texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
garey, SteveG, justin77, Tjh, Clint Mcmullen
72051 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,795
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,525
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,911
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics537,968
Posts9,731,183
Members87,051
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? #8861531 06/02/23 07:41 AM
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,422
S
Sewer rat Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
S
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,422
We all know there are a ton of variables with any shot but I have been noticing a trend that anything I shoot with an ELD-X seems to run off farther than with other bullets. I hope it is just weird coincidence as I have stockpiled quite a bit of this ammo in 6.5 creed, 6.5 prc, and 308. I find it to shoot very accurately in all my rifles.

I shoot a decent amount of hogs at my place using either one of the three above or a 300 ham’r with 130gr hot cor, a 243 with plain old 100 gr power points from the 90’s, or a 45-70 using 325 gr ftx.

What I have been noticing is with the ham’r, 243, or 45-70 more often than not any hog I shoot falls dead where it stands. Like 90% of them don’t move more than 5’. With the ELD-X the hogs die but more often than not they are running off anywhere from 25-100 yards.

Again I know animal to animal varies, shot placement is huge, etc but over the past 20 or so hogs I have shot I have noticed the above.I have had three hogs shot with an ELD-X that I knew I hit and saw blood and I never found them. I haven’t lost a hog yet shot with the other bullets. Is this all in my head or are others having issues with these bullets?

Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Sewer rat] #8861533 06/02/23 10:10 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 22,716
B
BigPig Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
B
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 22,716
Anything is possible and your range may have something to do with it. I had terrible luck with the 130g SST in my 270 on animals under 200 yards, yet the 123g SST in my Grendel has been fantastic, mainly because of its optimal velocity for proper expansion is within the speed of what the Grendel shoots.

I’ve had good results with the 178ELDX as both a target and pig/deer bullet in both 308 and 30-06.

Last edited by BigPig; 06/02/23 10:11 AM.
Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Sewer rat] #8861543 06/02/23 11:01 AM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 11,658
G
GusWayne Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
G
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 11,658
I used it once last year on a good buck, 125 yards broadside.

He ran about 50 yards and piled up, it did punch thru both sides…6.5CM

Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Sewer rat] #8861552 06/02/23 11:24 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,192
L
LonestarCobra Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
L
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,192
BP is onto it, I has similar results. I have had them pencil through on most animals when the impact velocity is over 2600 fps. We experienced this last with a doe at 220 yards, and the impact velocity was over 3000 fps. There was just no energy dumped in the animal. Same ammo at 360 yards will put a 200 lb hog in its back where he stands, no exit. I don’t have many years of experience with these bullets, I just started using them two years ago due to availability, and these are my findings.

Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Sewer rat] #8861568 06/02/23 12:00 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,317
T
TCB Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
T
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,317
I started using the ELD-X when they first hit the market and I think they have a place but it's not a "catch all" bullet. It's great for larger game like elk, oryx, etc. but I do not like the performance on Texas whitetails. Myself and my hunting partner have had too many instances of penciling, minimal blood trails and a couple of lost animals. I'd consider it for larger animals but it's not a bullet I'll use for whitetail hunting anymore.

Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Sewer rat] #8861572 06/02/23 12:11 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 18,951
C
ChadTRG42 Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
C
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 18,951
What I have seen with the 6.5 CM factory ammo with the 143 ELD-X, is the muzzle velocity is often pretty slow. Slower than the advertised 2700 fps (I've chronographed them at 2540 fps). The ELD-X is a controlled expansion bullet, which means the copper jacket gets thinker down the shaft of the bullet. They need good velocity to open up. On the 6.5 CM with slower speeds, I just don't think there is enough velocity to reliably expand the bullet properly. The comment I hear the most is the ice picking. When you load it to it's full potential, I think it does ok. But I'd go 140 ELD-M in the 6.5 CM to get better expansion. I also think 143 grains is a little heavy for the 6.5 CM with that style of bullet. If you drop down to the 130 grain weights for the 6.5 CM, you pick up speed to about 2800-2850, and performance greatly improves. A 130 Accubond or 130 ELD-M is good medicine!

I've seen baseball to softball size exits on game from a 300 WM with 212 ELDX from 600 to 800 yards. One of my favorite bullets is the 212 ELD-X. It shoots good and I hear very good feedback on the performance.


[Linked Image]
Custom and Precision Ammunition!!
https://DallasReloads.com/
Type 01 and Type 06 FFL
Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Sewer rat] #8861585 06/02/23 12:24 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,171
J.G. Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,171
I've got good reports from the bullet, across the board. Except for one person with the 6.5mm 143 gr. He told me he had to track a few deer 70 yards. In my opinion, that's shooting vitals, no matter what you're shooting. If you want bang flop, you need to hit the brain stem.

I use the 162 gr in 7mm-08 A.I. Muzzle Velocity 2640 fps and I get 1 1/2" exits in white tail, on shots 250 yards and less.

I think they are like a Berger VLD Hunting. They do better if you run them heavy for cartridge. 200 and 212 gr in .300 Win Mag, and I love getting pics of elk and Moose harvested.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Sewer rat] #8861594 06/02/23 12:53 PM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 15,642
Q
QuitShootinYoungBucks Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Q
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 15,642
I've shot close to 30 animals with the 6.5 CM/ 143gr ELD-X. I cannot say that any of them have penciled. I shot a 100-120lb hog broadside at 50 yds in the shoulders and it didn't exit, was a perfect mushroom under the opposite hide. He went about 15 yds, blood everywhere. A pronghorn at 199 yds went straight down, heart/lung region. Two central TX WT at 340+, one ran 70 yds, one ran 30, both exits, great blood trails. I'm trying to think of deer at <100 yds. There have been several, none memorable, none went far if at all.


[Linked Image]

https://web.archive.org/web/20170223065011/http:/www.rrdvegas.com/silencer-cleaning.html
Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Sewer rat] #8861597 06/02/23 12:57 PM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,320
C
Crews Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
C
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,320
Just another reason the ELD-M is a better choice cool

Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Sewer rat] #8861662 06/02/23 02:25 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 9,928
U
unclebubba Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
U
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 9,928
I have not shot a ton of critters with it, but, 1 deer and a handfull of pigs have fallen. The deer never took a step after I pulled the trigger, and I have not had a pig travel more than 20-30 yards. 6.5CM at 2800 fps. Shots have been from 80 yards to 520 yards.

Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Sewer rat] #8861666 06/02/23 02:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,250
J
Judd Online Confused
#1 Creedmoor Fan
Online Confused
#1 Creedmoor Fan
J
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,250
I know of 3 different ELD's penciling...I won't use them except on hogs, because I don't care. One was me with a 7-08 AR10, 97y zipped right through a coyote and never did find that thing. Talking to a guide one afternoon that sees a LOT of animals killed every year...his opinion was 200y and in they are unpredictable but 200y+ they are devastating and an awesome bullet.

My opinion...melting tips and all, the Amax was a better bullet than any of the ELD's. I have less than 100 162's left for my AR10 but when they are gone, I won't buy anymore.


Originally Posted by Phil Robertson
Don't let your ears hear what your eyes didn't see, and don't let your mouth say what your heart doesn't feel
Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Sewer rat] #8861774 06/02/23 07:25 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,848
T
Texan Til I Die Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
T
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,848
I load the 143 ELD-X in my 260 and what I typically see is a small entry, slightly larger exit, and a lot of internal damage. No issues with animals running off. Out of the last 5 or 6 deer I've shot with it, the only "runner" went about 30 yards straight towards me. That one was a heart shot and it took a few seconds to bleed out. I also shot a buck last year with a 180 ELD-M out of my 7 mag. That one was dead before hitting the ground.


Silver spurs and gold tequila
keep me hanging on.
Pretty girls and old cantinas
give me shelter from the storm.
Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Sewer rat] #8861786 06/02/23 07:42 PM
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,422
S
Sewer rat Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
S
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,422
Some interesting responses on this thread. Some comments think the ELD-X does bad when it is going too fast and others think it does bad when going too slow. What I have noticed is penciling. Exit wound on recovered animals looks just like entrance wound. Most shots have been in the 100 yard range +/- with 143 gr ELD-X out of a 6.5 CM or 6.5 PRC and a couple with 178 gr ELD-X out of a 308.

Maybe I wrong in my logic but I either want a bullet traveling at least halfway through the animal and stopping delivering 100% of its energy or I want it expanding like crazy and leaving a huge exit hole so there is much larger blood trail to follow.

Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Sewer rat] #8861788 06/02/23 07:45 PM
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,422
S
Sewer rat Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
S
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,422
I guess a related but somewhat different question is I just bought a 7-08 rifle and will be using it on hogs and deer at ranges typically 100-250 yards. What bullet would you recommend?

Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Sewer rat] #8861802 06/02/23 08:09 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,542
R
redchevy Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,542
I like them. I shoot 175’s in 7mm08 and 212’s in 30-06 and a 300 wby. Will try them in 270 when I run out of my stash of partitions.


It's hell eatin em live
Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Sewer rat] #8861804 06/02/23 08:13 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,448
A
aggiehunter03 Online Content
Veteran Tracker
Online Content
Veteran Tracker
A
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,448
Originally Posted by Sewer rat
I guess a related but somewhat different question is I just bought a 7-08 rifle and will be using it on hogs and deer at ranges typically 100-250 yards. What bullet would you recommend?


I hunt with a 7-08 Ackley and I've only shot animals with factory Hornady 139 SSTs. They go off like a grenade. The last Aoudad and WT Buck I shot, a buddy was watching through binoculars and said @#$% %&^$ when they hit because of the red explosion. All that said I'm doing load development with 165 Tipped Gamekings and 162 ELD-Xs and don't know which way I'm going yet.

Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Sewer rat] #8861806 06/02/23 08:17 PM
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,920
J
Jgraider Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
J
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,920
Originally Posted by Sewer rat
I guess a related but somewhat different question is I just bought a 7-08 rifle and will be using it on hogs and deer at ranges typically 100-250 yards. What bullet would you recommend?


140 Accubond, 120 ballistic tip will kill any deer or hog on the planet, easily. As far as the 6.5CM goes, I'll take a 139gr Scenar over and ELDX ever made.

Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Jgraider] #8861811 06/02/23 08:32 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,317
D
Deans Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
D
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,317
Originally Posted by Jgraider
Originally Posted by Sewer rat
I guess a related but somewhat different question is I just bought a 7-08 rifle and will be using it on hogs and deer at ranges typically 100-250 yards. What bullet would you recommend?


140 Accubond, 120 ballistic tip will kill any deer or hog on the planet, easily.



^^^^^^^^^^^
THIS.


“Fear thou not; for I am with thee: be not dismayed; for I am thy God: I will strengthen thee; yea, I will help thee; yea, I will uphold thee with the right hand of my righteousness.”
ISAIAH 41:10
Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Sewer rat] #8861823 06/02/23 08:59 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,832
D
Drop Tine Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
D
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,832
I've had better luck with the eld-x when hitting bone or more speed (6.5 PRC vs 260) but I much prefer the consistency of the 139 Scenar. 6.5 PRC and 308 straight hammer animals with the Scenar


[Linked Image]
Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Sewer rat] #8861828 06/02/23 09:10 PM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 148
C
corkys son Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
C
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 148
I use Sierra 140gr BTSP #1905 with all my 7-08 rifles. Very accurate and expansion is fantastic. I use the 165gr BTSP in my 30-06 rifles, same thing, very accurate and expansion is great again. But Sierra is way behind in keeping up with demand and they can be hard to find. I can't find them at all for my 243, the 100 grain #1560. I'm sure there are people who've had problems with them, but I've never met or talked to any one who did. In my opinion, bullet manufactures are getting too fancy with bullets now, I don't want a bullet that works good at under 200 yards but so so beyond that or vica versa. I still believe the old cup and core bullets do what I want, kill them dead right there.

Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Judd] #8861830 06/02/23 09:13 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,521
R
RiverRider Online Confused
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Confused
THF Trophy Hunter
R
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,521
Originally Posted by Judd
I know of 3 different ELD's penciling...I won't use them except on hogs, because I don't care. One was me with a 7-08 AR10, 97y zipped right through a coyote and never did find that thing. Talking to a guide one afternoon that sees a LOT of animals killed every year...his opinion was 200y and in they are unpredictable but 200y+ they are devastating and an awesome bullet.

My opinion...melting tips and all, the Amax was a better bullet than any of the ELD's. I have less than 100 162's left for my AR10 but when they are gone, I won't buy anymore.



I read that several times, and the two critiques seem to contradict each other. Am I just misunderstanding how you're saying it, Judd?


[Linked Image]

"Arguing with you always makes me thirsty."

-Augustus McRae
Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Sewer rat] #8861838 06/02/23 09:30 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,250
J
Judd Online Confused
#1 Creedmoor Fan
Online Confused
#1 Creedmoor Fan
J
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,250
Originally Posted by RiverRider
Originally Posted by Judd
I know of 3 different ELD's penciling...I won't use them except on hogs, because I don't care. One was me with a 7-08 AR10, 97y zipped right through a coyote and never did find that thing. Talking to a guide one afternoon that sees a LOT of animals killed every year...his opinion was 200y and in they are unpredictable but 200y+ they are devastating and an awesome bullet.

My opinion...melting tips and all, the Amax was a better bullet than any of the ELD's. I have less than 100 162's left for my AR10 but when they are gone, I won't buy anymore.



I read that several times, and the two critiques seem to contradict each other. Am I just misunderstanding how you're saying it, Judd?


Or I did a crappy job articulating my point...when I said zipped right through, penciled is exactly what happened. It's a 16" AR10 and I think they are going 2400 so zipping right through was probably a bad analogy...nothing zipping with that speed LOL! I'm assuming that is the line you're questioning...if it's not clarify RR and I will too.

Originally Posted by Sewer rat
I guess a related but somewhat different question is I just bought a 7-08 rifle and will be using it on hogs and deer at ranges typically 100-250 yards. What bullet would you recommend?


Noslers are good but they've gotten to arrogant and hard to get...they are pricing them like they are the only bullet that works. No way I'd shoot a $1.00 per shot at hogs. Right now, I'd probably roll with a 140 Berger.


Originally Posted by Phil Robertson
Don't let your ears hear what your eyes didn't see, and don't let your mouth say what your heart doesn't feel
Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Judd] #8861857 06/02/23 09:56 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,521
R
RiverRider Online Confused
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Confused
THF Trophy Hunter
R
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,521
Originally Posted by Judd

Or I did a crappy job articulating my point...when I said zipped right through, penciled is exactly what happened. It's a 16" AR10 and I think they are going 2400 so zipping right through was probably a bad analogy...nothing zipping with that speed LOL! I'm assuming that is the line you're questioning...if it's not clarify RR and I will too.

.


It sounds like your opinion is at odds with what your friend the guide had to say: his opinion was 200y and in they are unpredictable but 200y+ they are devastating and an awesome bullet. You're implying that 2400 fps is just not fast enough for reliable performance (and maybe that's true). I just don't see how the two statements mesh. I'd infer that they gotta be moving faster based on your opinion, but if I thought the guide's opinion was valid I might want to slow em down---especially if I expected shots at less than 200 yards.

It's been kind of a long day at the end of a long week (despite the holiday on Monday). Maybe I'm just wiped out.


[Linked Image]

"Arguing with you always makes me thirsty."

-Augustus McRae
Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: Sewer rat] #8861866 06/02/23 10:13 PM
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 195
Inge0071 Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 195
The Eld-X is supremely accurate in every rifle I have.

I pushed 3 rounds of the 103 ELD-X out of the 6mm GT last year. Dropped a Nilgai, curious coyote, and a second Nilgai in as many rounds.

That bullet just arrives on-scene and well, stops. Of the three, only the coyote had an exit wound. I note it doesn't do well busting through heavy bone.

I'd be curious to hear comparisons re shot placement. Been thinking about picking up a Ham'r.


Pro Deo et patria
Re: Anyone else disappointed with ELD-X? [Re: RiverRider] #8861994 06/03/23 01:59 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,542
R
redchevy Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,542
Originally Posted by RiverRider
Originally Posted by Judd

Or I did a crappy job articulating my point...when I said zipped right through, penciled is exactly what happened. It's a 16" AR10 and I think they are going 2400 so zipping right through was probably a bad analogy...nothing zipping with that speed LOL! I'm assuming that is the line you're questioning...if it's not clarify RR and I will too.

.


It sounds like your opinion is at odds with what your friend the guide had to say: his opinion was 200y and in they are unpredictable but 200y+ they are devastating and an awesome bullet. You're implying that 2400 fps is just not fast enough for reliable performance (and maybe that's true). I just don't see how the two statements mesh. I'd infer that they gotta be moving faster based on your opinion, but if I thought the guide's opinion was valid I might want to slow em down---especially if I expected shots at less than 200 yards.

It's been kind of a long day at the end of a long week (despite the holiday on Monday). Maybe I'm just wiped out.

X2
Never seen a bullet cause more destruction going slower than he same bullet going faster. I’ve had bullets expand very little but think in general it’s from too little velocity not the other way around.


It's hell eatin em live
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3