like stocks better. But, again, this was about getting a barreled action, and trigger into something, in a timely fashion. I've got no need to change it. It works.

If it's just going to sit on a tripod, then the chassis is serving only as an interface between the barreled action and the tripod. Nothing wrong with practicality (even if it's homely! ).

And here I was trying to give him a break.......

I don't need a break. It beats a Walnut stock, without a vertical grip, that's going to move with weather changes.

I said what I said.

Well if it is going to sit on a tripod in front of a window I feel Walnut would probably be fine. However I bet it will do it's duties just fine. Interested in getting myself a tripod around the right height for sitting.

Don't think I'd walk across the room to get a better look at that one. Call me shallow. Or just old.