|
Forums46
Topics538,854
Posts9,742,195
Members87,122
| |
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
 Re: SCOTUS ruling
[Re: ntxtrapper]
#8941428
10/22/23 10:48 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,385
Dave Davidson
THF Trophy Hunter
|
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,385 |
My, now deceased, brother was a precision shooting competitor. He bought a big lathe and started cutting precision barrels for those guys. He made a pretty good business out of it in his garage. These guys build their own guns.
Wondering if that is still legal.,
Last edited by Dave Davidson; 10/22/23 10:49 PM.
Without a sense of urgency, nothing ever happens.
Boy, if I say "sic em", you'd better look for something to bite. Sam Shelley, Rancher Muleshoe Texas 1892-1985 RIP
|
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS ruling
[Re: Dave Davidson]
#8941531
10/23/23 12:51 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,245
J.G.
THF Celebrity
|
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,245 |
My, now deceased, brother was a precision shooting competitor. He bought a big lathe and started cutting precision barrels for those guys. He made a pretty good business out of it in his garage. These guys build their own guns.
Wondering if that is still legal., The wording in the "Manufacturing of Firearms" consistently states "Receiver". So, your deceased brother was using a receiver that had been tracked from the manufacturer to the first FFL that received it, and then transfered it. (Had all that been in place when he got the reciever). After that, it was in the wind, like millions of others. Had he purchased the reciever/action/whole rifle legally (and I am sure he did) then his modifications were only that, modifications. He didn't make the receiver/action portion of the rifles.
![[Linked Image]](http://www.precisionriflehunters.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/garvey.jpg) 800 Yard Steel Range Precision Rifle Instruction Memberships and Classes Available
|
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS ruling
[Re: ntxtrapper]
#8941934
10/23/23 05:35 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 783
DonPablo
Tracker
|
|
Tracker
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 783 |
If I read it right, they only ruled on the emergency injunction. They have not yet heard (or accepted) the case, right?
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, txcornhusker
|
