texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Stephanie Bouma, Bambino Rooster, Mater3719, Texas Legacy Realty, Sprint car dude
72849 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,840
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 66,679
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
Stub 45,792
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics547,688
Posts9,850,819
Members87,849
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 150 of 166 1 2 148 149 150 151 152 165 166
Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: HaywireHaywood] #9013261 03/01/24 12:54 AM
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 294
G
Graycard Online Content
Bird Dog
Online Content
Bird Dog
G
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 294
No, I'm not Bill but these are easy questions. grin
1. I would say it is more stretching out a 5.56 instead of a 300BLK.
2. The when the project started it was base around improving the 7.62x40WT
3. The goal of matching the 30-30 was met.
4. Keeping the 5.56 case allowed the conversion without having to change the bolt.
5. A side note could be that when the project started LC brass was everywhere and could be had for next to nothing!

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: Graycard] #9013262 03/01/24 12:54 AM
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 95
H
HaywireHaywood Online Content
Outdoorsman
Online Content
Outdoorsman
H
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 95
I had it in my mind that the 30-30 still had about 200fps on the Ham'r.. now that I look at some 30/30 data, I see it's much closer than I thought. I think of the ham'r as a blk with longer brass and lighter bullets. The brass length was what I meant by "stretched".

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: HaywireHaywood] #9013268 03/01/24 01:07 AM
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,250
Wilson Combat Online Content
Boar Meister
Online Content
Boar Meister
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,250
Originally Posted by HaywireHaywood
Bill, I'm sure this has already been asked, but a 30cal cartridge based on the 6.8spc would have had more case capacity and would have gotten closer to the 30/30 ballistics goal (I think). What was the thought process behind stretching a 300BLK vs standardizing something like the 30HRT? Thanks


Haywire, Graycard has pretty much covered it. If you shoot factory 150gr .30-30 ammo in the same barrel length the HAM'R velocity is equal with the bonus of better BC bullets. It's "possible" that a necked up 6.8 would give more velocity, but you lose the stronger and more common .223/5.56 bolt compatibility which was a biggie for me. Another plus is more magazine capacity.

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: jkcowboy] #9013533 03/01/24 05:52 PM
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 42
T
Theg_man Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
T
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 42
Originally Posted by jkcowboy
Took a couple of years to indulge a wildcat but I bought an 18" barrel and am interested to see what I can make this rifle do. If your going to build an 30-30 equivalent, you have to be ok with what a 30-30 will do... take deer/hog sized game to 150 yds. Recommend thoughts of 300 yard shots upside down at bull elk leave your mind. Ok... results so far. (1) Hunting. Nickel WC, 130 gn Hot-Cor seated to cannelure, CCI 450 started at 22 gns CFE Black and worked up to 28.4 gns. Little flattening of primer, no ejector mark, got repeatable 2550 fps. Will back down to 28.2 gns for actual hunting load and test. Should be just over 2500 fps. (2) Plinking same bullet with 3031 powder, 22 grains, 1800 fps. (3) Plinking russian resized 123 gn bullet seated 2.26 3031 22 gns, 1800 fps. (4) Plinking converted wolf russian ammo- 123 gn resized .308, seated 2.26, 22.5 gns of what looks like 3031-2150 fps (burns a little hotter than 3031), (5) Plinking 110 gn solid, seated to chamber, 3031 full case fill, tap, compress - 2000 fps. (6) Plinking. 110 gn loaded same as above but with 22.5 gns 3031 1650 to 1700 fps. Only max CFE Black showed light pressure signs. All rounds fed and cycled 100% with 30 round WC Polymer magazine. For Plinking, focused on 110 gn round nose and russian 123 gn fmj as these can be purchased relatively on the cheap. My take, after experience with many calibers on game is... 130 gn bullet, 2500 fps will take game (deer/hog) to 100 yds with better than 30-30 performance and much better than 77gn 5.56 from more angles. Ballistics with a 2.7 " above bore, sighted at 50 yd zero show shots t o175 yds possible. If game has some oomph, stay within 100 yds. This is exactly what I wanted out of the cartridge... 30 carbine on steroids with accuracy and good dependability with near 300 savage performance/accuracy, one of the best deer cartridges ever developed. Hope this helps some. My next test session will nail down the hunting load and perform accuracy testing. Looking for around 1.5 inch at 100 yds, think this will do better as it was shooting on top of itself at 50 yds. One more note... the lower velocity loads had a noticeable lower point of impact at 50 yds. Has to be a barrel vibration thing, so may vary gun to gun. Last thought... had a few issues when using bullet seating die to apply slight crimp. Shell bulge just below neck was a problem. Had to take cartridges apart and rebuild with no crimp, no contact of die to cartridge. Next tension was satisfactory with no setback. I have factory crimp die on the way. Last Last thought. Assuming that WC Factory 130 grains were loaded with CFE Black, I match the load and could not match their velocity of 2450 fps. Not sure, but think the powder might be a bit different or crimp tighter. Will watch this as I crimp the next batch lightly. This might let full load back off to 28 gns and 2500 fps. A little more room for hotter environments.


The HAM'R is capable of cleanly taking more than deer and hogs. Bill has shown that with elk and lots of African game. I've taken multiple moose and grizzly. With the right bullets and loads 300 yards on game is within reason, IMO. The little engine that could...

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: HaywireHaywood] #9013537 03/01/24 06:00 PM
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 42
T
Theg_man Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
T
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 42
Originally Posted by HaywireHaywood
Bill, I'm sure this has already been asked, but a 30cal cartridge based on the 6.8spc would have had more case capacity and would have gotten closer to the 30/30 ballistics goal (I think). What was the thought process behind stretching a 300BLK vs standardizing something like the 30HRT? Thanks


I have a 30HRT as well. It does get 100 fps or so over the HAM'R in most cases, but in my experience, the brass quality and vast availability of the 223 case, and a stronger bolt make the HAM'R design a better choice for AR platforms, again IMO. The HAM'R hits the 30-30 goal, the 30 HRT surpasses it somewhat, but with the issues mentioned.

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: jkcowboy] #9013799 03/02/24 02:24 PM
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 4
J
jkcowboy Offline
Green Horn
Offline
Green Horn
J
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 4
My last comment was a bit long and covered trying several things, but I did have a few questions...

(1) With nickel cartridges and no flare, is it the seating of the bullet or the crimp that could cause the case bulge? Never had this problem with any other cartridge but admittedly never used nickel cartridges before.

(2) General Question about shift in POI. I just don't see how one bullet or load can shift more than an inch at 25 yds. More at 50 yds. What exactly allows this to happen? In this case, the lower velocity (1800 fps) were hitting a full 1" to 1.25" low at 25 yds. Baffles my mind.

(3) Has anyone tried any other Medium burn common powders for plinking? Looking for powders that are keep it simple safe 1800-2100 fps and full case fill. I should be good for awhile as I have lots of 7.62 x 39 but not gun in that chamber. I don't mind breaking them down 20 at a time at the cost of a primer.

Thanks.. John

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: Theg_man] #9013818 03/02/24 02:50 PM
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 4
J
jkcowboy Offline
Green Horn
Offline
Green Horn
J
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 4
I totally agree with what can be done with a 30-30, I seem to remember Teddy Roosevelt talking about an African trip with it and comparing to the calibers before. I also have a friend in Alaska who has taken all with the 30/30. Note: he would not hunt grizzly without a backup hunter and a much larger gun at the ready. IMO bullet design, weight and impact velocity have to be within a range of comfort, different for everyone. If I were to go bigger on game with 300 Ham'r, it would have to be the 150 gn, bonded or eq, 50 yds and as close to 2100 fps impact (+/-), and you have to be ok with expiration 3-5 minutes later, just IMO. To keep this general concept as the range extends to 100,150,200, 250... the minimum cartridge gets bigger to put more powder behind the bullet and/or use a bigger, more efficient bullet. What I like about the 130 gn is that the velocity of 2500 gives a good point blank out to 150-175 yds for everything I am going to shoot.

Slightly different tack, in Alaska many carry pistols or 12 ga for defense. The ham'r rifle is light enough that I think it would be an improvement on the 12 ga slug, if you can count on multiple rounds of heavier non-expanding deep penetration, head shot. I have not been there for years and used to carry a 45 colt with solids, only good if the barrel is in the mouth when you pull the trigger. The Ham'r would have been much better.

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: jkcowboy] #9013820 03/02/24 02:59 PM
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,250
Wilson Combat Online Content
Boar Meister
Online Content
Boar Meister
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,250
Originally Posted by jkcowboy
My last comment was a bit long and covered trying several things, but I did have a few questions...

(1) With nickel cartridges and no flare, is it the seating of the bullet or the crimp that could cause the case bulge? Never had this problem with any other cartridge but admittedly never used nickel cartridges before.

(2) General Question about shift in POI. I just don't see how one bullet or load can shift more than an inch at 25 yds. More at 50 yds. What exactly allows this to happen? In this case, the lower velocity (1800 fps) were hitting a full 1" to 1.25" low at 25 yds. Baffles my mind.

(3) Has anyone tried any other Medium burn common powders for plinking? Looking for powders that are keep it simple safe 1800-2100 fps and full case fill. I should be good for awhile as I have lots of 7.62 x 39 but not gun in that chamber. I don't mind breaking them down 20 at a time at the cost of a primer.

Thanks.. John



#1 I always flare the case mouth with a Lee Universal Neck Expanding die available from Amazon or WC, this eliminates the issue. I also taper crimp with ether a Dillon or Redding Blackout taper crimp die.

#2 I typically see a POI shift of up to 4" at 100yds depending on the load and don't see this as excessive. I usually see more with 5.56. I do have some loads that shoot the same POI in specific barrels.

#3 Suitable powders for the HAM'R is a short list...
A1680 or CFEBLK are the best all around
SW Black or SOCOM have some applications
Functioning loads can be made with IMR or H4227, A5744 and Norma N200, but they are too bulky for top velocity
Faster powders like W296, H110, 11FS and LilGun build dangerous pressures too fast and don't generate enough energy to function guns with mid or intermediate gas systems.

The only gun I blew up in early testing was with 11FS !!!

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: jkcowboy] #9013912 03/02/24 08:05 PM
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 42
T
Theg_man Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
T
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 42
Originally Posted by jkcowboy


Slightly different tack, in Alaska many carry pistols or 12 ga for defense. The ham'r rifle is light enough that I think it would be an improvement on the 12 ga slug, if you can count on multiple rounds of heavier non-expanding deep penetration, head shot. I have not been there for years and used to carry a 45 colt with solids, only good if the barrel is in the mouth when you pull the trigger. The Ham'r would have been much better.


Alaska and bears produce more than their share of lore, that's for sure. Not many that spend a lot of time outside carry a 12ga, not for long anyway, unless they're required to for work. After enough time, the weight generally gets it left behind and probably replaced with a handgun. A HAM'R would be very effective for bear defense, but no need for solids, normal hunting loads would work fine.

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: Wilson Combat] #9014520 03/04/24 02:00 AM
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 4
J
jkcowboy Offline
Green Horn
Offline
Green Horn
J
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 4
Thanks much! I'll incorporate all of #1 and get a neck expander and taper crimp. I just finished a batch and being gentle had 1 bulge in a 100 that I had to fix. A slight flare should end issue.

Playing with the zero of this rifle and a 2.7" over bore mount, I'm now thinking of going with a 75 yd zero or .5" low at 50 yds. This would give perfect zero from 50- 125 yds and within about 1 inch from 25-150 yds. 200 yds would be around 4" low (1900 fps, 1000 ft-lbf). That would work for me.

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: jkcowboy] #9014564 03/04/24 04:19 AM
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,250
Wilson Combat Online Content
Boar Meister
Online Content
Boar Meister
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,250
Originally Posted by jkcowboy
Thanks much! I'll incorporate all of #1 and get a neck expander and taper crimp. I just finished a batch and being gentle had 1 bulge in a 100 that I had to fix. A slight flare should end issue.

Playing with the zero of this rifle and a 2.7" over bore mount, I'm now thinking of going with a 75 yd zero or .5" low at 50 yds. This would give perfect zero from 50- 125 yds and within about 1 inch from 25-150 yds. 200 yds would be around 4" low (1900 fps, 1000 ft-lbf). That would work for me.



I zero 1" high at 100yds (basically a 150yd zero) with day scopes and dead on at 100yds with thermal for night hunting

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: dlrz71] #9016793 03/08/24 05:20 PM
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 12
D
DaleR Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
D
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 12
I loaded up my first test load for 300 HAM'R, using the loading data on the June 29,2023 update reloading data that everyone seems to reference. Having only been reloading for a year and my only rifle cartridge being 300 AAC, I took a pretty caution approach. I have an AeroPrecision converted 5.56 by using the WV 16" RECON barrel. Having had great luck with the Lehigh Controlled Chaos in 115 gr, I chose the CC in 125 grain and am starting with the Hornady 125 gr FMJ to get a feel for the cartridge before loading up the Lehigh bullets.

The parameters for the load are new Starline brass, CCI 41 primers (the mil version of the CCI 400---magnum primers are very difficult to find at a price you can afford), COAL 1.255 and CFE BLK for the powder.

Unlike most of you in Texas, my range is at 3000 MSL and the OAT was 32 degrees. Yes Montana gets high and cold. :-)

I reload with a Dillon 550C although for these test loads, I use it more like a single stage press......the cases are sized and primed....each powder charge is weighed and hand loaded, then seated and lightly crimped, using a separate seating and crimping die. Each round is inspected for primer seating, etc. I know it is awkward on a multi stage like the Dillon but it works great for small batch loads.


When I do a new cartridge, I always load the min load so that I can compare my actual results with the published results. For this round the published was 24.3 gr CFE BLK with a velocity of 2200 fps. My test results were very close to the published results.

Rifle Cartridge, 125.0 gr 24.3 gr CFE BLK
# Speed (FPS)
1 2242.9
2 2232.3
3 2211.7
4 2190.8
5 2197.9

Based on those results, I decided to start my actual test loads with 25.0 grains of CFE.

As I worked the load up in .2 grain increments all was going well. At 25.8 grains. here is the result

Rifle Cartridge, 125.0 gr CFE BLK 25.8
# Speed (FPS)
1 2350.1
2 2357.3
3 2362.4
4 2364.6
5 2362.4

AVERAGE SPEED 2359.4
STD DEV 5.2
SPREAD 14.5

I was incredibly impressed with the accuracy of the barrel and at this powder load the STD DEV of 5.2 seemed great. At 26.0 grains, it turned sour.

125.0 gr Hornady FMJ *
# Speed (FPS)
1 2399.3

This first shot felt a bit snappy and when I inspected the fired case, the primer was pushed out slightly. I packed up my new Garmin Xero C1 chronograph and headed home.

I understand the differences and all the variables. The published max velocity was 2450 fps and a load of 27.0 grains CFE BLK. The two differences, other than altitude and temperate are the CCI 41 primer and the Starline brass.....as opposed to the CCI 450 magnum primer and the SIG case. I noticed a comment on another thread that the Starline brass had less case volume. Is the case volume difference between the Starline and Sig brass significant enough to cause the pressure difference I seem to be experiencing. What looks to be a good load at 25.8 is well below the powder load and 90-100 fps slower. With this same Hornady bullet in 300 AAC I am getting right at 2200 fps. The increase using the HAM'R is only about 150 fps.

Any input is greatly appreciated.


"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.”
Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: dlrz71] #9016844 03/08/24 07:06 PM
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 12
D
DaleR Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
D
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 12
After more research....it seems the issue might be the CCI 41 primers instead of CCI 450......More checking to do!


"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.”
Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: dlrz71] #9016847 03/08/24 07:15 PM
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 95
H
HaywireHaywood Online Content
Outdoorsman
Online Content
Outdoorsman
H
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 95
A coworker of mine said that in his experimentation, he saw better velocities with standard primers. 🤔

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: dlrz71] #9016937 03/08/24 11:11 PM
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,250
Wilson Combat Online Content
Boar Meister
Online Content
Boar Meister
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,250
The Starline cases do have less powder capacity, approx .2gr less and you will normally get comparable velocity with this .2gr reduced charge compared to a Sig case.

All around I prefer CCI450s and that is what all of our factory ammo is loaded with, however I've had good luck with standard CCI400s too. I even use Fed 200s when loading for my bolt guns. I don't have a lot of experience with other brands of primers and wasn't happy with the accuracy I got when I tried CCI 41s.

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: Wilson Combat] #9017301 03/09/24 09:45 PM
Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 189
T
TxPigKiller Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
T
Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 189
Originally Posted by Wilson Combat
The Starline cases do have less powder capacity, approx .2gr less and you will normally get comparable velocity with this .2gr reduced charge compared to a Sig case.

All around I prefer CCI450s and that is what all of our factory ammo is loaded with, however I've had good luck with standard CCI400s too. I even use Fed 200s when loading for my bolt guns. I don't have a lot of experience with other brands of primers and wasn't happy with the accuracy I got when I tried CCI 41s.


Back when you couldn't beg borrow buy or steal primers I used some Remington 7 1/2 primers in my 5.56 loads with the result being the velocity went down slightly but the accuracy went WAY up compared to using CCI 41. Haven't tried that with my Ham'r yet so if anybody does (or has) experiment I'd be interested in the results.

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: dlrz71] #9017389 03/10/24 12:28 AM
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 294
G
Graycard Online Content
Bird Dog
Online Content
Bird Dog
G
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 294
I used the Remington 7 1/2 primers while loading for my 7.62x40WT for years before the 300 HAM'R came out. The only problem was they felt loose when seating them. I switched over to the CCI 400 and 450's and that seemed to solve the problem. That led me to testing out every primer I could find.
Now! Can anyone tell me where I put the information?

bang

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: Graycard] #9017423 03/10/24 01:21 AM
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 95
H
HaywireHaywood Online Content
Outdoorsman
Online Content
Outdoorsman
H
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 95
Originally Posted by Graycard
Now! Can anyone tell me where I put the information? bang


It's in that 3 ring binder labeled "reloading info" on the shelf above your reloading bench... there on the left.

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: dlrz71] #9017485 03/10/24 03:10 AM
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 49
G
greyling Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
G
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 49
Reloading question!!

so, I've been shooting the hamm'r off and on for a couple years now, and largely I love it. however, I've been getting inconsistent ejection. I'm assuming it all has to do with the ammo I'm shooting. I'm using a home built upper using the 11" barrel and an adjustable gas block. I had to open the gas block a considerable amount early on because while it mostly ejected, I'd get a few that didn't. now that it's open a lot, everything ejects, and most of it goes in a nice pile, 5 oclock, about 10-12 feet away. However, I get a few at the 3 position, and a couple that just barely come out and head about 130ish. I'm shooting suppressed, but I think the cause is this:

I'm fire forming cases made out of LC nato brass I cut down and resized. I'm using 25 grains of 1680 under a 125 grn TNT.

Am I just getting inconsistent pressures because some of the gas is slipping by before the case can seal the chamber? Will my issues go away once I start using actual ham'r cases? I've never fire formed using a semi auto before. It's always been in a bolt gun.

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: dlrz71] #9017546 03/10/24 08:51 AM
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 95
H
HaywireHaywood Online Content
Outdoorsman
Online Content
Outdoorsman
H
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 95
Does it happen on previously fireformed cases or just during the fireforming process?

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: dlrz71] #9017693 03/10/24 05:57 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 863
M
machinist Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
M
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 863
My best shooting loads use IMR 4198. My rifle doesn’t like CFEBLK at all . I just now have loaded some 125 TNT with 1680 but have not shot them yet. Speer 130’s and 4198 leaves the pigs DRT


some people like silver and gold
I like brass and lead with a little powder in between
Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: HaywireHaywood] #9017715 03/10/24 07:37 PM
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 49
G
greyling Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
G
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 49
Originally Posted by HaywireHaywood
Does it happen on previously fireformed cases or just during the fireforming process?


All I've shot so far are fire forming loads. I've shot about 500 or so of them, and they are accurate, and lethal.

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: greyling] #9017719 03/10/24 07:42 PM
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 95
H
HaywireHaywood Online Content
Outdoorsman
Online Content
Outdoorsman
H
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 95
I'd load some up on your fireformed cases and see how they function.

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: dlrz71] #9018057 03/11/24 06:27 PM
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,250
Wilson Combat Online Content
Boar Meister
Online Content
Boar Meister
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,250
There will soon be a new kid on the block....available in mid May (NRA show release)

Wilson Combat NULA M20S mini action (MSRP $2995.):

Bare rifle with 16.25" barrel weighs 4# 7oz
6# 3oz ready to hunt with Leupold 3-9x33 Ultralight scope, mounts, Silencer Central Banish Backcountry suppressor and 6rds of ammo
5 + 1 capacity
3 shot 100yd group with the new Lehigh 110gr TXC

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: dlrz71] #9018075 03/11/24 07:12 PM
Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 189
T
TxPigKiller Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
T
Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 189
Nice!!! Good thing Tractor Supply has a sale on their gun safes. partyon555

Page 150 of 166 1 2 148 149 150 151 152 165 166
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3