texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
victorcaoh, gtmill6619, cpen13, Huntinkid, garey
72055 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,797
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,527
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,927
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,030
Posts9,732,135
Members87,055
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: this is how I have said they will get the guns.......price goes up each year [Re: DeckArtist] #7695457 12/22/19 02:00 AM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,229
M
Marc K Online Content
Veteran Tracker
Online Content
Veteran Tracker
M
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,229
Originally Posted by DeckArtist
............................................

Our Constitution is in the crosshairs, without it the leftists can run roughshod over the country. Of course this cannot be accomplished with an armed citizenry. ................................................................................................


Simplistic view of today's world. I do not disagree that we are under a full scale attack and have been for years. The second amendment is important, but an armed citizenry is not nearly enough.

Respectfully,
Marc Kurth
Eustace, TX


A Democracy is when two wolves and a lamb vote on the dinner menu. That is why this country was specifically not designed as a Democracy. We are a Constitutional Republic.
Re: this is how I have said they will get the guns.......price goes up each year [Re: Marc K] #7717373 01/14/20 01:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,997
F
fadetoblack64 Offline OP
giddyup
OP Offline
giddyup
F
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,997
Gun owners across Maine would be subject to a first in the nation and potentially expensive new mandate just for owning a firearm under a proposal put forward by Rep. Janice Cooper of Yarmouth. The proposal will be considered by the Legislative Council of the Maine Legislature later this month before it can move forward.
Listed on the website of the Maine Revisor of Statute’s website is the proposed bill, LR 2645 “An Act To Require a Person Who Owns a Firearm To Purchase Liability Insurance.”
While several states have attempted to impose such requirements, no state has successfully passed the requirement into law. Supporters typically say that the measure will cut down on violent crimes committed with guns. Opponents strongly disagree.
Insurance companies and gun rights advocates both have opposed efforts in other states for numerous reasons.
Insurance companies say that while advocates of such mandates often talk about cutting down on violent crimes committed with guns, liability insurance does not cover intentional acts – only accidents. They say that puts the goals of supporters of the law at cross purposes with the principle of insurance. Insurance companies have also said that a new requirement would be costly and complicated.
Gun rights advocates have some overlapping concerns related to driving up the cost of buying or owning a gun – some firearm liability insurance proposals that have been put forward in other states or nationally would have required gun owners to show proof of insurance before being allowed to even purchase a firearm.
But the concept of paying to exercise a constitutional right, they say, amounts to an unconstitutional infringement before any discussion about the cost of insurance comes into play.
“This is just another in a long line of ‘do something’ attempts by the socialist left to make owning a gun so onerous that they hope people will opt not to. A solution to a non-existent problem. I can’t think of any other right protected by our constitution that requires insurance to exercise,” says Bruce Ashmore, a member of Gun Owners of Maine, a vibrant and effective grassroots organization focused on defending gun rights.
“The Second Amendment doesn’t end with “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed, if you have liability insurance,” he says.
Further, skeptics question how such a law could be enforced. Would the government create a registry of gun owners and monitor their liability insurance?
Unlike car insurance, which is only required for vehicles on public roads, firearm liability insurance would presumably be required at all times, even when firearms were locked away for months or years on end.
The penalty for not having adequate insurance could also be steep. In 2013, a Representative from New York proposed a law that carried a $10,000 fine for individuals who sold a firearm to someone without adequate liability insurance.
Another bill in the New York State Senate would have required gun owners carry $1 million in liability insurance coverage.



https://www.thedailysheeple.com/mai...gun-owners-to-carry-liability-insurance/


MORE AT THE LINK

Re: this is how I have said they will get the guns.......price goes up each year [Re: fadetoblack64] #7718046 01/14/20 11:36 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,261
S
Sniper.270 Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
S
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,261
Remember when they passed the law requiring gas stations to either purchase crazy amount of insurance or have containment built to have gas. Many little mom/pop stations went out. That was before many of you young uns.

Ammo is what they will attack first.


Proverbs 2
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3