Forums46
Topics546,087
Posts9,831,095
Members87,690
|
Most Online25,604 Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: Pitchfork Predator]
#6110247
12/30/15 11:37 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 21,271
SniperRAB
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 21,271 |
Very entertaining. And some good points made. I think a gut shot from 223 or 30.06 is gonna have the same result. It's like arguing about a 60 Degree Wedge and a Pitching Wedge with that guy at the office that plays Golf twice a year. Hardest Animal I ever had to Track was a .308 that was SLIGHTLY back and low and I mean SLIGHTLY....We tracked the Deer for over a mile and backed out over night, resumed the next Mng amd he still covered another mile with a hole you could stick your fist into..
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: Ackley_improved]
#6110292
12/30/15 11:59 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 16,303
QuitShootinYoungBucks
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 16,303 |
I've never understood why a perfectly rational thinking deer hunter would choose a .223 for his expensive trophy buck hunt, while standing in the gun safe along-side are perfectly serviceable rifles in .25-06, 7mm-08, and .30-06. I want a load that will perform under adverse circumstances--when the chips are down--than one that requires "putting the bullet in the right spot" (a mantra you repeat ceaselessly while nodding to each other).
----SNIP----
What was ever wrong with your 7mm-08 or .270? Consider a 200 yard shot on a that trophy buck from a 7-08 vs a properly loaded .223: 7-08, nosler 140 at 2800 - .4 mil elevation, and 2400fps on target. 223, 62 tsx at 2900 - .5 mil elevation, and 2260fps on target. Consider also the significant reduction in recoil, and the fact that you can (should) pile primers at the range for less than half the cost. I'm failing to see the downside...especially on thin skinned, medium game animals. The .223, properly loaded, drops them well beyond fine, and I've zero reservation in that regard. Except the 7-08 will pack double the energy at that range
https://web.archive.org/web/20170223065011/http:/www.rrdvegas.com/silencer-cleaning.html
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: Smeb]
#6110304
12/31/15 12:03 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 968
dogdown23
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 968 |
That's called a liver shot. You'd still be looking for it if you used your 223.
Dogdown
The only thing that'll stop a bad man with a gun, is a good man with a gun.
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: Smeb]
#6110309
12/31/15 12:06 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 968
dogdown23
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 968 |
If a marginal shot with the 308 had you doing a 2 mile track job just think what would happen with a marginal 223 shot. But we know everyone here makes perfect kills shots. So guess it's a moog point.
Dogdown
The only thing that'll stop a bad man with a gun, is a good man with a gun.
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: QuitShootinYoungBucks]
#6110318
12/31/15 12:11 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
Nogalus Prairie
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091 |
I've never understood why a perfectly rational thinking deer hunter would choose a .223 for his expensive trophy buck hunt, while standing in the gun safe along-side are perfectly serviceable rifles in .25-06, 7mm-08, and .30-06. I want a load that will perform under adverse circumstances--when the chips are down--than one that requires "putting the bullet in the right spot" (a mantra you repeat ceaselessly while nodding to each other).
----SNIP----
What was ever wrong with your 7mm-08 or .270? Consider a 200 yard shot on a that trophy buck from a 7-08 vs a properly loaded .223: 7-08, nosler 140 at 2800 - .4 mil elevation, and 2400fps on target. 223, 62 tsx at 2900 - .5 mil elevation, and 2260fps on target. Consider also the significant reduction in recoil, and the fact that you can (should) pile primers at the range for less than half the cost. I'm failing to see the downside...especially on thin skinned, medium game animals. The .223, properly loaded, drops them well beyond fine, and I've zero reservation in that regard. Except the 7-08 will pack double the energy at that range Energy/smenergy. Only rookies who can't shoot have to worry about energy.
I learned long ago you can't reason someone out of something they don't reason themselves into.
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: QuitShootinYoungBucks]
#6110342
12/31/15 12:22 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 94
Ackley_improved
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 94 |
I've never understood why a perfectly rational thinking deer hunter would choose a .223 for his expensive trophy buck hunt, while standing in the gun safe along-side are perfectly serviceable rifles in .25-06, 7mm-08, and .30-06. I want a load that will perform under adverse circumstances--when the chips are down--than one that requires "putting the bullet in the right spot" (a mantra you repeat ceaselessly while nodding to each other).
----SNIP----
What was ever wrong with your 7mm-08 or .270? Consider a 200 yard shot on a that trophy buck from a 7-08 vs a properly loaded .223: 7-08, nosler 140 at 2800 - .4 mil elevation, and 2400fps on target. 223, 62 tsx at 2900 - .5 mil elevation, and 2260fps on target. Consider also the significant reduction in recoil, and the fact that you can (should) pile primers at the range for less than half the cost. I'm failing to see the downside...especially on thin skinned, medium game animals. The .223, properly loaded, drops them well beyond fine, and I've zero reservation in that regard. Except the 7-08 will pack double the energy at that range You're right, specifically: 223/62tsx - 704 ft/lbs 7-08/140 BT - 1750 ft/lbs No doubt the 7-08 hits harder, but the question really is, in my opinion, does the energy difference REALLY matter with a thin skinned Texas deer? My answer is a decisive "no"...shot placement and bullet choice matters significantly more.
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: Nogalus Prairie]
#6110347
12/31/15 12:25 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 94
Ackley_improved
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 94 |
I've never understood why a perfectly rational thinking deer hunter would choose a .223 for his expensive trophy buck hunt, while standing in the gun safe along-side are perfectly serviceable rifles in .25-06, 7mm-08, and .30-06. I want a load that will perform under adverse circumstances--when the chips are down--than one that requires "putting the bullet in the right spot" (a mantra you repeat ceaselessly while nodding to each other).
----SNIP----
What was ever wrong with your 7mm-08 or .270? Consider a 200 yard shot on a that trophy buck from a 7-08 vs a properly loaded .223: 7-08, nosler 140 at 2800 - .4 mil elevation, and 2400fps on target. 223, 62 tsx at 2900 - .5 mil elevation, and 2260fps on target. Consider also the significant reduction in recoil, and the fact that you can (should) pile primers at the range for less than half the cost. I'm failing to see the downside...especially on thin skinned, medium game animals. The .223, properly loaded, drops them well beyond fine, and I've zero reservation in that regard. Except the 7-08 will pack double the energy at that range Energy/smenergy. Only rookies who can't shoot have to worry about energy. Well, I don't recall any rational person saying that. Maybe re-read the thread without sarcasm?
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: Smeb]
#6110371
12/31/15 12:41 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,445
BOONER
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,445 |
I just can't understand why there is never any middle ground on THF. The right bullet with the right load and proper shot placement from a 223 will kill any deer in Tx DED dead! A lot of people are very comfortable with their smaller rifles because of low recoil and the ability to practice a lot relatively cheap! Those guys are not the ones that myself or most guys are talking about when I/we say 223 aren't good deer guns. I shoot doe with both of my little guns. My 22-250 has dropped every doe that I have ever shot in its tracks but I don't use it when I'm buck hunting because I get buck fever. We just can't lump everyone into the same categories and say the 223 isn't a capable deer round because in the right hands it is. It's not in mine but it is in StxRanchmans. There is a middle ground. This is just like the damn HF/LF debate on here. Some people just can't seem to fathom(on both sides)that there is a middle ground! All HFs are not canned/livestock shooting. To say so is assanine! But on the flip side it is just as stupid to think that there are not plenty of HF places that give the rest a bad name if we lump them all in together. They are not anywhere near the same just as a 223 isn't equal in the hands of all people. Sorry for bringing up HF but dang sometimes this place frustrates the hell out of me.
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: BOONER]
#6110403
12/31/15 12:58 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 256
D6Ranch
Bird Dog
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 256 |
I just can't understand why there is never any middle ground on THF. The right bullet with the right load and proper shot placement from a 223 will kill any deer in Tx DED dead! A lot of people are very comfortable with their smaller rifles because of low recoil and the ability to practice a lot relatively cheap! Those guys are not the ones that myself or most guys are talking about when I/we say 223 aren't good deer guns. I shoot doe with both of my little guns. My 22-250 has dropped every doe that I have ever shot in its tracks but I don't use it when I'm buck hunting because I get buck fever. We just can't lump everyone into the same categories and say the 223 isn't a capable deer round because in the right hands it is. It's not in mine but it is in StxRanchmans. There is a middle ground. This is just like the damn HF/LF debate on here. Some people just can't seem to fathom(on both sides)that there is a middle ground! All HFs are not canned/livestock shooting. To say so is assanine! But on the flip side it is just as stupid to think that there are not plenty of HF places that give the rest a bad name if we lump them all in together. They are not anywhere near the same just as a 223 isn't equal in the hands of all people. Sorry for bringing up HF but dang sometimes this place frustrates the hell out of me. Because some people live to argue, it's that simple and they are easy to spot. How about I split the difference and say I really like the 243 for TX sized deer?
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: Smeb]
#6110405
12/31/15 12:59 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
Nogalus Prairie
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091 |
Why do you take it so seriously? A lot of guys seem to do that. It's just an internet forum. Nothing on here outside actual personal happenings is worth getting that worked up over. Really.
I learned long ago you can't reason someone out of something they don't reason themselves into.
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: Smeb]
#6110991
12/31/15 11:58 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 19,828
Pitchfork Predator
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 19,828 |
I would not choose the 223 if I had other options with more knock down energy behind the bullet. But, it is a very affordable caliber, plenty of ammo available, and used by many families for these reasons. For young hunters and small females it's a great option that makes sense. If they get buck fever, I want them shooting a rifle they have confidence in because they have shot it many times. Just remember fellas, most of us like winning the argument. We can argue and still be friends with fellow hunters. It keeps life interesting and we can learn from each other. We can agree to disagree.
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: Smeb]
#6110996
12/31/15 12:12 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 15,061
don k
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 15,061 |
I just like to argue. I never win with my wife so why should here be any different. It's alright NP. I still like you even though you don't have any confidence in your shooting ability.
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: Smeb]
#6111003
12/31/15 12:21 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 19,828
Pitchfork Predator
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 19,828 |
Thanks Don, I feel better knowing I'm not alone always loosing the argument to my wife.
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: Smeb]
#6111021
12/31/15 12:40 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
Nogalus Prairie
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091 |
And I still like you even though you can't handle even a .243. There no "winning" an argument on here. I rarely see anyone vociferously arguing against some issue admit that others may have a point. For most, the only sign I see that they have been given pause that someone might have a point is when the deflection techniques of personal attacks and "throwing their junk up on the table" begin. The (admittedly few) times I have conceded someone has a point, it is almost always taken as a sign of weakness rather than reflection upon their discussion point. But I continue to post on "hot topics" because I enjoy the discussion. They say a picture is worth a thousand words. Here's one - (L to R) .223, the bone-jarring .243 Win., and the shoulder-breaking elephant gun that is the mighty .270 WCF: Yeah, they're all the same when it comes to cleanly taking deer.
I learned long ago you can't reason someone out of something they don't reason themselves into.
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: Smeb]
#6111037
12/31/15 12:59 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
Nogalus Prairie
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091 |
Oh and Ackley_Improved: you basically said what I said in my (admittedly sarcastic) post in the thread immediately above the one where you say no one ever said that. To paraphrase, you said energy doesn't matter for hunting deer. With emphasis, no less.
(I would have quoted the post but you can only quote posts up to 4 levels deep.)
I learned long ago you can't reason someone out of something they don't reason themselves into.
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: Smeb]
#6111040
12/31/15 01:02 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 90
klp
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 90 |
I am very interested in this topic. I am on the lower caliber side of things. I am just interested in why some people shoot a larger round, lets say 30-06 for a deer. I understand if your hunting far wide open land and making far shots or taking some big animals, but the .223 can go through some pretty thick hog hide (I know this one for a fact) so a deer should never be a problem, unless it is too far. Someone brought of shooting 200 yards with 20 mph wind, which was something I never thought of. I never really know the wind when I hunt and never thought of it affecting my shot. I'm sure it does some but it has always worked out. I will be more observant of this and see. I've gotten one deer at about 150 yards in some wicked wind and the .223 did just fine.
Someone also mentioned they get some buck fever and like the larger round. I can understand this, My 25-06 does a lot more damage than the .223 so if your shot is off, the larger area of damage done by the larger round will help with the off shot (some). But how do you get nervous? I am not that old but I've noticed the past 5 years I don't get an adrenaline rush or anything. I just sit there, deer comes out (this step can take days), bang, get to work, then drink beer. Repeat until quota is full.
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: Smeb]
#6111041
12/31/15 01:02 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,440
TFF Caribou
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,440 |
I'm not going to question the guys who shoot 50+ deer a year successfully. My question is why you started using a .223 in the first place? There are even cheaper ammo options that are as or more effective (7.62x39 soft points immediately come to mind). Or was it generational, something you dad's did? Or did you just use it one time, it worked, and you stuck with it?
The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference. -George Washington
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: Smeb]
#6111047
12/31/15 01:07 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 21,271
SniperRAB
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 21,271 |
Touching .... Glad I threw the Howa in the case this weekend ...
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: TFF Caribou]
#6111052
12/31/15 01:09 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 15,061
don k
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 15,061 |
I'm not going to question the guys who shoot 50+ deer a year successfully. My question is why you started using a .223 in the first place? There are even cheaper ammo options that are as or more effective (7.62x39 soft points immediately come to mind). Or was it generational, something you dad's did? Or did you just use it one time, it worked, and you stuck with it? I did it because it gives those that have to always have something bigger and better something to brag about. Even though usually it is in their own minds.
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: Smeb]
#6111054
12/31/15 01:10 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 90
klp
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 90 |
Cause I am at work with not much to do, I started shooting a .222 which was a rifle my great grandma used (family thing) and my dad got the 25-06. Now my dad hunts with an AR and I get the 25-06. I've hunted with bot the AR and 25-06 and both work well (that is how I got on to the .223). I love the shot placement and trigger pull of the 25-06. But the AR is lighter and easier carry around (and looks cooler). Maybe if I started out shooting 30-06 I would be on the higher caliber side of things. I am looking at getting an AR (if anyone has one for sale) just cause it will be easier to handle and I do feel the 25-06 does a lot of meat damage to the shoulder compared to the .223. I get a lot more of the jelled blood and bone fragments with the 25.
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: Nogalus Prairie]
#6111058
12/31/15 01:12 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 15,061
don k
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 15,061 |
And I still like you even though you can't handle even a .243. There no "winning" an argument on here. I rarely see anyone vociferously arguing against some issue admit that others may have a point. For most, the only sign I see that they have been given pause that someone might have a point is when the deflection techniques of personal attacks and "throwing their junk up on the table" begin. The (admittedly few) times I have conceded someone has a point, it is almost always taken as a sign of weakness rather than reflection upon their discussion point. But I continue to post on "hot topics" because I enjoy the discussion. They say a picture is worth a thousand words. Here's one - (L to R) .223, the bone-jarring .243 Win., and the shoulder-breaking elephant gun that is the mighty .270 WCF: Yeah, they're all the same when it comes to cleanly taking deer. You forgot to put a picture of the favorite East Texas round. The 22 long Rifle.
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: klp]
#6111060
12/31/15 01:13 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 21,271
SniperRAB
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 21,271 |
Cause I am at work with not much to do, I started shooting a .222 which was a rifle my great grandma used (family thing) and my dad got the 25-06. Now my dad hunts with an AR and I get the 25-06. I've hunted with bot the AR and 25-06 and both work well (that is how I got on to the .223). I love the shot placement and trigger pull of the 25-06. But the AR is lighter and easier carry around (and looks cooler). Maybe if I started out shooting 30-06 I would be on the higher caliber side of things. I am looking at getting an AR (if anyone has one for sale) just cause it will be easier to handle and I do feel the 25-06 does a lot of meat damage to the shoulder compared to the .223. I get a lot more of the jelled blood and bone fragments with the 25. Was one of my Fathers favorite rounds.... .222 is a flat shooter
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: Smeb]
#6111066
12/31/15 01:18 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 21,271
SniperRAB
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 21,271 |
Go see what the guides have behind there seat on the Briscoe and Callghan ...Its not a 300 win mag
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: Smeb]
#6111073
12/31/15 01:23 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
Nogalus Prairie
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091 |
Research on ammo cost from Cabela's website:
Winchester PowerPoint .223 caliber: $1.05 per round ($22/box of 20) Winchester PowerPoint . 243 caliber: $1.10 per round ($23/box of 20)
Bulk FMJ 55 grain .223 ammo: .65 - .95 per round.
At 500 rounds per season using Win. PP ammo (.223 v. .243) one saves a whopping $25.00 annually. At 500 rounds per season using Win. PP ammo (.243) vs. the cheapest bulk .223 ammo one saves $225 annually.
Wow.
I learned long ago you can't reason someone out of something they don't reason themselves into.
|
|
|
Re: Hunting w/ 223
[Re: Smeb]
#6111075
12/31/15 01:25 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 968
dogdown23
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 968 |
Now we're opening up and making progress. you boys be safe tonight and Happy New Year
Dogdown
The only thing that'll stop a bad man with a gun, is a good man with a gun.
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|