texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
SidewinderTx, Hog Wild USA, adeptresources, ThomasSan, Saintsman65
72647 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,840
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 66,235
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
Stub 45,419
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics545,668
Posts9,824,723
Members87,647
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 2 of 12 1 2 3 4 11 12
Re: CWD in Texas [Re: Frio County Hunts] #5820994 07/07/15 01:32 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 200
B
Bowman24 Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
B
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 200
The Ranch with the CWD Case offered to donate all of the deer to the A&M Research team where animals are sent for testing. That way they would be able to see if rectal and blood testing could be used in accordance with testing with the brain stem and TPWD refused. The unknown is what is somewhat scary about CWD and TPWD and TAHC should be working with the owners and take advantage of the situation to learn more about CWD and help them get through this for everyone's benefit. Instead, TPWD is treating them like criminals and only seem to care about destroying the herd (EVIDENCE) and any linkage to it, that's what's more criminal in my opinion!

Re: CWD in Texas [Re: Frio County Hunts] #5821012 07/07/15 01:48 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 656
J
jmh004 Online Content
Tracker
Online Content
Tracker
J
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 656
I'm willing to bet all these breeders in Texas, most of whom are probably some of the wealthiest people in Texas, aren't going to take this lying down. I bet before too long we will be talking about TPWD getting sued over this.

Re: CWD in Texas [Re: Bowman24] #5821080 07/07/15 02:34 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,398
N
nsmike Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
N
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,398
Originally Posted By: Bowman24
The Ranch with the CWD Case offered to donate all of the deer to the A&M Research team where animals are sent for testing. That way they would be able to see if rectal and blood testing could be used in accordance with testing with the brain stem and TPWD refused. The unknown is what is somewhat scary about CWD and TPWD and TAHC should be working with the owners and take advantage of the situation to learn more about CWD and help them get through this for everyone's benefit. Instead, TPWD is treating them like criminals and only seem to care about destroying the herd (EVIDENCE) and any linkage to it, that's what's more criminal in my opinion!

This has been an on going problem, no live test has been validated, yet they destroy herds whithout letting researchers take samples that could possibly lead to a live test.


for every stereotype there's a prototype don't be the prototype
Re: CWD in Texas [Re: Frio County Hunts] #5821336 07/07/15 05:50 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 656
J
jmh004 Online Content
Tracker
Online Content
Tracker
J
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 656
TPWD is tracking all deer movement into, and out of that ranch in Medina County for the last 5 years. That will pretty much connect every breeder in Texas to this deer in some way. So instead of testing a couple hundred animals on one ranch, they will be able to claim who knows how many animals on who knows how many ranches to test. The breeding industry is about to get hammered.
I don't own a breeding facility, or even work on one is these ranches. I sure will hate to see how many deer are going to be killed in the name of "containment" in the coming months. I'm sure only a few of the most profitable breeders will be the only ones left after all this.
I blame these HF ranches and breeders for a lot of things in today's hunting world. The prices for leases, and basically the price of hunting in general has gone through the roof in recent years in part, what I believe, to these whitetail ranches. That being said, I hate to see the government come in and tell people what to do with their private property. The next few weeks will be very interesting in how the state will handle all this

Re: CWD in Texas [Re: Frio County Hunts] #5821378 07/07/15 06:27 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 947
J
JMalin Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
J
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 947
The wealthiest hunters I know (the kind that can afford to hunt places where legitimate Boone and Crockett caliber deer can be harvested) find the practice of shooting pen raised deer detestable.

Last edited by JMalin; 07/07/15 06:29 PM.
Re: CWD in Texas [Re: Frio County Hunts] #5821454 07/07/15 07:00 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 656
J
jmh004 Online Content
Tracker
Online Content
Tracker
J
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 656
I'm not saying shooting pen raised deer is my thing. But a person ought to be able to decide what to do on their own land don't you think?

Re: CWD in Texas [Re: JMalin] #5821466 07/07/15 07:07 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 61,930
BOBO the Clown Online Content
kind of a big deal
Online Content
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 61,930
Originally Posted By: JMalin
The wealthiest hunters I know (the kind that can afford to hunt places where legitimate Boone and Crockett caliber deer can be harvested) find the practice of shooting pen raised deer detestable.


Cool but that's not what the thread is about.


Bottom line, never trust a man whose uncle was eaten by cannibals.-Sen Joni Ernst
Re: CWD in Texas [Re: Bowman24] #5821488 07/07/15 07:21 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 304
F
flounder Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
F
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 304
Originally Posted By: Bowman24
The Ranch with the CWD Case offered to donate all of the deer to the A&M Research team where animals are sent for testing. That way they would be able to see if rectal and blood testing could be used in accordance with testing with the brain stem and TPWD refused. The unknown is what is somewhat scary about CWD and TPWD and TAHC should be working with the owners and take advantage of the situation to learn more about CWD and help them get through this for everyone's benefit. Instead, TPWD is treating them like criminals and only seem to care about destroying the herd (EVIDENCE) and any linkage to it, that's what's more criminal in my opinion!



for what's it's worth, I will ggive the owners a thumbs up up for ;


>>>The Ranch with the CWD Case offered to donate all of the deer to the A&M Research team where animals are sent for testing. That way they would be able to see if rectal and blood testing could be used in accordance with testing with the brain stem<<<


but not knowing the rest of the story, I won't comment about TPWD or TAHC and any reasoning they might have for not wanting use the herd for research confused2

I do hope they test all of the deer for cwd, and the results are published to the public?

however, I will say this. I know of another situation with captives with cwd, that if I am not mistaken, after cwd was discovered, there was a time period where the situation was set into limbo, either for litigations, courts, the government, the owners, whatever, those perfectly healthy deer that everyone was so concerned about, all those healthy looking deer, after the final testing was done after much delay, a long time after, there was an 79.8% CWD infection rate documented. I'm just saying, you let this cwd linger, the chances of the cwd agent spreading grows and grows. so dammed if they do, danged if they don't. all I am saying, if you snooze, you loose. this is why ;


For Immediate Release Thursday, October 2, 2014

Dustin Vande Hoef 515/281-3375 or 515/326-1616 (cell) or Dustin.VandeHoef@IowaAgriculture.gov

TEST RESULTS FROM CAPTIVE DEER HERD WITH CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE RELEASED 79.8 percent of the deer tested positive for the disease

DES MOINES – The Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship today announced that the test results from the depopulation of a quarantined captive deer herd in north-central Iowa showed that 284 of the 356 deer, or 79.8% of the herd, tested positive for Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD).

http://www.iowaagriculture.gov/press/2014press/press10022014.asp

*** see history of this CWD blunder here ;

http://www.iowadnr.gov/Portals/idnr/uploads/Hunting/070313_consent_order.pdf

On June 5, 2013, DNR conducted a fence inspection, after gaining approval from surrounding landowners, and confirmed that the fenced had been cut or removed in at least four separate locations; that the fence had degraded and was failing to maintain the enclosure around the Quarantined Premises in at least one area; that at least three gates had been opened;and that deer tracks were visible in and around one of the open areas in the sand on both sides of the fence, evidencing movement of deer into the Quarantined Premises.

http://www.iowadnr.gov/Portals/idnr/uploads/Hunting/060613_consent_order.pdf



***Recently, we have been using PMCA to study the role of environmental prion contamination on the horizontal spreading of TSEs. These experiments have focused on the study of the interaction of prions with plants and environmentally relevant surfaces. Our results show that plants (both leaves and roots) bind tightly to prions present in brain extracts and excreta (urine and feces) and retain even small quantities of PrPSc for long periods of time. Strikingly, ingestion of prioncontaminated leaves and roots produced disease with a 100% attack rate and an incubation period not substantially longer than feeding animals directly with scrapie brain homogenate. Furthermore, plants can uptake prions from contaminated soil and transport them to different parts of the plant tissue (stem and leaves). Similarly, prions bind tightly to a variety of environmentallyrelevant surfaces, including stones, wood, metals, plastic, glass, cement, etc. Prion contaminated surfaces efficiently transmit prion disease when these materials were directly injected into the brain of animals and strikingly when the contaminated surfaces were just placed in the animal cage. These findings demonstrate that environmental materials can efficiently bind infectious prions and act as carriers of infectivity, suggesting that they may play an important role in the horizontal transmission of the disease.

Since its invention 13 years ago, PMCA has helped to answer fundamental questions of prion propagation and has broad applications in research areas including the food industry, blood bank safety and human and veterinary disease diagnosis.

https://prion2015.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/programguide1.pdf

Wednesday, June 10, 2015

Zoonotic Potential of CWD Prions

LATE-BREAKING ABSTRACTS

http://chronic-wasting-disease.blogspot.com/2015/06/zoonotic-potential-of-cwd-prions.html

Wednesday, April 22, 2015

Circulation of prions within dust on a scrapie affected farm

http://transmissiblespongiformencephalop...in-dust-on.html

Friday, January 30, 2015

*** Scrapie: a particularly persistent pathogen ***

http://transmissiblespongiformencephalop...t-pathogen.html

2012

PO-039: A comparison of scrapie and chronic wasting disease in white-tailed deer

Justin Greenlee, Jodi Smith, Eric Nicholson US Dept. Agriculture; Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center; Ames, IA USA

snip...

The results of this study suggest that there are many similarities in the manifestation of CWD and scrapie in WTD after IC inoculation including early and widespread presence of PrPSc in lymphoid tissues, clinical signs of depression and weight loss progressing to wasting, and an incubation time of 21-23 months. Moreover, western blots (WB) done on brain material from the obex region have a molecular profile similar to CWD and distinct from tissues of the cerebrum or the scrapie inoculum. However, results of microscopic and IHC examination indicate that there are differences between the lesions expected in CWD and those that occur in deer with scrapie: amyloid plaques were not noted in any sections of brain examined from these deer and the pattern of immunoreactivity by IHC was diffuse rather than plaque-like.

*** After a natural route of exposure, 100% of WTD were susceptible to scrapie.

Deer developed clinical signs of wasting and mental depression and were necropsied from 28 to 33 months PI. Tissues from these deer were positive for PrPSc by IHC and WB. Similar to IC inoculated deer, samples from these deer exhibited two different molecular profiles: samples from obex resembled CWD whereas those from cerebrum were similar to the original scrapie inoculum. On further examination by WB using a panel of antibodies, the tissues from deer with scrapie exhibit properties differing from tissues either from sheep with scrapie or WTD with CWD. Samples from WTD with CWD or sheep with scrapie are strongly immunoreactive when probed with mAb P4, however, samples from WTD with scrapie are only weakly immunoreactive. In contrast, when probed with mAb’s 6H4 or SAF 84, samples from sheep with scrapie and WTD with CWD are weakly immunoreactive and samples from WTD with scrapie are strongly positive. This work demonstrates that WTD are highly susceptible to sheep scrapie, but on first passage, scrapie in WTD is differentiable from CWD.

http://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/prion/03-Prion6-2-Transmission-and-strains.pdf

2011

*** After a natural route of exposure, 100% of white-tailed deer were susceptible to scrapie.

http://www.usaha.org/Portals/6/Reports/2011/report-cwal-2011.pdf

*** We conclude that TSE infectivity is likely to survive burial for long time periods with minimal loss of infectivity and limited movement from the original burial site. However PMCA results have shown that there is the potential for rainwater to elute TSE related material from soil which could lead to the contamination of a wider area. These experiments reinforce the importance of risk assessment when disposing of TSE risk materials.

*** The results show that even highly diluted PrPSc can bind efficiently to polypropylene, stainless steel, glass, wood and stone and propagate the conversion of normal prion protein. For in vivo experiments, hamsters were ic injected with implants incubated in 1% 263K-infected brain homogenate. Hamsters, inoculated with 263K-contaminated implants of all groups, developed typical signs of prion disease, whereas control animals inoculated with non-contaminated materials did not.

PRION 2014 CONFERENCE

CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD

A FEW FINDINGS ;

Conclusions. To our knowledge, this is the first established experimental model of CWD in TgSB3985. We found evidence for co-existence or divergence of two CWD strains adapted to Tga20 mice and their replication in TgSB3985 mice. Finally, we observed phenotypic differences between cervid-derived CWD and CWD/Tg20 strains upon propagation in TgSB3985 mice. Further studies are underway to characterize these strains.

We conclude that TSE infectivity is likely to survive burial for long time periods with minimal loss of infectivity and limited movement from the original burial site. However PMCA results have shown that there is the potential for rainwater to elute TSE related material from soil which could lead to the contamination of a wider area. These experiments reinforce the importance of risk assessment when disposing of TSE risk materials.

The results show that even highly diluted PrPSc can bind efficiently to polypropylene, stainless steel, glass, wood and stone and propagate the conversion of normal prion protein. For in vivo experiments, hamsters were ic injected with implants incubated in 1% 263K-infected brain homogenate. Hamsters, inoculated with 263K-contaminated implants of all groups, developed typical signs of prion disease, whereas control animals inoculated with non-contaminated materials did not.

Our data establish that meadow voles are permissive to CWD via peripheral exposure route, suggesting they could serve as an environmental reservoir for CWD. Additionally, our data are consistent with the hypothesis that at least two strains of CWD circulate in naturally-infected cervid populations and provide evidence that meadow voles are a useful tool for CWD strain typing.

Conclusion. CWD prions are shed in saliva and urine of infected deer as early as 3 months post infection and throughout the subsequent >1.5 year course of infection. In current work we are examining the relationship of prionemia to excretion and the impact of excreted prion binding to surfaces and particulates in the environment.

Conclusion. CWD prions (as inferred by prion seeding activity by RT-QuIC) are shed in urine of infected deer as early as 6 months post inoculation and throughout the subsequent disease course. Further studies are in progress refining the real-time urinary prion assay sensitivity and we are examining more closely the excretion time frame, magnitude, and sample variables in relationship to inoculation route and prionemia in naturally and experimentally CWD-infected cervids.

Conclusions. Our results suggested that the odds of infection for CWD is likely controlled by areas that congregate deer thus increasing direct transmission (deer-to-deer interactions) or indirect transmission (deer-to-environment) by sharing or depositing infectious prion proteins in these preferred habitats. Epidemiology of CWD in the eastern U.S. is likely controlled by separate factors than found in the Midwestern and endemic areas for CWD and can assist in performing more efficient surveillance efforts for the region.

Conclusions. During the pre-symptomatic stage of CWD infection and throughout the course of disease deer may be shedding multiple LD50 doses per day in their saliva. CWD prion shedding through saliva and excreta may account for the unprecedented spread of this prion disease in nature.

see full text and more ;

Monday, June 23, 2014

*** PRION 2014 CONFERENCE CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD

https://www.landesbioscience.com/journal...n%20Animals.pdf

http://chronic-wasting-disease.blogspot.com/2014/06/prion-2014-chronic-wasting-disease-cwd.html

*** Infectious agent of sheep scrapie may persist in the environment for at least 16 years***

Gudmundur Georgsson1, Sigurdur Sigurdarson2 and Paul Brown3

http://jgv.sgmjournals.org/content/87/12/3737.full

New studies on the heat resistance of hamster-adapted scrapie agent: Threshold survival after ashing at 600°C suggests an inorganic template of replication

http://www.pnas.org/content/97/7/3418.full

Prion Infected Meat-and-Bone Meal Is Still Infectious after Biodiesel Production

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493038/

Detection of protease-resistant cervid prion protein in water from a CWD-endemic area

http://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/prion/NicholsPRION3-3.pdf

A Quantitative Assessment of the Amount of Prion Diverted to Category 1 Materials and Wastewater During Processing

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01922.x/abstract

Rapid assessment of bovine spongiform encephalopathy prion inactivation by heat treatment in yellow grease produced in the industrial manufacturing process of meat and bone meals

http://transmissiblespongiformencephalop...spongiform.html

98 | Veterinary Record | January 24, 2015

EDITORIAL

Scrapie: a particularly persistent pathogen

Cristina Acín

Resistant prions in the environment have been the sword of Damocles for scrapie control and eradication. Attempts to establish which physical and chemical agents could be applied to inactivate or moderate scrapie infectivity were initiated in the 1960s and 1970s,with the first study of this type focusing on the effect of heat treatment in reducing prion infectivity (Hunter and Millson 1964). Nowadays, most of the chemical procedures that aim to inactivate the prion protein are based on the method developed by Kimberlin and collaborators (1983). This procedure consists of treatment with 20,000 parts per million free chlorine solution, for a minimum of one hour, of all surfaces that need to be sterilised (in laboratories, lambing pens, slaughterhouses, and so on). Despite this, veterinarians and farmers may still ask a range of questions, such as ‘Is there an official procedure published somewhere?’ and ‘Is there an international organisation which recommends and defines the exact method of scrapie decontamination that must be applied?’

From a European perspective, it is difficult to find a treatment that could be applied, especially in relation to the disinfection of surfaces in lambing pens of affected flocks. A 999/2001 EU regulation on controlling spongiform encephalopathies (European Parliament and Council 2001) did not specify a particular decontamination measure to be used when an outbreak of scrapie is diagnosed. There is only a brief recommendation in Annex VII concerning the control and eradication of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE s).

Chapter B of the regulation explains the measures that must be applied if new caprine animals are to be introduced to a holding where a scrapie outbreak has previously been diagnosed. In that case, the statement indicates that caprine animals can be introduced ‘provided that a cleaning and disinfection of all animal housing on the premises has been carried out following destocking’.

Issues around cleaning and disinfection are common in prion prevention recommendations, but relevant authorities, veterinarians and farmers may have difficulties in finding the specific protocol which applies. The European Food and Safety Authority (EFSA ) published a detailed report about the efficacy of certain biocides, such as sodium hydroxide, sodium hypochlorite, guanidine and even a formulation of copper or iron metal ions in combination with hydrogen peroxide, against prions (EFSA 2009). The report was based on scientific evidence (Fichet and others 2004, Lemmer and others 2004, Gao and others 2006, Solassol and others 2006) but unfortunately the decontamination measures were not assessed under outbreak conditions.

The EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards recently published its conclusions on the scrapie situation in the EU after 10 years of monitoring and control of the disease in sheep and goats (EFSA 2014), and one of the most interesting findings was the Icelandic experience regarding the effect of disinfection in scrapie control. The Icelandic plan consisted of: culling scrapie-affected sheep or the whole flock in newly diagnosed outbreaks; deep cleaning and disinfection of stables, sheds, barns and equipment with high pressure washing followed by cleaning with 500 parts per million of hypochlorite; drying and treatment with 300 ppm of iodophor; and restocking was not permitted for at least two years. Even when all of these measures were implemented, scrapie recurred on several farms, indicating that the infectious agent survived for years in the environment, even as many as 16 years after restocking (Georgsson and others 2006).

In the rest of the countries considered in the EFSA (2014) report, recommendations for disinfection measures were not specifically defined at the government level. In the report, the only recommendation that is made for sheep is repopulation with sheep with scrapie-resistant genotypes. This reduces the risk of scrapie recurrence but it is difficult to know its effect on the infection.

Until the EFSA was established (in May 2003), scientific opinions about TSE s were provided by the Scientific Steering Committee (SSC) of the EC, whose advice regarding inactivation procedures focused on treating animal waste at high temperatures (150°C for three hours) and high pressure alkaline hydrolysis (SSC 2003). At the same time, the TSE Risk Management Subgroup of the Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP) in the UK published guidance on safe working and the prevention of TSE infection. Annex C of the ACDP report established that sodium hypochlorite was considered to be effective, but only if 20,000 ppm of available chlorine was present for at least one hour, which has practical limitations such as the release of chlorine gas, corrosion, incompatibility with formaldehyde, alcohols and acids, rapid inactivation of its active chemicals and the stability of dilutions (ACDP 2009).

In an international context, the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) does not recommend a specific disinfection protocol for prion agents in its Terrestrial Code or Manual. Chapter 4.13 of the Terrestrial Code, General recommendations on disinfection and disinsection (OIE 2014), focuses on foot-and-mouth disease virus, mycobacteria and Bacillus anthracis, but not on prion disinfection. Nevertheless, the last update published by the OIE on bovine spongiform encephalopathy (OIE 2012) indicates that few effective decontamination techniques are available to inactivate the agent on surfaces, and recommends the removal of all organic material and the use of sodium hydroxide, or a sodium hypochlorite solution containing 2 per cent available chlorine, for more than one hour at 20ºC.

The World Health Organization outlines guidelines for the control of TSE s, and also emphasises the importance of mechanically cleaning surfaces before disinfection with sodium hydroxide or sodium hypochlorite for one hour (WHO 1999).

Finally, the relevant agencies in both Canada and the USA suggest that the best treatments for surfaces potentially contaminated with prions are sodium hydroxide or sodium hypochlorite at 20,000 ppm. This is a 2 per cent solution, while most commercial household bleaches contain 5.25 per cent sodium hypochlorite. It is therefore recommended to dilute one part 5.25 per cent bleach with 1.5 parts water (CDC 2009, Canadian Food Inspection Agency 2013).

So what should we do about disinfection against prions? First, it is suggested that a single protocol be created by international authorities to homogenise inactivation procedures and enable their application in all scrapie-affected countries. Sodium hypochlorite with 20,000 ppm of available chlorine seems to be the procedure used in most countries, as noted in a paper summarised on p 99 of this issue of Veterinary Record (Hawkins and others 2015). But are we totally sure of its effectiveness as a preventive measure in a scrapie outbreak? Would an in-depth study of the recurrence of scrapie disease be needed?

What we can conclude is that, if we want to fight prion diseases, and specifically classical scrapie, we must focus on the accuracy of diagnosis, monitoring and surveillance; appropriate animal identification and control of movements; and, in the end, have homogeneous and suitable protocols to decontaminate and disinfect lambing barns, sheds and equipment available to veterinarians and farmers. Finally, further investigations into the resistance of prion proteins in the diversity of environmental surfaces are required.

References

snip...

98 | Veterinary Record | January 24, 2015

http://veterinaryrecord.bmj.com/content/176/4/97.extract

Persistence of ovine scrapie infectivity in a farm environment following cleaning and decontamination

Steve A. C. Hawkins, MIBiol, Pathology Department1, Hugh A. Simmons, BVSc MRCVS, MBA, MA Animal Services Unit1, Kevin C. Gough, BSc, PhD2 and Ben C. Maddison, BSc, PhD3 + Author Affiliations

1Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB, UK 2School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, The University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE12 5RD, UK 3ADAS UK, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, The University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE12 5RD, UK E-mail for correspondence: ben.maddison@adas.co.uk Abstract Scrapie of sheep/goats and chronic wasting disease of deer/elk are contagious prion diseases where environmental reservoirs are directly implicated in the transmission of disease. In this study, the effectiveness of recommended scrapie farm decontamination regimens was evaluated by a sheep bioassay using buildings naturally contaminated with scrapie. Pens within a farm building were treated with either 20,000 parts per million free chorine solution for one hour or were treated with the same but were followed by painting and full re-galvanisation or replacement of metalwork within the pen. Scrapie susceptible lambs of the PRNP genotype VRQ/VRQ were reared within these pens and their scrapie status was monitored by recto-anal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue. All animals became infected over an 18-month period, even in the pen that had been subject to the most stringent decontamination process. These data suggest that recommended current guidelines for the decontamination of farm buildings following outbreaks of scrapie do little to reduce the titre of infectious scrapie material and that environmental recontamination could also be an issue associated with these premises.

SNIP...

Discussion

Thorough pressure washing of a pen had no effect on the amount of bioavailable scrapie infectivity (pen B). The routine removal of prions from surfaces within a laboratory setting is treatment for a minimum of one hour with 20,000 ppm free chlorine, a method originally based on the use of brain macerates from infected rodents to evaluate the effectiveness of decontamination (Kimberlin and others 1983). Further studies have also investigated the effectiveness of hypochlorite disinfection of metal surfaces to simulate the decontamination of surgical devices within a hospital setting. Such treatments with hypochlorite solution were able to reduce infectivity by 5.5 logs to lower than the sensitivity of the bioassay used (Lemmer and others 2004). Analogous treatment of the pen surfaces did not effectively remove the levels of scrapie infectivity over that of the control pens, indicating that this method of decontamination is not effective within a farm setting. This may be due to the high level of biological matrix that is present upon surfaces within the farm environment, which may reduce the amount of free chlorine available to inactivate any infectious prion. Remarkably 1/5 sheep introduced into pen D had also became scrapie positive within nine months, with all animals in this pen being RAMALT positive by 18 months of age. Pen D was no further away from the control pen (pen A) than any of the other pens within this barn. Localised hot spots of infectivity may be present within scrapie-contaminated environments, but it is unlikely that pen D area had an amount of scrapie contamination that was significantly different than the other areas within this building. Similarly, there were no differences in how the biosecurity of pen D was maintained, or how this pen was ventilated compared with the other pens. This observation, perhaps, indicates the slower kinetics of disease uptake within this pen and is consistent with a more thorough prion removal and recontamination. These observations may also account for the presence of inadvertent scrapie cases within other studies, where despite stringent biosecurity, control animals have become scrapie positive during challenge studies using barns that also housed scrapie-affected animals (Ryder and others 2009). The bioassay data indicate that the exposure of the sheep to a farm environment after decontamination efforts thought to be effective in removing scrapie is sufficient for the animals to become infected with scrapie. The main exposure routes within this scenario are likely to be via the oral route, during feeding and drinking, and respiratory and conjunctival routes. It has been demonstrated that scrapie infectivity can be efficiently transmitted via the nasal route in sheep (Hamir and others 2008), as is the case for CWD in both murine models and in white-tailed deer (Denkers and others 2010, 2013). Recently, it has also been demonstrated that CWD prions presented as dust when bound to the soil mineral montmorillonite can be infectious via the nasal route (Nichols and others 2013). When considering pens C and D, the actual source of the infectious agent in the pens is not known, it is possible that biologically relevant levels of prion survive on surfaces during the decontamination regimen (pen C). With the use of galvanising and painting (pen D) covering and sealing the surface of the pen, it is possible that scrapie material recontaminated the pens by the movement of infectious prions contained within dusts originating from other parts of the barn that were not decontaminated or from other areas of the farm.

Given that scrapie prions are widespread on the surfaces of affected farms (Maddison and others 2010a), irrespective of the source of the infectious prions in the pens, this study clearly highlights the difficulties that are faced with the effective removal of environmentally associated scrapie infectivity. This is likely to be paralleled in CWD which shows strong similarities to scrapie in terms of both the dissemination of prions into the environment and the facile mode of disease transmission. These data further contribute to the understanding that prion diseases can be highly transmissible between susceptible individuals not just by direct contact but through highly stable environmental reservoirs that are refractory to decontamination.

The presence of these environmentally associated prions in farm buildings make the control of these diseases a considerable challenge, especially in animal species such as goats where there is lack of genetic resistance to scrapie and, therefore, no scope to re-stock farms with animals that are resistant to scrapie.

Scrapie Sheep Goats Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE) Accepted October 12, 2014. Published Online First 31 October 2014

http://veterinaryrecord.bmj.com/content/early/2014/10/31/vr.102743.abstract

Monday, November 3, 2014

Persistence of ovine scrapie infectivity in a farm environment following cleaning and decontamination

http://transmissiblespongiformencephalopathy.blogspot.com/2014/11/persistence-of-ovine-scrapie.html

PPo3-22:

Detection of Environmentally Associated PrPSc on a Farm with Endemic Scrapie

Ben C. Maddison,1 Claire A. Baker,1 Helen C. Rees,1 Linda A. Terry,2 Leigh Thorne,2 Susan J. Belworthy2 and Kevin C. Gough3 1ADAS-UK LTD; Department of Biology; University of Leicester; Leicester, UK; 2Veterinary Laboratories Agency; Surry, KT UK; 3Department of Veterinary Medicine and Science; University of Nottingham; Sutton Bonington, Loughborough UK

Key words: scrapie, evironmental persistence, sPMCA

Ovine scrapie shows considerable horizontal transmission, yet the routes of transmission and specifically the role of fomites in transmission remain poorly defined. Here we present biochemical data demonstrating that on a scrapie-affected sheep farm, scrapie prion contamination is widespread. It was anticipated at the outset that if prions contaminate the environment that they would be there at extremely low levels, as such the most sensitive method available for the detection of PrPSc, serial Protein Misfolding Cyclic Amplification (sPMCA), was used in this study. We investigated the distribution of environmental scrapie prions by applying ovine sPMCA to samples taken from a range of surfaces that were accessible to animals and could be collected by use of a wetted foam swab. Prion was amplified by sPMCA from a number of these environmental swab samples including those taken from metal, plastic and wooden surfaces, both in the indoor and outdoor environment. At the time of sampling there had been no sheep contact with these areas for at least 20 days prior to sampling indicating that prions persist for at least this duration in the environment. These data implicate inanimate objects as environmental reservoirs of prion infectivity which are likely to contribute to disease transmission.

http://www.prion2010.org/bilder/prion_20...00b77af81be3099

Friday, December 14, 2012

DEFRA U.K. What is the risk of Chronic Wasting Disease CWD being introduced into Great Britain? A Qualitative Risk Assessment October 2012

snip...

In the USA, under the Food and Drug Administration’s BSE Feed Regulation (21 CFR 589.2000) most material (exceptions include milk, tallow, and gelatin) from deer and elk is prohibited for use in feed for ruminant animals. With regards to feed for non-ruminant animals, under FDA law, CWD positive deer may not be used for any animal feed or feed ingredients. For elk and deer considered at high risk for CWD, the FDA recommends that these animals do not enter the animal feed system. However, this recommendation is guidance and not a requirement by law.

Animals considered at high risk for CWD include:

1) animals from areas declared to be endemic for CWD and/or to be CWD eradication zones and

2) deer and elk that at some time during the 60-month period prior to slaughter were in a captive herd that contained a CWD-positive animal.

Therefore, in the USA, materials from cervids other than CWD positive animals may be used in animal feed and feed ingredients for non-ruminants.

The amount of animal PAP that is of deer and/or elk origin imported from the USA to GB can not be determined, however, as it is not specified in TRACES. It may constitute a small percentage of the 8412 kilos of non-fish origin processed animal proteins that were imported from US into GB in 2011.

Overall, therefore, it is considered there is a __greater than negligible risk___ that (nonruminant) animal feed and pet food containing deer and/or elk protein is imported into GB.

There is uncertainty associated with this estimate given the lack of data on the amount of deer and/or elk protein possibly being imported in these products.

snip...

36% in 2007 (Almberg et al., 2011). In such areas, population declines of deer of up to 30 to 50% have been observed (Almberg et al., 2011). In areas of Colorado, the prevalence can be as high as 30% (EFSA, 2011). The clinical signs of CWD in affected adults are weight loss and behavioural changes that can span weeks or months (Williams, 2005). In addition, signs might include excessive salivation, behavioural alterations including a fixed stare and changes in interaction with other animals in the herd, and an altered stance (Williams, 2005). These signs are indistinguishable from cervids experimentally infected with bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). Given this, if CWD was to be introduced into countries with BSE such as GB, for example, infected deer populations would need to be tested to differentiate if they were infected with CWD or BSE to minimise the risk of BSE entering the human food-chain via affected venison.

snip...

The rate of transmission of CWD has been reported to be as high as 30% and can approach 100% among captive animals in endemic areas (Safar et al., 2008).

snip...

In summary, in endemic areas, there is a medium probability that the soil and surrounding environment is contaminated with CWD prions and in a bioavailable form. In rural areas where CWD has not been reported and deer are present, there is a greater than negligible risk the soil is contaminated with CWD prion.

snip...

In summary, given the volume of tourists, hunters and servicemen moving between GB and North America, the probability of at least one person travelling to/from a CWD affected area and, in doing so, contaminating their clothing, footwear and/or equipment prior to arriving in GB is greater than negligible. For deer hunters, specifically, the risk is likely to be greater given the increased contact with deer and their environment. However, there is significant uncertainty associated with these estimates.

snip...

Therefore, it is considered that farmed and park deer may have a higher probability of exposure to CWD transferred to the environment than wild deer given the restricted habitat range and higher frequency of contact with tourists and returning GB residents.

snip...

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130822084033/http://www.defra.gov.uk/animal-diseases/files/qra_chronic-wasting-disease-121029.pdf


kind regards, terry

Re: CWD in Texas [Re: Frio County Hunts] #5821586 07/07/15 08:47 PM
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 49
L
La Longue Carabine Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
L
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 49
You posted an abstract elsewhere that was pretty disconcerting. However I cannot find the full article anywhere online. If you come across it, please post it. Here was the abstract:

"Zoonotic Potential of CWD Prions

Liuting Qing1, Ignazio Cali1,2, Jue Yuan1, Shenghai Huang3, Diane Kofskey1, Pierluigi Gambetti1, Wenquan Zou1, Qingzhong Kong1 1Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, 2Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy, 3Encore Health Resources, Houston, Texas, USA

Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is a widespread and expanding prion disease in free-ranging and captive cervid species in North America. The zoonotic potential of CWD prions is a serious public health concern. Current literature generated with in vitro methods and in vivo animal models (transgenic mice, macaques and squirrel monkeys) reports conflicting results. The susceptibility of human CNS and peripheral organs to CWD prions remains largely unresolved. In our earlier bioassay experiments using several humanized transgenic mouse lines, we detected protease-resistant PrPSc in the spleen of two out of 140 mice that were intracerebrally inoculated with natural CWD isolates, but PrPSc was not detected in the brain of the same mice. Secondary passages with such PrPSc-positive CWD-inoculated humanized mouse spleen tissues led to efficient prion transmission with clear clinical and pathological signs in both humanized and cervidized transgenic mice. Furthermore, a recent bioassay with natural CWD isolates in a new humanized transgenic mouse line led to clinical prion infection in 2 out of 20 mice. ***These results indicate that the CWD prion has the potential to infect human CNS and peripheral lymphoid tissues and that there might be asymptomatic human carriers of CWD infection."

Re: CWD in Texas [Re: Frio County Hunts] #5821619 07/07/15 09:17 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 656
J
jmh004 Online Content
Tracker
Online Content
Tracker
J
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 656
Are they're any articles published on any die offs of wild deer? There have been a number posted on penned deer getting it, but what about wild herds?

Re: CWD in Texas [Re: jmh004] #5821650 07/07/15 09:34 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,445
B
BOONER Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
B
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,445
Originally Posted By: jmh004
I'm not saying shooting pen raised deer is my thing. But a person ought to be able to decide what to do on their own land don't you think?


Sure they should but not if it affects the health of other wildlife.

Re: CWD in Texas [Re: jmh004] #5821655 07/07/15 09:38 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 61,930
BOBO the Clown Online Content
kind of a big deal
Online Content
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 61,930
Originally Posted By: jmh004
Are they're any articles published on any die offs of wild deer? There have been a number posted on penned deer getting it, but what about wild herds?


Only Mass die offs you will find on wild deer or elk is EHD, toxins, starvation.... The quick killers

It's quick enough to be observed...example the 100 plus elk that died in NM in 2013.

You have to remember CWD wasn't discovered until migrating Elk and Mule deer stopped migrating via a fence research enclosure. Yotes, Bears etc have done a good job covering up CWD deaths. Note no CWD has been found in Yotes or Bears or other animals that ate CWD carcasses. Also Note that I'm not a doctorate


Bottom line, never trust a man whose uncle was eaten by cannibals.-Sen Joni Ernst
Re: CWD in Texas [Re: BOONER] #5821657 07/07/15 09:40 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 61,930
BOBO the Clown Online Content
kind of a big deal
Online Content
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 61,930
Originally Posted By: BOONER
Originally Posted By: jmh004
I'm not saying shooting pen raised deer is my thing. But a person ought to be able to decide what to do on their own land don't you think?


Sure they should but not if it affects the health of other wildlife.


Open season in West Texas border on all free range hoofed animals..... Have fun.. You're a few years late though.



Bottom line, never trust a man whose uncle was eaten by cannibals.-Sen Joni Ernst
Re: CWD in Texas [Re: jmh004] #5821697 07/07/15 10:12 PM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 224
H
HarperDeer Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
H
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 224
Originally Posted By: jmh004
TPWD is tracking all deer movement into, and out of that ranch in Medina County for the last 5 years. That will pretty much connect every breeder in Texas to this deer in some way. So instead of testing a couple hundred animals on one ranch, they will be able to claim who knows how many animals on who knows how many ranches to test. The breeding industry is about to get hammered.
I don't own a breeding facility, or even work on one is these ranches. I sure will hate to see how many deer are going to be killed in the name of "containment" in the coming months. I'm sure only a few of the most profitable breeders will be the only ones left after all this.
I blame these HF ranches and breeders for a lot of things in today's hunting world. The prices for leases, and basically the price of hunting in general has gone through the roof in recent years in part, what I believe, to these whitetail ranches. That being said, I hate to see the government come in and tell people what to do with their private property. The next few weeks will be very interesting in how the state will handle all this


It's scary. I own a HF ranch with only native deer on it and I don't maintain the fence very well. I know deer can come and go. If one of my HF neighbors imported a deer from that facility, TPWD will want to cull all of their deer AND mine too.

Which brings me to my question. I see TPWD compensated the landowner for the deer. Is there a standard $ figure per deer or do pen raised deer get more $ compared to my puny hill country deer??

Re: CWD in Texas [Re: Frio County Hunts] #5821703 07/07/15 10:15 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 656
J
jmh004 Online Content
Tracker
Online Content
Tracker
J
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 656
So if it is such a slow acting disease, chances are we've all shot a wild deer caring it and consumed it.

Re: CWD in Texas [Re: Frio County Hunts] #5821723 07/07/15 10:29 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 60,296
S
stxranchman Offline
Obie Juan Kenobi
Offline
Obie Juan Kenobi
S
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 60,296
Since it seems to be the norm to post links about CWD...here is one that has not been posted that seems interesting.
Link


Are idiots multiplying faster than normal people?[Linked Image]
Re: CWD in Texas [Re: stxranchman] #5821732 07/07/15 10:35 PM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 224
H
HarperDeer Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
H
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 224
Originally Posted By: stxranchman
Since it seems to be the norm to post links about CWD...here is one that has not been posted that seems interesting.
Link


Good article, Darwinism at work.

Re: CWD in Texas [Re: Frio County Hunts] #5821733 07/07/15 10:36 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 656
J
jmh004 Online Content
Tracker
Online Content
Tracker
J
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 656
But I thought CWD was a deer version of Ebola. Something that could wipe out every deer in Texas? According to this article, it may not be all that big of a deal. This article makes too much sense, we better get back on topic.

Re: CWD in Texas [Re: La Longue Carabine] #5821738 07/07/15 10:41 PM
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,192
T
therancher Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
T
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,192
Originally Posted By: La Longue Carabine
You posted an abstract elsewhere that was pretty disconcerting. However I cannot find the full article anywhere online. If you come across it, please post it. Here was the abstract:

"Zoonotic Potential of CWD Prions

Liuting Qing1, Ignazio Cali1,2, Jue Yuan1, Shenghai Huang3, Diane Kofskey1, Pierluigi Gambetti1, Wenquan Zou1, Qingzhong Kong1 1Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, 2Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy, 3Encore Health Resources, Houston, Texas, USA

Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is a widespread and expanding prion disease in free-ranging and captive cervid species in North America. The zoonotic potential of CWD prions is a serious public health concern. Current literature generated with in vitro methods and in vivo animal models (transgenic mice, macaques and squirrel monkeys) reports conflicting results. The susceptibility of human CNS and peripheral organs to CWD prions remains largely unresolved. In our earlier bioassay experiments using several humanized transgenic mouse lines, we detected protease-resistant PrPSc in the spleen of two out of 140 mice that were intracerebrally inoculated with natural CWD isolates, but PrPSc was not detected in the brain of the same mice. Secondary passages with such PrPSc-positive CWD-inoculated humanized mouse spleen tissues led to efficient prion transmission with clear clinical and pathological signs in both humanized and cervidized transgenic mice. Furthermore, a recent bioassay with natural CWD isolates in a new humanized transgenic mouse line led to clinical prion infection in 2 out of 20 mice. ***These results indicate that the CWD prion has the potential to infect human CNS and peripheral lymphoid tissues and that there might be asymptomatic human carriers of CWD infection."


Sweet Geezus. Would you please get with the program?! Mr tx_biologist has already established that Alzheimer's is caused by CWD. loser8


Crotchety old bastidge
Re: CWD in Texas [Re: jmh004] #5821768 07/07/15 10:54 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 61,930
BOBO the Clown Online Content
kind of a big deal
Online Content
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 61,930
Originally Posted By: jmh004
So if it is such a slow acting disease, chances are we've all shot a wild deer caring it and consumed it.


You have a better chance of winning the Texas lottery according to TPWD and biologist. But yes you are correct


Bottom line, never trust a man whose uncle was eaten by cannibals.-Sen Joni Ernst
Re: CWD in Texas [Re: La Longue Carabine] #5821769 07/07/15 10:55 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 304
F
flounder Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
F
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 304
Originally Posted By: La Longue Carabine
You posted an abstract elsewhere that was pretty disconcerting. However I cannot find the full article anywhere online. If you come across it, please post it. Here was the abstract:

"Zoonotic Potential of CWD Prions

Liuting Qing1, Ignazio Cali1,2, Jue Yuan1, Shenghai Huang3, Diane Kofskey1, Pierluigi Gambetti1, Wenquan Zou1, Qingzhong Kong1 1Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, 2Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy, 3Encore Health Resources, Houston, Texas, USA

Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is a widespread and expanding prion disease in free-ranging and captive cervid species in North America. The zoonotic potential of CWD prions is a serious public health concern. Current literature generated with in vitro methods and in vivo animal models (transgenic mice, macaques and squirrel monkeys) reports conflicting results. The susceptibility of human CNS and peripheral organs to CWD prions remains largely unresolved. In our earlier bioassay experiments using several humanized transgenic mouse lines, we detected protease-resistant PrPSc in the spleen of two out of 140 mice that were intracerebrally inoculated with natural CWD isolates, but PrPSc was not detected in the brain of the same mice. Secondary passages with such PrPSc-positive CWD-inoculated humanized mouse spleen tissues led to efficient prion transmission with clear clinical and pathological signs in both humanized and cervidized transgenic mice. Furthermore, a recent bioassay with natural CWD isolates in a new humanized transgenic mouse line led to clinical prion infection in 2 out of 20 mice. ***These results indicate that the CWD prion has the potential to infect human CNS and peripheral lymphoid tissues and that there might be asymptomatic human carriers of CWD infection."



the abstract you speak of are papers in progress, and were presented at the Prion2015 conference as abstracts. the finished product will come out soon after (months usually). there was another paper that was interesting as well, and then others from the prion2014 conference. see ;




P.105: RT-QuIC models trans-species prion transmission

Kristen Davenport, Davin Henderson, Candace Mathiason, and Edward Hoover Prion Research Center; Colorado State University; Fort Collins, CO USA

The propensity for trans-species prion transmission is related to the structural characteristics of the enciphering and heterologous PrP, but the exact mechanism remains mostly mysterious. Studies of the effects of primary or tertiary prion protein structures on trans-species prion transmission have relied primarily upon animal bioassays, making the influence of prion protein structure vs. host co-factors (e.g. cellular constituents, trafficking, and innate immune interactions) difficult to dissect. As an alternative strategy, we used real-time quakinginduced conversion (RT-QuIC) to investigate trans-species prion conversion.

To assess trans-species conversion in the RT-QuIC system, we compared chronic wasting disease (CWD) and bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) prions, as well as feline CWD (fCWD) and feline spongiform encephalopathy (FSE). Each prion was seeded into each host recombinant PrP (full-length rPrP of white-tailed deer, bovine or feline). We demonstrated that fCWD is a more efficient seed for feline rPrP than for white-tailed deer rPrP, which suggests adaptation to the new host.

Conversely, FSE maintained sufficient BSE characteristics to more efficiently convert bovine rPrP than feline rPrP. Additionally, human rPrP was competent for conversion by CWD and fCWD. ***This insinuates that, at the level of protein:protein interactions, the barrier preventing transmission of CWD to humans is less robust than previously estimated.

================

***This insinuates that, at the level of protein:protein interactions, the barrier preventing transmission of CWD to humans is less robust than previously estimated.***

================

https://prion2015.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/prion2015abstracts.pdf


old data from the BSE Inquiry way back ;


In conclusion, an analysis of dietary histories revealed statistical associations between various meats/animal products and INCREASED RISK OF CJD. When some account was taken of possible confounding, the association between VEAL EATING AND RISK OF CJD EMERGED AS THE STRONGEST OF THESE ASSOCIATIONS STATISTICALLY. ...

snip...

In the study in the USA, a range of foodstuffs were associated with an increased risk of CJD, including liver consumption which was associated with an apparent SIX-FOLD INCREASE IN THE RISK OF CJD. By comparing the data from 3 studies in relation to this particular dietary factor, the risk of liver consumption became non-significant with an odds ratio of 1.2 (PERSONAL COMMUNICATION, PROFESSOR A. HOFMAN. ERASMUS UNIVERSITY, ROTTERDAM). (???...TSS)

snip...see full report ;

http://collections.europarchive.org/tna/20090505194948/http://bseinquiry.gov.uk/files/yb/1994/08/00004001.pdf

Thursday, October 10, 2013

*************CJD REPORT 1994 increased risk for consumption of veal and venison and lamb**************

http://creutzfeldt-jakob-disease.blogspot.com/2013/10/cjd-report-1994-increased-risk-for.html

CJD9/10022

October 1994

Mr R.N. Elmhirst Chairman British Deer Farmers Association Holly Lodge Spencers Lane BerksWell Coventry CV7 7BZ

Dear Mr Elmhirst,

CREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE (CJD) SURVEILLANCE UNIT REPORT

Thank you for your recent letter concerning the publication of the third annual report from the CJD Surveillance Unit. I am sorry that you are dissatisfied with the way in which this report was published.

The Surveillance Unit is a completely independant outside body and the Department of Health is committed to publishing their reports as soon as they become available. In the circumstances it is not the practice to circulate the report for comment since the findings of the report would not be amended. In future we can ensure that the British Deer Farmers Association receives a copy of the report in advance of publication.

The Chief Medical Officer has undertaken to keep the public fully informed of the results of any research in respect of CJD. This report was entirely the work of the unit and was produced completely independantly of the the Department.

The statistical results reqarding the consumption of venison was put into perspective in the body of the report and was not mentioned at all in the press release. Media attention regarding this report was low key but gave a realistic presentation of the statistical findings of the Unit. This approach to publication was successful in that consumption of venison was highlighted only once by the media ie. in the News at one television proqramme.

I believe that a further statement about the report, or indeed statistical links between CJD and consumption of venison, would increase, and quite possibly give damaging credence, to the whole issue. From the low key media reports of which I am aware it seems unlikely that venison consumption will suffer adversely, if at all.

http://web.archive.org/web/20030511010117/http://www.bseinquiry.gov.uk/files/yb/1994/10/00003001.pdf

Thursday, October 10, 2013

*** CJD REPORT 1994 increased risk for consumption of veal and venison and lamb

http://creutzfeldt-jakob-disease.blogspot.com/2013/10/cjd-report-1994-increased-risk-for.html

PLUS, THE CDC DID NOT PUT THIS WARNING OUT FOR THE WELL BEING OF THE DEER AND ELK ;

Thursday, May 26, 2011

Travel History, Hunting, and Venison Consumption Related to Prion Disease Exposure, 2006-2007

FoodNet Population Survey Journal of the American Dietetic Association Volume 111, Issue 6 , Pages 858-863, June 2011.

http://transmissiblespongiformencephalop...nd-venison.html

NOR IS THE FDA recalling this CWD positive elk meat for the well being of the dead elk ;

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Noah's Ark Holding, LLC, Dawson, MN RECALL Elk products contain meat derived from an elk confirmed to have CWD NV, CA, TX, CO, NY, UT, FL, OK RECALLS AND FIELD CORRECTIONS: FOODS CLASS II

http://chronic-wasting-disease.blogspot.com/2009/03/noahs-ark-holding-llc-dawson-mn-recall.html

now, let’s see what the authors said about this casual link, personal communications years ago. see where it is stated NO STRONG evidence. so, does this mean there IS casual evidence ???? “Our conclusion stating that we found no strong evidence of CWD transmission to humans”

From: TSS (216-119-163-189.ipset45.wt.net) Subject: CWD aka MAD DEER/ELK TO HUMANS ???

Date: September 30, 2002 at 7:06 am PST From: "Belay, Ermias"

To: Cc: "Race, Richard (NIH)" ; ; "Belay, Ermias"

Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 9:22 AM

Subject: RE: TO CDC AND NIH - PUB MED- 3 MORE DEATHS - CWD - YOUNG HUNTERS

Dear Sir/Madam,

In the Archives of Neurology you quoted (the abstract of which was attached to your email), we did not say CWD in humans will present like variant CJD. That assumption would be wrong. I encourage you to read the whole article and call me if you have questions or need more clarification (phone: 404-639-3091). Also, we do not claim that "no-one has ever been infected with prion disease from eating venison." Our conclusion stating that we found no strong evidence of CWD transmission to humans in the article you quoted or in any other forum is limited to the patients we investigated.

Ermias Belay, M.D. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

-----Original Message-----

From:

Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 10:15 AM

To: rr26k@nih.gov; rrace@niaid.nih.gov; ebb8@CDC.GOV

Subject: TO CDC AND NIH - PUB MED- 3 MORE DEATHS - CWD - YOUNG HUNTERS Sunday, November 10, 2002 6:26 PM ......snip........end..............TSS

Thursday, April 03, 2008

A prion disease of cervids: Chronic wasting disease

2008 1: Vet Res. 2008 Apr 3;39(4):41 A prion disease of cervids: Chronic wasting disease Sigurdson CJ.

snip...

*** twenty-seven CJD patients who regularly consumed venison were reported to the Surveillance Center***,

snip... full text ;

http://chronic-wasting-disease.blogspot.com/2008/04/prion-disease-of-cervids-chronic.html

*** These results would seem to suggest that CWD does indeed have zoonotic potential, at least as judged by the compatibility of CWD prions and their human PrPC target. Furthermore, extrapolation from this simple in vitro assay suggests that if zoonotic CWD occurred, it would most likely effect those of the PRNP codon 129-MM genotype and that the PrPres type would be similar to that found in the most common subtype of sCJD (MM1). ***

https://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/prion/article/28124/?nocache=112223249

*** The potential impact of prion diseases on human health was greatly magnified by the recognition that interspecies transfer of BSE to humans by beef ingestion resulted in vCJD. While changes in animal feed constituents and slaughter practices appear to have curtailed vCJD, there is concern that CWD of free-ranging deer and elk in the U.S. might also cross the species barrier. Thus, consuming venison could be a source of human prion disease. Whether BSE and CWD represent interspecies scrapie transfer or are newly arisen prion diseases is unknown. Therefore, the possibility of transmission of prion disease through other food animals cannot be ruled out. There is evidence that vCJD can be transmitted through blood transfusion. There is likely a pool of unknown size of asymptomatic individuals infected with vCJD, and there may be asymptomatic individuals infected with the CWD equivalent. These circumstances represent a potential threat to blood, blood products, and plasma supplies.

http://cdmrp.army.mil/prevfunded/nprp/NPRP_Summit_Final_Report.pdf

Re: CWD in Texas [Re: jmh004] #5821774 07/07/15 10:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 19,817
P
Pitchfork Predator Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
P
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 19,817
Originally Posted By: jmh004
So if it is such a slow acting disease, chances are we've all shot a wild deer caring it and consumed it.


Bingo.... a fact that these scientists and doctors don't seem to wanna talk about


Marc C. Helfrich
Retirement Planner

www.insured-wealth.com
469-323-8920
Re: CWD in Texas [Re: Frio County Hunts] #5821776 07/07/15 10:58 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 304
F
flounder Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
F
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 304

*** PPo3-7: Prion Transmission from Cervids to Humans is Strain-dependent

*** Here we report that a human prion strain that had adopted the cervid prion protein (PrP) sequence through passage in cervidized transgenic mice efficiently infected transgenic mice expressing human PrP,

*** indicating that the species barrier from cervid to humans is prion strain-dependent and humans can be vulnerable to novel cervid prion strains.

PPo2-27:

Generation of a Novel form of Human PrPSc by Inter-species Transmission of Cervid Prions

*** Our findings suggest that CWD prions have the capability to infect humans, and that this ability depends on CWD strain adaptation, implying that the risk for human health progressively increases with the spread of CWD among cervids.

PPo2-7:

Biochemical and Biophysical Characterization of Different CWD Isolates

*** The data presented here substantiate and expand previous reports on the existence of different CWD strains.

https://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/prion/Prion4-3-PPo2.pdf

Envt.07:

Pathological Prion Protein (PrPTSE) in Skeletal Muscles of Farmed and Free Ranging White-Tailed Deer Infected with Chronic Wasting Disease

***The presence and seeding activity of PrPTSE in skeletal muscle from CWD-infected cervids suggests prevention of such tissue in the human diet as a precautionary measure for food safety, pending on further clarification of whether CWD may be transmissible to humans.

http://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/prion/Prion5-Supp-PrionEnvironment.pdf?nocache=1333529975

>>>CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE , THERE WAS NO ABSOLUTE BARRIER TO CONVERSION OF THE HUMAN PRION PROTEIN<<<

*** PRICE OF CWD TSE PRION POKER GOES UP 2014 ***

Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy TSE PRION update January 2, 2014

Wednesday, January 01, 2014

Molecular Barriers to Zoonotic Transmission of Prions

*** chronic wasting disease, there was no absolute barrier to conversion of the human prion protein.

*** Furthermore, the form of human PrPres produced in this in vitro assay when seeded with CWD, resembles that found in the most common human prion disease, namely sCJD of the MM1 subtype.

http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/20/1/13-0858_article.htm

http://chronic-wasting-disease.blogspot.com/2014/01/molecular-barriers-to-zoonotic.html


kind regards, terry

Re: CWD in Texas [Re: jmh004] #5821792 07/07/15 11:04 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 60,296
S
stxranchman Offline
Obie Juan Kenobi
Offline
Obie Juan Kenobi
S
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 60,296
Originally Posted By: jmh004
TPWD is tracking all deer movement into, and out of that ranch in Medina County for the last 5 years. That will pretty much connect every breeder in Texas to this deer in some way. So instead of testing a couple hundred animals on one ranch, they will be able to claim who knows how many animals on who knows how many ranches to test. The breeding industry is about to get hammered.
I don't own a breeding facility, or even work on one is these ranches. I sure will hate to see how many deer are going to be killed in the name of "containment" in the coming months. I'm sure only a few of the most profitable breeders will be the only ones left after all this.
I blame these HF ranches and breeders for a lot of things in today's hunting world. The prices for leases, and basically the price of hunting in general has gone through the roof in recent years in part, what I believe, to these whitetail ranches. That being said, I hate to see the government come in and tell people what to do with their private property. The next few weeks will be very interesting in how the state will handle all this

I have heard the same thing about testing and year amount being bumped for 2yrs out to 5yrs now. Also found it interesting that last week the day after the story leaked that 2 ranches who got deer from this breeding ranch offered to kill those deer for testing. Called Austin and they were told to wait. Told to wait????? I guess "they" want to make sure that if any other ranches have CWD that it gets a running head start to make sure it spreads into those deer herds thoroughly. I guess it makes the validation of the impending slaughter more valid to the public eye.....
Sad thing for me is there is more whizzing on corner posts and tires right now than than there is trying to channel our efforts find out the source of what or how CWD got into that deer in that facility. IMO what will happen is the "sky will fall", deer will be slaughtered in very high numbers, compiling info will be used to this to drag this out as long as it can be to allow as many more deer to get CWD...just so that the slaughter can be validated in the uniformed public eye, then the "sky will fall" again, more deer will be slaughtered, sometime in the future while deer are being slaughtered CWD will be found again in another area not even related to this one or any other one...sadly when the real emphasis should be on research to find the source(s) of how it got to those pens....all the emphasis right now is being directed to stopping the deer breeding industry instead of all sides focusing on our real problem- CWD.
CWD was in Texas already in wild free ranging deer before it was found in Central Texas. It did not seem to be to much of a problem since deer were still being allowed to be moved from breeding pens to other breedrs or released on any ranch(LF or HF) or being moved via TTT permits from any ranch in Texas to another ranch. All that was required was a CWD test on a minimum number of or % of deer being moved to qualify. Today, that is much different with CWD now in WT deer in Texas.
I don't think this particular ranch woke up one morning to say "I am going to introduced CWD into Texas". Sadly, they are being convicted in the publics eye of that right now. I do not know of one single ranch or landowner that wanted CWD to be found in Texas but it had been. Those same people to a person never wanted it found in WT deer in Texas. But it happened. It is here and now we have to deal with it. We need to work on find the source of how it got into Central Texas before it shows up again and again.
I had a noted wildlife biologist tell me 12 yrs ago that in his opinion CWD had been or was in Texas already. Pretty sad that I can now tell him...you were right.
Texas has alway been looked at as the leader in wildlife management and research, now is our chance to show why we are the leader.


Are idiots multiplying faster than normal people?[Linked Image]
Re: CWD in Texas [Re: Frio County Hunts] #5821824 07/07/15 11:18 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 61,930
BOBO the Clown Online Content
kind of a big deal
Online Content
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 61,930
SMH


Bottom line, never trust a man whose uncle was eaten by cannibals.-Sen Joni Ernst
Page 2 of 12 1 2 3 4 11 12
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3