|
Forums46
Topics551,939
Posts9,898,422
Members88,160
| |
Most Online28,231
Feb 7th, 2025
|
|
|
 Re: An argument for turrets ????
[Re: NMGW]
#6707495
03/17/17 02:41 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,736
NMGW
OP
Pro Tracker
|
|
OP
Pro Tracker
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,736 |
BTW guys in researching scopes I discovered that Burris is making a dual focal plane scope. An elevation reticle in the first plane so it is subtend true at any magnification. AND a sighting reticle at the second plane that does not change size at any magnification. It is available on their XTR II line of scopes.
I have never been a big fan of Burris although I did use there pistol scopes back when I shot silhouette's. These might be worth a look.
Last edited by NMGW; 03/17/17 04:09 AM.
New Mexico: Not Really New, Not Really Mexico
|
|
|
|
Re: An argument for turrets ????
[Re: NMGW]
#6707624
03/17/17 11:11 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
dee
THF Trophy Hunter
|
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219 |
I believe the dual focal is mainly on the lower powered scopes.
Another "solution" that one company chooses is added ring or circle around the center of the reticle. The Bushnell lrhs offers this.
"A vote is like a rifle; it's usefulness depends on the character of the user" Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, txcornhusker
|
