|
Forums46
Topics541,444
Posts9,756,780
Members88,184
| |
Most Online38,971
9 hours ago
|
|
|
 SCOTUS Rules on Ghost Gun case-not good
#9203240
03/26/25 06:33 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,718
Choctaw
OP
THF Celebrity
|
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,718 |
|
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS Rules on Ghost Gun case-not good
[Re: Choctaw]
#9203250
03/26/25 06:54 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 22
BovineNotions
Light Foot
|
|
Light Foot
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 22 |
Saw this earlier. It doesn't (currently) mean that you need a 4473 to buy as little as a firing pin or pvc pipe. Just means the frames and receiver rule isn't facially unconstitutional. So far the understanding is that things like the Polymer80s with the jig and tools are guns as is, but something like an AK flat or an 80 lower on its own is not. Of course we know how some courts get creative in their interpretations... short version, this likely won't impact many of us to any significant degree.
|
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS Rules on Ghost Gun case-not good
[Re: Choctaw]
#9203277
03/26/25 08:11 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 16,015
ntxtrapper
THF Celebrity
|
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 16,015 |
I’m surprised they ruled this way.
|
|
|
|
Re: SCOTUS Rules on Ghost Gun case-not good
[Re: ntxtrapper]
#9203319
03/26/25 09:32 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,718
Choctaw
OP
THF Celebrity
|
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,718 |
I’m surprised they ruled this way. I am too.
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, txcornhusker
|
