The Kerr Wildlife Study was about the most in depth study on spikes and, from memory, no one there ever said once a spike always a spike. Pretty sure the conclusion was they , as a group, the never caught up with their branched antlered brethren.
We can't even shoot a deer until its 3 1/2, so we take zero (as in none) spikes off our place. When this discussion gets going, we always get to hear about anecdotal evidence. Moxzygemba's big and I think original herd sire, Paco, was said to have been given to him in exchange for dental treatment when the deer was a spike. Cannot tell you the veracity behind that comment, but I do know the unbridled success of the Paco Deer Company. Whatever.
If you are fugly when you are young, pretty much gonna be that you are fugly when older. .
All they proved was when you breed a 200lb Stx breeder buck back to his offspring That Stx breeder buck offspring will be statistically larger then a hill country spike that was line breed back to hill country spring offspring offspring...
What's next, taking a stud 200” Kansas breeder buck and inbreeding him against inbreeding another Hill country spike. .
Regardless how you feel about spikes it wasn't a very far fight, they never cross bred does as a third group.
In reality not even 5% of the hunters on this forum have enough tag allocation to continually maintain a spike harvest that begins to be detrimental to the continued yearly viewing