texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
BobOso, Tbirdszz, Fischpat, barracude, LEAD
72065 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,797
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,533
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,947
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,081
Posts9,732,770
Members87,065
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: tShawnB] #7091799 02/25/18 12:39 AM
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 484
H
howl Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
H
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 484

Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: tShawnB] #7094283 02/27/18 03:47 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 398
F
fishon1017 Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
F
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 398
2nd amendment doesn't give us the right to own battle field weapons, supreme court has made that ruling. Congress has extended that for semi automatic weapons but congress can revere it. NRA is not America but a lobby group for gun manufactures.

Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: fishon1017] #7094316 02/27/18 04:34 AM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,696
K
krmitchell Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
K
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,696
Originally Posted By: fishon1017
2nd amendment doesn't give us the right to own battle field weapons, supreme court has made that ruling. Congress has extended that for semi automatic weapons but congress can revere it. NRA is not America but a lobby group for gun manufactures.


Define battlefield weapons. Dont forget to include 1911s, and every other bolt action rifle the military has ever used.

Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: fishon1017] #7094699 02/27/18 04:25 PM
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,226
6InARowMakeItGo Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,226
Originally Posted By: fishon1017
2nd amendment doesn't give us the right to own battle field weapons, supreme court has made that ruling. Congress has extended that for semi automatic weapons but congress can revere it. NRA is not America but a lobby group for gun manufactures.


Libtard?


🍻
Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: fishon1017] #7094733 02/27/18 04:57 PM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,041
texretvet Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,041
Originally Posted By: fishon1017
2nd amendment doesn't give us the right to own battle field weapons, supreme court has made that ruling. Congress has extended that for semi automatic weapons but congress can revere it. NRA is not America but a lobby group for gun manufactures.


You couldnt be more wrong. That is exactly what the 2A gives us the right to own.

Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: texretvet] #7094764 02/27/18 05:40 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 21,617
P
pegasaurus Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
P
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 21,617
Originally Posted By: texretvet
Originally Posted By: fishon1017
2nd amendment doesn't give us the right to own battle field weapons, supreme court has made that ruling. Congress has extended that for semi automatic weapons but congress can revere it. NRA is not America but a lobby group for gun manufactures.


You couldnt be more wrong. That is exactly what the 2A gives us the right to own.


Although it does not specify the intent is to allow the people to meet an overreaching and tyrannical government with like force. Here have been some reasonableness in the types of weapons but out side of nuclear and some bombs, almost anything is allowed. That is the way it was supposed to be.

Just like the reasonableness for the 1A. Cant go yelling fire or inciting riot with the intent to harm.


Funny thing about getting older:
Your eyesight starts getting weaker but your ability to
see through people's BS gets much better.
Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: fishon1017] #7094798 02/27/18 06:07 PM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 28,031
skinnerback Offline
THF Celebrity Chef
Offline
THF Celebrity Chef
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 28,031
Originally Posted By: fishon1017
2nd amendment doesn't give us the right to own battle field weapons, supreme court has made that ruling. Congress has extended that for semi automatic weapons but congress can revere it. NRA is not America but a lobby group for gun manufactures.



You are very wrong.

Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: tShawnB] #7094829 02/27/18 06:36 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,287
S
scalebuster Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
S
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,287
Theres nothing that can be done. In a free society some innocent people are going to die. Accept it and move on.

Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: fishon1017] #7094945 02/27/18 08:25 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 9,935
U
unclebubba Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
U
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 9,935
Originally Posted By: fishon1017
2nd amendment doesn't give us the right to own battle field weapons, supreme court has made that ruling. Congress has extended that for semi automatic weapons but congress can revere it. NRA is not America but a lobby group for gun manufactures.


At the time of the writing of the 2nd amendment, "battlefield rifles" were the same muskets that they used to hunt with. Using your logic, they wrote the 2nd amendment to ban pretty much all the rifles that people owned at the time. Battlefield weapons have always trickled over into civilian use. Bolt actions were once battlefield rifles. Lever actions were once battlefield rifles. Single shot rifles were once battlefield rifles. And one day, the AR-15/m-4 rifle will be replaced by something that is more technologically advanced, and at that time, an AR-15 will no longer be a battlefield. At that point, will it be OK to own one?

Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: texretvet] #7095242 02/28/18 12:28 AM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 65,533
S
SnakeWrangler Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
S
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 65,533
Originally Posted By: texretvet
Originally Posted By: fishon1017
2nd amendment doesn't give us the right to own battle field weapons, supreme court has made that ruling. Congress has extended that for semi automatic weapons but congress can revere it. NRA is not America but a lobby group for gun manufactures.


You couldn't be more wrong. That is exactly what the 2A gives us the right to own.


The 2nd amendment gives citizens the individual liberty to defend themselves, their property, and neighbors from any and all that would infringe on their sacred property rights.....to include the government! Has nothing to do with hunting....that is a liburd deflection used to undermine and erode your constitutional rights.....

Yet they claim you have a right to healthcare, food, housing, and now a living wage....all at the expense of the producers.....the reason they want your guns is so they can confiscate your property and redistribute it to their voting block. The left has to have a victim-based underclass in order to exist. When the citizenry doesn't provide a large enough group to support their demands for power they import them...legally (muzzies from the middle east) and illegally (whatever that can get across the border).

The left has demonstrated over and over that you have no rights to your one wealth/property and label you selfish (plus a long list of -ists and -phobics) while championing the "rights" to your property for those here illegally or "underprivileged" like the middle eastern imports....

Oh, and don't forget that the only reason you have any property/wealth in the first place is your white privilege....

It wasn't about the failings of the FBI....
It wasn't about the failings of the sheriffs office...
It wasn't about the failings of the public school system...

It's the fault of the NRA...and the NRA code is you and me.....law abiding citizens!

They make the discussion about the guns because they want to take them away from you so that they can control you!

Jes my 2cents


Originally Posted by Sneaky
I believe in science and I’m an insufferable [censored]
Originally Posted by beaversnipe
Actually, BBC is pretty damn good

"You Cannot Simultaneously Be Politically Correct And Intellectually Honest!"
Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: SnakeWrangler] #7095249 02/28/18 12:33 AM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 28,031
skinnerback Offline
THF Celebrity Chef
Offline
THF Celebrity Chef
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 28,031
On the money Jes.

Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: 6InARowMakeItGo] #7096119 02/28/18 05:02 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 19,652
P
Pitchfork Predator Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
P
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 19,652
Originally Posted By: Thundervee
Originally Posted By: fishon1017
2nd amendment doesn't give us the right to own battle field weapons, supreme court has made that ruling. Congress has extended that for semi automatic weapons but congress can revere it. NRA is not America but a lobby group for gun manufactures.


Libtard?


Yes indeed. Go back to the fishing forum.


Marc C. Helfrich
Retirement Planner

www.insured-wealth.com
469-323-8920
Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: tShawnB] #7096726 02/28/18 11:49 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,261
T
Texas Dan Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,261
Minimum age of 21 to purchase any firearm. Treat AR-type firearms just like noise suppressors. Anyone of legal age can own one after submitting the necessary paperwork and paying a fee.


"Some people will never like you because your spirit irritates their demons."
Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: Texas Dan] #7096785 03/01/18 12:31 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,221
Grizz Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,221
Originally Posted By: Texas Dan
Minimum age of 21 to purchase any firearm. Treat AR-type firearms just like noise suppressors. Anyone of legal age can own one after submitting the necessary paperwork and paying a fee.


1. What about under 21 folks who have military or LE service (there are circumstances in which a peace officer can be under 21).
2. I agree ARs should be treated like suppressors, provided neither requires any stamp, extra paperwork, or extra fees.

Like I said in an earlier post, neither of these things will fix a stinking thing and they take attention/resources away from the real problems. Youre trying to fix things that arent broke.


[Linked Image] [Linked Image]
Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: tShawnB] #7097477 03/01/18 04:15 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 786
B
BassBuster1 Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
B
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 786
To fix the problem...

Fix the family, the basic unit of society!

Husbands and wives stay together and raise your children. Teach them to work, to pray and read the scriptures, to be respectful, to go outside, and that they have a responsibility to become a valuable member of society. Above all, parents lead by example! We have got to get back to the Christian values this country was built on if we expect change. All of the porno, and gay marriage, and drug and alcohol abuse, and just general disrespect for values in general have taken us to an ugly place in this country.

Killings have nothing to do with guns, they are just the tool these very messed up people are using to commit these acts of terrorism! No gun law will fix or defend against a society that has no values!

Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: BassBuster1] #7098298 03/02/18 03:38 AM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,261
T
Texas Dan Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,261
Originally Posted By: BassBuster1
To fix the problem...

Fix the family, the basic unit of society!

Husbands and wives stay together and raise your children. Teach them to work, to pray and read the scriptures, to be respectful, to go outside, and that they have a responsibility to become a valuable member of society. Above all, parents lead by example! We have got to get back to the Christian values this country was built on if we expect change. All of the porno, and gay marriage, and drug and alcohol abuse, and just general disrespect for values in general have taken us to an ugly place in this country.

Killings have nothing to do with guns, they are just the tool these very messed up people are using to commit these acts of terrorism! No gun law will fix or defend against a society that has no values!


Too late for any mass interest in that approach. But it could happen soon after an economic collapse or change in government, whichever comes first. Catastrophic events are another possibility.


"Some people will never like you because your spirit irritates their demons."
Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: Texas Dan] #7098510 03/02/18 01:44 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 19,652
P
Pitchfork Predator Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
P
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 19,652
Originally Posted By: Texas Dan
Minimum age of 21 to purchase any firearm. Treat AR-type firearms just like noise suppressors. Anyone of legal age can own one after submitting the necessary paperwork and paying a fee.


Interesting how non AR owners come up with these dumb ideas. Just like suppressors that protect your hearing and others around you, let's make it expensive and time consuming before you can protect your hearing. And your the one that belly aches over bow hunters getting special treatment, yet you suggest the same type of regulation for AR owners. Very hypocritical!


Marc C. Helfrich
Retirement Planner

www.insured-wealth.com
469-323-8920
Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: Pitchfork Predator] #7098585 03/02/18 02:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 65,533
S
SnakeWrangler Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
S
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 65,533
Originally Posted By: Pitchfork Predator
Originally Posted By: Texas Dan
Minimum age of 21 to purchase any firearm. Treat AR-type firearms just like noise suppressors. Anyone of legal age can own one after submitting the necessary paperwork and paying a fee.


Interesting how non AR owners come up with these dumb ideas. Just like suppressors that protect your hearing and others around you, let's make it expensive and time consuming before you can protect your hearing. And your the one that belly aches over bow hunters getting special treatment, yet you suggest the same type of regulation for AR owners. Very hypocritical!

Agree.....

Idiots abound....


Originally Posted by Sneaky
I believe in science and I’m an insufferable [censored]
Originally Posted by beaversnipe
Actually, BBC is pretty damn good

"You Cannot Simultaneously Be Politically Correct And Intellectually Honest!"
Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: tShawnB] #7098623 03/02/18 02:59 PM
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 2,451
D
Dalroo Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
D
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 2,451
The only item I can somehow get my head around, and not that it can 100% solve everything, is the legal age being 21. Yes, I get that 18 year olds can be in the service, but I will add that those individuals serving will have had psychological screening, proper training, and under supervision.

All of the rest are just bandaids that don't cure much of anything - except, hardened schools - it is immediate, effective, and will intimidate the cowards.


Dalroo
Deep in the Heart of Texas
How about that Brandon!
Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: tShawnB] #7098720 03/02/18 03:58 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 786
B
BassBuster1 Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
B
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 786
Only one shooter out of all of them was under 21 if I am not mistaken. Guns are not the reason for the shootings! Are we going to regulate Home Depot Rental trucks? How about airplanes? How about fertilizer? How about pressure cookers? They were all tools used to carry out terror. The regulate guns argument is silly but the media and libs love it! How about we get to the root of the problem and promote faith and family and values!

My daughter is a teacher and a teacher who can shoot! I also agree with "hardening the schools" now!

Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: tShawnB] #7099016 03/02/18 08:10 PM
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 1,363
C
Cherokee Mingan Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
C
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 1,363
I say no regulation, put a gun in everybody's hand that is 18 and older except for convicted felons and such... Make it to where you'd be nuts to try and do something unless you are willing to die for it which you most likely will sooner than planned.

Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: SnakeWrangler] #7099255 03/02/18 11:07 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 13,015
B
bucksnbass357 Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
B
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 13,015
Originally Posted By: SnakeWrangler
Originally Posted By: Grizz
No law should ever be written to appease any group. Any law written should have a legitimate goal and the reasonable ability to achieve that goal. If we get behind anything to appease the anti gun nut jobs we'll get exactly what we deserve and it won't be good. Passing a law to appease these buffoons does three things immediately: it takes something away from us, it gets them one more rung up their ladder, and it once again successfully keeps everyone from having to address the real problems. If you want to look at new laws, maybe we could start by talking about ways to take our schools off of the soft target list.
As much as people would like to believe otherwise, there is simply no way to completely prevent these crimes. We can only prevent as many as we can by doing things that will actually work. Make no mistake, the liberal left is much more concerned with eroding our gun rights than protecting our children. I have no interest in appeasing them.

Very well stated and I agree wholeheartedly..... flag


Agreed wholeheartedly Sir.

Re: So what's the answer OR Is there and answer. [Re: Pitchfork Predator] #7099338 03/03/18 12:51 AM
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,048
C
Cinch Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
C
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,048
Originally Posted By: Pitchfork Predator
Originally Posted By: unclebubba
Huntmaster, lets say that we as pro-gun people supported the following: Firearm sales to 21 and up, 10 round magazine limit, bump stock ban, and a more encompasing background check that would include all sales or tranfers of all firearms. And we did so to appease the anti gunners. OK. Once those had all passed, what happens when a year down the road (or sooner) someone does this again. What then? None of the laws did anything to stop it from happening again, so we need more laws to appease the anti-gunners. So we pass a law that bans all semi-auto firearms. We've still got levers and bolts to hunt with and revolvers to protect ourselves, right? So another year goes by, and it happens again. Crap! Gotta pass another law to appease the anti-gunners. Take away levers and bolts. Hey, we've still got ruger number 1's and shotguns to hunt with, and revolvers to protect ourselves, right? OK. A few years go by and it happens again...That's why I can not get behind any legistation that is just to appease anti-gunners and in reality won't do anything to protect our kids. What will protect our kids? Teachers with guns will, armed guards/police officers will, metal detectors that will alert those armed guards/police will. Removing the gun free zone so that a Dad or Mom who has a CHL and volunteers at the school will. That's where we need to focus.


AGREE up

Page 2 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3