texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Texas Tactical Depo, Masav05, 19MAD81, Lifechaser, WILDWHIT
68796 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 108,608
stxranchman 58,235
SnakeWrangler 57,521
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Gravytrain 43,681
BMD 41,222
Big Orn 37,484
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics609,794
Posts11,412,215
Members83,796
Most Online19,184
Feb 5th, 2020
Print Thread
Under gunned or overkill #8379959 09/09/21 07:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,851
H
hook_n_line Offline OP
THF Trophy Hunter
OP Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
H
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,851
How well do you know your rifle? I have a few and know them pretty well. I have standardized all zeros to 25 yards. I went a step further and ordered custom turrets for my 30.06 and .270. From 25 to 300 I don't need to hold out of the fur with any of my rifles on deer sized game.. Most of my shots are within 35 yards but every once in a while I'll make a long shot on an animal. I make sure it looks real good on paper first. If I can't hit 3 shots in a 12oz beer can off sand bags at 200 yards I don't use that rifle. Some rifles are too light for me and some don't have the balance I like. I don't consider myself an expert but I will say this is learned from experience and having the chance to use multiple makes and calibers. Overkill and under gunned is all based on confidence or lack of in the equipment being used. 2cents

P.S. breathing and heart rate are definitely going to factor in if Mr. Big comes in and it won't be the same as shooting paper. If you don't get that rush, then you're not getting the full effect. In all honesty I have an after the shot adrenaline rush that takes a while to come down from. If I lose that, I'm out of the game.


Sometimes it's hard being me! But somebody has to do it.
Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: hook_n_line] #8380656 09/10/21 12:16 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 19,278
T
Texas Dan Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 19,278
Let me see if I can attract a few responses to your post by posting one of my own.

I can't say I've ever seen anyone zero a deer rifle to just 25 yards. However, a quick check of the ballistics table for one of the more common deer rounds (6.5 Creedmoor) shows a trajectory that's not as awkward as I expected. The bullet reaches the maximum height of its arch (5.1 inches high) at roughly 160 yards and crosses the scope's axis again at roughly 300 yards.

Last edited by Texas Dan; 09/10/21 12:16 PM.

Dan

Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: hook_n_line] #8380702 09/10/21 12:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,851
H
hook_n_line Offline OP
THF Trophy Hunter
OP Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
H
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,851
Hopefully this will help somebody out. 270g win 130 Barnes TTS at 25 yard 0. The .243 win 95g is almost Identical.

0 yds 0.00 sec -1.5 in 0 in 3,060 fps 2,700 ft-lbs/sec
50 yds 0.05 sec 1.2 in 0 in 2,952 fps 2,513 ft-lbs/sec
100 yds 0.10 sec 2.8 in 0 in 2,846 fps 2,336 ft-lbs/sec
150 yds 0.16 sec 3.4 in 0 in 2,743 fps 2,170 ft-lbs/sec
200 yds 0.21 sec 2.8 in 0 in 2,643 fps 2,014 ft-lbs/sec
250 yds 0.27 sec 1.0 in 0 in 2,544 fps 1,866 ft-lbs/sec
300 yds 0.33 sec -2.2 in 0 in 2,448 fps 1,728 ft-lbs/sec

Last edited by hook_n_line; 09/10/21 01:06 PM.

Sometimes it's hard being me! But somebody has to do it.
Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: hook_n_line] #8380711 09/10/21 01:02 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 19,278
T
Texas Dan Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 19,278
Originally Posted by hook_n_line
270 win 130 Barnes TTS at 25 yard 0

0 yds 0.00 sec -1.5 in 0 in 3,060 fps 2,700 ft-lbs/sec
50 yds 0.05 sec 1.2 in 0 in 2,952 fps 2,513 ft-lbs/sec
100 yds 0.10 sec 2.8 in 0 in 2,846 fps 2,336 ft-lbs/sec
150 yds 0.16 sec 3.4 in 0 in 2,743 fps 2,170 ft-lbs/sec
200 yds 0.21 sec 2.8 in 0 in 2,643 fps 2,014 ft-lbs/sec
250 yds 0.27 sec 1.0 in 0 in 2,544 fps 1,866 ft-lbs/sec
300 yds 0.33 sec -2.2 in 0 in 2,448 fps 1,728 ft-lbs/sec


Please don't claim the .270 shoots flatter than the 6.5 Creedmoor. Heads might explode around here.


Dan

Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: Texas Dan] #8380714 09/10/21 01:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,851
H
hook_n_line Offline OP
THF Trophy Hunter
OP Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
H
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,851
Originally Posted by Texas Dan
Originally Posted by hook_n_line
270 win 130 Barnes TTS at 25 yard 0

0 yds 0.00 sec -1.5 in 0 in 3,060 fps 2,700 ft-lbs/sec
50 yds 0.05 sec 1.2 in 0 in 2,952 fps 2,513 ft-lbs/sec
100 yds 0.10 sec 2.8 in 0 in 2,846 fps 2,336 ft-lbs/sec
150 yds 0.16 sec 3.4 in 0 in 2,743 fps 2,170 ft-lbs/sec
200 yds 0.21 sec 2.8 in 0 in 2,643 fps 2,014 ft-lbs/sec
250 yds 0.27 sec 1.0 in 0 in 2,544 fps 1,866 ft-lbs/sec
300 yds 0.33 sec -2.2 in 0 in 2,448 fps 1,728 ft-lbs/sec


Please don't claim the .270 shoots flatter than the 6.5 Creedmoor. Heads might explode around here.


rofl


Sometimes it's hard being me! But somebody has to do it.
Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: Texas Dan] #8380715 09/10/21 01:07 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 58,235
S
stxranchman Online Content
Obie Juan Kenobi
Online Content
Obie Juan Kenobi
S
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 58,235
Originally Posted by Texas Dan
Let me see if I can attract a few responses to your post by posting one of my own.

I can't say I've ever seen anyone zero a deer rifle to just 25 yards. However, a quick check of the ballistics table for one of the more common deer rounds (6.5 Creedmoor) shows a trajectory that's not as awkward as I expected. The bullet reaches the maximum height of its arch (5.1 inches high) at roughly 160 yards and crosses the scope's axis again at roughly 300 yards.

It was common practice for my family back in the 70's and 80's to zero all of our rifles at 25 yards. We all shot either 6mm or .270 back then. We did a little reloading and some hunted in NM and Colorado during that time frame. Both calibers were good to 300 yards with a 25 yard zero. IIRC 6mm was back to zero at 250 and the .270 was back to zero at 265 yards. 105 grain on the 6mm and 130 on the .270.


[Linked Image]
Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: hook_n_line] #8380721 09/10/21 01:14 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,799
J
JJH Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
J
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,799
Jack OConner advocated sighting in at 25 yards in the late 50s or early 60s

Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: hook_n_line] #8380744 09/10/21 01:20 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 19,278
T
Texas Dan Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 19,278
My work appears to be done here.

Last edited by Texas Dan; 09/10/21 01:25 PM.

Dan

Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: Texas Dan] #8380750 09/10/21 01:23 PM
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 6,924
H
Hudbone Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
H
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 6,924
Originally Posted by Texas Dan
My work is done here.


how broad is this statement?

Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: hook_n_line] #8380761 09/10/21 01:32 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 19,278
T
Texas Dan Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 19,278
Originally Posted by hook_n_line
How well do you know your rifle?


You do realize you have people in your audience who might take no more than five shots a year with their rifle.

Last edited by Texas Dan; 09/10/21 01:34 PM.

Dan

Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: Texas Dan] #8380767 09/10/21 01:38 PM
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 6,924
H
Hudbone Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
H
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 6,924
Originally Posted by Texas Dan
Originally Posted by hook_n_line
How well do you know your rifle?


You do realize you have people in your audience who might take no more than five shots a year with their rifle.


"My work appears to be done here." Thus why I asked.

Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: stxranchman] #8380772 09/10/21 01:43 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,280
S
scalebuster Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
S
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,280
Originally Posted by stxranchman
Originally Posted by Texas Dan
Let me see if I can attract a few responses to your post by posting one of my own.

I can't say I've ever seen anyone zero a deer rifle to just 25 yards. However, a quick check of the ballistics table for one of the more common deer rounds (6.5 Creedmoor) shows a trajectory that's not as awkward as I expected. The bullet reaches the maximum height of its arch (5.1 inches high) at roughly 160 yards and crosses the scope's axis again at roughly 300 yards.

It was common practice for my family back in the 70's and 80's to zero all of our rifles at 25 yards. We all shot either 6mm or .270 back then. We did a little reloading and some hunted in NM and Colorado during that time frame. Both calibers were good to 300 yards with a 25 yard zero. IIRC 6mm was back to zero at 250 and the .270 was back to zero at 265 yards. 105 grain on the 6mm and 130 on the .270.


X2 Ranchman

Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: Hudbone] #8380776 09/10/21 01:45 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 19,278
T
Texas Dan Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 19,278
Originally Posted by Hudbone
Originally Posted by Texas Dan
Originally Posted by hook_n_line
How well do you know your rifle?


You do realize you have people in your audience who might take no more than five shots a year with their rifle.


"My work appears to be done here." Thus why I asked.


Sorry but I couldn't resist. With the OP not having drawn a response in almost a day, my intention was to arouse further interest in the discussion.

Last edited by Texas Dan; 09/10/21 02:18 PM.

Dan

Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: Texas Dan] #8380789 09/10/21 01:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,851
H
hook_n_line Offline OP
THF Trophy Hunter
OP Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
H
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,851
Originally Posted by Texas Dan
Originally Posted by hook_n_line
How well do you know your rifle?


You do realize you have people in your audience who might take no more than five shots a year with their rifle.


Yes. That is why I asked the question and followed up with information.


Sometimes it's hard being me! But somebody has to do it.
Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: hook_n_line] #8380819 09/10/21 02:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 300
N
NOCOOLNAMETOO Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
N
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 300
When I was in the Army we zero at 25 meters / 27 yards should be zero at 300 .

Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: hook_n_line] #8380827 09/10/21 02:15 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,851
H
hook_n_line Offline OP
THF Trophy Hunter
OP Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
H
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,851
salute


Sometimes it's hard being me! But somebody has to do it.
Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: Texas Dan] #8381212 09/10/21 08:24 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,799
J
JJH Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
J
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,799
Originally Posted by Texas Dan
My work appears to be done here.


promise?

Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: hook_n_line] #8381241 09/10/21 08:55 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 18,678
Sniper John Offline
gumshoe
Offline
gumshoe
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 18,678
How about other variables that could be effected by a close range sight in. For example scope height? Or for a variable scope, different scope power ranges?

Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: stxranchman] #8383144 09/12/21 08:08 PM
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 528
E
ErnestTBass Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
E
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 528
Originally Posted by stxranchman
Originally Posted by Texas Dan
Let me see if I can attract a few responses to your post by posting one of my own.

I can't say I've ever seen anyone zero a deer rifle to just 25 yards. However, a quick check of the ballistics table for one of the more common deer rounds (6.5 Creedmoor) shows a trajectory that's not as awkward as I expected. The bullet reaches the maximum height of its arch (5.1 inches high) at roughly 160 yards and crosses the scope's axis again at roughly 300 yards.

It was common practice for my family back in the 70's and 80's to zero all of our rifles at 25 yards. We all shot either 6mm or .270 back then. We did a little reloading and some hunted in NM and Colorado during that time frame. Both calibers were good to 300 yards with a 25 yard zero. IIRC 6mm was back to zero at 250 and the .270 was back to zero at 265 yards. 105 grain on the 6mm and 130 on the .270.


I'll zero my .270 or my .300 WM at 25 or 50 yards and won't blink out to 300. Just point and click.

Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: Sniper John] #8384040 09/13/21 05:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,851
H
hook_n_line Offline OP
THF Trophy Hunter
OP Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
H
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,851
Originally Posted by Sniper John
How about other variables that could be effected by a close range sight in. For example scope height? Or for a variable scope, different scope power ranges?



I've had no issues setting the scope to 5x and sighting at 25 yards. I can zoom in or out without changing zero. BDC is a different story and that's where custom turrets come in handy.


Sometimes it's hard being me! But somebody has to do it.
Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: hook_n_line] #8384929 09/14/21 03:00 PM
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 11,700
P
PMK Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
P
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 11,700
for years, we always used 25 yards for new rifles, new scopes, etc. to get them "zeroed" ... then take a few shots down range to verify, 100, 150, 200, 300, ... to fine tune and verify. I used to know off hand all the factory ammo ballistics for various calibers, but I don't shoot near as much as I did in my younger years to keep all that floating around in the gray matter.


"everyone that lives dies but not everyone who dies lived..."

~PMK~
Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: hook_n_line] #8391890 09/20/21 08:54 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 809
E
Erich Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
E
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 809
i've tended to zero my rifles at 50yds thru the years simply because i don't shoot outside 100yds usually and i figure if i'm testing zero why shoot father than necessary. checking zero at too much distance puts too many other variables at play for me. usually ends up costing me more shots to feel confident.


Outdoorsman
Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: Sniper John] #8391950 09/20/21 09:44 PM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 32,371
S
sig226fan (Rguns.com) Offline
duck & cover
Offline
duck & cover
S
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 32,371
Originally Posted by Sniper John
How about other variables that could be effected by a close range sight in. For example scope height? Or for a variable scope, different scope power ranges?




Or, that the point of impact is actually at the 2nd Foci....

I know to each his own, and I know great hunters that only shoot a couple rounds a year... but I might want to take a longer shot and be successful, and I am not Lucas McCain.... so I'll practice a little.

Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: hook_n_line] #8392097 09/20/21 11:23 PM
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 6,924
H
Hudbone Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
H
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 6,924
Lucas did not take long shots.

Re: Under gunned or overkill [Re: Hudbone] #8392155 Yesterday at 12:11 AM
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,723
F
freerange Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
F
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,723
Originally Posted by Hudbone
Lucas did not take long shots.

Y’all see the Lucas episode where he missed the shot at a leaping lion? He kinda freaked thinking he couldnt miss. Checked out the gun and his eyes and when they checked out his confidence was gone. The Rifleman could no longer shoot a rifle. Well, it ended well, imagine that. No turrets involved in the episode.


Keep your gratitude higher than your expectations. RWH
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2021 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3