.....this buck was a 6pt w/ a drop his first year..... not exactly roll of the dice keeping him around, even w/ the small tine length
ANY branching of the antlers during the second year, however small, seems to be the key indication of a 1-1/2 year old buck that should be allowed to walk.
No question, the ability to share photos and discuss them has made a significant impact on what we are learning about buck development. It has also given us the opportunity to validate the accuracy of what biologists have been preaching to us.
In my opinion, no 1.5 year old buck should EVER be killed, regardless of antler development (or lack thereof). There are simply too many variables that can cause a good buck to grow a crappy first set of antlers. If you have a healthy buck:doe ratio they won't be breeding anyway....let them get to 2.5 before making the decision to cull.
The belief that mature big bucks do the breeding is total BS.
RedChevy - While I don’t disagree entirely, if you have a 1:1 doe to buck ratio, very very few 18month old deer will have the opportunity to breed. Also, while I would strongly recommend culling as early as possible, including at 1.5yrs old, culling at 1.5yrs is much more important when buck numbers are low.
ElandSlayer - If you need to remove X number of deer to keep your herd from going over capacity, and you need Y number of those deer to be bucks to keep your ratio in check, then it comes down to which ones have to go. If you protect the entire 1.5yr old age class, then all of those bucks that have to be eliminated come from the older deer. It actually lowers your average age and reduces the number of mature bucks. You end up killing a great deer that needed one more year, instead of a deer that needs four more years and may never be good anyway. You can choose which age deer to eliminate in variety of ways. Eliminating the bottom half of the yearling population is not a bad way at all to maintain both a high average age and very good genetics. Another simple method is to identify all of the mature bucks that definitely need to go, a trophy or two that may not make it to next year or may decline, and then use the rest on the bottom of your yearling crop. Holding out on a subpar yearling in hopes that he’ll be good one day is very inefficient and results in a 3.5-4.5yr old cull far more times than it results in a surprise trophy. Remember, we’re managing population and sex ratio as well as antlers. One of those bucks has to go. I’ll take a lagging yearling anytime. Are there plenty of reasons that a deer might be lagging at 18months besides genetics? Sure, but how does he compare to his peers? Other than date of birth, his peers experienced the same conditions.
OP- most places don’t have 6pt yearlings in the bottom half of they yearling crop. If you do, then that deer is probably still lagging behind his peers that had better racks at 18months.