texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
ChiefKief39, VIPFishingJR, DaveW, Matthew Dean Rainey, WHITETAILCHASER
72758 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,840
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 66,429
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
Stub 45,627
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics546,801
Posts9,839,715
Members87,758
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Bullet de-stabilization [Re: J Hills] #8229457 04/08/21 02:00 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,667
U
unclebubba Offline OP
THF Celebrity
OP Offline
THF Celebrity
U
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,667
Jhills, I had you and Glocker mixed up for a minute. I want to know if Glocker can cycle those monster bullets reliably. The 200 grain ones tend to hang up sometimes.

But, no, I am not concerned about shooting the gas checks through the suppressor. I guess one may have concerns with it falling off and having a baffle strike, but I have probably put 500 rounds through it already and have not had issue. I get the bullets from Cast Performance. I've got a TON of them if you need some. In winchester brass, I do not have any issues loading them in 357. Never had to use 38.


http://www.boatloan.com/michael-hunt/

Originally Posted by Nolanco
current federal policy is clearly irrational, scientifically insupportable and ridiculous.
Re: Bullet de-stabilization [Re: unclebubba] #8229848 04/08/21 07:15 PM
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,052
glocker17 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,052
My cycled them well, using 357 brass. They are pretty good on hogs, never had one walk it off! Deep penetration, gun is very quiet but impact of the full wadcutter is quite loud.

[Linked Image]

Last edited by glocker17; 04/08/21 07:19 PM.
Re: Bullet de-stabilization [Re: glocker17] #8230305 04/09/21 03:49 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,667
U
unclebubba Offline OP
THF Celebrity
OP Offline
THF Celebrity
U
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,667
Originally Posted by glocker17
My cycled them well, using 357 brass. They are pretty good on hogs, never had one walk it off! Deep penetration, gun is very quiet but impact of the full wadcutter is quite loud.

[Linked Image]

That short barrel is sweet. I left mine at 20".


http://www.boatloan.com/michael-hunt/

Originally Posted by Nolanco
current federal policy is clearly irrational, scientifically insupportable and ridiculous.
Re: Bullet de-stabilization [Re: unclebubba] #8230361 04/09/21 08:25 AM
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 164
M
MathGeek Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
M
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 164
Originally Posted by unclebubba
Originally Posted by MathGeek
This question is much easier to answer empirically. Put out a much larger paper target and see if the bullets are going through sideways at 200 yards to indicate tumbling.

Compared with the shape of the bullet holes, accuracy is a very difficult metric to use as an indicator of stability.


I had already thought of doing that, but won't be able to do that until the next trip down to the Ranch. I know that some guys here use a calculator to figure stability of a bullet before they even attempt to load it, and maybe can tell me how stable/ unstable that combo might be.


I wrote some of those stability calculators. The ones I've written (and most others) compute gyroscopic stability, which is lowest when the bullet leaves the barrel and INCREASES as the bullet flies down range. If a bullet is stable out to 150 yards, but not at 200 yards, the issue is dynamic stability which is much harder to predict with a simple formula. It requires knowing a bunch of coefficients about the bullet that are not generally available, and it is also much more strongly affected by manufacturing imperfections. The gyroscopic stability calculators also suggest your bullet has no problem with gyroscopic stability. If there is a stability problem, it is a dynamic stability issue.

Originally Posted by unclebubba
Originally Posted by glocker17
I have the same rifle and cut off 6" of barrel. It still stabilizes 247gr cast bullets well. I have plinked with them at longer distances and them seem to remain stable. Using a MV of 1050 fps. The 16" twist should be more than enough for a 200gr bullet.


Maybe I just need to figure the correct bc so that I can calculate the correct drop. Unfortunately, the manufacturer website does not list bc, so I am just taking an uneducated guess.


All guessing at BCs can do is suggest a range of possible 200 yards drops if sighted in at 100 yards. I've also seen bullet BCs vary widely depending on the gun they are shot from as well as the velocity. Once bullet flight times are longer than about 0.5 seconds, the easiest approach to sighting them in is a really big target so your first shot is somewhere on the paper. Using a dirt backstop and a second person sighting can also be effective if they can see the hits and walk you in.

Re: Bullet de-stabilization [Re: MathGeek] #8231680 04/10/21 04:11 AM
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,052
glocker17 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,052
BC will vary slightly from barrel to barrel but not enough to really see at normal distances, maybe ELR stuff. Many bullets do better at subsonic speed. Either way, with subs 1.2 mil every 25 yards is going to be pretty close in most cases.

Re: Bullet de-stabilization [Re: unclebubba] #8231830 04/10/21 01:08 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 33,052
kmon11 Online Shocked
junior
Online Shocked
junior
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 33,052
the "guessing" at BC, in my thread above came from NOE bullet molds who give the BC for their bullet molds. Their 197gr bullet mold without gascheck is very close to the one pictured with a slightly more pointed profile so I dropped the BC a little for the slightly larger meplat.

I know the Berger twist rate calculator is better for boat tail bullets and they give twist rate recommendations for their flat based bullets for that reason. .


lf the saying "Liar, Liar your pants on fire" were true
Mainstream news might be fun to watch
Re: Bullet de-stabilization [Re: unclebubba] #8313654 07/06/21 01:44 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,667
U
unclebubba Offline OP
THF Celebrity
OP Offline
THF Celebrity
U
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,667
Update to thread: I realized this weekend that my issues with stability was a tree branch at about 150 yards. Once I figured that out, I was able to cleanly hit the 200 yard target every time. Roughly 17 moa of drop at that range. I've also decided that the 200 gr load at approx 1020 FPS is not a reliable pig killer. I am sure that they are dead or dying, but I only recovered 2 of the four that I shot, and one of the recovered pigs I did have to track quite a ways. Not as quiet, and not as fun, but I'll go back to 158 gr at 1800 fps for hunting.


http://www.boatloan.com/michael-hunt/

Originally Posted by Nolanco
current federal policy is clearly irrational, scientifically insupportable and ridiculous.
Re: Bullet de-stabilization [Re: unclebubba] #8315266 07/08/21 02:43 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,667
U
unclebubba Offline OP
THF Celebrity
OP Offline
THF Celebrity
U
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,667
Originally Posted by unclebubba
Jhills, I had you and Glocker mixed up for a minute. I want to know if Glocker can cycle those monster bullets reliably. The 200 grain ones tend to hang up sometimes.

But, no, I am not concerned about shooting the gas checks through the suppressor. I guess one may have concerns with it falling off and having a baffle strike, but I have probably put 500 rounds through it already and have not had issue. I get the bullets from Cast Performance. I've got a TON of them if you need some. In winchester brass, I do not have any issues loading them in 357. Never had to use 38.

Another update to this thread, as I now have a torn up baffle. J Hills, you were right. Yes, you should be concerned shooting gas checks through a suppressor. David and I have decided that the gas check has probably been falling off and striking the baffle. UGH. bang


http://www.boatloan.com/michael-hunt/

Originally Posted by Nolanco
current federal policy is clearly irrational, scientifically insupportable and ridiculous.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3