texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
victorcaoh, gtmill6619, cpen13, Huntinkid, garey
72055 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,797
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,531
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,941
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,072
Posts9,732,637
Members87,055
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: pedrov23] #5645857 03/11/15 03:40 AM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,856
R
REALKILLER Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
R
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,856
Those are the copper alloys. You like those? Never used them. I was always scared they were too hard even though they had a hollow front. Ive used the nosler partition and the front would shed, then the base would tumble erratically through the body. Usually the exit would be nowhere near inline with the entrance. I shot a buck with a 130 grain .270 NP in the shoulder broad side and the base came out at the back of the gut on the opposite side. It also had a huge exit hole in the front of the chest. Kind of freaked me out. Don't want to blow the horns off. Im sure the GMX is a more UNIFORMING bullet. That's not a word cause it aint in the dictionary.


Recently got a gym membership, strange folks! I like to show up the roid zombies with my full motion curls with the 55lb. bells. Not their cheater short stroked light weights. It's holarious.
Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: pedrov23] #5645898 03/11/15 04:03 AM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,407
W
WileyCoyote Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
W
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,407
Dawaba, find my old friend and mentor, the TuffPak guy from Bedford, and ask him about his adventures with the 9.3x62. Mention my name and location. Please say hello for me to his wife Karen, too. He's been using one for a long time and made more than few trips across the pond with one, and other of his extensive bag of toys. That's what mine was bought for, and it or I never got to go.
Ron


It is TIME for Term Limits, cause Politicians are like childrens diapers and for the same reasons...Robin Williams

"These are the times that try men's soul's"...Thomas Paine

"Those who fail to learn from History are doomed to repeat it" ....Santayana
Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: Texaslawman] #5645955 03/11/15 05:18 AM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 394
A
alexrex20 Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
A
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 394
Originally Posted By: Texaslawman
These wont fragment.



But, but, but... They're ballistic tips! They're gonna splode on impact! /sarcasm

Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: pedrov23] #5646012 03/11/15 08:07 AM
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 293
Theblakester Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 293
I wanna find a black box of ammo with the words "tactical" and "ballistic tip" on them... Oh and it would have a green ballistic tip too. That way it would armor piercing and explode on impact with extra tactical deadliness...

Jk but fwiw any box of ammo hat I've seen marketed as "ballistic tip" has either been a varmint round or a rapidly expanding round meant for thin skinned game. That's how I came to the (wrong) inference way back on page 2. I thought that when it was marketed as "ballistic" on the box I thought It was the cool way to say that it's a fragmenting round.


Fast paced gregarious society forgets the healing power of solitude. It's worked thousands of years. Casting a line/gazing into a campfire/sitting in a blind after a long week is medicine for the soul. The serenity and peacefulness of it all is majestic.
Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: pedrov23] #5646015 03/11/15 09:08 AM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 271
R
remman Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
R
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 271
Don't feel bad about him getting away. I had the same thing happen to me a week ago. I shot a broad side (quarterly slightly to me) 150-200 lbs hog at 170 yards with my 30-06 using 165 gr Rem Core-lokts and he got away. I shot right behind the ear, he dropped, about 5 seconds later he started flopping and was able to make it to his feet. He trotted off and stumbling. I tracked him in the snow for 500-600 yards with a good blood trail and never found him. I finally had to stop tracking because it led to Corps land. I couldn't believe it. This has never happened to me in my entire deer, hog, varmint hunting career. I have used the same gun and same ammo with great results.

Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: pedrov23] #5646211 03/11/15 01:35 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,856
R
REALKILLER Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
R
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,856
Hogs are tuff animals. A lot of people always say shot placement shot placement, but we do not have control of the bullet after it leaves the bore and impacts the animal. People like to assume that we making bad shots and it always is a possibility, but it is not an exact science. When a bullet hits bone it can glance off in all kinds of directions. Sometimes not ending up where you expected it to. And some animals may be a little more juiced up on adrenalin or rutted up not realizing theyre even hit. Also a pushed animal can run a long way on just fumes. I shot a 400 pounder one time and it took 5 shots to the side to kill him. He just kept getting back up.


Recently got a gym membership, strange folks! I like to show up the roid zombies with my full motion curls with the 55lb. bells. Not their cheater short stroked light weights. It's holarious.
Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: Texaslawman] #5646265 03/11/15 02:07 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,549
R
redchevy Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,549
Originally Posted By: Texaslawman
These wont fragment.



sure wont fragment, but ive had several that wouldn't expand either.


It's hell eatin em live
Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: pedrov23] #5646371 03/11/15 03:03 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,856
R
REALKILLER Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
R
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,856
On the real, good info. I studied all the ballistic tip bullets when they took off and was left with a lot of questions with all the options I had to choose from. I looked at the GMX and TSX and saw that barnes had some unopened bullets that were recovered from testing. This led me to think that the copper alloys were a pretty hard mixture. Double lung a deer with no rib hit with one of those and you will need a miracle to find him. Not my preferred shot but Ive seen people that aim behind the shoulder. I aim high on the shoulder for the knock down and if they move around I give them another. I haven't had to track one in a long time. That copper alloy may be a good one for a shoulder shot on a hog. Ive never used them.


Recently got a gym membership, strange folks! I like to show up the roid zombies with my full motion curls with the 55lb. bells. Not their cheater short stroked light weights. It's holarious.
Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: redchevy] #5646396 03/11/15 03:19 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 394
A
alexrex20 Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
A
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 394
Originally Posted By: redchevy
sure wont fragment, but ive had several that wouldn't expand either.


It sure would be helpful if you included caliber, load data, and shot distance with that claim, don'tcha think?

Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: pedrov23] #5646612 03/11/15 05:41 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,856
R
REALKILLER Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
R
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,856
Don't know who the message was intended for, but the article I read about the copper alloys was in a guns and ammo magazine. This was back when we didn't just ask the computer how something works. I only remember them testing the copper alloys in a 150 grain 7mm and .308 diameters in standard loaded cases. The specs on powder cases didn't matter to me because they were just a standard load. And the distance was at a practical range that didn't alarm me. The pictures of the retrieved projectiles said it all for me, and that was that the copper alloys didn't always mushroom out, so I wasn't concerned about buying them or even loading some up. This was about ten years ago. The pictures did make an impact on my brain. All the rest was thrown in the gutter after I saw what I wanted to see. I've never used them, but out of the ballistic tip type of bullets that I have used and felt like I had some confidence with was the Swift Scirrico. I shot the safari load rem 150 gr. in the 7 mag. I did shoot a buck with one of these rounds at a solid 300 yrds. and he dropped down and got up then ran about 40 yards. It was a leg to heart shot just under the shoulder. Those rounds would give me 2 in groups at 300 yards with a sporter weight Winchester model 70 with trigger work, floated barrel, and a 6x18x50 bushnell scope. That's fantastic in my world. I quit shooting the belted magnums not long after this because ammo prices got out of control. Its been a while.


Recently got a gym membership, strange folks! I like to show up the roid zombies with my full motion curls with the 55lb. bells. Not their cheater short stroked light weights. It's holarious.
Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: pedrov23] #5646716 03/11/15 06:43 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 394
A
alexrex20 Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
A
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 394
Barnes TSX and TTSX are proven hunting monolithic rounds (TTSX is basically a TSX with a ballistic tip) that expand reliably and consistently as long as you don't exceed the performance parameters (e.g. too low fps).

Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: pedrov23] #5646783 03/11/15 07:30 PM
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 13,614
1
1860.colt Online Content
emoji colt.45
Online Content
emoji colt.45
1
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 13,614
Originally Posted By: pedrov23
I had been stalking this tusker for several months, but he always stood outside the green lights of the feeder. Finally had a shot at him and took it with my Weatherby .308, using 150 grain ballistic. It was only about a 50 yard shot and I knew I hit him in the left shoulder, which usually brings them down for me. But I found nothing, no blood trail at all. Searched for over an hour in the dark, which was a bit nerve wracking. Anyway, my buddy shot him two nights later as he came limping in to the feeder. Sure enough, there was a wound in his left shoulder (not shown here). Man, our Texas hogs are tough. Guess it just didn't penetrate the shield?? Or the bullet fragmented. Not sure. Upon further investigation, I have read that it is probably best to use 165 gr or maybe 180 gr. Any thoughts?





popcorn flag



i'm postaddic
Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: alexrex20] #5647883 03/12/15 12:35 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,549
R
redchevy Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,549
Originally Posted By: alexrex20
Originally Posted By: redchevy
sure wont fragment, but ive had several that wouldn't expand either.


It sure would be helpful if you included caliber, load data, and shot distance with that claim, don'tcha think?


I don't really see why, the answer lies in the fact that if you don't hit something hard with them they will not reliably expand.

165 grain Hornady GMX
300 WBY
Max charge of H4831
Hog probably around 150-175 lbs.

Assumed double lung never recovered. Found small specks of blood for about 200 yards till a fence line. 100 Yard shot with good rest under a feeder.

Same load and similar shot as above but found that one. Very small entry/exit and a long sparse blood trail.

Shot a spike buck with it and hit the neck bone dead center and his head nearly fell off. Shot another hog straitgh through both shoulders and he was dead on the spot with a lot of internal damage and a decent exit. If you don't hit something hard/big bones, there is not telling if it will function right or not.


It's hell eatin em live
Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: flintknapper] #5648973 03/13/15 12:59 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,495
D
der Teufel Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
D
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,495
Originally Posted By: flintknapper

But for future opportunities...I would offer only this: (Circumstance Permitting) ALWAYS take a 'neck shot', stay off of the shoulder. I think you will be pleased with the results.

Flint.


Well, I was planning to take this advice, but the hog didn't cooperate. I spotted a sounder Wednesday evening crossing a pasture. They were headed for a wooded area and I had to hustle to get into shooting position. I reached a suitable spot just before they went into the woods. Several hogs milled around a little before wandering into the trees, and I decided this sow offered the best possibilities. She was quartering away, and I was lining up for a shot to the neck which would have exited somewhere in her head when she suddenly turned to face me. She put her head down to root and I figured I'd better take the shot before she decided to disappear. She was about five yards away from the tree line, and roughly 120 yards away from me.

I aimed for the center of her forehead, missing that by an inch or two. The bullet impacted her right eye and the hydrostatic shock fractured the skull above the eye socket, sending fragments above the eye outward. The bullet exited her neck and then passed through her right foreleg. She went straight down and didn't move again.

The bullet was a 150 grain Hornady Interlock SP — a basic cup and core bullet.

One less hog in Lee County today!

The heart girth measured 32 inches, indicating a weight of about 120 pounds.
--


I have two unwritten rules:
1.
2.
Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: pedrov23] #5649087 03/13/15 02:20 AM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 473
Beaubien Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 473
Nice piggie, nice shot. Congrats.



Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: pedrov23] #5649626 03/13/15 03:23 PM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 494
H
hornet527 Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
H
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 494
i dont understand why more people dont shoot em in the head/ear. i know it might be a smaller target, but with the "shield" and all the other side effects of shooting them elsewhere, this seems to work best for me whether its a ballistic tip, core lock or whatever runnig down the ear canal at 3000f/ps seems to have a definite effect on them just my o2

Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: pedrov23] #5650245 03/13/15 10:42 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 112
4
4dog Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
4
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 112
Confidence...thats why...small target that moves alot

Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: 4dog] #5650450 03/14/15 01:22 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,495
D
der Teufel Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
D
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,495
Originally Posted By: 4dog
Confidence...thats why...small target that moves alot



Exactly Right! I took the head shot a couple of posts up because that's what was available. Normally I go for whatever I think has the best chance of a sure kill. In the past that's often been shoulder shots because, with a .308, it'll knock their socks off. I'll probably take Flintknapper's advice and aim for the neck when the opportunity presents itself, but I don't want to take a chance on missing if I can help it.

I consider myself an average shot at best. I am NOT a super marksman, and I need every advantage I can muster.


I have two unwritten rules:
1.
2.
Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: pedrov23] #5650523 03/14/15 01:58 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,396
P
Pittstate Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
P
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,396
Not to try and prove anyone wrong about bullets or such....but, I have killed 3 big boars over/at 300lbs in my life. All three had bullets in their shoulders from previous shots and all seem to be 30 caliber bullets. One of them was a barnes mono bullet. I don't know the distances that the hogs were shot from. The one that I got mounted had 3 or 4 bullets in it's shoulders that did absolutely zero damage to it. After shooting a couple big boars and not recovering them, I have resorted to only shooting them in the neck. Since I have done this, I have killed the last 3 I shot.

Now with this said, I have bought a case of .308 in the Winchester razorback XT load (Mono bullet). Next opportunity, I am going to shoot the big boar in the shoulder and see if the bullet does what they claim.

Disclaimer: I shoot Winchester BST in my 30-06 and Hormady SST in my .243, but these are for deer and antelope only. When I hog hunt with these calibers, I use cup/core bullets like Hornady Interlock and Remington Core Lokt and do head shots on big sows and neck shots on big boars (save the skull for mount). Any hog under 150ish, gets shot in the slates usually.

Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: Texaslawman] #5651252 03/14/15 08:01 PM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 106
P
pedrov23 Offline OP
Woodsman
OP Offline
Woodsman
P
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 106
Gentlemen, Wow! I posted this weeks ago and forgot to check back. It is truly amazing how many of you have replied, and how many different opinions there are out there. I love this forum for exactly those two reasons. Appreciate all your replies.


PeteV
Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: pedrov23] #5654819 03/17/15 02:54 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,043
O
okbowhunter Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
O
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,043
I've only killed one hog with a rifle everything else bow.

30-30 150 grain in the shoulder and she dropped in her tracks.

125lb sow I'm sure boars are tougher.

Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: pedrov23] #5654925 03/17/15 04:19 PM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8,240
Double Naught Spy Online Happy
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Happy
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8,240
Quote:
i dont understand why more people dont shoot em in the head/ear. i know it might be a smaller target, but with the "shield" and all the other side effects of shooting them elsewhere, this seems to work best for me whether its a ballistic tip, core lock or whatever runnig down the ear canal at 3000f/ps seems to have a definite effect on them just my o2


Unless you are shooting a .22 or buck shot at long range, the shield really isn't a significant issue, certainly not to a centerfire bullet at 3000 fps.

The "ear" is a smaller target, often on a moving head as noted, located at the rear of the skull where the skull is thickest (and the only part where it may be actually thick), and so shots are fear to miss or glance. And that is another facet. Like the shield, people believe that hogs have "really thick skulls" and think that rounds will glance off of them because they are thick. The skulls are not really thick except for the occiput at the rear of the skull that can be thick, but it is on the back of the head, not the sides, front, top, or bottom. If a shot glances, it is because of the angle of incidence/impact, not because the skull is really thick.

And while it may be an issue of confidence, I have watched confident shooters miss.

Here is the shot of a confident shooter on a nearly stationary hog at less than 100 yards using a 3x scope on a .308. This hog ran and was picked up with subsequent body/chest shots.

Understand that a lot of your "experienced" hunters hunt with pie plate accuracy that they consider to be good enough for "the boiler room." Far too many don't bother to properly sight in their rifles or change ammo before a hunt and can't count of very good accuracy that would be needed for ear shots. Others don't know where to aim to compensate for drop in order to make such a shot. They sight in and practice at a given distance and then try shooting at some radically different distance, often with poor results.

I cringe every time sometime says they are sighted in with "minute of hog" or that their gun is "accurate enough to hit a hog at 100 yards." Heck, I had a keyholing rifle (worn barrel) that could hit a hog at 100 yards - could be the head, leg, butt, but you could hit a hog with it, not that you would know where.

I don't know if this one was supposed to be in the ear or behind. Either way, it missed the ear and failed to kill the hog. The round just went through soft tissue. Looks like a near perfect shot that perfectly failed. I killed this hog, apparently months after the first attempt had been made.


Quote:
30-30 150 grain in the shoulder and she dropped in her tracks.


Sure, and sometimes they will run and some will run for quite some distance. A well placed shoulder shot that does not hit the spine can still result in a hog that runs 50-100 yards with a blown heart or lungs, potentially with little or no blood trail. I figure that 50-100 is about normal for this placement, if they run. Some will get farther.

Last edited by Double Naught Spy; 03/17/15 04:30 PM.

Hogdalorian - Si vis pacem cum sus, para bellum.
My Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange
Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: pedrov23] #5655298 03/17/15 09:07 PM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 15,715
6
603Country Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
6
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 15,715
I hadn't really given it much thought, but I rarely get as good a blood trail from hogs as I do from deer. Most likely that has to do with the bullet I use and where I place it. The shield on the off side of the pig is stopping the small bullet I use. The good news is that I don't generally have to do much tracking, so I haven't needed the blood trail.

And one other thing to mention is that over the years that I have hunted hogs (about 15 years, versus about 55 years for deer), I've used my 270 with 130 gr bullets, my 260 with 120 and 100 gr bullets, and my 220 Swift with 63 gr and 55 gr bullets. With the 270 I most always got a blood trail. With the 260, I got blood trails from the 120 grainers but not with the 100 grainers. Never got any blood trail with a 220 bullet, but did have success using that 63 gr Sierra to kill pigs. Soooo, generally speaking, the bigger the bullet the more effective they have been for me on hogs, at least when talking about blood trails. I shoot them behind the shoulder.

For the last several years, I've just gone with the 260 and the 100 gr bullet (Nosler BT) for all my hunting. Works fine on deer, pigs, and coyote here in central Texas. If I was hunting bigger deer and pigs, like we had back in Louisiana, I'd go back to the 120 gr Nosler BT probably.

I'm not saying that one caliber or bullet is better than another. I'm just passing along my observations on what I've used and how they worked for me.

Last edited by 603Country; 03/17/15 09:12 PM.

Not my monkeys, not my circus...
Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: pedrov23] #5656489 03/18/15 03:30 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,856
R
REALKILLER Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
R
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,856
I have better luck with ammo that creates more impact within the animal than pass through. No need in tracking them if their dead. rifle


Recently got a gym membership, strange folks! I like to show up the roid zombies with my full motion curls with the 55lb. bells. Not their cheater short stroked light weights. It's holarious.
Re: 150 grain ballistic did not do him in [Re: REALKILLER] #5656685 03/18/15 04:56 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,549
R
redchevy Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,549
Originally Posted By: REALKILLER
I have better luck with ammo that creates more impact within the animal than pass through. No need in tracking them if their dead. rifle


That doesn't always work.


It's hell eatin em live
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3