Forums46
Topics549,312
Posts9,870,599
Members87,982
|
Most Online25,604 Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
Re: This is why I shoot spikes
[Re: Texas Dan]
#8961297
11/25/23 12:12 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,063
Dave Davidson
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,063 |
I haven’t killed a deer in 3 or 4 years. Haven’t seen one that I wanted on the wall. A devastating 4 year drought took out a lot of wildlife. That was about 5 years ago and the herds are still replenishing. It wouldn’t hurt to take one but I need the does. I’m mostly seeing bucks that need a little more time to reach their potential. Most will be legal next year. Dang few does seen anyway and I don’t know why.
Actually, I realize that I enjoy hunting and don’t have to kill anything to enjoy the hunt. But, it’s about like kissing your sister. It’s still a kiss but it’s like going fishing and not getting a bite.
Without a sense of urgency, nothing ever happens.
Boy, if I say "sic em", you'd better look for something to bite. Sam Shelley, Rancher Muleshoe Texas 1892-1985 RIP
|
|
|
Re: This is why I shoot spikes
[Re: Texas Dan]
#8963174
11/28/23 01:25 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,608
Texas Dan
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,608 |
Estimating the age and overall health of the spike might be easier with this photo.
"When the debate is lost, insults become the tool of the loser."
|
|
|
Re: This is why I shoot spikes
[Re: txtrophy85]
#8963808
11/29/23 02:03 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 4,235
Wytex
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 4,235 |
Time and time again it’s been shown that yearling spike bucks can result in a deer growing respectable if not trophy class antlers at maturity.
The antiquated Kerr study is the only one to show that spikes produce inferior racks at adulthood and it was heavily weighted. But this coming from an institute that denies CWD is sheep scrapie despite glaring evidence.
You need to call and talk with this guy, he researched and worked on cwd for years, ran the state lab up here. You are dead wrong on the scrapies part. Hank Edwards is his name. Thanks for the opportunity to respond to the article. Unfortunately, Mr. Gore misinterpreted most of the original science cited in his writeup! I've attached the journal articles he referenced to this email, and although both are "heavy reads", that I wouldn't recommend unless you are having trouble sleeping at night. If you do wade through them, you will see how Mr. Gore jumps to conclusions that are not supported by the authors. If on the other hand you are sleeping just fine, let me correct a few misstatements from the article... CWD is not scrapie and scrapie is not CWD. There are several theories that CWD originated from scrapie (just as BSE did in Europe), which could be correct. For the most part, prion diseases are very specific in regards to the species they infect, with little cross-over to other species (also known as a species barrier). Scientists have learned how to overcome the species barrier by directly infecting the brain of the test animal, which bypasses an animal's normal defences to disease. But sometimes, one passage of the agent through the brain isn't enough (strong species barrier) and they use the brain from the first experimentally infected animal to infect another (two passages). By passing the prion through two infections, the prion adapts to the new species and is able to cause disease. This is how they were able to get CWD to infect sheep; by making two passages of CWD into Suffolk lambs. If scrapie and CWD were the same disease, the sheep would have been equally susceptible to CWD as deer were to scrapie; not to mention the animals could have been infected naturally, rather than injecting the brain. Mr. Gore also states that deer are susceptible to scrapie by oral infection, but I can't find any scientific references to back that up. Finally, Mr. Gore states that CWD and scrapie are the same based on results from the western blot assay, which actually isn't what the authors are reporting. While the western blot results suggest that CWD and scrapie are similar, the origin of CWD still has not been determined, and more research is necessary before making such a claim. It should also be noted that CWD is having an effect on our deer populations and has been documented (by a full pathological examination) as a cause of death in hundreds of deer and elk in Wyoming.
|
|
|
Re: This is why I shoot spikes
[Re: Texas Dan]
#8963820
11/29/23 02:22 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 9,688
freerange
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 9,688 |
Wytex, what is Gores first name?
At some point in life its time to quit chasing the pot of gold and just enjoy the rainbow. FR Keep your gratitude higher than your expectations. RWH
|
|
|
Re: This is why I shoot spikes
[Re: Texas Dan]
#8963863
11/29/23 03:50 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,430
Stickchunker
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,430 |
Estimating the age and overall health of the spike might be easier with this photo. That deer is 1000% a baby!
Just "Garbage" hanging out on THF
|
|
|
Re: This is why I shoot spikes
[Re: txtrophy85]
#8964703
11/30/23 05:52 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,608
Texas Dan
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,608 |
The antiquated Kerr study is the only one to show that spikes produce inferior racks at adulthood and it was heavily weighted.
The two deer in my OP appear to be about the same age. My thoughts are the same as the TPWD. Decisions on shooting spikes should be made not on what you believe they could be in the future, but on what they should be today, both being relative to other deer in the area. One is based on blind hope, the other on clear observation.
Last edited by Texas Dan; 11/30/23 05:58 PM.
"When the debate is lost, insults become the tool of the loser."
|
|
|
Re: This is why I shoot spikes
[Re: txtrophy85]
#8964726
11/30/23 06:20 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 62,662
BOBO the Clown
kind of a big deal
|
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 62,662 |
Time and time again it’s been shown that yearling spike bucks can result in a deer growing respectable if not trophy class antlers at maturity.
The antiquated Kerr study is the only one to show that spikes produce inferior racks at adulthood and it was heavily weighted. But this coming from an institute that denies CWD is sheep scrapie despite glaring evidence.
all kerr showed was if you take a pedigreed 180” STX breeder buck and line breed it to its offspring, that its off spring will be larger as a % then a random yearling Hill county spike offspring that was line breed same way. Note they never cross breed the two lines…..
Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, b/c they know not victory nor defeat"- #26 TR
|
|
|
Re: This is why I shoot spikes
[Re: Texas Dan]
#8964732
11/30/23 06:34 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 62,662
BOBO the Clown
kind of a big deal
|
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 62,662 |
The antiquated Kerr study is the only one to show that spikes produce inferior racks at adulthood and it was heavily weighted.
The two deer in my OP appear to be about the same age. My thoughts are the same as the TPWD. Decisions on shooting spikes should be made not on what you believe they could be in the future, but on what they should be today, both being relative to other deer in the area. One is based on blind hope, the other on clear observation. and runt studies in all mammals shows yearling observational data is worthless It is even more compounded in a more natural environment where breeding times, feed and weather conditions are more extreme.
Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, b/c they know not victory nor defeat"- #26 TR
|
|
|
Re: This is why I shoot spikes
[Re: Texas Dan]
#8964740
11/30/23 06:40 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,368
txtrophy85
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,368 |
The antiquated Kerr study is the only one to show that spikes produce inferior racks at adulthood and it was heavily weighted.
The two deer in my OP appear to be about the same age. My thoughts are the same as the TPWD. Decisions on shooting spikes should be made not on what you believe they could be in the future, but on what they should be today, both being relative to other deer in the area. One is based on blind hope, the other on clear observation. Dan, have you ever managed a property for whitetail deer for any appreciable length of time? I'm curious to know what you are basing your opinions on; actual experience or just what sounds good ?
For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
|
|
|
Re: This is why I shoot spikes
[Re: MAP]
#8965754
12/02/23 02:28 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,646
Reloder28
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,646 |
If it was easier for me to upload pictures on here....i would show you alot of examples of why i dont shoot spikes.
Having a wild native yearling spike turn into a 196" buck 5 years later is justvone example Yeah, not a believer in the “once a spike, always a spike” theory. Besides, with Texas deer, aint much meat on a young spike.
You don't know what you don't know.........until you know.
|
|
|
Re: This is why I shoot spikes
[Re: Texas Dan]
#8966041
12/02/23 04:27 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,608
Texas Dan
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,608 |
Those looking to learn more about why the TPWD encourages hunters to take spikes in certain Texas counties should click on the link below. The photos shown are truly quite telling in terms of the role of genetics in antler development. Now if you're one who somehow believes deer that live in pens are somehow different in terms of genetic impacts from those who don't, the results of the Kerr WMA Study would be a waste of your time. Link
Last edited by Texas Dan; 12/02/23 04:32 PM.
"When the debate is lost, insults become the tool of the loser."
|
|
|
Re: This is why I shoot spikes
[Re: Reloder28]
#8966191
12/02/23 09:03 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,608
Texas Dan
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,608 |
If it was easier for me to upload pictures on here....i would show you alot of examples of why i dont shoot spikes.
Having a wild native yearling spike turn into a 196" buck 5 years later is justvone example Yeah, not a believer in the “once a spike, always a spike” theory. Besides, with Texas deer, aint much meat on a young spike. I would encourage you to focus on the comments and photos that appear in the "Results of Selection" section of the report. A key finding, which could only be found in a controlled setting, is that spikes that were produced by does that were fathered by spikes have less genetic potential. Of course, there will be spikes that develop good racks in later years because of the genetics of the buck that sired them. But this doesn't negate the clearly observed, negative impact of reproducing does that were fathered by spikes, rather than bucks with two forked antlers. Simply put, the Kerr Study has given hunters an indicator of deer that have poor genetics through the mother and grandfather. And in comparison, young bucks with two forked antlers are a good indication that both the mother and grandfather carried good genetic potential. The end result is better harvest decisions based on removing young bucks with less genetic potential relative to other bucks in the same age class.
Last edited by Texas Dan; 12/02/23 09:19 PM.
"When the debate is lost, insults become the tool of the loser."
|
|
|
Re: This is why I shoot spikes
[Re: Texas Dan]
#8966205
12/02/23 09:50 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 62,662
BOBO the Clown
kind of a big deal
|
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 62,662 |
If it was easier for me to upload pictures on here....i would show you alot of examples of why i dont shoot spikes.
Having a wild native yearling spike turn into a 196" buck 5 years later is justvone example Yeah, not a believer in the “once a spike, always a spike” theory. Besides, with Texas deer, aint much meat on a young spike. I would encourage you to focus on the comments and photos that appear in the "Results of Selection" section of the report. A key finding, which could only be found in a controlled setting, is that spikes that were produced by does that were fathered by spikes have less genetic potential. Of course, there will be spikes that develop good racks in later years because of the genetics of the buck that sired them. But this doesn't negate the clearly observed, negative impact of reproducing does that were fathered by spikes, rather than bucks with two forked antlers. Simply put, the Kerr Study has given hunters an indicator of deer that have poor genetics through the mother and grandfather. And in comparison, young bucks with two forked antlers are a good indication that both the mother and grandfather carried good genetic potential. The end result is better harvest decisions based on removing young bucks with less genetic potential relative to other bucks in the same age class. The antlers shown are not a natural occurrence in any form. the are genrations of inbreeding. No dispersal genetic influence or even doe influence They line bred a 160” + STX orgin breeder buck of documented hereditary to STX does. And then rebred his daughters to him the other group was they took a hill country spike and line breed his daughters to him. The finding was that the STX breeder bucks line breed offspring antler scoring where an average x percentage larger than a random hill country spike line breed off spring…. They never cross bred for a third control group, or took deer from same geographical genetics they study only proved the outcome they wanted. STX breeder bucks has better genetics as far as a percentage of B&C then random Hill country spikes
Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, b/c they know not victory nor defeat"- #26 TR
|
|
|
Re: This is why I shoot spikes
[Re: Texas Dan]
#8966778
12/03/23 06:59 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,608
Texas Dan
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,608 |
And likewise, outcomes that don’t support preconceived beliefs are often the driver of those who challenge the data.
Last edited by Texas Dan; 12/03/23 07:01 PM.
"When the debate is lost, insults become the tool of the loser."
|
|
|
Re: This is why I shoot spikes
[Re: Texas Dan]
#8966780
12/03/23 07:01 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,368
txtrophy85
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,368 |
Outcomes that don’t support preconceived beliefs are often the driver of those who challenge them. You’re arguing with a bunch of folks who have actual experience in growing big deer by citing a 50 year old line breeding study. And you’re brash enough to talk about pre conceived beliefs….
For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
|
|
|
Re: This is why I shoot spikes
[Re: Texas Dan]
#8966793
12/03/23 07:17 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,608
Texas Dan
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,608 |
If the local legends want to let every spike walk on the their properties, they clearly have every right to do so. But thankfully, they’re not in a position to make the rules for everyone else.
"When the debate is lost, insults become the tool of the loser."
|
|
|
Re: This is why I shoot spikes
[Re: txtrophy85]
#8967579
12/04/23 09:02 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,608
Texas Dan
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,608 |
Dan,
have you ever managed a property for whitetail deer for any appreciable length of time?
I'm curious to know what you are basing your opinions on; actual experience or just what sounds good? Your question implies that I should somehow hold those who feed, raise, and harvest deer as if they're livestock in high regard. Let's just say I value the outputs of those who have spent years studying Deer Ecology and Management so that I can apply what they have learned in my own little part of the world.
Last edited by Texas Dan; 12/04/23 09:02 PM.
"When the debate is lost, insults become the tool of the loser."
|
|
|
Re: This is why I shoot spikes
[Re: Texas Dan]
#8967588
12/04/23 09:13 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 9,688
freerange
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 9,688 |
Dan,
have you ever managed a property for whitetail deer for any appreciable length of time?
I'm curious to know what you are basing your opinions on; actual experience or just what sounds good? Your question implies that I should somehow hold those who feed, raise, and harvest deer as if they're livestock in high regard. Let's just say I value the outputs of those who have spent years studying Deer Ecology and Management so that I can apply what they have learned in my own little part of the world. When I want to learn(almost all the time) I look for input everywhere I can. My personal experience is in there but too small a sample size for me. I listen to anyone my ears get close enough to, including professionals and anyone with experience in the field. I have even had people with zero deer knowledge offer common sense ideas that I missed because of blindness from being too close for too long.
At some point in life its time to quit chasing the pot of gold and just enjoy the rainbow. FR Keep your gratitude higher than your expectations. RWH
|
|
|
Re: This is why I shoot spikes
[Re: Texas Dan]
#8967597
12/04/23 09:19 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,368
txtrophy85
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,368 |
Dan,
have you ever managed a property for whitetail deer for any appreciable length of time?
I'm curious to know what you are basing your opinions on; actual experience or just what sounds good? Let's just say I value the outputs of those who have spent years studying Deer Ecology and Management so that I can apply what they have learned in my own little part of the world. Value the outputs of those as long as they coincide with what you believe as fact. The Kerr Study was a singular study done in the 70's. Its been disproven so many times, if you want to look at a study the University of Mississippi conducted one that showed the exact opposite findings of the Kerr Study. Even QDMA does not promote the shooting of yearling spike deer. Just save everyone some time and say that you believe what TPWD says as Gospel, without question, and anyone with contradictory evidence is wrong.
For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|