I don't know if this is the case, but during this time of year I count fawns... fawning does break up into families in their particular fawning areas. They will stay in these areas until the fawns reach a certain age then they will begin to move to other areas. I don't have the exact age when they begin to move but I am close to defining it. Maybe in a couple of years I will be able to put an age when the fawns are old enough to move around the lease. I can say the fawns are less than around four months old. However, I am now in a position of possibly loosing my lease to the solar farm people and may not get to complete information gathering. Counting fawns is very hard as it takes me 5 months and a lot of money and time consuming. Actually, to be exact 5 months is not enough as some are born as late as September or even later in some cases. I begin to count fawns in May to the end of September, so you can see where I could miss a couple but not many and I don't have to be exact as now I feel I am 90 to 95 % accurate. The numbers will correlate to other data I end up with. So, I believe that does will protect their areas from other does and even bucks. I generally see three does and maybe a young buck which I believe are all in the same family. Their are exceptions as some of their areas may overlap. As our herd of deer expands I think the number of family deer could get bigger but I hope we keep the numbers in check so this may not happen. Like I say ..this may not be the case but could explain some of the area protection.
Taking a bit of a different angle, natural dispersion is something that crossed my mind as well, having read a few articles on it in the past. It would seem to be Mother Nature's way of avoiding inbreeding for both does and bucks. I thought perhaps the doe was being chased off to ensure it dropped its next fawn in another area. I could see where this could increase the chance of survival of the fawns from both does. Again, there are no feeders on the tract meaning food source was not at play.