texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Godfryness, Topdog77c, Tuckmansolo, bub53, retired lineman
72118 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,805
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,550
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 44,114
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,826
Posts9,741,850
Members87,118
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
223 vs 243 #2617475 09/28/11 03:21 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 290
B
Brit Offline OP
Bird Dog
OP Offline
Bird Dog
B
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 290
My son has taken an interest in deer hunting and wants a deer rifle for his birthday. His older brother got a youth model shotgun on his 7th birthday and it was a bit to much for him, and I don't want that to happen to my youngest son. He is turning 7 about average size for a 7 year old (kinda tall and thin) but he is strong and wirey is a 243 to much gun? I want a gun he will enjoy shooting and can keep for a long time. I'm leaning towards a 223, but not sure. Any opinions and 2 cents welcome. Thanks


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: Brit] #2617488 09/28/11 03:24 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 19,296
P
pokerj2 Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
P
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 19,296
243 would be a great choice. They dont kick anymore than a 223 and have better knockdown power.



President of American Entitlements LLC
Health insurance agency focusing in all ages from ACA plans all the way through Medicare.
Office is based in Wylie, TX
We have local agents in both Texas and Louisiana
469-814-0289
Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: Brit] #2617494 09/28/11 03:26 PM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,322
B
BMD Offline
Silver Spoon
Offline
Silver Spoon
B
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,322
Shouldn't have too much trouble with .243 the .223 won't last him but one deer season, I know been down that road started with .223 then .243 and now 7/08 and daughter said she can tell the difference in the .243 and 7/08 only 1lb more felt recoil. And she hardly noticed the jump from .223 to .243.


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: BMD] #2617513 09/28/11 03:30 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,173
K
kagomez85 Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
K
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,173
.243 bought my daughter one and she loves it, she is only ten and pretty small but she can shoot it just fine, all it takes is one shot!!


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: kagomez85] #2617522 09/28/11 03:33 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,975
J
jbd76266 Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
J
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,975
Know anyone with the calibers who would meet up at the range to let the kid try them out?


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: kagomez85] #2617534 09/28/11 03:38 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,127
B
buck-snort Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
B
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,127
I got my son a .223 this year. I am a little curious what kind of shot he will need to make to knock down a doe this year. I am also trying to figure out what grain bullet to have him use for about a 100yd shot? I picked it up for 150 with a decent scope. I guess if he out grows it it can always be used for smaller animals rabbits, turkeys, and hogs :-)




Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: buck-snort] #2617550 09/28/11 03:42 PM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,322
B
BMD Offline
Silver Spoon
Offline
Silver Spoon
B
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,322
.223 I recommend the 60gr nosler partition up


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: BMD] #2617584 09/28/11 03:52 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 245
E
E-Tx Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
E
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 245
I have a .223 myself and love it. I've killed a nice 8pt at about 225yrds with it and it dropped it in its tracks. I don't have much experience with the .243. My first rifle, other than a .22, was a 30-30 though. It may have been a lil much for me at the time but I shot the fire out of it. I've killed more animals with it that any of my other rifles.


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: E-Tx] #2617601 09/28/11 03:57 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,856
3
30378 Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
3
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,856
Don't overlook the 22/250 Remington



NRA Benefactor Life Member - Free men should not be subjected to permits, paperwork and taxation in order to carry a firearm.
Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: jbd76266] #2617657 09/28/11 04:23 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 23,638
Payne Offline
Cat Herder
Offline
Cat Herder
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 23,638
Originally Posted By: jbd76266
Know anyone with the calibers who would meet up at the range to let the kid try them out?


If you're ever on I10 halfway between San Antonio and Houston you can use my range. I have a 223, 22-250 and 243 your kid can shoot.



[Linked Image]
Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: Payne] #2617905 09/28/11 06:10 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 577
E
Elkman Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
E
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 577
My son is now 10 he has been shooting his 243 for 2 years now with this being his 3rd year, He really loves his 243, which will last him for years to come. IMO the 243 gets my vote.


Last edited by Elkman; 09/28/11 06:11 PM. Reason: spelling
Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: Elkman] #2618070 09/28/11 07:19 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 290
B
Brit Offline OP
Bird Dog
OP Offline
Bird Dog
B
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 290
Thanks for all the comments. The 243 seems like the better choice after reading all of the comments. JBD I wish I knew someone with each caliber, I would love to have my son shoot each and see which one better suited him. Payne thanks for the offer, but your a long way away, and I don't see a trip your direction anytime in the future. Elkman did your son start shooting the 243 at age 7, and how big was your son then? My son probably tops the scale around 60lbs? I have little experience with a 243 and none with a 223, but if I was to go with the 243 and it was to much recoil, are the managed recoil cartridges worth looking at? Do they impact the recoil that much?
Thanks


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: Brit] #2618080 09/28/11 07:22 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,975
J
jbd76266 Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
J
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,975
Brit, where are you located. Chances are someone on this forum is close. There are some good guys on here, I am sure someone could help.


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: jbd76266] #2618092 09/28/11 07:29 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 290
B
Brit Offline OP
Bird Dog
OP Offline
Bird Dog
B
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 290
Located in Abilene. Hunt in Brownwood, in fact will most likely be there all weekend.


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: Brit] #2618267 09/28/11 08:38 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 192
L
Lunk Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
L
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 192
My 12 year old daughter will be using my AR for her first deer hunting trip. With either 75 gr BTHP's or 70 gr Barnes TSX rounds. If she decides she likes deer hunting then I will be investing in a .243 for her. Personally, I've never shot a .243 so I can't compare it to .223/556. I'm trusting the advice from the good folks on this forum that say there's not much difference in the recoil of the two.

I have a 30-30 I hunt with. And I don't feel she's up to handling the recoil of it. So that's why she'll use the AR for her first trip. I couldn't see dropping the money on a .243 and find out she doesn't like to hunt.



Glock: It's like a hammer, not very pretty but works when you need it.
Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: Lunk] #2618292 09/28/11 08:47 PM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 505
G
GSS Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
G
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 505
The type of rifle chosen will also determine the felt recoil; the NEF and Rossi single shots will certainly have more recoil, and muzzle blast than most any bolt gun.
At almost 2x in bullet weight, and 2x in powder, there can be a very noticeable difference in shooting a 223 vs a 243. And the rifle also has to fit the shooter. Recoil against an arm muscle vs the shoulder could turn off a youngster real quick.



NRA Life
TSRA Life
Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: GSS] #2618314 09/28/11 08:56 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 35,167
B
Brother in-law Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
B
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 35,167
243


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: GSS] #2618317 09/28/11 08:58 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,067
Offline
Steve
Offline
Steve
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,067
Originally Posted By: BMD
.223 I recommend the 60gr nosler partition up


Originally Posted By: GSS
The type of rifle chosen will also determine the felt recoil; the NEF and Rossi single shots will certainly have more recoil, and muzzle blast than most any bolt gun.
At almost 2x in bullet weight, and 2x in powder, there can be a very noticeable difference in shooting a 223 vs a 243. And the rifle also has to fit the shooter. Recoil against an arm muscle vs the shoulder could turn off a youngster real quick.



Two best posts in this thread up


Chupa


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: Brother in-law] #2618333 09/28/11 09:02 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,653
BOBO the Clown Online Content
kind of a big deal
Online Content
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,653
243



Donate to TX Youth hunting program.... better to donate then to waste it in taxes

https://secure.qgiv.com/for/gtgoh/mobile
Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: BOBO the Clown] #2618351 09/28/11 09:08 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,127
B
buck-snort Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
B
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,127
I was able to find a 223 federal fusion 62gr at gander mountain. Would this be comparable to the 60gr nosler partition? I can't seem to find the 60gr Nosler Patrition anywhere.




Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: Elkman] #2618360 09/28/11 09:10 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,649
S
Savage388 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
S
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,649
Originally Posted By: Elkman
My son is now 10 he has been shooting his 243 for 2 years now with this being his 3rd year, He really loves his 243, which will last him for years to come. IMO the 243 gets my vote.



Mine too. I have several rifles in .223. Only one in .243, they really don't compare as a deer rifle IMO. I would definitely choose the .243.



ODERINT DUM METUANT
Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: ] #2618433 09/28/11 09:34 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,039
V
Vern1 Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
V
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,039
Greetings,
This recommendation is for a small, younger kid, not you growed up kids!
If you are going with a shorter, lighter rifle, go .223.
A heavier, longer barreled rifle, go with a .243.

Between me, my brother and my Dad, we have:
243 Winchester carbine bolt gun
243 Remington 700 bdl bolt gun
223 Remington 722 (punched to .223) bolt gun
Featherweight Carbon 15 AR-15 in 5.56 with nice loud Smiths steel compensator.

Shooting normal off the shelf soft nosed shells:
The 243 carbine kicks like a mule.
The 243 bdl and 223 adl kick about the same.
AR with compensator kicks like my 10-22 (it is loud as hell, tho).

Gun weight for a kid means a lot.
If it's too light and kicks like hell, they won't enjoy shooting it.
If it's too heavy and they can't carry it, they won't want to shoot it and will have trouble holding steady without a rest.

Our old Remington .223 has been killing deer, pigs and coyotes for over 60 years and and size doesn't matter (within reason) unless you go after huge game.
If you think you have outgrown a .223, you changed your target to bigger game or just want a new gun, not that there is anything wrong with that....
Haven't seem many elephants in Texas except in zoos and they get kinda testy if you carry your rifle into the zoo...(just kidding)...


Last edited by Vern1; 09/28/11 09:36 PM.

Cheers,
Vern1
Texans since The Old 300 in 1824
NRA Lifetime Member
Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: Vern1] #2618514 09/28/11 10:04 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 290
B
Brit Offline OP
Bird Dog
OP Offline
Bird Dog
B
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 290
The Rossi break over single shot at academy is the rifle I am considering. They sale it in 243 or 223. Here are the Specifications:

Manufacturer Warranty (general):1 year limited
Rear Sight:Fiber optic
Type:Centerfire
Front Sight:Fiber optic
Metal Finish:Blue
Action:Break
Product Weight:6.25 lb.
Handedness:Right
Trigger Pull (lb.):5
Stock:Synthetic
Caliber:.243
Manufacturer Warranty - General:1 year limited
Barrel Length (in.):22
Style:Hunting
Product Length (in.):37.5

The weight is the same as the savage bolt action youth rifles available at bass pro. I had my son hold it at Academy and the fit was great.

I'm not trying to sell myself on this rifle, I just want something affordable that he will be comfortable shooting. I don't want him to be turned off by it. I appreciate all of the feedback, Does anyone have any experience with this gun at the price I figure someone has shot it?
Thanks


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: Brit] #2618593 09/28/11 10:40 PM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 505
G
GSS Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
G
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 505
I have exactly one experience with a Rossi rifle, and it was in 243. A friend bought it for his girlfriend, and brought it out for scoping/sight-in.
Trigger was well above 5lbs, it grouped 3-4" with 80 and 100gr Remington, and it kicked more than expected.

Added: the shooting was done off my bench with rests and bags, and I may be optimistic in recalling 3-4" groups.


Last edited by GSS; 09/28/11 10:57 PM. Reason: info

NRA Life
TSRA Life
Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: Brit] #2618598 09/28/11 10:41 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 23,638
Payne Offline
Cat Herder
Offline
Cat Herder
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 23,638
I had a neighbor buy a 243 Rossi. It was a piece of junk, he had me try to sight it in for him. I tried factory ammo, remington/winchester/ federal/hornady. It could not not group with any of them.


Academy sent it back to Rossi and they returned the rifle with no description of any work done or problems found. Tried again to zero the rifle same conclusion. I've heard nothing good about the Rossi rifles.

If it was me I would spend a little extra and go for a NEF/H&R single shot.



[Linked Image]
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3