texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Sprint car dude, LADan, Hctracker, Dakotapfeil96, WeaponX
72845 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,840
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 66,660
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
Stub 45,786
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics547,638
Posts9,850,393
Members87,845
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Draw Hunts 10/15/24 [Re: grizzlyman] #9123727 10/18/24 11:45 AM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 666
J
jmh004 Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
J
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 666
I had 17 LPs and finally got an exotic hunt.

Re: Draw Hunts 10/15/24 [Re: Mistereeee] #9123803 10/18/24 02:01 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,412
B
blancobuster Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
B
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,412
Originally Posted by Mistereeee
Originally Posted by DRUNK
Originally Posted by Mistereeee
It's weird how they go straight to "Not Selected" on some hunts. South Llano had 20 permits, and went from "Pending 1st Draw" to "Not Selected" in under 20 seconds. All 20 people selected already accepted and paid?

(I update the page every 30 seconds)


Going straight to not selected isn't because all of the permits got accepted. The hunt manager for the hunt decides if the hunt goes to not selected or pending 2nd draw after the primary draw is done. I got this information from TPWD.


Interesting. What would be the logic behind doing that?


I would guess probably based on spotlight surveys for population. They give some set # of tags away as a baseline and then if they think they need to reduce the population for habitat management reasons they may have some extra permits to give out. I would guess the exotics are still hurting from the big freeze a few years ago.

Re: Draw Hunts 10/15/24 [Re: blancobuster] #9124034 10/18/24 08:30 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,488
Sniper John Online Happy
gumshoe
Online Happy
gumshoe
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,488
Originally Posted by blancobuster
........

I would guess probably based on spotlight surveys for population. They give some set # of tags away as a baseline and then if they think they need to reduce the population for habitat management reasons they may have some extra permits to give out. I would guess the exotics are still hurting from the big freeze a few years ago.


What I have been told on every WMA I have hunted on that had exotics is the long term plan is to eradicate all exotics from the property. For example Powderhorn WMA the plan was to rid the area of Sambar to manage native wildlife. But they also limit the take of exotics on most of these hunts so it makes me wonder if there may be some internal conflicts about the long term goals for these places.

Re: Draw Hunts 10/15/24 [Re: rolyat.nosaj] #9125088 10/21/24 12:31 AM
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 2,689
R
rolyat.nosaj Offline OP
Veteran Tracker
OP Offline
Veteran Tracker
R
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 2,689
I believe the plan for biologists is to restore habitat back to the way it was before humans altered it. Until money enters the conversation.

Re: Draw Hunts 10/15/24 [Re: Sniper John] #9125212 10/21/24 12:48 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,412
B
blancobuster Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
B
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,412
Originally Posted by Sniper John
Originally Posted by blancobuster
........

I would guess probably based on spotlight surveys for population. They give some set # of tags away as a baseline and then if they think they need to reduce the population for habitat management reasons they may have some extra permits to give out. I would guess the exotics are still hurting from the big freeze a few years ago.


What I have been told on every WMA I have hunted on that had exotics is the long term plan is to eradicate all exotics from the property. For example Powderhorn WMA the plan was to rid the area of Sambar to manage native wildlife. But they also limit the take of exotics on most of these hunts so it makes me wonder if there may be some internal conflicts about the long term goals for these places.


That would make sense to me at pretty much every property I know about except for Mason Mountain. I am sure there is plenty of internal conflict on the issue of exotic vs. native wildlife management on these properties.

Re: Draw Hunts 10/15/24 [Re: blancobuster] #9125276 10/21/24 02:57 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,488
Sniper John Online Happy
gumshoe
Online Happy
gumshoe
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,488
Originally Posted by blancobuster
Originally Posted by Sniper John
Originally Posted by blancobuster
........

I would guess probably based on spotlight surveys for population. They give some set # of tags away as a baseline and then if they think they need to reduce the population for habitat management reasons they may have some extra permits to give out. I would guess the exotics are still hurting from the big freeze a few years ago.


What I have been told on every WMA I have hunted on that had exotics is the long term plan is to eradicate all exotics from the property. For example Powderhorn WMA the plan was to rid the area of Sambar to manage native wildlife. But they also limit the take of exotics on most of these hunts so it makes me wonder if there may be some internal conflicts about the long term goals for these places.


That would make sense to me at pretty much every property I know about except for Mason Mountain. I am sure there is plenty of internal conflict on the issue of exotic vs. native wildlife management on these properties.


I hunted Mason Mountain twice in it's first or second year and one other time since that. Actually Mason Mountain was supposed to be rid of exotics by 2006. I did just read where the half dozen species left out of the original fourteen are now part of an exotics management study. So it does look like some long term goals did change for that one.

Re: Draw Hunts 10/15/24 [Re: Sniper John] #9125501 10/21/24 11:31 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 226
G
grizzlyman Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
G
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 226
Originally Posted by Sniper John
Originally Posted by blancobuster
........

I would guess probably based on spotlight surveys for population. They give some set # of tags away as a baseline and then if they think they need to reduce the population for habitat management reasons they may have some extra permits to give out. I would guess the exotics are still hurting from the big freeze a few years ago.


What I have been told on every WMA I have hunted on that had exotics is the long term plan is to eradicate all exotics from the property. For example Powderhorn WMA the plan was to rid the area of Sambar to manage native wildlife. But they also limit the take of exotics on most of these hunts so it makes me wonder if there may be some internal conflicts about the long term goals for these places.


When we hunted Powderhorn on the GDE hunt a few years ago it surprised me how the biologists talked about the Sambars. I have heard nicer things about Feral Hogs than what they were saying. I would prefer to hunt exotics than WT at this point.


NRA Certified Rifle/ML Instructor
NRA Certified RSO
Graduate of Benning's School for Wayward Boys
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3