texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
victorcaoh, gtmill6619, cpen13, Huntinkid, garey
72055 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,797
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,527
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,927
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,024
Posts9,732,047
Members87,055
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Lehality of .22 at 300 yards [Re: txtrophy85] #6264300 04/17/16 11:26 PM
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 59
Z
zbot Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
Z
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 59
Originally Posted By: txtrophy85
Originally Posted By: redchevy
Originally Posted By: txtrophy85

Sometimes that animal isn't going to produce a perfect vital shots and you have to shoot him head on, up the rear or punch thru a foot of intestines to get to the heart/lungs. This takes appropriate caliber, bullet weight and construction


Sometimes it takes restraint. I will never have to put a bullet through a foot of intestines to get to the vitals or a texas heart shot. If no better shot than that is offered ill let it walk to hunt another day. I still like quality bullets.




that's fine if you don't mind going home empty handed. its one thing when your on the ranch that you can be back at the next week.

if your out of state or the season is short its another story.


sometimes you have to take what's presented or hold off.....I'm likely to take a shot if I can work an angle to get to the vitals



Constraints don't justify disregarding ethics. I hunt multiple states after multiple species every year and I have never felt the need to launch a hail mary so I don't go home empty handed. I have had unfilled tags, including elk. Hell, I almost didn't fill a bighorn tag but managed one last quick trip after I said I was done and got one. I went home empty handed because I wasn't offered a shot I considered good to take on the first trip.


If you absolutely have to kill something when you go hunting, maybe you need to reconsider why you are going hunting, no offense to you Sir.

Re: Lehality of .22 at 300 yards [Re: 91cavgt] #6264385 04/18/16 12:35 AM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 31,953
T
txtrophy85 Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 31,953
Who said anything about disregarding ethics?

It's not unethical to use a stout cartridge/bullet combo to broaden your options on shots


For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
Re: Lehality of .22 at 300 yards [Re: 91cavgt] #6273069 04/24/16 05:05 AM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,806
M
MathMan Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
M
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,806
This has been a good read:).

Re: Lehality of .22 at 300 yards [Re: 91cavgt] #6273353 04/24/16 05:19 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 663
B
Beckett Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
B
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 663
I shoot Raccoons all the time under my feeder at 136 yds with a subsonic 22. I don't know the exact bullet drop or speed, but my scope is maxed out at the vertical setting. If you hit them in the vitals, they drop just like they would at 20 yds.


NRA LIFE MEMBER
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3