Forums46
Topics538,052
Posts9,732,441
Members87,055
|
Most Online25,604 Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
Re: recoil of 257
[Re: redchevy]
#6087905
12/16/15 09:33 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,483
BOBO the Clown
kind of a big deal
|
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,483 |
They seem pretty close to me. For someone with an injury being the reason for reducing recoil I see it as a pretty marginal step. They aren't. I would hand a 10 year old my CM no way I'd hand a 10 year old my 270.
|
|
|
Re: recoil of 257
[Re: BOBO the Clown]
#6087994
12/16/15 10:22 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,549
redchevy
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,549 |
They seem pretty close to me. For someone with an injury being the reason for reducing recoil I see it as a pretty marginal step. They aren't. I would hand a 10 year old my CM no way I'd hand a 10 year old my 270. Seem pretty close to me. I got handed a 270 as a ten year old and didn't have a problem. The 6.5 is less, but it seems far from a night and day difference to me. To each their own. Similar weight bullets going similar speeds they are gonna have recoil in the same ball park. And the long action will weigh more.
It's hell eatin em live
|
|
|
Re: recoil of 257
[Re: chemdawg]
#6088005
12/16/15 10:33 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,511
syncerus
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,511 |
Bear in mind that there are only four factors in recoil calculations: rifle weight, bullet weight, bullet velocity and propellant weight. At the end of the day, it comes down to only bullet weight, bullet velocity and propellant weight when comparing cartridges and not rifles.
Last edited by syncerus; 12/16/15 10:34 PM. Reason: speling
NRA Patriot Benefactor & DSC Lifer
|
|
|
Re: recoil of 257
[Re: chemdawg]
#6088089
12/16/15 11:18 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 569
nyalubwe
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 569 |
If you hand load, either the .243 or the Bob. If you are not a hand loader there is a lot more available in factory ammo for a .243....
Recoil wise they are same-o same-o
|
|
|
Re: recoil of 257
[Re: chemdawg]
#6088727
12/17/15 04:59 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 838
stxhunter
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 838 |
I think you'll be fine with the 243. Take a good look at the Tikka T3.
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|