texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Dano8706, DayAnt, Anthony Miller, MsTexas24, BelligerentEngine
72658 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,840
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 66,257
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
Stub 45,435
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics545,738
Posts9,826,059
Members87,658
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 35 of 163 1 2 33 34 35 36 37 162 163
Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: dlrz71] #7827939 05/03/20 08:24 PM
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 33
S
sage3155 Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
S
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 33
I'm looking to change another one of my .223 wylde uppers into a 300 HAMR. I want to go with a 16" but I want one of the heavier profile barrels. I have yet to see them in stock. Does anyone know when we can expect new barrels to become available on the WC website?

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: sage3155] #7828849 05/04/20 04:56 PM
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,218
Wilson Combat Online Content
Boar Meister
Online Content
Boar Meister
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,218
Originally Posted by sage3155
I'm looking to change another one of my .223 wylde uppers into a 300 HAMR. I want to go with a 16" but I want one of the heavier profile barrels. I have yet to see them in stock. Does anyone know when we can expect new barrels to become available on the WC website?


We just completed a production run of the LE profile (.700/.700) and a run of Recon profile (.840/.740) are in final cosmetic finishing now. I'd definitely recommend the LE profile we use for the Protector series unless you just want a heavy gun for some reason. My preference is the Ranger Profile (.675/.650) for a 16". We've seen NO increase in accuracy as the profiles get heavier. I've even got a prototype 16" that's only .625/.625 that still shoots sub-inch, Photo attached

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: Wilson Combat] #7828901 05/04/20 05:32 PM
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 118
S
SDTurner Online Content
Woodsman
Online Content
Woodsman
S
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 118
From Bill Wilson - "We just completed a production run of the LE profile (.700/.700) and a run of Recon profile (.840/.740) are in final cosmetic finishing now. I'd definitely recommend the LE profile we use for the Protector series unless you just want a heavy gun for some reason. My preference is the Ranger Profile (.675/.650) for a 16". We've seen NO increase in accuracy as the profiles get heavier. I've even got a prototype 16" that's only .625/.625 that still shoots sub-inch, Photo attached"


I will verify this with my results as well. I have a Ranger Profile 16" that shoots very well with no issues. I considered going with a slightly heavier profile, but after shooting this one, I'm glad I didn't. I have loads with several bullets that shoot sub minute groups with no problems - highly recommended.

Last edited by SDTurner; 05/04/20 05:32 PM.
Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: Wilson Combat] #7828984 05/04/20 06:34 PM
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 33
S
sage3155 Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
S
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 33
I was leaning towards the LE profile. The reason for the heavier barrel choice was recoil management, as I don't intend to use a muzzle brake. Hunting the heavy brush in the Appalachian mountains and I don't want twigs or other debris to get caught up in a brake or flash hider. But that's no reason to go crazy heavy. I'll keep watching the website closely. A new 300 HAMR is soon to be assembled. BTW I'm really liking the 135 grain bonded bullets. A great all around load!

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: sage3155] #7829062 05/04/20 07:27 PM
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,218
Wilson Combat Online Content
Boar Meister
Online Content
Boar Meister
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,218
Originally Posted by sage3155
I was leaning towards the LE profile. The reason for the heavier barrel choice was recoil management, as I don't intend to use a muzzle brake. Hunting the heavy brush in the Appalachian mountains and I don't want twigs or other debris to get caught up in a brake or flash hider. But that's no reason to go crazy heavy. I'll keep watching the website closely. A new 300 HAMR is soon to be assembled. BTW I'm really liking the 135 grain bonded bullets. A great all around load!


Sage, as a FYI our 5 best selling barrels listed in order are:

18" Tac Hunter fluted/threaded
16" Ranger round/threaded
11.3" SBR round/fluted
18" BW Ranch round/threaded
18" Tac Hunter round/threaded

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: dlrz71] #7829440 05/04/20 11:38 PM
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 84
S
ShadowFast1 Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
S
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 84
Any ETA on the 11.3" Ham'r barrel?


God bless.
Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: Wilson Combat] #7829525 05/05/20 12:44 AM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,506
TX_LT230FH Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,506
Originally Posted by Wilson Combat
Originally Posted by sage3155
I was leaning towards the LE profile. The reason for the heavier barrel choice was recoil management, as I don't intend to use a muzzle brake. Hunting the heavy brush in the Appalachian mountains and I don't want twigs or other debris to get caught up in a brake or flash hider. But that's no reason to go crazy heavy. I'll keep watching the website closely. A new 300 HAMR is soon to be assembled. BTW I'm really liking the 135 grain bonded bullets. A great all around load!


Sage, as a FYI our 5 best selling barrels listed in order are:

18" Tac Hunter fluted/threaded
16" Ranger round/threaded
11.3" SBR round/fluted
18" BW Ranch round/threaded
18" Tac Hunter round/threaded


In the same caliber, of course, what's the weight on the 18" Tac Hunter vs the 16" Ranger (Complete gun)?


[Linked Image]
Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: sage3155] #7830108 05/05/20 04:05 PM
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 111
S
SwatDude1 Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
S
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 111
Originally Posted by sage3155
I was leaning towards the LE profile. The reason for the heavier barrel choice was recoil management, as I don't intend to use a muzzle brake. Hunting the heavy brush in the Appalachian mountains and I don't want twigs or other debris to get caught up in a brake or flash hider. But that's no reason to go crazy heavy. I'll keep watching the website closely. A new 300 HAMR is soon to be assembled. BTW I'm really liking the 135 grain bonded bullets. A great all around load!


The only reason I see to go with a heavy barrel is heat dissipation for rapid fire in LE use. I have found, if they fit the profile, the JP Thermal Dissipators suck heat from the barrel quick enough to burn me if I accidentally touch the cooling fins through the rail. I cut them in half with my table saw and get two for one, installing as close to the chamber as possible on light profile barrels. I find these actually give better cooling than heavier profile barrels, even fluted ones, with less weight.

I am EXTREMELY satisfied with all four of my Wilson Combat 300 HAM'r barrels. Dissipator on 11.3" WC HAM'R Barrel with ALG rail...

[Linked Image]

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: ShadowFast1] #7831363 05/06/20 04:35 PM
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,218
Wilson Combat Online Content
Boar Meister
Online Content
Boar Meister
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,218
Originally Posted by ShadowFast1
Any ETA on the 11.3" Ham'r barrel?


We're currently in the process of changing the twist rate on the 11.3" and 14.7" barrels to a 1-13 to assure full stabilization of 150gr bullets in extremely cold weather so I can't give you a exact timeline. Best estimate is late May/early June timeframe.

1-13 seems to be the optimal twist rate for 16" length too for those who want to maximize accuracy of 150gr bullets, so we eventually plan to also offer a couple of 16" options in both 1-13 and 1-15 twist rates.

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: dlrz71] #7832690 05/07/20 06:05 PM
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 33
S
sage3155 Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
S
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 33
16" LE profile barrel on order! Can't wait to get it installed and shooting!

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: dlrz71] #7833017 05/07/20 11:27 PM
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 84
S
ShadowFast1 Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
S
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 84
Looking forward to getting an 11.3" for my pistol build. I have a 16.2" Ranger profile on the way for an upper I'm building for my dad.

Last edited by ShadowFast1; 05/08/20 01:05 AM.

God bless.
Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: dlrz71] #7834098 05/09/20 01:18 AM
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 33
S
sage3155 Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
S
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 33
New barrel (16" LE profile) arrived today. The barrel had a yellow spot on the extension, some sort of marking I'm guessing. It cleaned off easily leaving the barrel flawless. It's assembled, cleaned, and bore aligned. Tomorrow morning will be its first range trip for a basic sight in and function check. If all goes well I might even see some good groups!

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: sage3155] #7834273 05/09/20 12:02 PM
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,218
Wilson Combat Online Content
Boar Meister
Online Content
Boar Meister
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,218
Originally Posted by sage3155
New barrel (16" LE profile) arrived today. The barrel had a yellow spot on the extension, some sort of marking I'm guessing. It cleaned off easily leaving the barrel flawless. It's assembled, cleaned, and bore aligned. Tomorrow morning will be its first range trip for a basic sight in and function check. If all goes well I might even see some good groups!


Good deal, best groups usually come after 100-200rds through the barrel

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: Wilson Combat] #7834494 05/09/20 05:07 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,817
D
djones Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
D
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,817
you're doing a bang up job here willy, but it's time for another vid. unfortunately it's a short one cuz i haven't got in much hunting. maybe that'll change soon.


Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: Wilson Combat] #7834548 05/09/20 06:52 PM
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 33
S
sage3155 Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
S
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 33
Originally Posted by Wilson Combat
Originally Posted by sage3155
New barrel (16" LE profile) arrived today. The barrel had a yellow spot on the extension, some sort of marking I'm guessing. It cleaned off easily leaving the barrel flawless. It's assembled, cleaned, and bore aligned. Tomorrow morning will be its first range trip for a basic sight in and function check. If all goes well I might even see some good groups!


Good deal, best groups usually come after 100-200rds through the barrel


Range trip complete. Function for the first 30 rounds was flawless. Accuracy at 50 yards was one hole. At 100 yards I was getting about 1 1/2" groups but some of that can be attributed to the 1-6x scope. I was having a hard time picking out the center dot on the reticle. The dot is 1/2 moa but it was covering the 1/2" red squares on the target making my point of aim a little sloppy. I'm going to get some 2" orange spots for my next outing to try and improve my hold. I'd say I had at least a 1/2 moa error. I was able to put three rounds touching in several five shot groups. Right now I think it's shooting better than my optics will allow me to see. Plenty accurate for hunting deer at 50 yards or less (usually less) in the Appalachian mountains.

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: dlrz71] #7835427 05/10/20 09:21 PM
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 282
M
MC68 Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
M
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 282
[Linked Image]

I had a few minutes today at our property so took the HAM’R to the range for some trigger time. Four different rounds from 100 yards. Top right was 130gr HC, center was 150gr bonded, bottom left was 150gr SST and bottom right was 110gr CC. I’m happy with all of them. Most of my shots while hunting are under 150 yards so this accuracy will work. I will use the SST ammo on hogs and the bonded and HC ammo for deer.

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: MC68] #7835448 05/10/20 09:56 PM
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,218
Wilson Combat Online Content
Boar Meister
Online Content
Boar Meister
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,218
Originally Posted by MC68
[Linked Image]

I had a few minutes today at our property so took the HAM’R to the range for some trigger time. Four different rounds from 100 yards. Top right was 130gr HC, center was 150gr bonded, bottom left was 150gr SST and bottom right was 110gr CC. I’m happy with all of them. Most of my shots while hunting are under 150 yards so this accuracy will work. I will use the SST ammo on hogs and the bonded and HC ammo for deer.


Nothing wrong with that and shows how versatile the HAM'R is. As a FYI the 150gr Bonded is a pretty tough bullet for deer, even the larger northern ones. If you want a bonded bullet the new 135gr would be a much better choice and it's typically more accurate than the 150gr. The 150gr HAM'R BONDED is for 400#+ game.

For deer and hogs you simply can't go wrong with any of the following loads:

130gr HAM'R HOT-COR
135gr HAM'R BONDED
135gr FTX (ammo will be available this week)
150gr SST
150gr BTSP (this has become my favorite all around bullet. Accurate, good terminal performance on game up to 400#, normally available and inexpensive.)

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: MC68] #7835460 05/10/20 10:15 PM
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 17
H
HVTHunter Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
H
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 17
MC68, what barrel length?


One Nation Under God
Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: Wilson Combat] #7835539 05/11/20 12:45 AM
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 118
S
SDTurner Online Content
Woodsman
Online Content
Woodsman
S
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 118
Originally Posted by Wilson Combat
Originally Posted by MC68
[Linked Image]

I had a few minutes today at our property so took the HAM’R to the range for some trigger time. Four different rounds from 100 yards. Top right was 130gr HC, center was 150gr bonded, bottom left was 150gr SST and bottom right was 110gr CC. I’m happy with all of them. Most of my shots while hunting are under 150 yards so this accuracy will work. I will use the SST ammo on hogs and the bonded and HC ammo for deer.


Nothing wrong with that and shows how versatile the HAM'R is. As a FYI the 150gr Bonded is a pretty tough bullet for deer, even the larger northern ones. If you want a bonded bullet the new 135gr would be a much better choice and it's typically more accurate than the 150gr. The 150gr HAM'R BONDED is for 400#+ game.

For deer and hogs you simply can't go wrong with any of the following loads:

130gr HAM'R HOT-COR
135gr HAM'R BONDED
135gr FTX (ammo will be available this week)
150gr SST
150gr BTSP (this has become my favorite all around bullet. Accurate, good terminal performance on game up to 400#, normally available and inexpensive.)

Bill,

In your experience, what are the difference you see between the 135 ham'r bonded and the 150 btsp?

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: HVTHunter] #7835776 05/11/20 12:03 PM
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 282
M
MC68 Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
M
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 282
Originally Posted by HVTHunter
MC68, what barrel length?


18 inch barrel.

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: SDTurner] #7835805 05/11/20 12:42 PM
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,218
Wilson Combat Online Content
Boar Meister
Online Content
Boar Meister
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,218
In your experience, what are the difference you see between the 135 ham'r bonded and the 150 btsp?

SD, In regards to accuracy both are very good, pretty consistent sub-inch in my guns. In regards to terminal performance both kill hogs well (I didn't have these two bullets back during deer season so can't comment on deer performance) just differently. The 150BTSP performs much like the 130HHC and 150SST by expanding violently and loosing some weight (normally 20-30%) which creates a lot of internal damage. The 135HB expands a LOT but normally retains 95+% of it's weight. So it kinda depends which camp your in as to which one is best. I've killed a lot of hogs (5 last night) with the 150BTSP and does a VERY good job. But for hogs/deer sized game I'm in the dramatic expansion loose 20-30% of the weight camp. Bottom line both kill well if you place them in the right spot.

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: dlrz71] #7836011 05/11/20 04:08 PM
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,218
Wilson Combat Online Content
Boar Meister
Online Content
Boar Meister
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,218
We had some additional pressure testing done and a few updates have been made to the load data posted on the WC web site. Also the 135gr Hornady FTX load is now available.

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: Wilson Combat] #7836389 05/11/20 09:21 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,817
D
djones Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
D
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,817
i did some pressure testing of my own.

[Linked Image]

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: djones] #7838652 05/13/20 09:48 PM
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,218
Wilson Combat Online Content
Boar Meister
Online Content
Boar Meister
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,218
Powder Valley has Hodgdon CFEBLK in stock in case anyone needs any.

Re: WILSON COMBAT 300 HAM'R [Re: dlrz71] #7838748 05/13/20 11:16 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,927
J
Judd Online Confused
#1 Creedmoor Fan
Online Confused
#1 Creedmoor Fan
J
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,927
djones...you’re approaching max pressure...proceed with caution roflmao


Originally Posted by Phil Robertson
Don't let your ears hear what your eyes didn't see, and don't let your mouth say what your heart doesn't feel
Page 35 of 163 1 2 33 34 35 36 37 162 163
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3