Texas pc 42.02. Riot
There’s already a law there “if needed” for protests that get violent. Who cares about proving burglary or arson? If 7 or more people assemble and it (1) creates an immediate danger of damage to property or injury to persons;

(2) substantially obstructs law enforcement or other governmental functions or services;  or

(3) by force, threat of force, or physical action deprives any person of a legal right or disturbs any person in the enjoyment of a legal right.

Then it’s a riot and a crime.

You don’t need a curfew that you’re only going to enforce if things go bad when there’s already a law you can enforce if things go bad. A higher offense at that.

So imo, waste of time.

Dallas County DA just refused to take charges against protestors. They are being released.
I guess City of Dallas curfew is worthless. As is any charge Cruezot refuses to accept.

I want my money back for that ticket I got up there last year...

Why would a class c misdemeanor be presented to the district attorney's office. Municipal court judges should be the only people making probable cause determinations on that level of offense.

Dealing with non-violent protesters, when violent outside anarchists show up who the organizers don't know anything about, is a difficult thing if you want to do the right thing. It's a complicated thing in major metropolitan cities.

The charge was blocking passageway. County charge The curfew was just to discourage and minimize Crowd size.

x2 thanks trapper

Don't. Hold your breath.