What is a detail man?

A sales representative of a drug manufacturer who introduces new drugs especially to physicians and pharmacists.

And they can be sued, and lose, for trying to "practice medicine". One real hack on here that thinks he's Einstein when it comes to medicine. Watch out! He'll ruin you!

The only word in your statements that matter is “assume.” That says it all.

They have a Pharm. D. (Doctor of Pharmacy).

You can get a Pharm. D., PHD

You can also get a MD, PHD.

You can also walk away from the pharmacy and go to another.

Thank you.

House Bill 2561 from 2016 (I think that was the year) changed the Texas Pharmacy Act to say that a Texas pharmacist can refuse to fill any prescription for any reason. If I remember correctly they don't even need to give a reason. Nobody would win a lawsuit over this in Texas when the State Legislature gave the pharmacist the authority to do it.

Yeah, you’re not making any sense……

Nothing I said was incorrect……

The second pharmacist agreed that the first was out of line, for what it’s worth.

And you were incorrect. She wasn’t trying to find out about the patient. I never said what her questions were.

But keep assuming, if you’d like.

Why are you so angry? There’s nothing wrong with assuming due to a lack of information. Stop acting like you caught me in a “gotcha” moment. You’ve obviously never heard of the concept of Occam’s Razor. You never said what the questions are simply because you want to be an [censored] if someone doesn’t “guess” correctly what they are. I kind of feel bad that you go through life so confrontational. Why are so scared of posting what questions were asked? Are you scared someone may point out their validity? The pharmacist may very well have been out of line, but so were you.

The logical assumption based on a pharmacist’s responsibility, knowledge that pharmacies have unique policies/procedures, the fact that your kid isn’t more important than any other to them, and your obviously hostile approach to everyone is that the pharmacist wasn’t out of line. They provide counseling to screen for barriers to medication adherence and possible reaction causing factors the doc may have not picked up on.

How have I shown any anger or hostility towards you?

Again, you make more assumptions. I have simply pointed that out. Now you’ve resorted to name calling. Who’s being hostile, here?

That isn’t what the pharmacist did. You never asked, so I never said. You just jumped to your own conclusions. I won’t say, either, since I don’t care to go into those details.

This conversation is going nowhere, and I’m tired. Have a nice evening.

Again, nothing I said is false. Quit acting like making an assumption is some egregious act. Reference Occam’s razor again. My assumption is based on facts including sometimes they do ask questions that kind of probe, but they do it for a reason. You haven’t inspired confidence in knowing about the profession with your “they think they’re the final authority on prescriptions” when it’s their job to be. I’m also not name calling. I’m describing your behavior.

I frankly don’t care at this point, but you need to understand the other side of the situation where there may have been a valid reason for the questions. It depends on the policies created by their risk manager. I’m at least open to the possibility of the pharmacist being right or wrong. If they were so wrong you can report it and should.

You keep going on about assuming, but you assumed the pharmacist was wrong without trying to understand why the questions were asked.

With out naming names , some of the pharmacy chains have made it policy not to fill ivermectin for covid.

I don't know why. Physicians prescribe med for " off label " use every day.

MO RPH

They don't want to cross big pharma...

They just dont want the word to get out that its the cure for everything from toenail fungus and bad breath to cancer and HIV.

But I bet you support the right of a baker that refuses to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple.

To be clear, they offered to make the cake, just not decorate it. That part was important.

if they can keep the charade alive long enough the scamdemic will be more profitable and increase depopulation more greater than any of their wargames in history. If they cant keep the charade alive most will find out its likely a a cure for the flu for one.

I’m just guessing here, liberal voter? If not, you sure sound like one.

I've never voted anything but Republican in my life, just merely pointing out the bias. Each business, being private, have every right to choose who they service, I support that.

There is a major difference in changing to a generic version or watching for possible bad and deadly drug combo’s.

If someone die’s from non treatment of Covid because a pharmacist refused to fill the treatment, they should be not only held in civil court, but also for 2nd degree murder if that patient dies.

As for any Hospital Administrator that also bars treatment of their employee doctors, they too should suffer both courts.

There is virtually no down side to prescriptions of ivermectin.

Fact that doctors and families are having to get court orders for treatments, is ABSOLUTE BS.

Then you would be wrong. Pharmacists sole job is to know drugs. The docs that prescribe them only know what is told will give them be biggest incentive from the pharma reps. There is a reason once a drug reaches it's term of exclusivity and generics are now available that a "new" miracle drug is released.

It’s all funny until it isn’t. Remember how hydroxychoroquine was going to kill everyone…ironically it’s used in conjunction with several different cancer drug trials…..

https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/clinical-trials/intervention/hydroxychloroquine

If there was only a single pharmacy that refused to fill a drug on their approved list which in turn could be found that being denied this drug was the causation of said patients death, then yes, 100% they should be held liable. That is unfortunately a complete 180* turn from this situation.

Is it? Or is it just a precursor to $1.2 billion worth of Molnupiravir with a substantially higher mark up

It’s the exact same thing here.

No pharma company wants a cheap, readily available, non-patented drug to become an acceptable treatment.